Full length articleThe five-parameter grain boundary curvature distribution in an austenitic and ferritic steel
Graphical abstract
Introduction
Recent advances in three-dimensional (3D) materials characterization methods have made it possible to collect the first large sets of data on grain shape [1], [2], grain topology [3], grain boundary populations [4], the evolution of the grain boundary population [5], and grain boundary energies [6]. Grain boundary curvature is one of the most important properties of a microstructure because the product of the curvature and energy provide the driving force for grain growth. Using measurements from about 2000 β-Ti grains, Rowenhorst et al. [3] found that grains with 15 or fewer faces have, on average, a positive integral mean curvature and grains with 16 or more faces have, on average, a negative integral mean curvature. Although the integral mean grain boundary curvature is known to be correlated to the grain size and the number of grain faces [3], less is known about its correlation to grain boundary crystallography.
Grain boundaries have five independent crystallographic parameters; three describe the lattice misorientation (Δg) and two describe the grain boundary plane orientation (n) [7]. While studies of lattice misorientations have a long history, it has only been through 3D studies that direct measurements of the grain boundary plane orientations have been possible. Grain boundary properties, and the macroscopic properties of polycrystals, can be sensitive to grain boundary plane orientations [8], [9], [10]. Therefore, the characterization of all five parameters can be important for establishing structure-property relations for polycrystalline materials. A number of measurements have been reported of grain boundary populations and grain boundary energies as a function of all five parameters [11], [12], [13], [14], [15]. One general conclusion is that in microstructures formed by normal grain growth, the grain boundary population is inversely correlated to the grain boundary energy [16].
It has not yet been established whether a relationship exists between local grain boundary curvature and the local grain boundary crystallography. However, based on anecdotal observations of microstructure, there is support for a correlation. For example, the coherent twin boundary in FCC metals, which has a well-defined crystallography, is often very flat (it has minimal curvature). The coherent twin boundary also has minimal energy and a relative large area fraction [12].
Grain growth theories usually assume that, at any instance in time, there is a constant mean field chemical potential in the microstructure and that local deviations from this mean value drive grain growth [17], [18]. For example, in Hillert's [17], [18] classic grain growth theory, there is a critical radius (rcr) above which grains grow and below which they shrink; the time rate of change of a grain with radius r is then proportional to the difference between the chemical potential of a grain with radius and r and one with radius rcr, which has the mean field chemical potential. In Hillert's formulation, the chemical potential is not dependent the grain boundary crystallography. However, the chemical potential in its most general form does depend on the grain boundary crystallography. This is clear from the way Herring [19], [20], [21] expressed the chemical potential of a non-singular surface at a specific point in equilibrium:where γ(Δg, n) is the grain boundary energy, κ1 and κ2 are the principal curvatures, θ1 is the angle between the normal to the grain boundary at the point of interest and another normal at a nearby point on the boundary that is also in the plane of principal curvature corresponding to κ1 and θ2 is the corresponding quantity for the perpendicular plane. In other words, the derivative terms in Eqn. (1) characterize variations of the grain boundary energy within the planes of principal curvature. If we ignore the second derivatives for the moment and define the mean curvature as H (Δg, n) = 1/2 (κ1 + κ2), then Eqn. (1) reduces to the simplified form:
Assuming a constant mean field chemical potential, Eqn. (2) argues for an inverse relationship between the mean curvature and the grain boundary energy. Because the grain boundary energy varies with grain boundary crystallography, the mean curvature should also depend on the grain boundary crystallography. Grain boundary energies have been measured based on the assumption of local equilibrium at triple junctions [6], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15] and the measurements produce results that are consistent with calculations, at least of the most common, lowest energy grain boundaries [22]. Unfortunately, the energies of grain boundaries that occur infrequently are not well-determined and, because of this, the second derivatives of the measured grain boundary energies needed to apply Eqn. (1) are not likely to be meaningful.
The argument above applies to grain boundaries with non-singular orientations, which are orientations where the grain boundary energy versus orientation at fixed disorientation, γ(Δg|n), is continuous and differentiable. The same will not be true for singular orientations, which occur at cusps in γ(Δg|n) [23]. The chemical potential of a singular grain boundary is proportional to its weighted mean curvature (which is inversely proportional to the size of the grain and is comparable to curvature of a non-singular boundary) [24] multiplied by the area weighted average energy of the boundaries that are on the periphery of the singular interface, [19]. In other words, it is not the energy of the singular interface that determines its chemical potential, it is the energies of the boundaries that are nearest to the singular plane in orientation space [19], [20], [24]. The reason for this is that the energy change that occurs when a flat facet advances (retracts) is proportional to the energy required to extend (shrink) the boundaries on the periphery of the facet. The exact form of the chemical potential of a singular boundary depends on its exact geometry and the details can be found in Refs. [19], [20], [24]. We can write an approximate expression for the chemical potential of a singular boundary, μs, that is analogous to Eqn. (2):where α is the weighted mean curvature and includes geometric terms that are specific for each singular interface; the expression ignores a variable but small contribution from the singular boundary itself. While Eqn. (3) is highly approximate, it illustrates the most important difference between the chemical potential of a singular and non-singular boundary: the chemical potential of the non-singular boundary is proportional to the energy of that boundary while the chemical potential of a singular grain boundary depends on the energies of the grain boundaries that are peripheral to the singular orientation. In every case where there is more than one stable orientation, the peripheral orientations have higher energies than the singular orientation [23].
Based on what is known about the chemical potentials of singular and non-singular grain boundaries, and the assumption of a constant average chemical potential, we expect the correlation between grain boundary energy and curvature to be different for different types of boundaries. Singular grain boundary orientations should have low curvatures and low energies. This is consistent with the observation that twin boundaries are flat and have low energies. For non-singular grain boundaries, on the other hand, low energy boundaries are expected to have relatively higher curvatures.
The purpose of this paper is to test the hypothesis that the mean grain boundary curvature depends on the grain boundary crystallography. We test the hypothesis through a new analysis of 3D microstructure data from an austenitic steel and a ferritic steel for which the five-parameter grain boundary area and energy distributions have already been measured [14], [15]. Before analyzing the real microstructures, the accuracy of the grain boundary curvature measurement is tested on ideal shapes to establish how the uncertainty varies with the resolution and reconstruction procedures. We then determine how the integral mean curvature of the grains varies with the number of grain faces and with the average number of faces of its nearest neighbors. Finally, we compute the five-parameter grain boundary curvature distribution for austenite and ferrite and compare it to the measured grain boundary energy.
Section snippets
Procedures
In this paper, we analyzed 3D orientation maps previously reported for two steels. The first is an austenitic twinning-induced plasticity (TWIP) steel with the face-centered cubic (FCC) structure and the second is a ferritic steel with the body-centered cubic (BCC) structure. Throughout this paper, these samples will simply be referred to as the austenitic and ferritic steels. The composition of the austenitic steel was 0.6C–18Mn–1.5Al (wt.%) and the composition of the ferritic steel was 0.04
Curvature measurements of spheres
It should be recognized that curvatures measured from discrete voxelized data are necessarily approximations of the true grain boundary curvature. Intuitively, the accuracy of this approximation should depend on the resolution of the data (defined as the size of a voxel compared to the size of a grain) and the way that the triangular mesh representing the grain boundary is smoothed. Furthermore, when the curvature of an individual triangle is classified in the discrete five-parameter
Discussion
The results in §3.1 indicate that measuring curvatures from a discrete triangular mesh using the method of Goldfeather and Interrante [31] is accurate provided that there is sufficient resolution compared to the range of curvature to be measured. A basic limitation will always be that there is a wide range of grain sizes with different curvatures and no single smoothing procedure will be ideal for all grains. Fortunately, the largest fraction of boundaries has relatively low curvatures that are
Conclusions
Grain boundary mean curvatures can be accurately measured from discrete triangular meshes, but the highest curvatures are underestimated. The curvatures measured for an austenitic steel and a ferritic steel show the expected trend that the integral mean curvature of the grains decreases as the number of grain faces increases. The curvatures are also related to grain topology. In austenite, when the number of faces on a grain is equal to the average number of faces of its neighbors, it has zero
Acknowledgements
G.S.R. acknowledges support from the National Science Foundation under grant DMR 1628994 and, for equipment, MRI grant DMR 1428480. D.J.R. Acknowledges the support from the Office Naval Research under the Structural Materials Program. The authors acknowledge use of the Materials Characterization Facility at Carnegie Mellon University supported by grant MCF-677785. A part of this work was conducted with the support of the Deakin Advanced Characterization Facility.
References (43)
- et al.
3D reconstruction and characterization of polycrystalline microstructures using a FIB-SEM system
Mater. Charact.
(2006) - et al.
3D microstructural characterization of nickel superalloys via serial-sectioning using a dual beam FIB-SEM
Scr. Mater
(2006) - et al.
Three-dimensional analysis of grain topology and interface curvature in a beta-titanium alloy
Acta Mater.
(2010) - et al.
Observation of annealing twin nucleation at triple lines in nickel during grain growth
Acta Mater.
(2015) - et al.
The relative free energies of grain boundaries in magnesia as a function of five macroscopic parameters
Acta Mater.
(2003) Twinning-related grain boundary engineering
Acta Mater.
(2004)- et al.
Grain boundary planes: new dimensions in the grain boundary character distribution
Scr. Mater
(2006) - et al.
Relative grain boundary area and energy distributions in nickel
Acta Mater.
(2009) - et al.
The relative grain boundary area and energy distributions in a ferritic steel determined from three-dimensional electron backscatter diffraction maps
Acta Mater.
(2013) - et al.
The five-parameter grain boundary character and energy distributions of a fully austenitic high-manganese steel using three dimensional data
Acta Mater.
(2014)
On theory of normal and abnormal grain growth
Acta Metall.
Modified mean field models of normal grain growth
Acta Mater.
Comparing calculated and measured grain boundary energies in nickel
Acta Mater.
Mean-curvature and weighted mean-curvature. 2
Acta Metall. Mater.
3D polycrystalline microstructure reconstruction from FIB generated serial sections for FE analysis
Comput. Mater. Sci.
CAD-based reconstruction of 3D polycrystalline alloy microstructures from FIB generated serial sections
Computer-Aided Des.
Affinities for topological arrangements in grain structures
Acta Mater.
Method to calculate the grain boundary energy distribution over the space of macroscopic boundary parameters from the geometry of triple junctions
Acta Mater.
Distribution of grain boundaries in magnesia as a function of five macroscopic parameters
Acta Mater.
Estimation of the geometrical rate-constant in idealized 3 dimensional grain-growth
Acta Metall.
The five parameter grain boundary character distribution of alpha-Ti determined from three-dimensional orientation data
Acta Mater.
Cited by (44)
Grain boundary migration in polycrystalline α-Fe
2024, Acta MaterialiaPossible globularization mechanism in LPBF additively manufactured Ti-6Al-4 V alloys
2023, Materials Characterization3D grain growth in nanocrystalline Al via molecular dynamics: Influence of size, topology and integral mean curvature on grain kinetics
2023, Computational Materials ScienceMicrostructure and mechanical properties of electroplated Ni-Sn TLP bonded joints with different bonding and aging times
2022, Materials CharacterizationCitation Excerpt :Firstly, columnar-shaped Ni3Sn4 grains formed along the surface of the electroplated Ni towards the remnant Sn which was present as a single continuous layer around the centre of the joint after bonding for 0.5 h (Fig. 7(a)). Some grains grew faster than other grains in the joints, which might be due to their lower surface energy or grain boundary energy [25–27]. Also, the newly formed fine Ni3Sn4 grains around the Ni/Ni3Sn4 interfaces are mainly along the grain boundaries of Ni3Sn4 IMCs because the grain boundary diffusion of Ni/Sn is much faster than the lattice diffusion [28].