Abstract
Data from open modelling sessions for year 10 and 11 students at an extracurricular modelling event and from a year 9 class participating in a programme of structured modelling of real situations were analysed for evidence of Niss’s theoretical construct, implemented anticipation, during mathematisation. Evidence was found for all three proposed aspects. With respect to Niss’ s enablers of ideal mathematisation explaining unsuccessful mathematisations, flaws in the modelling of the year 10–11 students were related to the required mathematics being beyond the knowledge of the group members or poor choice of the particular mathematics to use in the modelling context; whilst unsuccessful attempts at mathematisations in the year 9 class were related to inability to use relevant mathematical knowledge in the modelling context. The necessity of these enablers as requisites for modelling, particularly in a classroom context, needs further investigation.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
All references to Niss refer to Mogens Niss except where explicitly stated otherwise.
Martin Niss (2012) alludes to a similar need for further research into mathematisation processes in the context of viewing real world problem solving as modelling in Physics.
Student names used throughout this article are pseudonyms.
In the Forum, Singaporean students with their Australian hosts (including our focus group) visited tourist theme park, Movie World, to collect data using various technological tools about amusement rides such as the Batwing Spaceshot Ride. Students posed their own problems about the rides and tried to solve these using mathematical modelling [Video, Day 3 Forum].
References
Blum, W., Galbraith, P. L., Henn, H.-W., & Niss, M. (Eds.). (2007). Modelling and applications in mathematics education: the 14th ICMI study. New York: Springer.
Boero, P. (2001). Transformation and anticipation as key processes in algebraic problem solving. In R. Sutherland, T. Rojano, A. Bell, & R. Lins (Eds.), Perspectives on school algebra (pp. 99–119). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Brown, J. P. (2013). Inducting year 6 students into “a Culture of Mathematising as a Practice”. In G. Stillman, G. Kaiser, W. Blum, & J. P. Brown (Eds.), Teaching mathematical modelling: connecting to research and practice (pp. 295–305). Dordrecht: Springer.
CIIP. (2010). Plan d’etudes romand. Neuchâtel, Switzerland: Conférences Intercantonnal de L’Instructio Publique de la Swuisse romande et du Tessin. Available from http://www.plandetudes.ch
Common Core State Standards Initiative. (2010). Common core standards for mathematics. Available from http://www.corestandards.org/assets/CCSSI_Math%20Standards.pdf
De Lange, J. (1989). The teaching, learning and testing of mathematics for the life and social sciences. In W. Blum, J. S. Berry, R. Biehler, I. D. Huntley, G. Kaiser-Messmer, & L. Profke (Eds.), Applications and modelling in learning and teaching mathematics (pp. 98–104). Chichester: Ellis Horwood.
Doerr, H. M. (2007). What knowledge do teachers need for teaching mathematics through applications and modelling. In W. Blum, P. L. Galbraith, H.-W. Henn, & M. Niss (Eds.), Modelling and applications in mathematics education (pp. 69–79). New York: Springer.
Doerr, H. M., & Pratt, D. (2008). The learning of mathematics and mathematical modelling. In M. K. Heid & G. W. Blume (Eds.), Research on technology and the teaching and learning of mathematics: Vol. 1. Research syntheses (pp. 259–286). Charlotte: Information Age Press.
Flick, U. (2006). An introduction to qualitative research (3rd ed.). London: Sage.
Freudenthal, H. (1981). Major problems of mathematics education. Educational Studies of Mathematics, 12(2), 133–150.
Getzels, J. W. (1979). Problem finding: a theoretical note. Cognitive Science, 3(2), 167–179.
Grigoras, R., Garcia, F. J., & Halverscheid, S. (2011). Examining mathematizing activities in modelling tasks with a hidden mathematical character. In G. Kaiser, W. Blum, R. Borromeo Ferri, & G. Stillman (Eds.), Trends in teaching and learning mathematical modelling (pp. 85–95). New York: Springer.
Jablonka, E., & Gellert, U. (2007). Mathematisation—demathematisation. In U. Gellert & E. Jablonka (Eds.), Mathematisation and demathematisation: social, philosophical and educational ramifications (pp. 1–18). Rotterdam: Sense.
Kaiser, G., Blum, W., Borromeo Ferri, R., & Stillman, G. (Eds.). (2011). Trends in the teaching and learning of mathematical modelling. New York: Springer.
Maaß, K. (2006). What are modelling competencies? ZDM, 38(2), 113–162.
Merriam, S. B. (2002). Assessing and evaluating qualitative research. In S. B. Merriam (Ed.), Qualitative research in practice: examples for discussion and analysis (pp. 18–33). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Ministry of Education. (2006). 2007 Mathematics (secondary) syllabus. Singapore: Author.
National Council for Curriculum and Assessment. (2012). Leaving certificate mathematics syllabus: foundation, ordinary and higher level. Dublin: Government of Ireland.
Niss, M. (2001). Issues and problems of research on the teaching and learning of applications and modelling. In J. F. Matos, W. Blum, S. K. Houston, & S. P. Carreira (Eds.), Modelling and mathematics education (pp. 74–88). Chichester: Horwood.
Niss, M. (2010). Modeling a crucial aspect of students’ mathematical modeling. In R. Lesh, P. Galbraith, C. R. Haines, & A. Hurford (Eds.), Modelling students’ mathematical competencies (pp. 43–59). New York: Springer.
Niss, M. (2012). Towards a conceptual framework for identifying student difficulties with solving real-world problems in physics. Latin American Journal for Physics Education, 6(1), 3–13.
OECD. (2009). Mathematics framework. In OECD PISA 2009 assessment framework: key competencies in reading, mathematics and science (pp. 83–123). Paris: OECD Publishing. doi:http://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/44455820.pdf
OECD. (2010). Draft PISA 2012 mathematics framework. Retrieved 29 March 2012 from http://www.oecd.org
Richards, L. (2005). Handling qualitative data: a practical guide. London: Sage.
Schaap, S., Vos, P., & Goedhart, M. (2011). Students overcoming blockages while building a mathematical model: exploring a framework. In G. Kaiser, W. Blum, R. Borromeo Ferri, & G. Stillman (Eds.), Trends in the teaching and learning of mathematical modelling (pp. 137–146). New York: Springer.
Schwarzkopf, R. (2007). Elementary modelling in mathematics lessons: the interplay between “real-world” knowledge and “mathematical structures”. In W. Blum, P. L. Galbraith, H.-W. Henn, & M. Niss (Eds.), Modelling and applications in mathematics education: the 14th ICMI study (pp. 209–216). New York: Springer.
Sol, M., Giménez, J., & Rosich, N. (2011). Project modelling routes in 12–16-year-old pupils. In G. Kaiser, W. Blum, R. Borromeo Ferri, & G. Stillman (Eds.), Trends in the teaching and learning of mathematical modelling (pp. 231–240). New York: Springer.
Stillman, G. (1998). The emperor’s new clothes? Teaching and assessment of mathematical applications at the senior secondary level. In P. Galbraith, W. Blum, G. Booker, & I. D. Huntley (Eds.), Mathematical modelling (pp. 243–253). Chichester: Horwood.
Stillman, G. (2014). Problem finding and problem posing for mathematical modelling. In K. E. D. Ng & N. H. Lee (Eds.), Mathematical modelling_from theory to practice. Singapore: World Scientific (in press).
Stillman, G., & Brown, J. (2007). Challenges in formulating an extended modelling task at Year 9. In K. Milton, K. Milton, H. Reeves, & T. Spencer (Eds.), Mathematics: essential for learning, essential for life, Proceedings of the 21st biennial conference of the Australian Association of Mathematics Teachers (pp. 224–231). Hobart: AAMT.
Stillman, G., & Brown, J. (2012). Empirical evidence for Niss’ implemented anticipation in mathematizing realistic situations. In J. Dindyal, L. P. Cheng, & S. F. Ng (Eds.), Mathematics education: expanding horizons. Proceedings of the 35th Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (MERGA), Singapore (Vol. 2, pp. 682–689). Adelaide: MERGA.
Stillman, G., & Galbraith, P. (2011). Evolution of applications and modelling in a senior secondary curriculum. In G. Kaiser, W. Blum, R. Borromeo Ferri, & G. Stillman (Eds.), Trends in teaching of mathematical modelling (pp. 689–699). New York: Springer.
Stillman, G., Brown, J., & Galbraith, P. (2010). Identifying challenges within transition phases of mathematical modelling activities at Year 9. In R. Lesh, P. Galbraith, C. R. Haines, & A. Hurford (Eds.), Modelling students’ mathematical competencies (pp. 385–398). New York: Springer.
Stillman, G. A., Kaiser, G., Blum, W., & Brown, J. P. (2013). Teaching mathematical modelling: connecting to research and practice. Dordrecht: Springer.
Treffers, A. (1991). Didactical background of a mathematics program for primary education. In L. Streefland (Ed.), Realistic mathematics education in primary school (pp. 21–56). Utrecht: CD-ß Press.
Treilibs, V. (1979). Formulation processes in mathematical modelling. (Unpublished Master of Philosophy). UK: University of Nottingham.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Williams, J., & Goos, M. (2013). Modelling with mathematics and technologies. In M. A. Clements, A. J. Bishop, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick, & F. K. S. Leung (Eds.), Third international handbook of mathematics education (pp. 549–569). New York: Springer.
Acknowledgments
Some data used here were collected by the authors as part of the RITEMATHS project (an Australian Research Council funded linkage project—LP0453701). The year 9 task was developed from a task originally designed by Ian Edwards, Luther College.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This article is an extended version of the following conference paper including further data from a different context and further analysis:
Stillman, G. and Brown, J. (2012). Empirical evidence for Niss’ implemented anticipation in mathematising realistic situations. In J. Dindyal, L. P. Cheng and S. F. Ng (Eds.), Mathematics education: expanding horizons. Proceedings of the 35th Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (MERGA), Singapore (Vol. 2, pp. 682–689). Adelaide: MERGA.
Appendices
Appendices
Appendix 1: solution elements to Shot on Goal
An outline of essential steps in the solution for a run line 18 m from the near goal post follows. Table 6 shows calculations obtained using the LIST facility of a TI-83 Plus graphing calculator. Calculations are shown for positions of the goal shooter at distances from the goal line of between 14 and 28 m along the run line (see Fig. 5). Width of goalmouth is 7.32 m. (the students carried out calculations from 1–30 m) The maximum angle is highlighted in the table, which was generated by the LIST facility of the calculator, following hand calculations to establish a method.
A graph (Fig. 8) showing angle against distance along the run line is drawn, using the graph plotting facility of the calculator. Additional points near the maximum can then be calculated, to provide a numerical approach to the optimum position (9.73° at 21.35 m from the goal line) or an algebraic model, y = tan − 1(25.32/x) − tan − 1(18/x) can be constructed and the maximum found using graphing calculator operations.
Appendix 2: selected interview questions
Q10.1 Could you have written an algebraic model for your answer to Task 11?
Q10.2 One group [Group 6] said that the position of the spot for the maximum shot on goal was 3 m more than the distance of the run line from the goal post. What type of mathematical relationship is this?
Q10.2.2 Draw me a graph to show it.
Q10.2.3 How could a coach of a defending player use this information?
Q11.1 Do you like doing challenging tasks like this in maths? Can you elaborate on that? [Prompt: What makes it challenging/not challenging?]
Q11.1.1 What types of maths tasks do you prefer?
Q11.2 What is the purpose of tasks such as Cunning Running and Shot on Goal?
Q11.3 Do you like the fact these tasks are set in a real world context?
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Stillman, G., Brown, J.P. Evidence of implemented anticipation in mathematising by beginning modellers. Math Ed Res J 26, 763–789 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-014-0119-6
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-014-0119-6