Integrating marketing and production planning in make-to-order companies

https://doi.org/10.1016/0925-5273(93)90081-UGet rights and content

Abstract

Make-To-Order companies are in the business of supplying products only in response to a customer's order. They may supply unique products made to a customer's specification and/or a limited range of products. They range from the traditional job shop, e.g. cutting pieces of metal to a specific shape, to producers of machine tools, e.g. a vulcanising line. A major problem is the divide between sales/marketing and production. The production function is often faced with unrealistic delivery dates for incoming orders. This arises when the sales force quote delivery dates and prices which will maximise the chance of the company winning the order. The lack of coordination with production often leads to confirmed orders being delivered later than promised by sales and/or being produced at a loss, or alternatively production has to delay other orders with consequent extra costs. The need to integrate sales and production planning considerations at the customer enquiry stage in deciding how to respond has been pointed out by several authors, yet little research has been carried out. The paper will discuss some possible approaches to the problem. These essentially depend on estimating routinely the probability of winning an enquiry order, dependent on many factors including price and lead time etc. Companies do not traditionally keep records of this data, particularly records of unsuccessful bids and on competitors. In addition, the paper describes the experience of setting up a system to collect such data in a major UK company and the potential uses of such a database.

References (31)

  • L.C. Hendry et al.

    A decision support system for job release in make-to-order companies

    Int. J. Op. Prod. Manage.

    (1991)
  • E.C. Huge

    Managing manufacturing lead times

    Harvard Business Rev.

    (1979)
  • .P. Tatsiopoulos et al.

    Lead time management

    Eur. J. Op. Res.

    (1983)
  • H. Mather et al.

    Priority fixation versus throughout planning

    Production and Inventory Management

    (1978)
  • G. Plossl et al.

    Capacity planning and control

    Production and Inventory Management

    (1973)
  • Cited by (61)

    • Dynamic appointment scheduling with wait-dependent abandonment

      2018, European Journal of Operational Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      Due-date management or lead-time quotation in manufacturing industry is also relevant and consists in determining the due-date for product delivery in order to find a tradeoff between quoting short lead times and achieving them. It is necessary to decide whether future capacity will be allocated to a low-margin order now or to reserve capacity for potential future arrivals of high-margin orders (Cheng & Gupta, 1989; Feng, Liu, & Liu, 2011; Keskinocak & Tayur, 2004; Kingsman, Worden, Hendry, Mercer, & Wilson, 1993). In particular, Feng et al. (2011) prove structural properties of the optimal joint pricing and lead-time quotation policy of a single server system.

    • Robust order promising with anticipated customer response

      2015, International Journal of Production Economics
      Citation Excerpt :

      Pibernik and Yadav (2008) consider a corresponding aspect in the tests of their CTP model by assuming an order acceptance probability that decreases with increasing delivery date deviation (response function). This response function is a specific case of probability distributions that have been proposed in the context of competitive bidding for orders with non-price features (Simmonds, 1968) and have been made applicable for planning of make-to-order production by means of strike rate matrices (Kingsman et al., 1993; Kingsman and Mercer, 1997). Recently, Thürer et al. (2014) have analyzed the implications of considering strike rates for workload control by means of simulations.

    • Customer Enquiry Management in global supply chains: A comparative multi-case study analysis

      2012, European Management Journal
      Citation Excerpt :

      Performance is assessed based on productive efficacy measures, such as the average percentage of delayed orders and the average delay compared to the total delivery lead time (Hicks & Braiden, 2000). The strike rate percentage is also taken into account and considered as additional information to the aforementioned indicators (Kingsman & Mercer A., 1997; Kingsman, Worden, Hendry, Mercer, & Wilson, 1993). Five distinct levels are used (very good, good, medium, poor, very poor), based on an understanding of the capital goods sector derived from previous studies.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text