Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Interpreting Adaptation to Concurrent Compared with Single-Mode Exercise Training: Some Methodological Considerations

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Sports Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Incorporating both endurance and resistance training into an exercise regime is termed concurrent training. While there is evidence that concurrent training can attenuate resistance training-induced improvements in maximal strength and muscle hypertrophy, research findings are often equivocal, with some suggesting short-term concurrent training may instead further enhance muscle hypertrophy versus resistance training alone. These observations have questioned the validity of the purported ‘interference effect’ on muscle hypertrophy with concurrent versus single-mode resistance training. This article aims to highlight some methodological considerations when interpreting the concurrent training literature, and, in particular, the degree of changes in strength and muscle hypertrophy observed with concurrent versus single-mode resistance training. Individual training status clearly influences the relative magnitude and specificity of both training adaptation and post-exercise molecular responses in skeletal muscle. The training status of participants is therefore likely a key modulator of the degree of adaptation and interference seen with concurrent training interventions. The divergent magnitudes of strength gain versus muscle hypertrophy induced by resistance training also suggests most concurrent training studies are likely to observe more substantial changes in (and in turn, any potential interference to) strength compared with muscle hypertrophy. Both the specificity and sensitivity of measures used to assess training-induced changes in strength and muscle hypertrophy also likely influence the interpretation of concurrent training outcomes. Finally, the relative importance of any modulation of hypertrophic versus strength adaptation with concurrent training should be considered in context with the relevance of training-induced changes in these variables for enhancing athletic performance and/or functional capacity. Taken together, these observations suggest that aside from various training-related factors, additional non-training-related variables, including participant training status and the measures used to assess changes in strength and muscle hypertrophy, are important considerations when interpreting the outcomes of concurrent training interventions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Baar K. Using molecular biology to maximize concurrent training. Sports Med. 2014;44(Suppl 2):S117–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Fyfe JJ, Bishop DJ, Stepto NK. Interference between concurrent resistance and endurance exercise: molecular bases and the role of individual training variables. Sports Med. 2014;44(6):743–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kazior Z, Willis SJ, Moberg M, et al. Endurance exercise enhances the effect of strength training on muscle fiber size and protein expression of Akt and mTOR. PLoS One. 2016;11(2):e0149082.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Lundberg TR, Fernandez-Gonzalo R, Gustafsson T, et al. Aerobic exercise does not compromise muscle hypertrophy response to short-term resistance training. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2013;114(1):81–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Murach KA, Bagley JR. Skeletal muscle hypertrophy with concurrent exercise training: contrary evidence for an interference effect. Sports Med. 2016;46(8):1029–39.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kraemer WJ, Patton JF, Gordon SE, et al. Compatibility of high-intensity strength and endurance training on hormonal and skeletal muscle adaptations. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1995;78(3):976–89.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hickson RC. Interference of strength development by simultaneously training for strength and endurance. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1980;45(2–3):255–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bell GJ, Syrotuik D, Martin TP, et al. Effect of concurrent strength and endurance training on skeletal muscle properties and hormone concentrations in humans. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2000;81(5):418–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Craig B, Lucas J, Pohlman R. Effects of running, weightlifting and a combination of both on growth hormone release. J Appl Sport Sci Res. 1991;5:198–203.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hennessy L, Watson A. The interference effects of training for strength and endurance simultaneously. J Strength Cond Res. 1994;12:9–12.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fyfe JJ, Bartlett JD, Hanson ED, et al. Endurance training intensity does not mediate interference to maximal lower-body strength gain during short-term concurrent training. Front Physiol. 2016;7:487.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Balabinis CP, Psarakis CH, Moukas M, et al. Early phase changes by concurrent endurance and strength training. J Strength Cond Res. 2003;17(2):393–401.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. McCarthy JP, Pozniak MA, Agre JC. Neuromuscular adaptations to concurrent strength and endurance training. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2002;34(3):511–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Häkkinen K, Alen M, Kraemer WJ, et al. Neuromuscular adaptations during concurrent strength and endurance training versus strength training. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2003;89(1):42–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lundberg TR, Fernandez-Gonzalo R, Tesch PA. Exercise-induced AMPK activation does not interfere with muscle hypertrophy in response to resistance training in men. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2014;116(6):611–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wang L, Mascher H, Psilander N, et al. Resistance exercise enhances the molecular signaling of mitochondrial biogenesis induced by endurance exercise in human skeletal muscle. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2011;111(5):1335–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Fernandez-Gonzalo R, Lundberg TR, Tesch PA. Acute molecular responses in untrained and trained muscle subjected to aerobic and resistance exercise training versus resistance training alone. Acta Physiol (Oxf). 2013;209(4):283–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Fyfe JJ, Bishop DJ, Zacharewicz E, et al. Concurrent exercise incorporating high-intensity interval or continuous training modulates mTORC1 signalling and microRNA expression in human skeletal muscle. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2016;310(11):R1297–311.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Perez-Schindler J, Hamilton DL, Moore DR, et al. Nutritional strategies to support concurrent training. Eur J Sport Sci. 2015;15(1):41–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Bouchard C, Rankinen T, Timmons JA. Genomics and genetics in the biology of adaptation to exercise. Compr Physiol. 2011;1(3):1603–48.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Volek JS, Volk BM, Gomez AL, et al. Whey protein supplementation during resistance training augments lean body mass. J Am Coll Nutr. 2013;32(2):122–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Swain DP, Franklin BA. VO(2) reserve and the minimal intensity for improving cardiorespiratory fitness. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2002;34(1):152–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Coffey VG, Hawley JA. Concurrent exercise training: do opposites distract? J Physiol. 2016;595(9):2883–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hawley JA. Molecular responses to strength and endurance training: are they incompatible? Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2009;34(3):355–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Harber MP, Konopka AR, Douglass MD, et al. Aerobic exercise training improves whole muscle and single myofiber size and function in older women. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2009;297(5):R1452–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Harber MP, Konopka AR, Undem MK, et al. Aerobic exercise training induces skeletal muscle hypertrophy and age-dependent adaptations in myofiber function in young and older men. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2012;113(9):1495–504.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Farup J, Kjolhede T, Sorensen H, et al. Muscle morphological and strength adaptations to endurance vs. resistance training. J Strength Cond Res. 2012;26(2):398–407.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Salvadego D, Domenis R, Lazzer S, et al. Skeletal muscle oxidative function in vivo and ex vivo in athletes with marked hypertrophy from resistance training. J Appl Physiol. 2013;114(11):1527–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Wilkinson SB, Phillips SM, Atherton PJ, et al. Differential effects of resistance and endurance exercise in the fed state on signalling molecule phosphorylation and protein synthesis in human muscle. J Physiol. 2008;586(Pt 15):3701–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Vissing K, McGee SL, Farup J, et al. Differentiated mTOR but not AMPK signaling after strength vs endurance exercise in training-accustomed individuals. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2011;23(3):355–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Camera DM, Edge J, Short MJ, et al. Early time course of Akt phosphorylation after endurance and resistance exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2010;42(10):1843–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Coffey VG, Zhong Z, Shield A, et al. Early signaling responses to divergent exercise stimuli in skeletal muscle from well-trained humans. FASEB J. 2006;20(1):190–2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Lundberg TR, Fernandez-Gonzalo R, Gustafsson T, et al. Aerobic exercise alters skeletal muscle molecular responses to resistance exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012;44(9):1680–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Fyfe JJ, Bishop DJ, Bartlett JD, et al. Enhanced skeletal muscle ribosome biogenesis, yet attenuated mTORC1 and ribosome biogenesis-related signalling, with concurrent versus single-mode resistance training. BioRxiv. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1101/115212.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Atherton PJ, Etheridge T, Watt PW, et al. Muscle full effect after oral protein: time-dependent concordance and discordance between human muscle protein synthesis and mTORC1 signaling. Am J Clin Nutr. 2010;92(5):1080–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Terzis G, Georgiadis G, Stratakos G, et al. Resistance exercise-induced increase in muscle mass correlates with p70S6 kinase phosphorylation in human subjects. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2008;102(2):145–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Mayhew DL, Hornberger TA, Lincoln HC, et al. Eukaryotic initiation factor 2B epsilon induces cap-dependent translation and skeletal muscle hypertrophy. J Physiol. 2011;589(Pt 12):3023–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Mitchell CJ, Churchward-Venne TA, Bellamy L, et al. Muscular and systemic correlates of resistance training-induced muscle hypertrophy. PLoS One. 2013;8(10):e78636.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Mitchell CJ, Churchward-Venne TA, West DW, et al. Resistance exercise load does not determine training-mediated hypertrophic gains in young men. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2012;113(1):71–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Buckner SL, Mouser JG, Jessee MB, et al. What does individual strength say about resistance training status? Muscle Nerve. 2017;55(4):455–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Seynnes OR, de Boer M, Narici MV. Early skeletal muscle hypertrophy and architectural changes in response to high-intensity resistance training. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2007;102(1):368–73.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. DeFreitas JM, Beck TW, Stock MS, et al. An examination of the time course of training-induced skeletal muscle hypertrophy. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2011;111(11):2785–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Counts BR, Buckner SL, Mouser JG, et al. Muscle growth: to infinity and beyond? Muscle Nerve. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.25696.

  44. Hickson RC, Bomze HA, Holloszy JO. Linear increase in aerobic power induced by a strenuous program of endurance exercise. J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol. 1977;42(3):372–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Hickson RC, Hagberg JM, Ehsani AA, et al. Time course of the adaptive responses of aerobic power and heart rate to training. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1981;13(1):17–20.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Kirk EP, Jacobsen DJ, Gibson C, et al. Time course for changes in aerobic capacity and body composition in overweight men and women in response to long-term exercise: the Midwest Exercise Trial (MET). Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2003;27(8):912–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Rasch PJ, Morehouse LE. Effect of static and dynamic exercises on muscular strength and hypertrophy. J Appl Physiol. 1957;11(1):29–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Caputo F, Denadai BS. Effects of aerobic endurance training status and specificity on oxygen uptake kinetics during maximal exercise. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2004;93(1–2):87–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Millet GP, Vleck VE, Bentley DJ. Physiological differences between cycling and running: lessons from triathletes. Sports Med. 2009;39(3):179–206.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Folland JP, Williams AG. The adaptations to strength training: morphological and neurological contributions to increased strength. Sports Med. 2007;37(2):145–68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Chilibeck PD, Calder AW, Sale DG, et al. A comparison of strength and muscle mass increases during resistance training in young women. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1998;77(1–2):170–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Damas F, Phillips SM, Lixandrao ME, et al. Early resistance training-induced increases in muscle cross-sectional area are concomitant with edema-induced muscle swelling. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2016;116(1):49–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Damas F, Phillips SM, Lixandrao ME, et al. An inability to distinguish edematous swelling from true hypertrophy still prevents a completely accurate interpretation of the time course of muscle hypertrophy. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2016;116(2):445–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Buckner SL, Dankel SJ, Mattocks KT, et al. Differentiating swelling and hypertrophy through indirect assessment of muscle damage in untrained men following repeated bouts of resistance exercise. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2017;117(1):213–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Zourdos MC, Dolan C, Quiles JM, et al. Efficacy of daily one-repetition maximum training in well-trained powerlifters and weightlifters: a case series. Nutr Hosp. 2016;33(2):437–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Dankel SJ, Counts BR, Barnett BE, et al. Muscle adaptations following 21 consecutive days of strength test familiarization compared with traditional training. Muscle Nerve. 2017;56(2):307–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Van Roie E, Bautmans I, Boonen S, et al. Impact of external resistance and maximal effort on force-velocity characteristics of the knee extensors during strengthening exercise: a randomized controlled experiment. J Strength Cond Res. 2013;27(4):1118–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Martin-Hernandez J, Marin PJ, Menendez H, et al. Muscular adaptations after two different volumes of blood flow-restricted training. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2013;23(2):e114–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Fink J, Kikuchi N, Nakazato K. Effects of rest intervals and training loads on metabolic stress and muscle hypertrophy. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1111/cpf.12409.

  60. Fink J, Kikuchi N, Yoshida S, et al. Impact of high versus low fixed loads and non-linear training loads on muscle hypertrophy, strength and force development. Springerplus. 2016;5(1):698.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Aagaard P, Andersen JL. Effects of strength training on endurance capacity in top-level endurance athletes. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2010;20(Suppl 2):39–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Brown M, Sinacore DR, Host HH. The relationship of strength to function in the older adult. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 1995;50(Spec No.):55–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Suchomel TJ, Nimphius S, Stone MH. The importance of muscular strength in athletic performance. Sports Med. 2016;46(10):1419–49.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Seitz LB, Reyes A, Tran TT, et al. Increases in lower-body strength transfer positively to sprint performance: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Sports Med. 2014;44(12):1693–702.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Ahtiainen JP, Walker S, Peltonen H, et al. Heterogeneity in resistance training-induced muscle strength and mass responses in men and women of different ages. Age (Dordr). 2016;38(1):10.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. Erskine RM, Fletcher G, Folland JP. The contribution of muscle hypertrophy to strength changes following resistance training. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2014;114(6):1239–49.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Loenneke JP, Rossow LM, Fahs CA, et al. Time-course of muscle growth, and its relationship with muscle strength in both young and older women. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1111/ggi.13010.

  68. Buckner SL, Dankel SJ, Mattocks KT, et al. The problem of muscle hypertrophy: revisited. Muscle Nerve. 2016;54(6):1012–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Mattocks KT, Buckner SL, Jessee MB, et al. Practicing the test produces strength equivalent to higher volume training. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2017;49(9):1945–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Dankel SJ, Buckner SL, Jessee MB, et al. Correlations do not show cause and effect: not even for changes in muscle size and strength. Sports Med. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-017-0774-3

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Burwood, Melbourne, VIC, 3125, Australia

    Jackson J. Fyfe

  2. Centre for Sport Research, Deakin University, Burwood, Melbourne, VIC, 3125, Australia

    Jackson J. Fyfe

  3. Kevser Ermin Applied Physiology Laboratory, Department of Health, Exercise Science, and Recreation Management, University of Mississippi, University, MS, USA

    Jeremy P. Loenneke

Authors
  1. Jackson J. Fyfe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jeremy P. Loenneke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jackson J. Fyfe.

Ethics declarations

Funding

No sources of funding were used to assist in the preparation of this article.

Conflicts of interest

Jackson Fyfe and Jeremy Loenneke declare that they have no conflicts of interest relevant to the content of this review.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fyfe, J.J., Loenneke, J.P. Interpreting Adaptation to Concurrent Compared with Single-Mode Exercise Training: Some Methodological Considerations. Sports Med 48, 289–297 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-017-0812-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-017-0812-1

Search

Navigation