Elsevier

Automatica

Volume 71, September 2016, Pages 197-201
Automatica

Technical communique
New finite-sum inequalities with applications to stability of discrete time-delay systems

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2016.04.049Get rights and content

Abstract

This paper is concerned with the problem of stability analysis of discrete time-delay systems. New finite-sum inequalities, which encompass the ones based on Abel lemma or Wirtinger type inequality, are first proposed. The potential capability of the newly derived inequalities is then demonstrated by establishing less conservative stability conditions for some classes of linear discrete-time systems with delay. The derived stability criteria are theoretically and numerically proved to be less conservative than existing results.

Introduction

Consider a linear discrete time-delay system of the form {x(k+1)=Ax(k)+Adx(kd(k)),k0,x(k)=ϕ(k),k=d2,d2+1,,0, where x(k)Rn is the system state, A,AdRn×n are given matrices, d(k) is a time-varying delay satisfying d1d(k)d2, where d1,d2 are known positive integers and ϕ(k) is an initial condition.

System (1) frequently appears in engineering because of many practical control systems are implemented through a network in which communication delays occur in the control channel (Huang and Nguang, 2009, Shu and Lin, 2014). The existence of time-delay usually is a source of oscillations, poor performance or instability. Therefore, during the last decade, the problem of stability analysis and applications to control of system (1) has received considerable attention. To mention a few, we refer the reader to Feng, Lam, and Yang (2015), Hien, An, and Trinh (2014), Kim (2015), Kwon, Park, Park, Lee, and Cha (2013), Meng, Lam, Du, and Gao (2010), Nam, Pubudu, and Trinh (2015), Shao and Han (2011) and Zhang and Han (2015).

For the case of a constant delay, analytical method based on the characteristic equation or a lifting technique can be used to derive a necessary and sufficient stability condition for system (1). However, in many practical systems, time-delay is usually random but bounded in a certain range (Shu & Lin, 2014), and thus, the analytical method or lifting technique is no longer suitable. An alternative effective approach for stability analysis of system (1) is the use of the Lyapunov–Krasovskii functional (LKF) method (see, for example,  Hien et al., 2014, Kim, 2015, Zhang and Han, 2015). Based on a priori construction of an LKF combining with some bounding techniques, sufficient conditions are derived in terms of linear matrix inequalities (LMIs) ensuring asymptotic stability of system (1). For example, a widely used LKF candidate is constructed asV0(k)=ds=d1j=k+skuT(j)Ru(j), where d is a positive integer, k is an integer representing time variable, R is a positive definite matrix and u(k) is the difference at time k of the state x(k) defined as u(k)=Δx(k)x(k+1)x(k). The difference of V0(k) is given by ΔV0(k)=d2uT(k)Ru(k)ds=kdk1uT(s)Ru(s). To derive LMI-based stability conditions from (2), it is required to find a lower bound of the summation term ds=kdk1uT(s)Ru(s). More generally, for integers a<b, a function u:Z[a,b]Rn and a positive definite matrix R, a lower bound of a finite-sum in the form SRu(a,b)=k=abuT(k)Ru(k) plays an important role in establishing stability conditions for system (1). In addition, a tighter lower bound of (3) definitely can be helpful to derive less conservative stability conditions. By using the Jensen-type inequality, the term SRu(a,b) in (3) is estimated as follows SRu(a,b)1(k=abu(k))TR(k=abu(k)), where =ba+1 denotes the length of interval [a,b] in Z. Similar to (4) we can obtain the following double summation inequality k=abs=akuT(s)Ru(s)2(+1)(k=abs=aku(s))TR(k=abs=aku(s)). An interesting improvement of (5) has recently been achieved by utilizing Abel lemma (Zhang & Han, 2015) or Wirtinger-type inequality (Nam et al., 2015, Seuret et al., 2015) which is given by SRu(a,b)1υ1TRυ1+3(+1)(1)(υ12+1υ2)TR(υ12+1υ2), where υ1=k=abu(k) and υ2=k=abs=aku(s).

Clearly, (6) gives a tighter bound for (3) than (4) does. Moreover, as discussed in  Zhang and Han (2015), how to find a new lower bound for (3) is of significance in theory and practice, which motivates our present study.

In this paper, we first propose some new finite-sum inequalities in single and double forms. The obtained inequality in single form theoretically encompasses the existing one given in (6). The proposed inequalities are then employed to derive delay-dependent stability conditions for system (1). Finally, two examples are provided to show the effectiveness and significant improvement of our results over the existing literature.

Section snippets

New finite-sum inequalities

Hereafter, for given integers a<b and a function u:Z[a,b]Rn, we denote =ba+1, υ1=k=abu(k), υ2=k=abs=aku(s) and υ3=k=abs=aki=asu(i). We also denote S+n the set of symmetric positive definite matrices in Rn×n.

Lemma 1

For a matrix RSn+, integers a<b and a function u:Z[a,b]Rn, the following inequality holdsSRu(a,b)1υ1TRυ1+3(+1)(1)ζ1TRζ1+5(+1)(+2)2(1)(2+11)ζ2TRζ2,where ζ1=υ12+1υ2 and ζ2=υ16+1υ2+12(+1)(+2)υ3.

Proof

Inspired by  Hien and Trinh (2015), we define an approximation function v

Systems with a constant delay

In this section, we assume in system (1) that the time-delay is a constant dk=d. If d=1, the stability of system (1) can be judged by using characteristic equation or lifting technique. Here, we assume d>1. To demonstrate the effectiveness of our results in comparison with existing method, for example, Abel-lemma based finite-sum inequality, let us consider the same LKF candidate as in  Zhang and Han (2015)V1(k)=xˆT(k)Pxˆ(k)+j=kdk1xT(s)Qx(s)+dj=d1i=k+jk1zT(i)Rz(i), where xˆ(k)=col{x(k),

Numerical examples

Example 1

Consider a discrete-time system arised in sampled-data control system (Seuret et al., 2015) x(k+1)=A(T)x(k)+Ad(T)x(kd),k0, where T>0 is a sampling period, A(T)=[110(1λ(T))0λ(T)], Ad(T)=[32.5(1λ(T))3.75T115(1λ(T))11.5T3.75(λ(T)1)11.5(λ(T)1)] and λ(T)=eT/10.

The result of  Seuret et al. (2015) ensures that, for a constant delay d=5, system (30) remains stable for a maximum acceptable constant sampling period T=0.21. We apply Proposition 6 in our paper and Proposition 1 in  Zhang and Han

Conclusion

In this paper, new finite-sum inequalities in single and double form have been proposed. By utilizing the newly derived inequalities, improved delay-dependent stability conditions have been derived for a class of discrete-time systems with interval time-varying delay. The effectiveness of the method proposed in this paper and a large improvement over existing results have been illustrated by numerical examples.

Cited by (44)

  • Free-weighting-matrix inequality for exponential stability for neural networks with time-varying delay

    2021, Neurocomputing
    Citation Excerpt :

    Therefore, the construction of LKFs and the estimation of their derivatives play critical roles in reducing the conservativeness of time delay related stability criteria. So far, a large number of integral inequalities have been proposed and shown to be efficient tools for studying stability of time delay systems (see [13–16] and the references therein). The collections include Wirtinger-based inequality [17,18], the auxiliary function based inequality [19,20], the free-matrix-based integral inequality [21,22], and the recently established generalized free-weighting-matrix (GFWM) inequality [23,24].

  • Finite-time stability for discrete-time systems with time-varying delay and nonlinear perturbations by weighted inequalities

    2020, Journal of the Franklin Institute
    Citation Excerpt :

    In many literatures [7–11], Jensen-based inequality and Wirtnger-based inequality, combined with reciprocally convex inequality, are employed to tackle the problem. Integral inequalities (and their variants as inequalities of summation) have applications in the theoretical analysis of different areas (see [12–17]). Our study follows the same path to investigate the stability of delayed systems.

  • Necessary and sufficient conditions to stability of discrete-time delay systems

    2019, Journal of the Franklin Institute
    Citation Excerpt :

    A variety of structures have been employed such as are based on double or triple integral/summation terms, extended state functions [1,12,13], or all the possible quadratic combinations for every delay existing in the system [14]. After the selection of Lyapunov–Krasovskii functionals, one often has to utilize some integral/summation inequalities such as the Jensen [15,16], the Wirtinger [17–19], the Bessel inequalities [20,21], auxiliary function based inequalities [11,22–24] and free matrix-based multiple integral inequalities [25–29] to derive a tractable numerical optimization problem, which can be employed to obtain a tight bound of the inequality for the integral/summation terms in the derivation and somehow introduce some conservatism. In particular, a class of general delay-dependent Lyapunov–Krasovskii functionals for discrete-time delay systems is proposed in [14].

  • An overview of recent developments in Lyapunov–Krasovskii functionals and stability criteria for recurrent neural networks with time-varying delays

    2018, Neurocomputing
    Citation Excerpt :

    For convenience of presentation, we first state the S-procedure as follows. For discrete-time RNNs with time-varying delays, the estimation on the forward difference of Lyapunov functionals can be similarly made by using the discrete-time counterparts of Jensen inequality, Wirtinger-based inequality and (second-order) Bessel-Legendre inequality [109–113]. For practical systems, if more information on the delay and its derivative is known, it is possible to further refine the allowable delay set such that the obtained delay upper bound can approach to its analytic value as closely as possible.

View all citing articles on Scopus

This work was supported by the Australian Research Council Discovery Grant DP130101532. The material in this paper was not presented at any conference. This paper was recommended for publication in revised form by Associate Editor Keqin Gu under the direction of Editor André L. Tits.

View full text