Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Issue of Research Graduate Employability in Australia: An Analysis of the Policy Framing (1999–2013)

  • Published:
The Australian Educational Researcher Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The prevalent knowledge economy discourse has direct implications for higher education policies and practices. It is expected that the higher education sector supports national economic competitiveness mainly through promoting scientific research, supporting technological transfer and innovation, and producing ‘knowledge workers’ such as higher degree by research graduates. However in the context of changing work requirements and fast paced technological progress, the ‘skills gap’ between the labour market needs and the actual attributes of graduates has emerged as a tangible concern. This paper explores the issue of research graduate employability in Australia. Drawing on critical frame analysis, the paper particularly problematises the way research graduate employability has been framed in relevant policy texts, and shows what issues are excluded from the policy agenda and why. By way of demonstrating exclusions from the current debate on doctoral graduates’ skills and employability, we briefly report on new data on the level of industry-engagement of research students at one large Australian university to argue that assumptions about the need to ‘fix’ the skills deficit of graduates have excluded from view high levels of industry engagement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The Economist. (24 Jan. 2015). Education and class: America’s new aristocracy http://www.economist.com/news/leaders/21640331-importance-intellectual-capital-grows-privilege-has-become-increasingly.

  2. See https://education.gov.au/research-training-scheme

References

  • APEC, DELOITTE. (2010). Skills and competencies needed in the research field objectives 2020. Paris: APEC/DELOITTE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bacchi, C. (2009). Analysing policy. Melbourne: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, S. (2005). Education policy and social class: The selected works of Stephen Ball. Hoboken: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. (1993 [1964]). Human capital. A theoretical and empirical analysis with special reference to education (3rd ed.). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

  • BHERT [Business/Higher Education Round Table] (2012). Research skills for an innovative future: views and needs—final report. Retrieved July 10, 2014, from http://www.bhert.com/activities/2012-research-skills-for-an-innovative-future.

  • Bradley, D., Noonan, P., Nugent, H., & Scales, B. (2008). Review of Australian higher education: Final report. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.

  • Brinkley, I. (2006). Defining the knowledge economy, Knowledge Economy Programme Report. London: The Work Foundation. Retrieved November 10, 2014 from http://www.theworkfoundation.com/assets/docs/publications/65_defining%20knowledge%20economy.pdf.

  • Chubb, I. (2013). Productivity, industry engagement and the PhD workforce. Speech delivered at AMSI accelerate Australia conference (06 February). Retrieved August 22, 2014, from http://www.chiefscientist.gov.au/2013/02/productivity-industry-engagement-and-the-phd-workforce/.

  • Cuthbert, D., & Molla, T. (2015). PhD crisis discourse: A critical approach to the framing of the problem and some Australian ‘solutions’. Higher Education, 69(1), 33–53.

  • DIISR [Department of Innovation, Industry, Science and Research]. (2011). Research skills for an innovative future: A research workforce strategy to cover the decade to 2020 and beyond. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easton, D. (1953). The political system: An inquiry into the state of political science. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, D., Bexley, E., Richardson, S. (2009). Regenerating the academic workforce. The careers, intentions and motivations of higher degree research students in Australia. Findings of the National Research Student Survey (NRSS). Melbourne: Australian Council of Education Research (ACER).

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, T., Evans, B., Marsh, H. (2008). Australia. In M. Nerad M. Heggelund (Eds.), Toward a global PhD? Forces and forms in doctoral education worldwide (pp. 171–203). Seattle and London: University of Washington Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough, N. (2001). Critical discourse analysis as a method in social scientific research. In R. Wodak M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (pp. 121–138). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, F. (2003). Reframing public policy: Discursive politics and deliberative practices. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gale, T. (1994). Story-telling and policy making: The construction of university entrance problems in Australia. Journal of Education Policy, 9(3), 227–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graduate Careers Australia. (2010). Postgraduate destinations 2009: A report on the work and study outcomes of postgraduates. Melbourne: Graduate Careers Australia Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graduate Careers Australia. (2011). Postgraduate destinations 2010: A report on the work and study outcomes of postgraduates. Melbourne: Graduate Careers Australia Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graduate Careers Australia. (2012). Postgraduate destinations 2011: A report on the work and study outcomes of recent higher education postgraduates. Melbourne: Graduate Careers Australia Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graduate Careers Australia. (2013). Postgraduate destinations 2012: A report on the work and study outcomes of recent higher education postgraduates. Melbourne: Graduate Careers Australia Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Group of Eight. (2013a). The changing PhD (discussion paper). Canberra: Group of Eight.

    Google Scholar 

  • Group of Eight. (2013b). Where should governments invest their research funding? Policy note. Retrieved February 10, 2014, from http://www.go8.edu.au/__documents/go8-policy-analysis/2013/go8policynote7_investresearchfunding_final.pdf.

  • Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. New York: Harper & Row.

  • Harvey, L. (2000). New realities: The relationship between higher education and employment. Tertiary Education and Management, 6(1), 3–17.

  • HRSCISI [House of Representatives Standing Committee on Industry, Science and Innovation]. (2008). Inquiry into research training and research workforce issues in Australian Universities. Submission 90: The Council of Association of Australian Postgraduate Associations (CAPA). Retrieved from http://www.aph.gov.au/parliamentary_business/committees/house_of_representatives_committees?url=isi/research/subs/sub90.pdf

  • Houghton, J., & Sheehan, P. (2000). A Primer on the knowledge economy. Melbourne: Center for Strategic Economic Studies, Victoria University.

  • Jäger, S. (2001). Discourse and knowledge: Theoretical and methodological aspects of a critical discourse and dispositive analysis. In R. Wodak M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (pp. 32–64). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jessop, B. (2008). A cultural political economy of competitiveness and its implications for higher education. In B. Jessop, N. Fairclough, R. Wodak (Eds.), Education and the knowledge-based economy in Europe (pp. 11–39). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemp, D. (1999a). Knowledge and innovation: A policy statement on research and research training. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemp, D. (1999b). New knowledge, new opportunities: A discussion paper on higher education research and research training. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G. (2004). Don’t think of an elephant! Know your values and frame the debate. White River Junction: Chelsea Green Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, M. (2001). Between theory, method, and politics: positioning of the approaches to CDA. In R. Wodak M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (pp. 14–31). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD [Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development]. (1996). The knowledge-based economy. Paris: OECD Publishing.

  • OECD [Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development]. (2014). Education indicators in focus. Paris: OECD Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, N. (2012). The CRC contribution to research training: Report of a scoping study for the Cooperative Research Centres Association. Melbourne: Centre for the Study of Higher Education at the University of Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rein, M., Schön, D. (1996). Frame-critical policy analysis and frame-reflective policy practice. Knowledge and Policy, 9(1), 85–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rizvi, F., & Lingard, B. (2010). Globalizing education policy. London: Routledge.

  • Schomburg, H., & Teichler, U. (2006). Higher education and graduate employment in Europe. Results from graduate surveys from twelve countries. Dordrecht: Springer.

  • Schultz, T. W. (1960). Capital formation in education. Journal of Political Economy, 68(4), 571–583.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, T. W. (1961). Investment in human capital. The American Economic Review, 51(1), 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, D. A., (2004). Framing processes, ideology, and discursive fields. In D. A. Snow, A. S. Sarah & K. Hanspeter (Eds.), The Blackwell companion to social movements (pp.380–412). Oxford: Blackwell.

  • The Allen Consulting Group. (2010). Employer demand for researchers in Australia (final report). Canberra: The Allen Consulting Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornton, M. (2014). Introduction: The retreat from the critical. In M. Thornton (Ed.), Through a glass darkly: The social sciences look at the neoliberal university (pp. 1–15). Canberra: Australian National University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Universities Australia. (2013). A smarter Australia: An agenda for Australian higher education 2013–2016. Canberra: Universities Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verloo, M. (2004). Mainstreaming gender equality in Europe. A frame analysis approach. Paper presented at the conference of the Europeanists in Chicago, March 11–13, 2004 from http://www.mageeq.net/docs/magpap04.pdf

  • Verloo, M., Lombardo, E. (2007). Contested gender equality and policy variety in Europe. In M. Verloo (Ed.), Multiple meanings of gender equality (pp. 21–50). Budapest: CEU Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (1999). World development report: Knowledge for development. Washington, DC: The World Bank.

  • Yorke, M. (2006). Employability in higher education: what it is – what it is not. York: The Higher Education Academy.

  • Zahidi, S. (2014). The human capital index. In M. Gmür K. Schwab (Eds.), Education and skills 2.0: New targets and innovative approaches (pp. 92–97). Geneva: World Economic Forum.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tebeje Molla.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Molla, T., Cuthbert, D. The Issue of Research Graduate Employability in Australia: An Analysis of the Policy Framing (1999–2013). Aust. Educ. Res. 42, 237–256 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-015-0171-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-015-0171-6

Keywords

Navigation