Elsevier

Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment

Volume 211, 15 December 2015, Pages 145-154
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment

Ecological and social drivers of coffee pollination in Santander, Colombia

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2015.06.007Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Open pollination accounted for a 10.5 ± 2.0% increase in final coffee fruit set.

  • Forest proximity has a major positive impact on stingless bees and other insect pollinators.

  • Honeybees are positively affected by conventional farm management.

  • A wide range of social factors influence farmers on the decision of which crop management type to adopt.

  • The economic value of pollination by honeybees (US$129.6/ha of coffee) was greater than that of stingless bees (US$16.5/ha)

Abstract

Bees and other insects provide pollination services that are key to determining the fruit set on coffee plantations. These pollination services are influenced by local ecology as well as human factors, both social and economic. To better understand these different factors, we assessed their effect on pollinators and coffee pollination services in Santander, Colombia. We quantified the effect of key ecological drivers on pollinator community composition, such as the method of farm management (either conventional or organic) and the surrounding landscape composition, specifically the proximity to forest.

We found that ambient levels of pollination services provided by the local pollinator fauna (open pollination) accounted for a 10.5 ± 2.0% increase in final coffee fruit set, and that the various pollinators are affected differently by the differing factors. For example, our findings indicate that conventional farm management, using synthetic inputs, can promote pollinators, especially if they are in close proximity to natural forest fragments. This is particularly true for stingless bees. Honeybee visitation to coffee is also positively influenced by the conventional management of farms. Factors associated with greater numbers of stingless bees on farms include greater shade cover, lower tree densities, smaller numbers and types of trees in bloom, and younger coffee plantations. A forested landscape close to farms appears to enhance these factors, giving increased stability and resilience to the pollinating bees and insects. However we found that organic farms also support diverse pollinator communities, even if distant from forest fragments.

The contribution of honeybees to pollination value (US$129.6/ha of coffee) is greater than that of stingless bees (US$16.5/ha of coffee). Since the method of farm management has a major impact on the numbers and types of pollinators attracted to farms, we have analysed the statistically significant social factors that influence farmers’ decisions on whether to adopt organic or conventional practices. These include the availability of technology, the type of landowner (whether married couples or individual owners), the number of years of farmers’ formal education, the role of institutions, membership of community organizations, farm size, coffee productivity and the number of coffee plots per farm. It is hoped that the use of our holistic approach, which combines investigation of the social as well as the ecological drivers of pollination, will help provide evidence to underpin the development of best practices for integrating the management of pollination into sustainable agricultural practices.

Introduction

Landscapes that are dominated by agriculture are subject to changes resulting from the choice of cropping and from land-use patterns. These changes affect pollinator biodiversity and the provision of pollination services (Kleijn et al., 2011). Market forces and agricultural policy are often the driving factors behind an expansion of crops that were previously only grown over limited areas, and can bring about the introduction of novel crops into the landscape (Haughton et al., 2009).

The integration of pollination management into agricultural practice is essential since pollination by insects can increase the yield of 75% of global crops (Klein et al., 2007). Looking specifically at coffee production, studies have found that pollinators have a positive impact on the Coffea arabica L. yield of between 10 and 40% (Klein et al., 2007), despite the fact that the plant has a high degree of self-fertility (Klein et al., 2003a). A wide range of studies have been reviewed (Ngo et al., 2011) to investigate the effect of insects on coffee pollination. They have found that bees are widely recognised for their important role in pollination, especially the highly eusocial tribe Meliponini and the Africanized honey bee. The roles of other insects such as vespid wasps and syrphid flies have not been explored in detail, although species from these groups have been observed visiting coffee flowers.

Several studies have analysed the landscape contexts of coffee farms and have documented increases in bee species richness, visitation frequency, fruit set or berry weight when coffee crops are located in sites close to forest fragments (e.g. De Marco and Coelho, 2004, Klein et al., 2003a, Ricketts, 2004, Roubik, 2002a, Roubik, 2002b). Other studies in Mexico (Vergara and Badano, 2009) found that the greatest richness of pollinator species and the greatest fruit production were found on more structurally and floristically complex shaded coffee agro-ecosystems. Similarly, it has been stated (Jha and Vandermeer, 2010) that the most important factors predicting bee abundance were related to the diversity of vegetation within the agroforestry system. However, the impact of particular management practices (irrigation, liming, and shading) on pollination services to Coffea canephora production were assessed in India (Boreux et al., 2013), where it was found that managing irrigation to produce asynchronous flowering was a more effective tool for securing good pollination than maintaining high shade tree densities as pollinator habitat. Together these studies demonstrate the variety of factors affecting coffee pollinators and that they vary with farm type and location.

Thomas and Kevan (2012) reviewed evidence of the economic impact of pollination services in coffee plantation mosaic habitats and made several relevant policy recommendations. One key finding was that the value of pollination services is influenced directly by the amount of intact forest within 400 m of coffee trees, and that the average pollination value is reduced from US$100/ha to US$74/ha over that distance (Olschewski et al., 2006). They concluded, therefore, that at the global scale, policies such as direct subsidies for forest conservation would positively affect yields.

Further, empirical studies have recently shown the efficacy of pollinators as biocontrol agent vectoring (BVT) against populations of coffee borer, a disease that severely reduces crop yields (Vergara et al., 2014). Special dispensers can be placed at the exit/entrance of hives of managed pollinators (e.g. some honeybees and bumblebees). The dispensers contain specially formulated, naturally-occurring biological control agents that bees carry from their hives to the flowers they visit.

Thus, the two ecosystem services of insect pollination and crop protection combine to improve yields, and it is possible that their promotion at farm level could encourage the adoption of certified management schemes, i.e. practices that encourage farmers to grow coffee crops and manage farms sustainably.

Olschewski et al. (2006) also noted that economic incentives would improve production and advocated policies to support higher prices for certified coffee. Similarly, governmental and trade organizations involved in the import and export of coffee could also potentially influence policies and practices by promoting insect pollination in the process of coffee certification (Thomas and Kevan, 2012).

In addition to the ecological and economic factors noted above, an understanding of the social factors that influence farmers’ decisions at the local level is essential since these decisions affect farm management, which ultimately determines pollination services and crop yields (Plieninger et al., 2013). Most research of Arabica coffee has separately analysed either ecological or economic variables and often failed to take into account social factors and their combined effects on coffee pollination systems. If coffee production is to be sustainably managed, then it is important to understand the farm context and what factors drive pollinator biodiversity and pollination services at both the local farm level and on the wider landscape scale, and how these factors interact. The farm scale perspective is particularly important in Colombia and Latin America where smallholder coffee production is predominant, and the adoption of any given agricultural management practice primarily relies on the land owner’s decisions.

Focusing on the predominant pollinator groups in the study area, our research aims to quantify the response of pollinators to both farm management (organic vs. conventional) and distance to the nearest forest. Having established these environmental conditions, this study has also attempted to identify the various economic and social factors that influence farmers’ decisions regarding management methods. It is hoped that an improved understanding of these factors will allow farmers, in the future, to improve pollination rates, benefiting coffee fruit set and therefore their own livelihoods. We focused on the following questions: (1) What are the effects of both farm management and the surrounding landscape on pollinators and pollination delivery? (2) What is the economic value of pollination services provided by stingless and honeybees? (3) What social drivers affect the provision of pollination services through their influence on both ecological and economic factors?

Section snippets

Study sites

The study was undertaken in the Santander area, a mountainous region where a high proportion of Colombian specialty coffees are produced. The field work was carried out on 12 farms in Ocamonte, a town located in the south of the region (N6°22′945″, W73°07′552″, at elevations ranging from 1577 m to 1919 m). A balanced two factor design was developed to test the effects of proximity to forest, farm management type, and their interaction. Twelve farms of different smallholders were selected based on

Pollinator community and contribution of open pollination to coffee fruit production

Across all sites, bees were the predominant group observed, representing 92% of individual pollinators. Other insects accounted for just 8%, included wasps (Hymenoptera), flies (Diptera), butterflies and moths (Lepidoptera), and beetles (Coleoptera). Honeybees comprised 59% of the bees and stingless bees were found to be 40%; bumblebees, carpenter bees and small solitary bees constituted less than 2%.

Comparisons from the pollination experiments (using bagged branches alongside braches left open

Discussion

As discussed above, this study found that open pollination contributes an increased fruit set of 10.5 ± 2.0% to coffee fruit production, which is consistent with Klein et al. (2003a) who recorded a 12.3% increase in initial fruit set. Similarly, it is comparable to the 17.1% reported by Roubik (2002a). Our findings are also consistent with previous studies in which social bees (i.e. stingless and honeybees) were found to be the primary pollinators of coffee (Bos et al., 2007, Ricketts, 2004,

Conclusions

In summary, our results suggest that open pollination contributes an increased final fruit set of 10.5 ± 2.0%. The most important factors enhancing wild bee and insect pollinators in coffee agro-ecosystems is the proximity to forest in combination with local management methods, organic or conventional. Both schemes of management promote pollinators with a statistically significant effect on the composition of pollinator community (richness of stingless bees), whereas conventional management

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to coffee growers of Ocamonte (APCO), Federación Nacional de Cafeteros de Colombia and their Comités Cafeteros in Charalá, Socorro and San Gil, for orientations, farm access and collaboration. L.B.M. expresses her deepest gratitude to her family for their immense support and help, and to CAER and the University of Reading for an outstanding research-oriented environment, and also to Colfuturo for significant funding. We are also grateful for the highly-constructive comments of

References (43)

  • P. De Marco et al.

    Services performed by the ecosystem: forest remnants influence agricultural cultures’ pollination and production

    Biodivers. Conserv.

    (2004)
  • J.B. Free

    Insect Pollination of Crops

    (1993)
  • L. Garibaldi et al.

    Stability of pollination services decreases with isolation from natural areas despite honey bee visits

    Ecol. Lett.

    (2011)
  • R. Guber

    La Etnografía: Método, Campo y Reflexividad

    (2001)
  • W.P. Handwerker

    The construct validity of cultures: cultural diversity, culture theory, and a method for ethnography

    Am. Anthropol.

    (2002)
  • A.J. Haughton et al.

    A novel, integrated approach to assessing social, economic and environmental implications of changing rural land-use: a case study of perennial biomass crops

    J. Appl. Ecol.

    (2009)
  • R. Karanja et al.

    Bee interactions with wild flora around organic and conventional coffee farms in Kiambu district, central Kenya

    J. Pollinat. Ecol.

    (2010)
  • A.M. Klein et al.

    Bee pollination and fruit set of Coffea arabica and C. canephora (Rubiaceae)

    Am. J. Bot.

    (2003)
  • A.M. Klein et al.

    Fruit set of highland coffee increases with the diversity of pollinating bees

    Proc. R. Soc. B

    (2003)
  • A.M. Klein et al.

    Pollination of Coffea canephora in relation to local and regional agroforestry management

    J. Appl. Ecol.

    (2003)
  • A.M. Klein et al.

    Importance of pollinators in changing landscapes for world crops

    Proc. R. Soc. B

    (2007)
  • Cited by (37)

    • Fostering pollination through agroforestry: A global review

      2023, Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment
    • Shade trees and agrochemical use affect butterfly assemblages in coffee home gardens

      2021, Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment
      Citation Excerpt :

      Here, we aim to investigate the relationship between shade cover and the abundance, diversity, and richness of butterflies in coffee home gardens in West Java, Indonesia. As significant pollinators, butterflies are key bioindicators of the state of coffee fields (Bravo-Monroy et al., 2015). Based on previous studies (Perfecto et al., 2003; Borkhataria et al., 2012a; Nesper et al., 2017), we expect a lower abundance, diversity, and richness of butterflies in sun-exposed fields and in fields with a lower shade tree diversity.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text