Skip to main content
Log in

Influence of specimen geometry of hot torsion test on temperature distribution during reheating treatment of API-X70

  • Published:
Journal of Iron and Steel Research International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The commercial finite element package ANSYSTM was utilized for prediction of temperature distribution during reheating treatment of hot torsion test (HTT) samples with different geometries for API-X70 microalloyed steel. Simulation results show that an inappropriate choice of test specimen geometry and reheating conditions before deformation could lead to non-uniform temperature distribution within the gauge section of specimen. Therefore, assumptions of isothermal experimental conditions and zero temperature gradient within the specimen cross section appear unjustified and led to uncertainties of flow curve obtained. Recommendations on finding proper specimen geometry for reducing temperature gradient along the gauge part of specimen will be given to create homogeneous initial microstructure as much as possible before deformation in order to avoid uncertainty in consequent results of HTT.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Samuel F H. Modeling of Flow Stress and Rolling Load of a Hot Strip Mill by Torsion Testing [J]. IS1J International, 1989, 29(10): 878.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bia D Q. Effect of Deformation Parameters on the Non-Recrystallization Temperature in Nb-Bearirtg Steels [J]. Metallurgical Transactions A, 1993, 24: 2151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Carsi M. The Strain Rate as a Factor Influencing the Hot Forming Simulation of Medium Carbon Microalloyed Steels [J]. Materials Science and Engineering A, 1996, 216: 155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hodgson P D. The Prediction of the Hot Strength in Steels With an Integrated Phenomenological and Artificial Neural Network Model [J]. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 1999, 87: 131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Quispe A. Improved Model for Static Recrystallization Kinetics of Hot Deformed Austenite in Low Alloy and Nb/V Microalloyed Steels [J]. ISIJ International, 2001, 41(7): 774.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kuc D. Influence of Deformation Parameters and Initial Grain Size on the Microstructure of Austenitic Steels After Hot-Working Processes [J]. Materials Characterization, 2006, 56: 318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dieter G. Handbook of Workability and Process Design [M]. New York: Materials Park, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Tanaka T. Formation Mechanism of Mixed Austenite Grain Structure Accompanying Controlled-Rolling of Niobium-Bearing Steel [C] // Proceedings of International Conference on Thermomechanical of Microalloyed Austenite. New York: Marcel Dekker, 1981: 195.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Yoshie A. Modelling of Microstructural of Steel Plates Produced by Evolution and Mechanical Properties Thermo-Mechanical Control Process [J]. ISIJ International, 1992, 32(3): 395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Flores O. Abnormal Grain Growth of Austenite in a V-Nb Microalloyed Steel [J]. Journal of Materials Science, 1997, 32: 5985.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Fernandez A. Static Recrystallization Mechanisms in a Coarse-Grained Nb-Microalloyed Austenite [J]. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A, 2002, 33: 3089.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Oudin A. Grain Size Effect on the Warm Deformation Behavior of a Ti-IF Steel [J]. Materials Science and Engineering A, 2004, 367: 282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhou M. Thermal Analysis of the Torsion Test Under Hot-Working Condition [J]. Computational Materials Science, 1998, (9): 411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Njiwa R K. Effect of Self Heating on the Torque vs Equivalent Tensile Strain Plot in High Temperature Torsion of Visco-Plastic Material [J]. Journal of Materials Science, 2001, 36: 5659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Khoddam S. Conversion of the Hot Torsion Test Results Into Flow Curve With Multiple Regimes of Hardening [J]. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 2004, 153: 839.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Speidel M. User Guide of OS550/OS550-BB Series Industrial Infrared Thermometer/Transmitter [M]. New York: Marcel Dekker, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Khoddam S. Thermo-Mechanical Rigid Viscoplastic FE Analysis of the Hot Torsion Test for Determining Constitutive Parameters [D]. Canberra: Monash University, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Holman J P. Heat Transfer [M]. Boston: McGraw-Hill, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Khoddam S. The Effect of Specimen Geometry on the Accuracy of the Constitutive Equation Derived From the Hot Torsion Test [J]. Steel Research, 1995, 66(2): 45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Shigley J E. Mechanical Engineering Design [M]. Boston: McGraw-Hill, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bahman Mirzakhani.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mirzakhani, B., Khoddam, S., Arabi, H. et al. Influence of specimen geometry of hot torsion test on temperature distribution during reheating treatment of API-X70. J. Iron Steel Res. Int. 17, 34–39 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1006-706X(10)60069-6

Download citation

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1006-706X(10)60069-6

Key words

Navigation