Skip to main content
Log in

A carpet loom and matters of inequality: an agential realist approach to deindustrialisation and schooling in the City of Geelong, Australia

  • Published:
The Australian Educational Researcher Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper brings Barad’s agential realism into relation with educational ethnographic work, and longstanding concerns with matters of inequality. We extend previous work that foregrounds time and space in particular places, and that resists approaches to inequality that generalise about ‘best practices’ for schools in communities facing challenging circumstances. An Axminster Jacquard carpet loom—located in a particular place, the City of Geelong—becomes a specific point of entry to a discussion of agential realism, ethnography and inequality. This carpet loom was once a key machine in a thriving Geelong carpet factory employing families intergenerationally; it is now a demonstration machine in the Geelong National Wool Museum, operated by skilled carpet weavers (now employed as demonstrators) formerly employed at the (now closed) factory. We read questions of deindustrialisation and schooling through the carpet loom as apparatus, working with the questions that it materialises about educational research, ethnography and inequalities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. It is beyond the scope of this article to review the debates about terminology: from deindustrialised, to deindustrialising, to post-industrial, and the continuities as well as breaks in the shifts to reindustrialisation and to different forms of industry (see Tregenna 2013). Terminology matters politically—it makes some things come to matter, and leads to the forgetting and discarding of other people, places and things.

  2. By interfere, we invoke Barad’s discussion of the “diffraction or interference pattern that water waves make when they rush through an opening in a breakwater” (Barad 2007, p. 28). Barad uses the terms diffraction and interference “interchangeably” (Barad 2007, p. 29). Interference is not the intrusion of an external influence (for example, the ‘objective’ researcher), but rather, the movements and shifts that happen from within, in entanglement with what we (as researchers) research.

  3. Barad describes her own use of “the metaphor of smoke” as a way “to displace the illusion of mirrors, particularly representationalism’s obsession with reflection and the view from a distance” (Barad 2007, p. 453, note 1).

  4. These words are paraphrased from Karen Barad’s spoken response to an earlier draft of this paper at a workshop at Deakin University during Karen Barad’s Visiting Fulbright Fellowship in October 2018. We thank her for her generous contribution to our thinking and writing relating to the loom.

  5. Acknowledgements and thanks to Lucinda McKnight for raising some of these points about whiteness and about the chemical properties of carpet in response to an earlier draft of this paper.

References

  • Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. London: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barad, K. (2012). On Touching—The inhuman that therefore I am. Differences,25(5), 206–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barad, K. (2014). Diffracting diffraction: Cutting together-apart. Parallax,20(3), 168–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/13534645.2014.927623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barad, K. (October 5, 2018). Troubling time/s and ecologies of nothingness: Re-turning, re-membering and facing the incalculable. A talk with Karen Barad. School of Communication and Creative Arts, Deakin University.

  • Bright, N. G., Manchester, H., & Allendyke, S. (2013). Space, place, and social justice in education: Growing a bigger entanglement: Editors’ Introduction. Qualitative Inquiry,19(10), 747–755. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800413503794.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brintons Limited. (1946). Interruption of one hundred and sixty-two years of carpet making: Being the story of the war activities of Brintons Limited, Kidderminster and Bridgewater 1939–1945. Ledbury: H.J. Chapman and Co. Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burawoy, M. (2000). Introduction: Reaching for the global. In M. Burawoy, J. A. Blum, S. George, Z. Gille, T. Gowan, L. Haney, M. Klawiter, S. H. Lopez, S. O. Riain, & M. Thayer (Eds.), Global ethnography: Forces, connections, and imaginations in a postmodern world (pp. 1–40). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clifford, J., & Marcus, G. (1986). Writing culture: The poetics and politics of ethnography. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comber, B. (2015). Literacy, place, and pedagogies of possibility. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Commonwealth of Australia: Ministers for the Department of Industry Innovation and Science. (2015). Building a modern centre of innovation in Geelong. Retrieved February 21, 2019, from https://www.minister.industry.gov.au/ministers/macfarlane/media-releases/building-modern-centre-innovation-geelong.

  • Fernandes, L. (1997). Producing workers: The politics of gender, class, and culture in the Calcutta Jute Mills. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finkelpearl, T. (2013). What we made: Conversations on art and social cooperation. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gannon, S., Hattam, R., & Sawyer, W. (2018). Researching educational sites serving ‘disadvantaged’ (sub)urban communities: Reframing policy and practice. In S. Gannon, R. Hattam, & W. Sawyer (Eds.), Resisting educational inequality: Reframing policy and practice in schools serving vulnerable communities (pp. 1–14). Oxon: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Geelong Advertiser Opinion. (2019, 9 April). Geelong’s struggling northern suburbs deserve more attention. Geelong Advertiser. https://www.geelongadvertiser.com.au/news/opinion/geelongs-struggling-northern-suburbs-deserve-more-attention/news-story/dd18fbbaef3160f80e7c3c48ec3fcf36.

  • Gulson, K. N., & Symes, C. (Eds.). (2007). Spatial theories of education: Policy and geography matters. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guy, M. E., & McCandless, S. A. (2012). Social equity: Its legacy, its promise. Public Administration Review,72(s1), S5–S13. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2012.02635.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. (1991). Simians, cyborgs, and women: The reinvention of nature. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. (1997). Modest_Witness@Second_Millennium. FemaleMan Meets_OncoMouseTM: Feminism and technoscience. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, D., & Comber, B. (2018). Researching pedagogy in high poverty contexts: Implications of non-representational ontology. International Journal of Research and Method in Education,41(4), 387–397. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727x.2017.1395409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, D., Hattam, R., Comber, B., Kerkham, L., Lupton, D., & Thomson, P. (2017). Literacy, leading and learning. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, D., Talbot, D., & Mayes, E. (under review). Diffractive accounts of inequality in education: Making the effects of differences evident. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education.

  • Hobbs, K.-A. (2008, May 4). 100 JOBS TO GO; Brintons set to close down Geelong carpet factory in June. Geelong Advertiser, pp. 1, 6.

  • Jefferson, A. (2019, 10 April). Fair Go For The North: Less than half of Corio and Norlane residents work full-time. Geelong Advertiser. https://www.geelongadvertiser.com.au/news/geelong/fair-go-for-the-north-less-than-half-of-corio-and-norlane-residents-work-fulltime/news-story/1299cdd7f427540221f4aea259c8e704?utm_source=Geelong%20Advertiser&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=editorial.

  • Johnson, L. (2009). Cultural capitals: Revaluing the arts, remaking urban spaces. Burlington, VT: Ashgate Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, D., Low Choy, D., Clarke, P., Serrao-Neumann, S., Hales, R., & Koschade, O. (2016). The challenge of being heard: Understanding Wadawurrung climate change vulnerability and adaptive capacity. In M. Kenneddy, A. Butt, & M. Amati (Eds.), Conflict and change in Australia’s peri-urban landscapes (pp. 204–220). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, M. (2017). Tread: Socially engaged art in the de-industrialising city, 3–12 February 2017, Dennys Lascelles Gallery, Deakin University, Geelong Waterfront Campus.

  • Kenway, J. (2013). Challenging inequality in Australian schools: Gonski and beyond. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education,34(2), 286–308. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2013.770254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kenway, J., Fahey, J., Epstein, D., Koh, A., McCarthy, C., & Rizvi, F. (2018). Multi-sited global ethnography and elite schools: A methodological entrée. In D. Beach, C. Bagley, & S. Marques da Silva (Eds.), The Wiley handbook of ethnography of education (pp. 423–442). New York: Wiley.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kenway, J., Kraak, A., & Hickey-Moody, A. (2006). Masculinity beyond the metropolis. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Laslett, P. (1965/1983). The world we have lost. London: Methuen.

  • Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lingard, B., Martino, W., Rezai-Rashti, G., & Sellar, S. (2015). Globalizing educational accountabilities. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, G. E. (1995). Ethnography in/of the world system: The emergence of multi-sited ethnography. Annual Review of Anthropology,24, 95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massey, D. B. (2005). For space. London: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayes, C. (2018a). Unsettling food politics: Agriculture, dispossession and sovereignty in Australia. London: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayes, E. (2018b). Student voice in an age of ‘security’? Critical Studies in Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2018.1455721.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayes, E., Keddie, A., Moss, J., Rawolle, S., Paatsch,L., & Kelly, M. (2018). Rethinking inequalities between deindustrialisation, schools and educational research in Geelong. Educational Philosophy and Theory. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2018.1466701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMichael, P. (1984). Settlers and the agrarian question: Capitalism in colonial Australia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Moss, J. (2003). Inclusive schooling policy: An educational detective story. Australian Educational Researcher, 30(1), 63–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moss, J., & Pini, B. (Eds.). (2016). Visual research methods in education. Hampshire, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Wool Museum (Producer BioMedia Pty. Ltd.). (2006). Carpet weaving on the 1910 Axminster Carpet Loom (Video recording). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QmHPTd4qXUM.

  • Nespor, J. (1997). Tangled up in school: Politics, space, bodies and signs in the educational process. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierides, D. (2010). Multi-sited ethnography and the field of educational research. Critical Studies in Education,51(2), 179–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508481003731059.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rawolle, S., Wells, M., Paatsch, L., Tytler, R., & Campbell, C. (2016). Improving schools: Productive tensions between the local, the systemic and the global. Singapore: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rosiek, J. L. (2018). Agential realism and educational ethnography: Guidance for application from Karen Barad’s new materialism and Charles Sanders Peirce’s material semiotics. In D. Beach, C. Bagley, & S. Marques da Silva (Eds.), The Wiley handbook of ethnography of education (pp. 403–421). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, E. (2017). Middle-class school choice in urban spaces: The economics of public schooling and globalized education reform. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Somerville, M., & Green, M. (2015). Children, place and sustainability. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Somerville, M., & Powell, S. (2018). Researching with children of the Anthropocene: A new paradigm? In V. Reyes, J. Charteris, A. Nye, & S. Mavropoulou (Eds.), Educational research in the age of Anthropocene (pp. 14–35). Hershey, PA: IGA Global.

    Google Scholar 

  • Standing, G. (2011). The precariat: The new dangerous class. London: Bloomsbury Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strangleman, T., & Rhodes, J. (2014). The ‘new’ sociology of deindustrialisation? Understanding industrial change. Sociology Compass,8(4), 411–421. https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Textile Clothing and Footwear Union of Australia. (2009). Hands on—Life with the loom: Stories from Brintons Factory workers (Exhibition catalogue). Geelong: Textile Clothing and Footwear Union of Australia, Australian Centre for the Moving Image and National Wool Museum.

  • Thomson, P. (2002). Schooling the rustbelt kids: Making a difference in changing times. Crows Nest, NSW: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tregenna, F. (2013). Deindustrialization and reindustrialization. In A. Szirmai, W. Naudé, & L. Alcorta (Eds.), Pathways to industrialization in the twenty-first century: New challenges and emerging paradigms (pp. 76–101). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Victorian School Building Authority. (2018). Geelong Tech School. Retrieved October 10, 2018, from https://www.schoolbuildings.vic.gov.au/schools/pages/GeelongTechSchool.aspx?Redirect=1.

  • Willis, P. (1977). Learning to labor: How working class kids get working class jobs. Farnborough: Saxon House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, M. J., & Mayes, E. (in press). Response-ability: Re-e-valuing shameful measuring processes within the Australian Academy. In M. Breeze, C. Costa, & Y. Taylor (Eds.), Educational futures and fractures: Time and space in the neoliberal university. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The carpet loom that we discuss in this paper is currently located in the Wool Museum in Geelong, Victoria. In discussing the weaving practices of a carpet loom, we acknowledge the thousands of years of weaving and arts practices on this Country. The Wadawurrung people of the Kulin nation are the first peoples and traditional custodians of the land where this research work has taken place, and we pay respect to past, present and future Wadawurrung Elders of the Kulin nation. We acknowledge and thank the colleagues who are part of the broader project exploring Geelong, deindustrialisation and schooling: Shaun Rawolle, Louise Paatsch, and Amanda Keddie. We thank Nathan Green and Angela Bailey for their photography and permission to use their photographs in this article, and to Helena Spyrou for her encouragement and support in finding the Brintons Exhibition Catalogue. Karen Barad listened and was discussant to an earlier version of this paper, presented at a seminar during Professor Barad’s Fulbright Fellowship to Deakin University in October 2019. She offered a thoughtful and constructive commentary on the paper, raising pertinent questions for further consideration. Thanks also to the attendees at this seminar and for their comments in response to an earlier draft of this paper. Thank you in particular to the editor and anonymous peer reviewers for their supportive and helpful feedback, and to Helen Nixon for support in the final preparation of the manuscript for publication.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eve Mayes.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mayes, E., Mobayad, Y., Moss, J. et al. A carpet loom and matters of inequality: an agential realist approach to deindustrialisation and schooling in the City of Geelong, Australia. Aust. Educ. Res. 47, 1–18 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-019-00331-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-019-00331-5

Keywords

Navigation