New Directions: Airborne Transmission of Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus☆
Section snippets
Acknowledgements
The authors gratefully acknowledge Alex Donaldson (formerly Head of Pirbright Laboratory), Torben Mikkelsen (Risø National Laboratory, Denmark) and Jens Sørensen (Danish Meteorological Institute) and Derrick Ryall (Met Office, UK) for their helpful comments on the paper.
References (0)
Cited by (33)
SARS-Cov-2RNA found on particulate matter of Bergamo in Northern Italy: First evidence
2020, Environmental ResearchCitation Excerpt :Wu et al., 2020). In previous communications, we have hypothesized the possibility that SARS-CoV-2 virus could be present on particulate matter (PM) during the spreading of the infection (Italian Society of Enviro, 2020; Setti et al., 2020), consistently with evidence already available for other viruses (Sedlmaier et al., 2009; Zhao et al., 2019a, 2019b; Ma et al., 2017a, 2017b; Sorensen et al., 2000; Glostera and Alexandersen, 2004; Reche et al., 2018; Qin et al., 2020). However, the issue of airborne PM-associated microbiome, especially in urban environments, remains largely under-investigated (Jiang et al., 2015), and – at the present – nobody has still carried out experimental studies specifically aimed at confirming or excluding the presence of the SARS-CoV-2 on PM.
PCR to predict risk of airborne disease
2008, Trends in MicrobiologyCitation Excerpt :Many plant, animal and human diseases spread by airborne particles have had major economic and social impacts during history. For example, the 19th century potato famine in Ireland, which was caused by potato late blight, resulted in mass migration to the USA [1,2] and the 2001 foot and mouth disease outbreak in the UK [3,4] caused £8 billion of damage to the rural economy [5]. The influenza pandemic of 1918 resulted in 21–50 million deaths and influenza and whooping cough continue to cause epidemics in humans of all ages [6–8].
A Lagrangian particle model to predict the airborne spread of foot-and-mouth disease virus
2008, Atmospheric EnvironmentCitation Excerpt :Gloster and Alexandersen (2004) proposed several future research activities necessary to improve the estimation of airborne transmission of FMD virus.
Ridding London of smallpox: The aerial transmission debate and the evolution of a precautionary approach
2008, Epidemiology and Infection16S rRNA gene identification of airborne pathogenic bacteria isolated from bioaerosols of wastewater treatment plant
2022, Egyptian Pharmaceutical JournalEnvironmental Impacts on COVID-19: Mechanisms of Increased Susceptibility
2022, Annals of Global Health
- ☆
Something to say? Comments on this article, or suggestions for other topics, are welcome. Please contact: [email protected] or go to www.uea.ac.uk/∼e044/apex/newdir2.html for further details.
- 1
John Gloster, a member of the UK Met Office Research Department since 1968, first worked on the airborne spread of FMD in the early 1980s and again became involved in FMD research during and subsequent to the 2001 epidemic.
- 2
Soren Alexandersen is presently Head of Experimental Epidemiology at the Institute for Animal Health-Pirbright. He is also Adjunct Professor of General Pathology at the Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University in Copenhagen, Denmark, and former Director of the Danish Veterinary Institute for Virus Research at Lindholm. He was closely involved in epidemiological research and advice during the 2001 UK FMD epidemic.