Elsevier

Biological Conservation

Volume 186, June 2015, Pages 1-11
Biological Conservation

Plantations, not farmlands, cause biotic homogenisation of ground-active beetles in south-eastern Australia

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2015.02.026Get rights and content

Highlights

  • We studied ground-active beetles in a patchy landscape with two matrix types.

  • The plantation matrix had fewer and less diverse species than farmland matrix.

  • Patches with edges of both matrices were not intermediate in community composition.

  • Species in the plantation matrix likely caused biotic homogenisation in patches.

  • Conservation efforts should concentrate on increasing matrix similarity to patches.

Abstract

Following landscape change, species invasions and extinctions may lead to biotic homogenisation, resulting in increased taxonomic and functional similarity between previously distinct biotas. Biotic homogenisation is more likely to occur in landscapes where the matrix contrasts strongly with native vegetation patches. To test this, we examined the distribution of ground-active beetles in a landscape of remnant Eucalyptus open woodland patches where large areas of lower contrast matrix (farmland) are being transformed to high-contrast pine plantations in south-eastern Australia. We sampled beetles from 30 sites including six replicates of five categories; (1) remnants adjacent to farmland, (2) remnants adjacent to plantation, (3) farmland, (4) plantation, and, (5) remnants between pine plantation and farmland. Community composition in the pine matrix was similar to native patches embedded in pine (ANOSIM, Global R = 0.49, P < 0.000), which we suggest is due to biotic homogenisation. Remnant patches with edges of both farmland and pine plantation did not represent an intermediate community composition between patches surrounded by either matrix type, but rather a unique habitat with unique species. Farmland supported the greatest number of individuals (F = 9.049, df = 25, P < 0.000) and species (F = 5.875, df = 25, P = 0.002), even compared to native remnant patches. Our results suggest that matrix transformations can reduce species richness and homogenise within-patch populations. This may increase the risk of species declines in fragmented landscapes where plantations are not only replacing native vegetation patches, but also other matrix types that may better support biodiversity. Our findings are particularly concerning given expanding plantation establishment worldwide.

Introduction

Many native species exist in a landscape mosaic that includes native vegetation patches surrounded by human-modified land-cover; the ‘matrix’ (Lindenmayer et al., 2001). Driscoll et al. (2013) defines the matrix as areas where species of conservation interest cannot form sustainable populations. The matrix can significantly impact the colonisation, persistence and survival of patch-associated species by influencing migration (Kuefler et al., 2010), changing abiotic conditions at patch edges (Lindenmayer et al., 2009), and providing resources to patch-associated species and/or non-patch species (Brady et al., 2011, Driscoll et al., 2013). While each of these effects have consequences for individual species and community composition (Driscoll et al., 2013), the ability of the matrix to foster non-patch species can lead to biotic homogenisation (Olden, 2006).

Biotic homogenisation refers to the reduction of species diversity and increase in community similarity between previously distinct biotas (Dormann et al., 2007, Olden et al., 2004). The ‘winners’ of biotic homogenisation are usually generalist species, with rapid dispersal rates and a high tolerance of human-modified landscapes (McKinney and Lockwood, 1999). The ‘losers’ are often habitat specialists, with low dispersal rates, being dependent on areas characterised by low levels of landscape modification (Robertson et al., 2013). These ‘losers’ are vulnerable to external perturbations (Dormann et al., 2007, Olden et al., 2004) and are therefore more likely to suffer from local extinction events. Successful generalist species may further expedite the process of biotic homogenisation by exerting competitive dominance over patch-associated species (Robertson et al., 2013).

Patch-associated species are expected to be less vulnerable to biotic homogenisation if they can also exploit the surrounding matrix (Ekroos et al., 2010). Matrices which share structural similarities with habitat patches can increase matrix use and movement for patch-associated species (reviewed in Eycott et al., 2012), which helps protect species against patch isolation and associated extinction risks (Donald and Evans, 2006). For example, species associated with open, grass-dominated native vegetation remnants may perceive agricultural pastures, also having open canopies and grasses, as sub-optimal habitat rather than hostile matrix (Bayne and Hobson, 1998, House et al., 2012, Sweaney et al., submitted for publication). Hence, in some fragmented landscapes, agricultural pastures can be more conducive to edge crossings, dispersal, and resource supplementation than dense closed forest (e.g. Jules and Shahani, 2003, Pita et al., 2007). Structurally similar matrices can support connectivity and persistence of native patch-associated species (Eycott et al., 2012). In these cases, the potential for widespread generalist species to successfully dominate patch-associated species or colonise patches after local extinctions is limited (Ekroos et al., 2010).

In many regions of the world, agricultural matrices are being transformed to tree plantations (Felton et al., 2010b, Kröger, 2012). Simplified landscapes created by the establishment and maintenance of monoculture plantations can cause a loss of habitat specialists and increase in population isolation, thereby increasing vulnerabilities to extinction risks (Dormann et al., 2007, Ekroos et al., 2010). Such landscape transformations may exacerbate and accelerate biotic homogenisation, particularly in areas where the agricultural matrix being replaced was structurally similar to native vegetation remnants.

We examined the distribution and abundance of ground-active beetles in a fragmented landscape in south-eastern (SE) Australia. Here, patches of Eucalyptus open woodland are surrounded by agricultural pastures (established almost two centuries ago) and extensive areas of pine plantations (established 1998), including areas where the two matrix types meet (Lindenmayer et al., 2008a). Previous research in this study area has shown that butterflies were often found in farmland, but were completely absent in pine plantations (Sweaney et al., submitted for publication). These results suggested that pine plantations constitute a high-contrast matrix for patch-associated species, which may make populations in patches surrounded by pine susceptible to biotic homogenisation.

Ground-active beetles are an ecologically important group in most ecosystems (Gibb et al., 2006b, Werner and Raffa, 2000) and are expected to also be sensitive to matrix transformation (Gaublomme et al., 2008). This sensitivity to environmental change may affect beetles differently depending on their ecological traits and/or functional group (Hyvärinen et al., 2009). For example, winged beetle species may be more abundant in recently disturbed areas as they can quickly colonise these sites compared to flightless species (Hart, 1998, Moretti et al., 2004), while larger-bodied species are often found to be negatively affected by disturbances (Ribera et al., 2001). Alterations to beetle communities and the loss of particular suites of species with certain ecological traits (such as body size and the presence of wings) and/or from different functional groups (such as trophic groups) can have major implications for food web stability and overall ecosystem function and integrity (Naeem et al., 1994, Ulanowicz, 1996). However, research examining biotic homogenisation and changes to ecological traits and functional groups in areas undergoing landscape transformation is limited (Ekroos et al., 2010), and represents a concerning knowledge gap in the literature.

To address this knowledge gap, we sought to determine if taxonomic and functional similarities between ground-active beetles in the matrix and native vegetation remnants was greater in areas where agricultural pastures had been transformed to pine plantations. We examined overall community composition, as well as the abundance and species richness of ground-active beetles and groups of beetles with various traits (body size, wing presence and trophic group). We expected that, because pine plantations in our study area contrast more strongly with eucalypt patches compared to agricultural pastures, ground-active beetle populations in patches surrounded by pine will show more signs of biotic homogenisation than patches adjacent to farmland.

Given that most of the world’s new plantations are established on former agricultural pastures (Felton et al., 2010a), understanding species’ responses to matrix transformations from agriculture to plantation is critical to successful biodiversity conservation and the effective management of plantations. This is particularly important given expectations that plantations will expand globally from 230 million ha to over 300 million ha by 2020 (FAO, 2010).

Section snippets

Study area

This investigation was conducted at ‘Nanangroe’, 10–20 km south-east of Jugiong in NSW Australia (Lindenmayer et al., 2001; Fig. 1). Historically, the area consisted of extensive stands of temperate Eucalyptus open woodlands. Approximately 85% has been cleared for agriculture over the past 170 years (Lindenmayer et al., 2008b). In 1998, large areas of Nanangroe were converted to Pinus radiata plantations (Lindenmayer et al., 2008b). Prior to plantation establishment, 52 Eucalyptus woodland

Results

We collected a total of 562 ground-active beetles representing 130 morphospecies from 28 families. These numbers, while lower than studies conducted in some other forest types, are typical of temperate woodlands (Barton et al., 2009, Gibb and Cunningham, 2010, Nittérus and Gunnarsson, 2006). Of the 130 morphospecies identified, 47 were predators, 36 herbivores, 33 detritivores and 14 fungivores (Appendix B). Only eight morphospecies were exotics, the remainder were native species.

Discussion

Our results suggest replacing agricultural pastures with plantations in areas characterised by open native vegetation patches may negatively affect patch-associated species and others that occur more broadly across the landscape. While farmland communities of the ground-active beetles we sampled shared some similarities with those in native vegetation patches, community composition was still distinct. Conversely, the establishment of pine plantations appeared to enhance the process of biotic

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the research team based in Gundagai, specifically Mason Crane and Rebecca Montague-Drake, for their assistance in selecting and locating the sites used in our study. We thank Liyana Kayali and Rosana Militois-McCall for volunteering to assist with fieldwork. We are most grateful to the private landholders in the Nanangroe area who kindly allowed regular access to their properties – Mr. B. Luff, Mr. N. and Mrs. S. Keatinge. Funding to support this work has come from the

References (104)

  • A. Felton et al.

    A meta-analysis of fauna and flora species richness and abundance in plantations and pasture lands

    Biol. Conserv.

    (2010)
  • E. Fleishman et al.

    Utility and limitations of species richness metrics for conservation planning

    Ecol. Ind.

    (2006)
  • E. Gaublomme et al.

    The effects of forest patch size and matrix type on changes in carabid beetle assemblages in an urbanized landscape

    Biol. Conserv.

    (2008)
  • H. Gibb et al.

    Revegetation of farmland restores function and composition of epigaeic beetle assemblages

    Biol. Conserv.

    (2010)
  • H. Gibb et al.

    Wing loading and habitat selection in forest beetles: Are red-listed species poorer dispersers or more habitat-specific than common congenerics?

    Biol. Conserv.

    (2006)
  • H. Gibb et al.

    Conservation-oriented forestry and early successional saproxylic beetles: responses of functional groups to manipulated dead wood substrates

    Biol. Conserv.

    (2006)
  • M.J. Hartley

    Rationale and methods for conserving biodiversity in plantation forests

    For. Ecol. Manage.

    (2002)
  • S. Jellinek et al.

    Are only the strong surviving? Little influence of restoration on beetles (Coleoptera) in an agricultural landscape

    Biol. Conserv.

    (2013)
  • M. Karen et al.

    Distribution and composition of carabid beetle (Coleoptera, Carabidae) communities across the plantation forest cycle – implications for management

    For. Ecol. Manage.

    (2008)
  • D.B. Lindenmayer et al.

    A prospective longitudinal study of landscape matrix effects on fauna in woodland remnants: experimental design and baseline data

    Biol. Conserv.

    (2001)
  • M.L. McKinney et al.

    Biotic homogenization: a few winners replacing many losers in the next mass extinction

    Trends Ecol. Evol.

    (1999)
  • L. Nahuelhual et al.

    Land-cover change to forest plantations: proximate causes and implications for the landscape in south-central Chile

    Landscape Urban Plan.

    (2012)
  • J.D. Olden et al.

    Ecological and evolutionary consequences of biotic homogenization

    Trends Ecol. Evol.

    (2004)
  • J. Perner et al.

    Assessment of changing agricultural land use: response of vegetation, ground-dwelling spiders and beetles to the conversion of arable land into grassland

    Agric. Ecosyst. Environ.

    (2003)
  • R. Pita et al.

    Spatial population structure of the Cabrera vole in Mediterranean farmland: the relative role of patch and matrix effects

    Biol. Conserv.

    (2007)
  • H.F. Recher et al.

    Eucalypts, arthropods and birds: on the relation between foliar nutrients and species richness

    For. Ecol. Manage.

    (1996)
  • A. Rusch et al.

    Response of ground beetle (Coleoptera, Carabidae) communities to changes in agricultural policies in Sweden over two decades

    Agric. Ecosyst. Environ.

    (2013)
  • AccuWeather, 2013. Gundagai March Weather 2013....
  • S. Almeida et al.

    Subtle land-use change and tropical biodiversity: Dung Beetle communities in Cerrado Grasslands and Exotic Pastures

    Biotropica

    (2011)
  • O. Barbosa et al.

    Effects of forest fragmentation on the beetle assemblage at the relict forest of Fray Jorge, Chile

    Oecologia

    (2002)
  • E.M. Bayne et al.

    The effects of habitat fragmentation by forestry and agriculture on the abundance of small mammals in the southern boreal mixedwood forest

    Can. J. Zool.

    (1998)
  • T.M. Blackburn et al.

    Species number, population density and body size relationships in natural communities

    J. Anim. Ecol.

    (1990)
  • M. Brady et al.

    Matrix is important for mammals in landscapes with small amounts of native forest habitat

    Landscape Ecol.

    (2011)
  • J.R. Bray et al.

    An ordination of the upland forest communities of southern Wisconsin

    Ecol. Monogr.

    (1957)
  • J. Butterfield

    Changes in decomposition rates and Collembola densities during the forestry cycle in conifer plantations

    J. Appl. Ecol.

    (1999)
  • O. Cizek et al.

    Diversification of mowing regime increases arthropods diversity in species-poor cultural hay meadows

    J. Insect Conserv.

    (2012)
  • K.R. Clarke et al.

    Change in Marine Communities: An Approach to Statistical Analysis and Interpretation

    (2001)
  • L.J. Cole et al.

    Riparian field margins: can they enhance the functional structure of ground beetle (Coleoptera: Carabidae) assemblages in intensively managed grassland landscapes?

    J. Appl. Ecol.

    (2012)
  • A. Dávalos et al.

    Matrix habitat and plant damage influence colonization of purple loosestrife patches by specialist leaf-beetles

    Environ. Entomol.

    (2011)
  • R.K. Didham et al.

    Trophic structure stability and extinction dynamics of beetles (Coleoptera) in tropical forest fragments

    Philosoph. Transact. Roy. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci.

    (1998)
  • P.F. Donald et al.

    Habitat connectivity and matrix restoration: the wider implications of agri-environment schemes

    J. Appl. Ecol.

    (2006)
  • C.F. Dormann et al.

    Effects of landscape structure and land-use intensity on similarity of plant and animal communities

    Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr.

    (2007)
  • P. Drapeau et al.

    Landscape-scale disturbances and changes in bird communities of boreal mixed-wood forests

    Ecol. Monogr.

    (2000)
  • D.A. Driscoll et al.

    Beetle responses to habitat fragmentation depend on ecological traits, habitat condition, and remnant size

    Conserv. Biol.

    (2005)
  • D.A. Driscoll et al.

    Classic metapopulations are rare among common beetle species from a naturally fragmented landscape

    J. Anim. Ecol.

    (2010)
  • J. Ekroos et al.

    Homogenization of lepidopteran communities in intensively cultivated agricultural landscapes

    J. Appl. Ecol.

    (2010)
  • A. Eycott et al.

    A meta-analysis on the impact of different matrix structures on species movement rates

    Landscape Ecol.

    (2012)
  • FAO, 2010. Global forest resource assessment 2010; Main Report. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United...
  • J. Fischer et al.

    The role of landscape texture in conservation biogeography: a case study on birds in south-eastern Australia

    Divers. Distrib.

    (2008)
  • B.J. Goodwin et al.

    Effect of landscape structure on the movement behaviour of a specialized goldenrod beetle, Trirhabda borealis

    Can. J. Zool.

    (2002)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text