Abstract
In this article we will be arguing in favour of legislating to protect doctors who bring about the deaths of PVS patients, regardless of whether the death is through passive means (e.g. the discontinuation of artificial feeding and respiration) or active means (e.g. through the administration of pharmaceuticals known to hasten death in end-of-life care). We will first discuss the ethical dilemmas doctors and lawmakers faced in the more famous PVS cases arising in the US and UK, before exploring what the law should be regarding such patients, particularly in Australia. We will continue by arguing in favour of allowing euthanasia in the interests of PVS patients, their families, and finally the wider community, before concluding with some suggestions for how these ethical arguments could be transformed into a set of guidelines for medical practice in this area.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Jennett and Plum (1972, p. 734).
Jennett (1993, p. 40).
Ibid.
Cranford (2006, p. 67).
NHMRC (2008, p. 5).
Stender et al. (2014, p. 519).
R. D. Truog notes that in some cases life-sustaining support such as tubal feeding is provided as a “matter of convenience” as hospitals do not have the time or resources to keep patients nourished through oral feeding (Truog 2008, p. 47).
Jennett (1976, p. 595; 1993, p. 43). A recent case demonstrating this is that of Jahi McMath, a teenager deemed to be brain-dead in December 2013 by staff at a Children’s Hospital in Oakland, California and whose life support was considered an inappropriate use of medical resources (Fieldstadt 2013).
Stender et al. (2014, p. 514).
Ibid., p. 63.
Cranford (2006, p. 105); Order, In Re: The Guardianship of Theresa Marie Schiavo, Incapacitated, File No. 90-2908GD-0003.
Cruzan; in Quinlan it was described as “the right to a natural death.”
Schloendorff v. Society of New York Hospital, 211N. Y. 125, 129–130, 105N. E. 92, 93 (1914).
N.J. Const. (1947), Art. I, par. 1.
Constitution of the United States, Amendment 14.1.
Cruzan.
Schiavo; see also Harvey v. Harvey, 949 F.2d 1127, 1133-34 (11th Cir.1992): “Use of the courts by private parties does not constitute an act under color of state law.”
Ibid.
Airedale NHS Trust v. Bland, [1993] 1 All ER 821.
Ibid.
Singer (1994, p. 59).
Mitchell et al. (1993, p. 75).
NHMRC (2008, p. 59).
Geraghty (2002, p. 185).
Northridge v. Central Sydney Area Health Service [2000] NSWLR 1241.
Messiha v. South East Health [2004] NSWSC 1061.
Faunce and Stewart (2005, p. 261).
Saxton (2013, pp. 205–206).
Willmott et al. (2014, pp. 545–547).
Slaveski v. Austin Health [2010] VSC 493.
Such an argument is also suggested by Catherine Constable in reference to the situation in the US in “Withdrawal of Artificial Nutrition and Hydration for Patients in a Permanent Vegetative State: Changing Tack” (2012, p. 157).
From a distributive justice perspective there would need to be limitations placed on what treatments such patients could reasonably demand. Truog recounts the case of Catherine Gilgunn, an elderly woman who slipped into a coma following uncontrollable seizures. Her daughter refused to sign a Do Not Resuscitate order due to a belief Gilgunn would have “wanted everything possible to save her life regardless of cost.” After requesting an ethics consult, physicians stood by a decision that resuscitation would be “inhumane and unethical” and did not attempt to resuscitate Gilgunn when she later arrested. Gilgunn’s daughter sued and while the jury agreed that the patient probably would have desired resuscitation, as such an act would have been medically futile, it was decided the physicians were not obliged to provide it (Truog 2008, p. 46).
Jennett (1993, p. 41).
Demertzi et al. (2011, p. 1060).
Ibid., p. 1061.
Gipson et al. (2014, p. 5).
Ibid., p. 6.
Pamela Bone, “Foreword,” in Syme (2008, p. v).
Kass (2002, p. 245).
Stanley (1989, p. 131).
Ibid.
Fisher (1999, p. 475).
Gray et al. (2011, p. 278).
NHMRC (2008, p. 3).
Wilkinson et al. (2009, p. 509).
Ibid.
Ibid.
Andrews (1991, p. 121).
Glover (1977).
Gipson et al. (2014, p. 5).
Health Experience Research Group, Oxford University’s Department of Primary Care and Health Sciences “Media Representations of Coma: Reality versus Fiction.” Available at: http://www.healthtalk.org/content/media-representations-coma-reality-versus-fiction.
Fine (2005, p. 307).
Kuehlmeyer et al. (2012, p. 335).
Ibid.
Gardner (2007, p. 166). It is not possible to speculate what the reaction might have been to the use of pharmaceuticals as an alternative method.
Truog (2008, p. 47).
Syme (2008, p. 274).
Willmott et al. (2011, pp. 523–544).
Stanley (1989, p. 130).
S5. Medical Treatment Act (VIC) 1988.
VCAT 121 (28 February 2003); While this decision only applied to Victorian Law, bioethicist Loane Skene noted in 2004 that it was likely to be adopted in other states (Skene 2004). Other commentators also wrote in the same year that this decision should become policy Australia-wide (Mendelson and Ashby 2004, p. 286).
R v. Klinkermann [2013] VSC 65.
R v. Shirley Justins [2008] NSWSC 1194.
McGee (2014, p. 26).
McGee (2004, p. 46).
Medew (2014).
Andrews (1991, p. 121).
Bernat (2010, p. S36).
Wanzer and Glenmullen (2007, p. 16).
Wilkinson and Savulescu (2012).
Mitchell et al. (1993, p. 72).
References
Airedale NHS Trust v. Bland [1993] 1 All ER 821.
Andrews, Keith. 1991. Persistent vegetative state. British Medical Journal 303(6794): 121.
Bernat, James. 2010. Current controversies in states of chronic unconsciousness. Neurology 75(18, supplement 1): S33–S38.
Constable, Catherine. 2012. Withdrawal of artificial nutrition and hydration for patients in a permanent vegetative state: Changing tack. Bioethics 26(3): 157–163.
Constitution of the United States, Amendment 14.1.
Cranford, Ronald. 2006. Diagnosing the permanent vegetative state. In The case of Terri Schiavo, ed. Arthur Caplan, James McCartney, and Dominic Sisti, 67–70. New York: Prometheus Books.
Cruzan by Cruzan v. Harmon, 760 S.W.2d 408 (1988).
Demertzi, A., D. Ledoux, M.-A. Bruno, A. Vanhaudenhuyse, O. Gosseries, A. Soddu, C. Schnakers, G. Moonen, and S. Laureys. 2011. Attitudes towards end-of-life issues in disorders of consciousness: A European study. Journal of Neurology 258: 1058–1065.
Faunce, Thomas A., and Cameron Stewart. 2005. The Messiha and Schiavo cases: Third-party ethical and legal interventions in futile care disputes. Medical Journal of Australia 183(5): 261–263.
Fieldstadt, Elisha. 2013. Brain-dead teen to remain on life support pending appeal by family. NBC News, December 30.
Fine, Robert. 2005. From Quinlan to Schiavo: Medical, ethical, and legal issues in severe brain injury. Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings 18(4): 303–310.
Fisher, Josie. 1999. Re-examining death: Against a higher brain criterion. Journal of Medical Ethics 25(6): 473–476.
Gardner, Julian. 2007. Dilemmas in end-of-life care: The Maria Korp case. In Analysing health policy: A problem-oriented approach, ed. Simon Barraclough, and Heather Gardner, 166–176. Sydney: Elsevier Australia.
Geraghty, Ellen. 2002. What price uncertainty? The persistent vegetative state in New South Wales. Macquarie Law Review 2: 185–191.
Gipson, Jacob, Guy Kahane, and Julian Savulescu. 2014. Attitudes of lay people to withdrawal of treatment in brain damaged patients. Neuroethics. doi:10.1007/s12152-012-9174-4.
Glover, Jonathan. 1977. Causing Death and Saving Lives. Penguin: Harmondsworth.
Gray, Kurt, T. Anne Knickman, and Daniel M. Wegner. 2011. More dead than dead: Perceptions of persons in the persistent vegetative state. Cognition 121: 275–280.
Harvey v. Harvey, 949 F.2d 1127, 1133-34 (11th Cir.1992).
Health Experience Research Group. Oxford University’s Department of Primary Care and Health Sciences, “Media Representations of Coma: Reality versus Fiction.” http://www.healthtalk.org/content/media-representations-coma-reality-versus-fiction.
Jackson, Emily. 2013. Medical law: Text, cases, and materials, 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Jennett, Bryan. 1976. Editorial: Resource allocation for the severely brain damaged. Archives of Neurology 33(9): 595–597.
Jennett, Bryan. 1993. The case for letting vegetative patients die. Ethics and Medicine 9(3): 40–44.
Jennett, Bryan, and Fred Plum. 1972. Persistent vegetative state after brain damage: A syndrome in search of a name. Lancet 1: 734–737.
Kass, Leon. 2002. Life, liberty and the defense of dignity: The challenge for bioethics. California: Encounter Books.
Kuehlmeyer, Katya, Gian Domenico Borasio, and Ralf J. Fox. 2012. How family caregivers’ medical and moral assumptions influence decision making for patients in the vegetative state: A qualitative interview study. Journal of Medical Ethics 38(6): 332–337.
McCullagh, Peter. 2004. Conscious in a vegetative state? A critique of the PVS concept. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
McGee, Andrew. 2004. Double effect in the Criminal Code 1899 (QLD): A critical appraisal. QUT Law and Justice Journal 4(1): 46–57.
McGee, Andrew. 2014. Does withdrawing life-sustaining treatment cause death or allow the patient to die? Medical Law Review 22(1): 26–47.
Medew, Julia. 2014. Police investigating doctor who gave dying man drugs. The Age, April 28 (online). http://www.theage.com.au/victoria/police-investigating-doctor-who-gave-dying-man-drugs-20140428-zr0u1.html.
Mendelson, Danuta, and Michael Ashby. 2004. The medical provision of hydration and nutrition: Two very different outcomes in Victoria and Florida. Journal of Law and Medicine 11(3): 282–291.
Messiha v. South East Health [2004] NSWSC 1061.
Mitchell, Kenneth, Ian Kerridge, and Terence Lovat. 1993. Medical futility, treatment withdrawal and the persistent vegetative state. Journal of Medical Ethics 19(2): 71–76.
National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC). 2003. Post-coma unresponsiveness (vegetative state): A clinical framework for diagnosis.
National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC). 2008. Ethical guidelines for the care of people in post-coma unresponsiveness (vegetative state) or a minimally responsive state.
New Jersey Constitution (1947), Art. I, par. 1.
Northridge v. Central Sydney Area Health Service [2000] NSWLR 1241.
Order, In Re: The Guardianship of Theresa Marie Schiavo, Incapacitated, File No. 90-2908GD-0003.
R v. Klinkermann [2013] VSC 65.
R v. Shirley Justins [2008] NSWSC 1194.
S5. Medical Treatment Act (VIC) 1988.
Saxton, Andrew. 2013. Parens Patriae—Blood transfusion for child despite parental objection. Australian Health Law Bulletin 21(2): 205–206.
Schloendorff v. Society of New York Hospital, 211 N. Y. 125, 129-130, 105 N. E. 92, 93 (1914).
Singer, Peter. 1994. Rethinking life & death: The collapse of our traditional ethics. Melbourne: The Text Publishing Company.
Skene, Loane. 2004. Law and medical practice: Rights, duties, claims, and defences, 2nd ed. Melbourne: Buttersworth.
Slaveski v. Austin Health [2010] VSC 493.
Stanley, John. 1989. The Appleton consensus: Suggested international guidelines for decisions to Forego Medical Treatment. Journal of Medical Ethics 15(3): 129–136.
Stender, Johan, Olivia Gosseries, Marie-Aurélie Bruno, Vanessa Charland-Verville, Audrey Vanhaudenhuyse, Athena Demertzi, Camille Chatelle, Marie Thonnard, Aurore Thibaut, Lizette Heine, Andrea Soddu, Mélanie Boly, Caroline Schnakers, Albert Gjeddes, and Steven Laureys. 2014. Diagnostic precision of PET imaging and functional MRI in disorders of consciousness: A clinical validation study. The Lancet 384: 514–522.
Syme, Rodney. 2008. A good death: An argument for voluntary euthanasia. Carlton: Melbourne University Press.
Truog, R.D. 2008. End-of-life decision-making in the US. European Journal of Anaesthesiology 25(sup. 42): 43–50.
VCAT 121 (28 February 2003).
Wanzer, Sidney, and Joseph Glenmullen. 2007. To die well: Your right to comfort, calm, and choice in the last days of life. Philadelphia: Da Capo Press.
Wilkinson, D.J., G. Kahane, M. Horne, and J. Savulescu. 2009. Functional neuroimaging and withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment from vegetative patients. Journal of Medical Ethics 35: 508–511.
Wilkinson, Dominic, and Julian Savulescu. 2012. Is it better to be minimally conscious than vegetative? Journal of Medical Ethics. doi:10.1136/medethics-2012-100954.
Willmott, Lindy, Benjamin P. White, Malcolm Parker, and Colleen Cartwright. 2011. The legal role of medical professionals in decisions to withhold or withdraw life-sustaining treatment: Part Two (Queensland). Journal of Law and Medicine 18(3): 523–544.
Willmott, Lindy, Ben White, Malcolm K. Smith, and Dominic J.C. Wilkinson. 2014. Withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining treatment in a patient’s best interests: Australian judicial deliberations. Medical Journal of Australia 201(9): 545–547.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kendal, E., Maher, LJ. Should patients in a persistent vegetative state be allowed to die? Guidelines for a new standard of care in Australian hospitals. Monash Bioeth. Rev. 33, 148–166 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40592-015-0039-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40592-015-0039-6