Abstract
In this paper, we present case study data from research that sought to evaluate the implementation and impact of a Respectful Relationships in Education (RRE) program. The program is part of the Victorian state government’s school-based response to ending violence against women and their children. It advocates a liberal feminist aligned ‘gender lens’ (of equitable gender access, representation and participation) within six areas of a whole school approach. The paper illustrates how this lens informed the understandings and practices of educators at one of the primary schools in the research. We explore the deployment of an affirmative and non-affirmative gender politics within the context and goals of the RRE program. Identifying the potential and problematics of this deployment in working to support the goals of gender justice, we offer a theoretical framework—the status model—as a way forward. The status model supports a critical engagement with all relations and knowledges (i.e. within dominant and subordinate cultures) that oppress and marginalise. It thus supports the deployment of a critical affirmative and non-affirmative gender politics that reflects capacity to transform the underlying power relations and structures that generate gender-based violence.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anthias, F., & Yuval-Davis, N. (1993). Racialized boundaries: Race, Nation, gender, colour and class and the anti-racist struggle. London: Routledge.
Atkinson, E., & DePalma, R. (2009). Unbelieving the matrix: Queering consensual heteronormativity. Gender and Education, 21(1), 17–29.
Blaise, M. (2005). Playing it straight: Uncovering gender discourses in the early childhood classroom. London: Routledge.
Brah, A. (2012). The scent of memory: Strangers, our own and others. Feminist Review, 100(1), 6–26.
Coll, L., O’Sullivan, M., & Enright, E. (2017). ‘The trouble with normal’: (re)Imagining sexuality education with young people. Sex education, 18(2), 157–171.
Connell, R. W. (1995). Masculinities. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Connell, R. W. (2010). Kartini’s children: On the need for thinking gender and education together on a world scale. Gender and Education, 22(6), 603–615.
David, M. E. (2017). A feminist manifesto for education. London: Polity Press.
Davies, B. (2000). A body of writing, 1990–1999. New York: AltaMira Press.
Enns, C., & Sinacore, A. (2005). Teaching and social justice: Integrating multicultural and feminist theories in the classroom. Washington DC: American Psychological Association.
Francis, B. (2008). Engendering debate: How to formulate a political analysis of the divide between genetic bodies and discursive gender. Journal of Gender Studies, 17(3), 211–223.
Francis, B. (2010). Re/theorising gender: Female masculinity and male femininity in the classroom? Gender and Education, 22(6), 477–490.
Francis, B., & Paechter, C. (2015). The problem of gender categorisation: addressing dilemmas past and present in gender and education research. Gender and Education, 27(7), 776–790.
Fraser, N. (1997). Justice interruptus: Critical reflections on the ‘postsocialist’ condition. New York: Routledge.
Fraser, N. (2007). Feminist politics in the age of recognition: A two-dimensional approach to gender justice. Studies in Social Justice, 1(1), 23–35.
Fraser, N. (2008). Rethinking recognition: overcoming displacement and reification in cultural politics. In K. Olson (Ed.), Adding Insult to Injury: Nancy Fraser debates her critics (pp. 129–141). London: Verso.
Fraser, N. (2009). Scales of justice: Reimagining political space in a globalizing world. New York: Columbia University Press.
Gill, R. (2016). Post-postfeminism? New feminist visibilities in postfeminist times. Feminist Media Studies, 16(4), 610–630.
Gore, J. (1992). What we can do for you! What can ‘we’ do for ‘you’? Struggling over empowerment in critical and feminist pedagogy. In C. Luke & J. Gore (Eds.), Feminisms and critical pedagogy (pp. 54–73). New York: RoutledgeFalmer.
Hall, R. (2015). Feminist strategies to end violence against women. In R. Baksh & W. Harcourt (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of transnational feminist movements (pp. 394–415). New York: Oxford University Press.
Harrison, L., & Ollis, D. (2015). Stepping out of our comfort zones: pre-service teachers’ responses to a critical analysis of gender/power relations in sexuality education. Sex Education, 15(3), 318–331.
Jones, T. (2011). A sexuality education discourses framework: Conservative, liberal, critical, and postmodern. American Journal of Sexuality Education, 6(2), 133–175.
Kearney, S., Loksee, L., Ollis, D., Joyce, A., & Gleeson, C. (2016). Respectful relationships education in schools: The beginnings of change. Melbourne: Our Watch.
Keddie, A. (2012a). Educating for diversity and social justice. New York: Routledge.
Keddie, A. (2012b). Refugee education and injustices of representation, redistribution and recognition. Cambridge journal of education, 42(2), 197–212.
Ollis, D. (2017). The power of feminist pedagogy in Australia: Vagina shorts and the primary prevention of violence against women. Gender and Education, 29(4), 461–475.
Paechter, C. (2007). Being boys, being girls: Learning masculinities and femininities. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Renolds, E. (2018). ‘Feel what I feel’: Making da(r)ta with teen girls for creative activisms on how sexual violence matters. Journal of Gender Studies, 27(1), 37–55.
Ringrose, J. (2012). Postfeminist education? Girls and the sexual politics of schooling. London: Routledge.
Spivak, G. (1987). In other worlds: Essays in cultural politics. New York: Methuen.
Sundaram, V., Maxwell, C., & Ollis, D. (2016). Where does violence against women and girls work fit in? Exploring spaces for challenging violence within a sex-positive framework in schools. In V. Sundaram & H. Sauntson (Eds.), Global perspectives and key debates in sex and relationships education: Addressing issues of gender, sexuality, plurality and power (pp. 68–83). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillian.
Acknowledgements
This research was undertaken with the funding and support of Our Watch.
Disclaimer
The paper presents research and analysis conducted by the authors. As such, any comment, opinion and position presented are that of the researchers and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of any persons associated with the programs or organisations featured.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Keddie, A., Ollis, D. Teaching for gender justice: free to be me?. Aust. Educ. Res. 46, 533–547 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-019-00301-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-019-00301-x