Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Developing primary pre-service teachers’ mathematical content knowledge: opportunities and influences

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Mathematics Education Research Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There is a consensus that we need to improve the quality of pre-service teacher education, and teachers’ mathematical content knowledge is critical for teaching. Identifying opportunities and influences that assist pre-service teachers to extend their mathematical content knowledge throughout their teacher education programme is important. This paper reports on qualitative data, collected over 4 years from two typical pre-service teachers whose developing mathematical content knowledge was investigated during their primary and secondary programme. These data were analysed and reported using the four dimensions of the Knowledge Quartet: foundation knowledge, transformation, connection and contingency. The results highlight the consequences of programme structure in order to help pre-service teachers to establish and sustain a positive mathematics learner identity, build teacher identity and develop mathematical content knowledge.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adler, J., Ball, D. L., Krainer, K., Lin, F.-L., & Novotná, J. (2005). Reflections on an emerging field: Researching mathematics teacher education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 60, 359–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anthony, G., Beswick, K., & Ell, F. (2012). The professional education and development of prospective teachers of mathematics. In B. Perry, T. Lowrie, T. Logan, A. MacDonald, & J. Greenlees (Eds.), Research in mathematics education in Australasia 2008–2011 (pp. 291–312). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anthony, G., Cooke, A., & Muir, T. (2016). Challenges, reforms, and learning in initial teacher education. Research in mathematics education in Australasia 2012–2015 (pp. 305–327). Singapore: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Askew, M., Rhodes, V., Brown, M., William, D., & Johnson, D. (1997). Effective teachers of numeracy: report of a study carried out for the Teacher Training Agency. London: King’s College, University of London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Council for Educational Research [ACER]. (2015). Literacy and numeracy test for initial teacher education students: sample questions. Retrieved from https://teacheredtest.acer.edu.au/files/Literacy_and_Numeracy_Test_for_Initial_Teacher_Education_students_-_Sample_Questions.pdf. Retrieved 19.02.2017.

  • Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority [ACARA]. (2017). The Australian curriculum mathematics V8.3. Author Retrieved from http://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/mathematics/curriculum/f-10?layout=1. Retrieved 18.8.2017

  • Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership (2017). Australian professional standards for teachers. Retrieved from https://www.aitsl.edu.au/teach/standards. Retrieved 14.10.2018

  • Ball, D. L., & Even, R. (2009). Strengthening practice in and research on the professional education and development of teachers of mathematics: next steps. In R. Even & D. L. Ball (Eds.), The professional education and development of teachers of mathematics: the 15th ICMI study (pp. 255–259). New York, NY: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: what makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59, 389–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beswick, K. (2012). Teachers’ beliefs about school mathematics and mathematicians’ mathematics and their relationship to practice. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 79(1), 127–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callingham, R., Chick, H. L., & Thornton, S. (2012). Evidence-based approaches to developing content knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge in pre-service mathematics teacher education. In R. Callingham, H. L. Chick & S. Thornton (Eds.), Mathematical teacher education and development, 14, (pp. 1–3).

  • Chick, H. L. (2003). Pre-service teachers’ explanations of two mathematical concepts [Electronic Version]. Proceedings of the 2003 Annual Conference of the Australian Association for Research in Education. Retrieved from http://www.aare.edu.au/03pap/chi03413.pdf. Retrieved 01.04.2007.

  • Clements, M. A. (2008). Australasian mathematics education research 2004-2007: an overview. In H. Forgasz, A. Barkatsas, A. Bishop, B. Clarke, S. Keast, W. T. Seah, & P. Sullivan (Eds.), Research in mathematics education in Australasia, 2004–2007 (pp. 337–356). Monash University, Australia: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Education Employment and Training [DEET]. (2001). Early numeracy interview booklet. Melbourne: Department of Education, Employment and Training.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grootenboer, P. (2008). Mathematical belief change in prospective primary teachers. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 11, 479–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodgen, J., & Askew, M. (2007). Emotion, identity and teacher learning: becoming a primary mathematics teacher. Oxford Review of Education, 33(4), 469–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kazemi, E., Franke, M., & Lampert, M. (2009). Developing pedagogies in teacher education to support novice teachers’ ability to enact ambitious instruction. In R. Hunter, B. Bicknell, & T. Burgess (Eds.), Crossing divides: Proceedings of the 32nd annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (Vol. 1, pp. 11–29). Palmerston North, NZ: MERGA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kervin, L., Vialle, W., Herrington, J., & Okely, T. (2006). Research for educators. South Melbourne: Thomson Social Science Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, M. (2012). How inconvenient assumptions affect pre-service teachers’ uptake of new interactional patterns in mathematics: analysis and aspiration through a bifocal lens. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 80(1–2), 25–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kulm, G. (2008). A theoretical framework for mathematics knowledge in teaching middle grades. In G. Kulum (Ed.), Teacher knowledge and practice in middle grades mathematics (pp. 3–8). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liljedahl, P. (2005). Re-educating preservice teachers of mathematics: attention to the affective domain. In G. M. Lloyd, Wilson, M., Wilkins, J. L. M., & Behm, S. L. (Ed.), Proceedings of the 27th annual meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 1–7). Virginia Tech.

  • Livy, S. (2014). Development and contributing factors in primary pre-service teachers’ mathematical content knowledge. (Doctoral dissertation, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.) Retrieved from http://dro.deakin.edu.au/eserv/DU:30067361/livy-development-2014A.pdf. Retrieved 14.10.2018

  • Livy, S., & Downton, A. (2018). Exploring experiences for assisting primary pre-service teachers to extend their knowledge of student strategies and reasoning. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 51, 150–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2017.11.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Livy, S., Downton, A., & Muir, T. (2017). Developing pre-service teachers’ knowledge for teaching in the early years: selecting and sequencing. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 19(3), 17–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma, L. (1999). Knowing and teaching elementary mathematics. Teachers’ understanding of fundamental mathematics in China and the United States. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mapolelo, D. C., & Akinsola, M. K. (2015). Preparation of mathematics teachers: lessons from review of literature on teachers’ knowledge, beliefs, and teacher education. American Journal of Educational Research, 3(4), 505–513.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, M., Kazemi, E., Kelley-Petersen, M., Mikolasy, K., Thompson, J., Valencia, S. W., & Windschitl, M. (2014). Practice makes practice: Learning to teach in teacher education. Peabody Journal of Education, 89(4), 500–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owens, K. (2007/2008). Identity as a mathematical thinker. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 9, 36–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pajares, F. (1996). Self-efficacy beliefs in academic settings. Review of Education Research, 66(4), 543–578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ponte, J. P. D., & Chapman, O. (2006). Mathematics teachers’ knowledge and practices. In A. Gutierrez & P. Boero (Eds.), Handbook of research on the psychology of mathematics education: Past, present and future (pp. 461–494). Rotterdam/Taipei: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ponte, J. P. D., & Chapman, O. (2008). Preservice mathematics teachers’ knowledge and development. In D. English (Ed.), Handbook of international research in mathematics education (pp. 223–261). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowland, T., Turner, F., Thwaites, A., & Huckstep, P. (2009). Developing primary mathematics teaching: reflecting on practice with the knowledge quartet. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sachs, J. (2005). Teacher education and the development of professional identity: learning to be a teacher. In P. Denicolo & M. Kompf (Eds.), Connecting policy and practice: Challenges for teaching and learning in schools and universities (pp. 5–21). Oxford: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoenfeld, A. H., & Kilpatrcik, J. (2008). Toward a theory of proficiency in teaching mathematics. In D. Tirosh & T. Wood (Eds.), The international handbook of mathematics teacher education: tools and processes in mathematics teacher education (Vol. 2, pp. 321–354). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simminoff, L. A., & Jacoby, L. (2008). Qualitative content analysis. In A. Primer (Ed.), Empirical methods for bioethics (pp. 39–62). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tatto, M. T., Lerman, S., & Novotná, J. (2009). Overview of teacher education systems across the world. In R. Even & D. L. Ball (Eds.), The professional education and development of teachers of mathematics: the 15th ICMI study (Vol. 11, pp. 15–23). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Tatto, M. T., Peck, R., Schwille, J., Bankov, K., Senk, S. L., Rodrguez, M., & Rowley, G. (2012). Policy, practice, and readiness to teach primary and secondary mathematics in 17 countries: findings from the IEA Teacher Education and Development Study in Mathematics (TEDS-M). Amsterdam: IEA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teacher Education Ministerial Advisory Group (TEMAG). (2014). Action now: classroom ready teachers. Retrieved from https://docs.education.gov.au/system/files/doc/other/action_now_classroom_ready_teachers_accessible.pdf. Retrieved 19.02.2017

  • Thames, M. H., & Ball, D. L. (2010). What math knowledge does teaching require? Teaching Children Mathematics, 17(4), 220–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thwaites, A., Jared, L., & Rowland, T. (2011). Analysing secondary mathematics teaching with the Knowledge Quartet. Research in Mathematics Education, 13(2), 227–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, F. (2012). Using the Knowledge Quartet to develop mathematics content knowledge: The role of reflection on professional development. Research in Mathematics Education, 14(3), 253–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Zoest, L. R., & Bohl, J. V. (2005). Mathematics teacher identity: a framework for understanding secondary school mathematics teachers’ learning through practice. Teacher Development, 9(3), 315–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Victorian Institute of Teaching (VIT). (2010). Qualification for teacher registration qualification policy. Retrieved from http://www.vit.vic.edu.au/SiteCollectionDocuments/PDF/Qualification_for_Teacher_Registration_Policy_approved_by_Council_13_October_2010.pdf. Retrieved 03.09.2010

  • Walshaw, M. (2008). Developing theory to explain learning to teach. In T. Brown (Ed.), The psychology of mathematics education (pp. 119–137). Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, S. (2015). Using critical incident technique to investigate pre-service teacher mathematics anxiety. In K. Beswick, T. Muir, & J. Wells (Eds.), Climbing mountains, building bridges: Proceedings of the 39th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 3, pp. 313–320). Hobart: PME.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young-Loveridge, J., Bicknell, B., & Mills, J. (2012). The mathematical content knowledge and attitudes of New Zealand pre-service primary teachers. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development., 14(2), 28–49.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sharyn Livy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Livy, S., Herbert, S. & Vale, C. Developing primary pre-service teachers’ mathematical content knowledge: opportunities and influences. Math Ed Res J 31, 279–299 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-018-0252-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-018-0252-8

Keywords

Navigation