Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Nitrate leaching is not controlled by the slurry application technique in productive grassland on organic–sandy soil

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Agronomy for Sustainable Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The return of slurry is the most important means of fertilization in grassland dairy farming. Broadcast application of slurry induces air pollution by ammonia. Alternatives to broadcast application like sliding shoe or injection have therefore been introduced. These alternatives might, however, cause higher N losses by nitrate leaching because N prevented from volatilization may not completely be utilized for dry matter production. Information on the interactive effects of amount of N input and slurry application technique on nitrate leaching from productive organic–sandy soils are still scarce. Therefore, we tested the hypothesis that slurry application by sliding shoe or injection leads to larger NO3-N losses via leaching than broadcast application. In a 4-year experiment on cut grassland, we applied N at 0, 160, 240, and 320 kg ha−1 year−1 using four application techniques: in the form of a chemical-synthetic N fertilizer or as cattle slurry applied broadcast, by sliding shoe or shallow injection. We assessed nitrate leaching during winter using suction cups. Additionally, we determined herbage dry matter yields, N offtake, and soil mineral N content to compile N balances for the individual treatments based on these data. Our results show that nitrate leaching during winter did not differ significantly among treatments of N application technique. Nitrate leaching increased significantly with increasing amount of N input, but was on average lower than 16.5 kg N ha−1 for application rates of up to 320 kg N ha−1. Soil mineral N content in autumn was a reasonably good predictor for nitrate leaching, with R 2 of 0.65. The proportion of nitrate leaching of positive N surpluses increased in the order broadcast, sliding shoe, injection, and chemical-synthetic N application. Our findings demonstrate that the amount of N input but not the technique of application results in a significant effect on nitrate leaching.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Benke M (1992) Untersuchungen zur Nitratauswaschung unter Grünland mittels der Saugkerzen-Methode in Abhängigkeit von der Nutzungsart (Schnitt/Weide), der Nutzungshäufigkeit, der Bestandeszusammensetzung (mit/ohne Weißklee) und der Stickstoffdüngung. PhD thesis, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel

  • Bussink DW, Oenema O (1998) Ammonia volatilization from dairy farming systems in temperate areas: a review. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 51:19–33. doi:10.1023/A:1009747109538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Döhler H, Eurich-Menden B, Dämmgen U, Osterburg B, Lüttich M, Bergschmidt A, Berg W, Brunsch R (2002) BMELV/UBA-Ammoniak-Emissionsinventar der deutschen Landwirtschaft und Minderungszenarien bis zum Jahr 2010. Forschungsbericht 299 42 256/02. Texte 05/02. Umweltbundesamt Berlin

  • DVWK (1996) Ermittlung der Verdunstung von Land- und Wasserflächen. (Measuring transpiration from Land and Water Surfaces). DVWK-Merkblätter 238, Bonn

    Google Scholar 

  • Flessa H, Müller D, Plassmann K, Osterburg B, Techen A-K, Nitsch H, Nieberg H, Sanders J, Meyer zu Hartlage O, Breckmann E, Anspach V (2012) Studie zur Vorbereitung einer effizienten und gut abgestimmten Klimaschutzpolitik für den Agrarsektor. vTI Agriculture and Forestry Research, Special Issue 361

  • Garwood EA, Ryden JC (1986) Nitrate loss through leaching and surface runoff from grassland: effects of water supply, soil type and management. In: Van der Meer HG, Ryden JC, Ennik GC (eds) Nitrogen fluxes in intensive grassland systems. Martinus Nijhoff, Dordrecht, pp 99–113

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Groot JCJ, Van der Ploeg JD, Verhoeven FPM, Lantinga EA (2007) Interpretation of results from on-farm experiments: manure-nitrogen recovery on grassland as affected by manure quality and application technique. 1. An agronomic analysis. Neth J Agric Sci 54:235–254. doi:10.1016/S1573-5214(07)80017-0

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutser R, Ebertseder T, Weber A, Schraml M, Schmidhalter U (2005) Short-term and residual availability of nitrogen after long-term application of organic fertilizers on arable land. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 168:439–446. doi:10.1002/jpln.200520510

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jarvis SC (2000) Progress in studies of nitrate leaching from grassland soils. Soil Use Manag 16:152–156. doi:10.1111/j.1475-2743.2000.tb00219.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarvis SC, Sherwood M, Steenvorden JHAM (1987) Nitrogen losses from animal manures: from grazed pastures and from applied slurry. In: Van der Meer HG, Unwin RJ, Van Dijk TA, Ennik GC (eds) Animal manure on grassland and fodder crops. Martinus Nijhoff, Dordrecht, pp 1195–1221

    Google Scholar 

  • Javis SC, Pain BF (eds) (1997) Gaseous emissions from grasslands. CAB International, Wallingford

    Google Scholar 

  • Kayser M, Müller J, Isselstein J (2004) Within-field variation in the amount of soil mineral nitrogen in autumn as related to organic carbon and total nitrogen content in the topsoil. Book of Abstracts, Eurosoil, Freiburg, 2004, p.419

  • Kayser M, Müller J, Isselstein J (2007) Potassium leaching from cut grassland and from urine patches. Soil Use Manag 23:384–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kayser M, Benke M, Isselstein J (2011) Little fertilizer response but high N loss risk of maize growing on a productive organic-sandy soil. Agron Sustain Dev 31:709–718. doi:10.1007/s13593-011-0046-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuzyakov Y, Fiedel JK, Stahr K (2000) Review of mechanisms and quantification of priming effects. Soil Biol Biochem 32:1485–1498. doi:10.1016/s0038-0717(00)00084-5

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ledgard SF (2001) Nitrogen cycling in low input legume-based agriculture, with emphasis on legume/grass pastures. Plant Soil 228:43–59. doi:10.1023/A:1004810620983

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lower Saxony Ministry Report (2013) http://www.umwelt.niedersachsen.de/umweltbericht/herausforderungen/eutrophierung/naehrstoffeintrag_durch_deposition/quellen_und_eintraege/quellen-und-eintraege-88992.html, 18 November 2013

  • McConway KJ, Jones MC, Taylor PC (1999) Statistical modelling using Genstat. Arnold, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Misselbrook TH, Smith KA, Johnson RA, Pain BF (2002) Slurry application techniques to reduce ammonia emissions: results of some UK field-scale experiments. Biosyst Eng 81:313–321. doi:10.1006/bioe.2001.0017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osterburg B, Isermeyer F, Lassen B, Röder N (2010) Impact of economic and political drivers on grassland use in the EU. Grassland Sci Eur 15:14–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Pape A. (1995) Ziel-5b-Plan Landkreis Cuxhaven Forschungsprojekt – Dauergrünlandnutung Teilprojekt 3: Minderung der Stickstoffemissionen auf Grünland. Final report (unpublished)

  • Payne RW (2002) The guide to Genstat. Part 2: Statistics. VSN International, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Schröder JJ, Jansen AG, Hilhorst GJ (2005) Long-term nitrogen supply from cattle slurry. Soil Use Manag 21:196–204. doi:10.1111/j.1475-2743.2005.tb00125.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schröder JJ, Assinck FBT, Uenk D, Velthof GL (2010) Nitrate leaching from cut grassland as affected by the substitution of slurry with nitrogen mineral fertilizer on two soil types. Grass Forage Sci 65:49–57. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2494.2009.00719.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smit HJ, Metzger MJ, Ewert F (2008) Spatial distribution of grassland productivity and land use in Europe. Agric Syst 98:208–219. doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2008.07.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith KA, Beckwith CP, Chalmers AG, Jackson DR (2002) Nitrate leaching following autumn and winter application of animal manures to grassland. Soil Use Manag 18:428–434. doi:10.1079/SUM2002156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stout WL, Weaver SR, Gburek WJ, Folmar GJ, Schnabel RR (2000) Water quality implications of dairy slurry applied to cut pastures in the northeast USA. Soil Use Manag 16:189–193. doi:10.1111/j.1475-2743.2000.tb00191.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wachendorf M, Büchter M, Trott H, Taube F (2004) Performance and environmental effects of forage production on sandy soils. Grass Forage Sci 59:56–68. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2494.2004.00401.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webb J, Pain B, Bittman S, Morgan J (2010) The impacts of manure application methods on emissions of ammonia, nitrous oxide and on crop response—a review. Agric Ecosyst Environ 137:39–46. doi:10.1016/j.agee.2010.01.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead DC (1995) Grassland nitrogen. CAB International, Wallingford

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Federal State of Lower-Saxony, Germany. We would like to thank Hubert Koopmann for allowing us to set up the experimental field on his farm, and Barbara Thomann and Annette Kayser for technical assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manfred Kayser.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kayser, M., Breitsameter, L., Benke, M. et al. Nitrate leaching is not controlled by the slurry application technique in productive grassland on organic–sandy soil. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 35, 213–223 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-014-0220-y

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-014-0220-y

Keywords

Navigation