Research paperExploring staff willingness to attend work during a disaster: A study of nurses employed in four Australian emergency departments
Introduction
The willingness of health care personnel such as emergency medical practitioners, nurses and paramedics, to work during disasters has been extensively researched; however, there is little research that specifically explores the perspective of Australian emergency nurses’ willingness to attend work in disasters.1 This paper presents the qualitative component, the focus group and interviews, of a much bigger mixed methods study. The bigger study comprised consecutively, of a national survey, followed by focus groups and then individual interviews with emergency nurses from four Australian jurisdictions. The research aimed to understand the complex nature of the willingness of Australian emergency nurses to attend work during a disaster. The constructs of willingness explored in this study emerged from the literature; however, they have not yet been examined and given meaning to within the Australian emergency nurses’ perspective.
Section snippets
Background
Disasters challenge the ability of healthcare systems to respond to the needs of the communities they serve. Damage to infrastructure, lack of staff and increased demand for healthcare caused by the disaster may decrease the effective functioning of the healthcare system. For the purpose of this study, the term disaster includes an all hazards approach, from environmental to biochemical hazards. The healthcare demands during a disaster will increase, especially if these are protracted events,
Design
The bigger study used a mixed-method approach.23 Data collection was in three consecutive stages using a combination of survey, focus group and interview methods. The purpose of using a mixed method approach was to both complement the survey method and to gain more in depth understanding of the factors that influenced emergency nurses’ willingness to attend work during a disaster. Preliminary findings from each stage informed questions in the following phases, using an explanatory sequential
Results
Five focus groups were held across the four participating hospitals with 41 participants (Participants – Site1 n = 9; Site 2 n = 11; Site 3 n = 13; Site 4 n = 8). There were 13 individual interviews conducted across all four hospitals. The participants in the focus groups and interviews comprised a mix of ages, genders and years of experience, 46.3% (n = 19) had worked 1–5 years as emergency nurses. Three major themes emerged with a number of subthemes summarised in the table below.
Discussion
This study of Australian emergency nurses highlights that the willingness to attend work during a disaster is multidimensional, affected by many competing factors. Changes to societal functions during a disaster may result in loss of power, water, closing of schools, transport restrictions, and increased risks to public safety. These changes could impact on emergency nurses’ lives in both their work and home environments.
This research confirms a number of factors already found in the literature
Study limitations
Though the national study included a survey from emergency nurses in both rural and metropolitan areas the focus groups and interviews were held with emergency nurses at four major metropolitan hospitals across Australia, therefore the findings for emergency nurses working in more isolated communities may be different.
Conclusion
Within the Australian context willingness of emergency nurses to attend work during a disaster is not a straightforward process of decision-making. Decision-making includes a number of complex personal, work-related and professional factors that can change depending on the context of the disaster, preparedness of the work environment and the emergency nurses’ personal responsibilities at that time. Willingness of an Australian emergency nurse to attend work is influenced by the type of
Authors’ contribution
All authors were responsible for the study conception, design and implementation of this research project. All authors contributed to the interpretation of the research findings. LC, JR and LB developed the initial publication outline. LC wrote the first draft manuscript. All authors contributed to the drafts and critical revisions for important intellectual content.
Provenance and conflict of interest
The following authors hold editorial positions within the Australasian Emergency Nursing Journal: Ramon Shaban is Editor-in-Chief; Julie Considine is Deputy Editor; and Jamie Ranse is Associate Editor (Disasters). Authors Shaban, Considine and Ranse had no role to play in the editorial management, peer review or editorial decision-making related to the paper whatsoever. Karen Hammad is a Company Director of the College of Emergency Nursing Australasia, which owns the Australasian Emergency
Funding
This research was partially supported through a Flinders University, Industry Partnership Grant. Additional in-kind support to complete this project was provided by the authors various institutions.
References (29)
- et al.
Nurses’ intentions to respond to bioterrorism and other infectious disease emergencies
Nurs Outlook
(2010) Willingness to respond: of emergency department personnel and their predicted participation in mass casualty terrorist events
J Emerg Med
(2009)A method of analysing interview transcripts in qualitative research
Nurse Educ Today
(1991)Fight or flight: the ethics of emergency physician disaster responce
Ann Emerg Med
(2008)Australasian emergency nurses’ willingness to attend work in a disaster: a survey
Australas Emerg Nurs J
(2013)- et al.
Chemical, biological and radiological incidents: preparedness and perceptions of emergency nurses
Disasters
(2008) Willingness of frontline health care workers to work during a public health emergency
Aust J Emerg Manage
(2010)How would Australian hospital staff react to an avian influenza admission, or an influenza pandemic?
Emerg Med Australas
(2009)Paramedics and public health emergencies: is there a ‘duty to respond’ in Australia?
Aust J Emerg Manage
(2010)- et al.
Mitigating absenteeism in hospital workers during a pandemic
Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness
(2009)
Factors associated with motivation and hesitation to work among health professionals during a public crisis: a cross sectional study of hospital workers in Japan during the pandemic (H1N1) 2009
BMC Public Health
Health care workers’ ability and willingness to report to duty during catastrophic disasters
J Urban Health
Will they just pack up and leave? Attitudes and intended behaviour of hospital health care workers during an influenza pandemic
BMC Health Serv Res
Paramedics’ perceptions of risk and willingness to work during disasters
Aust J Emerg Manage
Cited by (49)
Barriers and facilitators to the participation of physical therapists in disaster response following natural hazard-driven sudden-onset disasters: A systematised integrative review of the literature
2024, International Journal of Disaster Risk ReductionDisaster Education in the Nursing Curriculum: Embracing the Past, Learning From the Present, Preparing for the Future
2023, Journal of Radiology NursingUse of video-based telehealth services using a mobile app for workers in underserved areas during the COVID-19 pandemic: A prospective observational study
2022, International Journal of Medical InformaticsOccupational Health Problems and Lifestyle Changes Among Novice Working-From-Home Workers Amid the COVID-19 Pandemic
2021, Safety and Health at WorkCitation Excerpt :Working from home is beneficial for employees, employers, and society in terms of the economy and the environment [2,3]. Moreover, it is suitable in some unpredictable situations, such as natural disasters or epidemics [4,5]. In the first three months of 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic began.
Health care students’ willingness to work during disasters in Turkey
2021, International Emergency Nursing