Skip to main content
Log in

Conceptions of performativity, responsibility and care within a University excellence program

  • Published:
The Australian Educational Researcher Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, the experiences and aspirations of seven students who are members of an excellence program at a large Australian university are foregrounded. The theoretical concepts of performativity and responsibilisation are drawn on to highlight (1) how these students responsibilise themselves and (2) how they are responsibilised by the program—in ways that reflect and reproduce an existence of calculation. This existence of calculation was directed towards particular academic and employment outputs. The strong predominance of a neoliberal framing of responsibilisation in the lifeworlds of these students is recognised. Also recognised are alternative forms of responsibility based on relations of care exemplified in the high levels of social consciousness and concern for the welfare of others expressed by the students. The paper examines how care relations within the excellence program are anchored in a technical rationality focused on meeting performative targets. These targets are at odds with the relations of care prioritised by students and stifle their social and political agency. Against this backdrop, the paper argues for the ongoing significance of re-aligning universities with the ideals of the public good where the values of inclusion and equity are prioritised.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The ATAR is the Australian Tertiary Admissions Rank. It reflects student achievement upon completion of secondary education (Year 12) as they compare with other students. It is a score used by tertiary institutions in allocating course places.

References

  • Ball, S. (2003). The teacher’s soul and the terrors of performativity. Journal of Education Policy,18(2), 215–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ball, S. (2012). Performativity, commodification and commitment: An I-spy guide to the neoliberal university. British Journal of Educational Studies,60(1), 17–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ball, S., & Olmedo, A. (2013). Care of the self, resistance and subjectivity under neoliberal governmentalities. Critical Studies in Education,54(1), 85–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackmore, J. (2006). Social justice and the study and practice of leadership in education: A feminist history. Journal of Educational Administration and History,38(2), 185–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craig, R., Amernic, J., & Tourish, D. (2014). Perverse audit culture and accountability of the modern public university. Financial Accountability and Management, 30(1), 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, B. (2005). The (im)possibility of intellectual work in neoliberal regimes. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education,26(1), 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, B., & Bansel, P. (2007). Neoliberalism and education. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education,20(3), 247–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deem, R., & Brehony, K. (2005). Management as ideology: The case of ‘new managerialism’ in higher education. Oxford Review of Education,31(2), 217–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Espeland, W., & Sauder, M. (2007). Rankings and reactivity: How public measures recreate social worlds. American Journal of Sociology,113(1), 1–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (2002). The subject and power. In D. Faubion (Ed.), Essential works of Foucault, 1954–1984 (pp. 326–348). London: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hazelkorn, E. (2014). Reflections on a decade of global rankings: What we’ve learned and outstanding issues. European Journal of Education,49(1), 12–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyslop-Marginson, E., & Sears, A. (2006). Neo-liberalism, globalization and human capital learning. The Netherlands: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kimber, M., & Ehrich, L. (2015). Are Australia’s universities in deficit? Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management,37(1), 83–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leys, C. (2003). Market-driven politics: Neoliberal democracy and the public interest. New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, K. (2015). Performativity. Performance and Education, Educational Philosophy and Theory,47(3), 247–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, K. (2012). Affective equality as a key issue of justice: A comment on Fraser’s 3-dimensional framework. Social Justice Series,12(3), 45–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, K. (2014). ‘New managerialism’ in education: the organisational form of neoliberalism, Open Democracy, https://www.opendemocracy.net/kathleen-lynch/%27new-managerialism%27-in-education-organisational-form-of-neoliberalism

  • Lynch, K. (2015). Control by numbers: New managerialism and ranking in higher education. Critical Studies in Education,56(2), 190–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyotard, J.-F. (1984). The Postmodern Condition: a report on knowledge. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macfarlane, B. (2015). Student performativity in higher education: Converting learning as a private space into a public performance. Higher Education Research & Development,34(2), 338–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marginson, S. (2010). The university: Punctuated by Paradox, Academic Matters, May 2010, pp. 14–18.

  • Marginson, S. (2016). Global stratification in Higher Education. In S. Slaughter & B. Taylore (Eds.), Higher education, stratification and workforce development (pp. 13–34). Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, J. (1999). Performativity: Lyotard and Foucault through Seale and Austin. Studies in Philosophy and Education,18, 309–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLeod, J. (2000). Subjectivity and schooling in a longitudinal study of secondary students. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 21, 501–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLeod, J. (2017). Reframing responsibility in an era of responsibilisation: Education, feminist ethics. Discourse,38(1), 43–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNay, L. (2009). Self as enterprise: Dilemmas of control and resistance in Foucault’s The birth of biopolitics. Theory, Culture and Society,26(6), 55–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mills, M., Keddie, A., Renshaw, P., & Monk, S. (2017). The politics of differentiation in schools. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nairn, K., & Higgins, J. (2007). New Zealand’s neoliberal generation. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education,20(3), 261–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noddings, N. (1988). An ethic of caring and its implications for instructional arrangements. American Journal of Education,96(2), 215–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Flynn, G., & Petersen, E. (2007). The ‘good life’ and the ‘rich portfolio’: Young women, schooling and neoliberal subjectification. British Journal of Sociology of Education,28(4), 459–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petersen, E., & O’Flynn, G. (2007). Neoliberal technologies of subject formation. Critical Studies in Education,48(2), 197–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Power, M. (1999). The audit society: Rituals of verification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ranson, S. (2003). Public accountability in the age of neo-liberal governance. Journal of Education Policy, 18(5), 459–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rawolle, R., Rowlands, J., & Blackmore, J. (2017). The implications of contractualism for the responsibilisation of higher education. Discourse,38(1), 109–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, N. (1989). Governing the soul: The shaping of the private self. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, N. (1996). Governing ‘advanced’ liberal democracies. In A. Barry, T. Osborne, & N. Rose (Eds.), Foucault and political reason (pp. 37–65). London: UCL Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, N. (1999). Powers of freedom: Reframing political thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Scharff, C. (2016). The psychic life of neoliberalism: Mapping the contours of entrepreneurial subjectivity. Theory, Culture and Society,33(6), 107–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shamir, R. (2008). The age of responsibilization: On market-embedded morality. Economy and Society,37(1), 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shore, C. (2010). Beyond the multiversity. Social Anthropology,18(1), 15–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Southgate, E., & Bennett, A. (2014). Excavating widening participation policy in Australian Higher Education. Creative Approaches to Research,7(1), 21–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strathern, M. (Ed.). (2000). Audit cultures. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • TEQSA. (2016). National register of higher education providers, Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency from http://www.teqsa.gov.au/nationalregister

  • Thornton, M. (Ed.). (2014). Through a glass darkly: The social sciences look at the neoliberal university. Canberra: Australian National University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trnka, S., & Trundle, C. (2014). Competing responsibilities: Moving beyond neoliberal responsibilisation. Anthropological Forum,24(2), 136–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walkerdine, V., Lucey, H., & Melody, J. (2001). Growing up girls: Psychosocial explorations of gender and class. London: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, I. M. (2011). Responsibility for justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amanda Keddie.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Keddie, A., Black, R. & Charles, C. Conceptions of performativity, responsibility and care within a University excellence program. Aust. Educ. Res. 47, 95–111 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-019-00322-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-019-00322-6

Keywords

Navigation