Personality in captivity: More exploratory males reproduce better in an aviary population
Introduction
Personality is defined as inter-individual differences in behaviour that are consistent over time and/or context (Carere and Maestripieri, 2013). Much work has been conducted on measuring animal personality in captivity (Carere and Maestripieri, 2013), but there has been little focus on relating these personality differences to fitness attributes, despite the known genetic basis of variation in personality traits between individuals (van Oers et al., 2005). Personality differences in the wild have been hypothesized to be maintained when they contribute to consistent individual differences in life history traits such as productivity, reproductive success, growth and survival but trade-offs occur between these traits (Réale et al., 2007, Stamps, 2007); for example, one personality type might generally lead to higher reproductive success but also lower survival (Biro and Stamps, 2008). Moreover, the pace-of-life syndrome hypothesis (Réale et al., 2010), predicts that proactive individuals (which tend to display personality traits such as high exploratory and risk-taking behaviour) are more likely to maximize current over future reproduction than reactive individuals (Wolf et al., 2007). A meta-analysis of work comparing personality with fitness (Smith and Blumstein, 2008), found that both in captivity and the wild, bold individuals had reduced survival compared with shy individuals. However, in captivity, individuals are usually not subject to predation risk and often receive resources such as food ad libitum (McPhee, 2003), which may allow, all else being equal, the bold individuals to prosper and pass on this trait to their offspring (Roberts et al., 2011). In support of this hypothesis, Smith and Blumstein's (2008) meta-analysis found a small positive effect of boldness on reproductive success for captive/domesticated populations but not wild populations which was higher in males but significant in both sexes. Interestingly, no effect of exploratory behaviour on reproductive success was found in the meta-analysis, but only a small positive effect on survival (Smith and Blumstein, 2008). However, the relationships between personality traits and fitness attributes may vary from species to species and in different environments or situations. In wild great tits Parus major, for example, both survival and reproductive success have been shown to be linked to exploratory behaviour, but these relationships vary dependent on an individual's sex and the environmental conditions (Dingemanse et al., 2004). Moreover, in female North American red squirrels Tamiasciurus hudsonicus, activity in a captive novel environment (exploratory behaviour) was found to be negatively correlated with survival in the wild (Boon et al., 2008).
In the zebra finch Taeniopygia guttata, breeding behaviour is a major area of focus, with breeding experiments conducted in small breeding cages or aviaries (Griffith and Buchanan, 2010). Typically, studies utilize sub-sampling by focusing only on those individuals that manage to breed, with unsuccessful breeders not contributing to experimental datasets (especially for the research focused on reproductive behaviour or physiology) and not contributing to the next generation of laboratory stock. However, in any one experiment, the propensity of individuals to breed, which partner they select to breed with or the comparative number of offspring produced may be linked to their personality, leading to bias in the experimental design, and potentially in the interpretation of results, particularly with respect to attempting to relate experimental results back to adaptive outcomes in wild populations. Schielzeth et al. (2011) found that in the zebra finch, the repeatable personality trait neophilia, or speed of approach to a novel object, was not significantly correlated with overall reproductive success, promiscuity or extra-pair paternity in captive aviaries. However, manipulating the sex ratios in the aviaries was found to influence the correlations between neophilia and the proportion of extra-pair paternity, suggesting that neophilia is tied in with variation in reproductive strategies, especially in males. Furthermore, exploratory behaviour has been shown to influence partner-selection specificity and consistency in the female zebra finch (David and Cézilly, 2011). Two previous studies in birds have shown that socially monogamous pairs with more similar (assortative) levels of the two personality traits (exploratory behaviour and aggression), tended to raise foster offspring in better condition than pairs with dissimilar (disassortative) personalities (Both et al., 2005, Schuett et al., 2011a). Moreover, in one zebra finch study when both members of a pair had high levels of exploration and aggression, they raised offspring in a better condition than any other pair combination (Schuett et al., 2011a). Finally, when given the opportunity to choose between mates, female zebra finches have been shown to select males on the basis of their exploratory behaviour per se (considering their own personality in their choice), with intermediate or highly exploratory females preferring apparently highly exploratory males (Schuett et al., 2011b). Such studies therefore indicate the potential importance of personality variation to reproductive success in the short-term.
Here, we examined the extent to which the breeding success of zebra finches in a common captive environment, a large outdoor aviary, was influenced by their exploratory behaviour. Prior to our breeding trial, we measured exploratory behaviour in a social foraging context in the same aviary environment, but in different social groups. Second, we measured the reproductive success of the behaviourally tested pairs. Following the predictions of the pace-of-life hypothesis (Réale et al., 2010), we predicted that the more exploratory individuals would have greater reproductive success in the aviary. Our work builds on previous work (Schuett et al., 2011a), by considering zebra finches breeding in a larger captive environment in which inter-individual competition and positive and negative social interactions can take place as they do in wild free-living populations of this species (Mariette and Griffith, 2013, Zann, 1996).
Section snippets
Ethical note
Animal welfare and methodological design were approved by the Animal Ethics Committee at Macquarie University (AEC reference number: 2010/059). The health and condition of all birds were monitored on a daily basis and no individuals were noted to be unduly distressed by the experimental procedures or housing conditions.
General methods
Data were collected from July 2011 to June 2012 from domestic ‘wild-type’ zebra finches originally obtained from aviculturists in the Sydney region in 2005 and bred at Macquarie
Aviary foraging test
The exploration scores from the aviary foraging test were significantly repeatable in males (R ± SE = 0.462 ± 0.155, N = 26, CI = 0.11, 0.726; Mean in hours ± SE (excluding all overnight non-feeding periods) = 18.346 ± 2.140) but not females (R ± SE = 0.291 ± 0.171, N = 25, CI = 0, 0.607; Mean in hours ± SE (excluding all overnight non-feeding periods) = 21.816 ± 2.492) between the first and second trials. As the results of the aviary foraging test were not significantly repeatable in females, the test and data should not be
Discussion
We found that for males, aspects of an individuals’ exploratory personality were predictive of the degree to which they succeeded in producing and rearing offspring with their partner in captivity. More exploratory males made a greater number of breeding attempts where at least one nestling hatched. Moreover, for the males that attempted to breed with a partner (and marginally non-significantly for all of the males in the aviary), more exploratory males raised more nestlings successfully with
Acknowledgements
We thank Emilie Perez and Fiona Finch for assistance with bird monitoring and logistical support and Mark Mainwaring, Andrew P. Allen and Shinichi Nakagawa for statistical advice. This work was supported by the Australian Research Council (grant number ARC DP0881019) to S.C.G. and a Macquarie University Postgraduate Research Fellowship to L.S.C.M.
References (50)
- et al.
Are animal personality traits linked to life-history productivity?
Trends Ecol. Evol.
(2008) - et al.
Fecal corticosteroids in a territorial bird selected for different personalities: daily rhythm and the response to social stress
Horm. Behav.
(2003) - et al.
Low level of extrapair parentage in wild zebra finches
Anim. Behav.
(2010) - et al.
Zebra finches are bolder in an asocial, rather than social, context
Behav. Process.
(2011) Differential reactivity of wild and semi-domestic deermice (Peromyscus maniculatus)
Anim. Behav.
(1970)- et al.
Environmental enrichment reduces maladaptive risk-taking behavior in salmon reared for conservation
Biol. Conserv.
(2011) - et al.
Patterns of conspecific brood parasitism in zebra finches
Anim. Behav.
(2010) - et al.
Sex differences, social context and personality in zebra finches, Taeniopygia guttata
Anim. Behav.
(2009) - et al.
Pairs of zebra finches with similar ‘personalities’ make better parents
Anim. Behav.
(2011) - et al.
Fitness consequences of personality: a meta-analysis
Behav. Ecol.
(2008)
Monogamy on the fast track
Biol. Lett.
Individual differences in activity and exploration influence leadership in pairs of foraging zebra finches
Behaviour
Extra-pair paternity and intraspecific brood parasitism in wild zebra finches Taeniopygia guttata, revealed by DNA fingerprinting
Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol.
Personality, habitat use, and their consequences for survival in North American red squirrels Tamiasciurus hudsonicus
Oikos
Pairs of extreme avian personalities have highest reproductive success
J. Anim. Ecol.
Sexual selection and extrapair fertilization in a socially monogamous passerine, the zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata)
Behav. Ecol.
Black rhinoceros (Diceros bicornis) in U.S. zoos: I. Individual behavior profiles and their relationship to breeding success
Zoo Biol.
Assessing short- and long-term repeatability and stability of personality in captive zebra finches using longitudinal data
Ethology
Handling stress does not reflect personality in female zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata)
J. Comp. Psychol.
Personality may confound common measures of mate-choice
PLoS ONE
New methods to identify conserved microsatellite loci and develop primer sets of high cross-species utility – as demonstrated for birds
Mol. Ecol. Resour.
Fitness consequences of avian personalities in a fluctuating environment
Proc. Biol. Sci.
Energy requirements for egg-laying and incubation in the zebra finch, Taeniopygia castanotis
Condor
Do individual females differ intrinsically in their propensity to engage in extra-pair copulations?
PLoS ONE
Cited by (25)
Responses to environmental enrichment are associated with personality characteristics in chestnut-bellied seed finches (Sporophila angolensis)
2023, Behavioural ProcessesCitation Excerpt :Pre-release training is a strategy for improving coping skills used to prepare captive born animals to be released into the wild (Batson et al., 2015). Consistent individual differences in behaviour over time and across situations, also referred to as personality (Réale et al., 2007), may affect preference for types of enrichment (Almeida et al., 2018) and the expression of exploratory behaviour in birds (McCowan et al., 2014; Paulino et al., 2018). Exploration is likely to be a beneficial characteristic when animals are reintroduced into the wild, and therefore any individual behavioural differences in this ability may be related to survival and fitness (Mcdougall et al., 2006; Smith and Blumstein, 2008).
Female Java sparrows prefer high exploratory males without assortative mating
2022, Behavioural ProcessesCitation Excerpt :When males have no offspring to show their parental ability, male exploratory behavior may be an indicator of parental skills that females can use during mate choice (Royle et al., 2010; Schuett et al., 2011a). Males with higher exploration raised more nestlings successfully (McCowan et al., 2014). More exploratory individuals can potentially gather more rewards, but take more risks along the way (Sih and Del Giudice, 2012).
You're Just My Type: Mate Choice and Behavioral Types
2020, Trends in Ecology and EvolutionStress reactivity, condition, and foraging behavior in zebra finches: effects on boldness, exploration, and sociality
2017, General and Comparative EndocrinologyCitation Excerpt :The relative ease with which zebra finches breed in captivity has contributed to their development as a model avian species for captive-based research in physiology, endocrinology, and the behavioral sciences (Griffith and Buchanan, 2010). Recent zebra finch studies have focused on variation between individuals with respect to behaviors such as foraging, exploratory behavior, risk-taking, activity levels, and neophobia (David et al., 2012a; Mainwaring et al., 2011; Martins et al., 2007; McCowan et al., 2014; Schuett and Dall, 2009). Variation in these consistent behavioral traits (‘behavioral syndromes’) in captive zebra finches is related to foraging behavior (Beauchamp, 2006; David et al., 2011, 2012b; McCowan and Griffith, 2015) and reproductive success (McCowan et al., 2015; Schuett et al., 2011).
‘Do you come from a land down under?’ Characteristics of the international trade in Australian endemic parrots
2017, Biological Conservation