Skip to main content
Log in

Reassessing the production of handaxes versus flakes from a functional perspective

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Bifacially flaked stone tools, traditionally referred to as “handaxes” were produced by Pleistocene hominins for over one million years over three different continents. This spatial and temporal prevalence raises questions about the factors that may have motivated their use as supplements to more simple flake tools. Hence, understanding the comparative functional performance capabilities of flakes and handaxes is essential to understanding factors that may have motivated the repeated production of handaxes during the Pleistocene. Here, we examine this question using a larger scale experimental approach than has previously been undertaken. We statistically assessed the comparative functional efficiencies of basic flake cutting tools and handaxes when undertaking a series of distinct cutting tasks. Furthermore, for the first time, we examined the functional capabilities of flake tools that are of equal size and mass to handaxes. Our results identify that the specific material context in which these tools are used is key to their relative functional efficiencies, with basic flake cutting tools being significantly more efficient than handaxes when undertaking relatively small, precise cutting tasks. Alternatively, we identify that handaxes are significantly more efficient than basic flake cutting tools when tasked with cutting relatively large, resistant portions of material. Thus, we conclude the adoption and widespread production of handaxes by Pleistocene hominins was motivated, at least in part, by requirements to undertake this specific type of task, rather than them being inherently superior to flakes in all cutting tasks. Indeed, interestingly, the comparative functional efficiencies of handaxes and flakes of equal size are far less pronounced than expected, with a number of tasks displaying no significant efficiency differences. Subsequently, we stress that a number of other hypothesized advantages of handaxes may have also been key to their widespread production and use by Pleistocene hominins.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Atkins T (2009) The science and engineering of cutting: the mechanics and processes of separating, scratching and puncturing biomaterials, metals and non-metals. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Beyene Y, Katoh S, WoldeGabriel G, et al. (2013) The characteristics and chronology of the earliest Acheulean at Konso, Ethiopia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 110:1584–1591

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark JD (1994) The Acheulian industrial complex in Africa and elsewhere. In: Corruccini RS, Ciochon RL (eds) Integrative paths to the past. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, pp. 451–469

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark JD (2001) Variability in primary and secondary technologies of the later Acheulian in Africa. In: Milliken S, Cook J (eds) A very remote period indeed: papers on the palaeolithic presented to Derek Roe. Oxbow Books, Oxford, pp. 1–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Claud E (2014) The use of biface manufacturing flakes: functional analysis of three Middle Palaeolithic assemblages from southwestern and northern France. Quat Int 361:131–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crabtree DE, Davis EL (1968) Experimental manufacture of wooden implements with tools of flaked stone. Science 159:426–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crompton RH, Gowlett JAJ (1993) Allometry and multidimensional form in Acheulean bifaces from Kilombe, Kenya. J Hum Evol 25:175–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Domínguez-Rodrigo M, Serralllonga J, Juan-Tresserras J, Alcala L, Luque L (2001) Woodworking activities by early humans: a plant residue analysis on Acheulian stone tools from Peninj (Tanzania). J Hum Evol 40:289–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dytham C (2003) Choosing and Using Statistics: A Biologists Guide. Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester

  • Feblot-Augustins J (1997) La circulation des matières premières au Paléolithique. In: CNRS/ERAUL no 75. Université de Liège, Liège

    Google Scholar 

  • Frison GC (1989) Experimental use of Clovis weaponry and tools on African elephants. Am Antiq 54:766–784

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galán AB, Domínguez-Rodrigo M (2014) Testing the efficiency of simple flakes, retouched flakes and small handaxes during butchery. Archaeometry 56:1054–1074

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gowlett JAJ (1986) Culture and conceptualisation: the Oldowan-Acheulian gradient. In: Bailey GN, Callow P (eds) Stone age prehistory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 243–260

    Google Scholar 

  • Gowlett JAJ (2011) The empire of the Acheulean strikes back. In: Sept J, Pilbeam D (eds) Casting the net wide: papers in honor of Glynn Isaac and his approach to human origins research. American School of Prehistoric Research, Cambridge, MA, pp. 93–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Harmand S, Lewis JE, Feibel CS, Lepre CJ, Prat S, Lenoble A, et al. (2015) 3.3-million-year-old stone tools from Lomekwi 3, West Turkana, Kenya. Nature 521:310–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hester TR, Spence RL, Busby C, Bard J (1976) Butchering a deer with obsidian tools. Contributions of the University of California Archaeological Research Facility 33:45–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Hou Y, Potts R, Baoyin Y, Zhengtang G, Deino A, Wei W, Weiwen H (2000) Mid-Pleistocene Acheulean-like stone technology of the Bose basin, South China. Science 287:1622–1626

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isaac GL (1969) Studies of early culture in East Africa. World Archaeology 1:1–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isaac GL (1986) Foundation stones: early artefacts as indicators of activities and abilities. In: Bailey GN, Callow P (eds) Stone Age prehistory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 221–241

    Google Scholar 

  • Jobson RW (1986) Stone tool morphology and rabbit butchering. Lithic Technology 15:9–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones PR (1980) Experimental butchery with modern stone tools and its relevance for Palaeolithic archaeology. World Archaeology 12:153–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones PR (1981) Experimental implement manufacture and use; a case study from Olduvai Gorge, Tanzania. Phil Trans R Soc B 292:189–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones PR (1994) Results of experimental work in relation to the stone industries of Olduvai Gorge. In: Leakey MD, Roe DA (eds) Olduvai Gorge: volume 5. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 254–298

    Google Scholar 

  • Key AJM, Lycett SJ (2011) Technology based evolution? A biometric test of the effects of handsize versus tool form on efficiency in an experimental cutting task. J Archaeol Sci 38:1663–1670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Key AJM, Lycett SJ (2014) Are bigger flakes always better? An experimental assessment of flake size variation on cutting efficiency and loading. J Archaeol Sci 41:140–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Key AJM, Lycett SJ (2015) Edge angle as a variably influential factor in flake cutting efficiency: an experimental investigation of its relationship with tool size and loading. Archaeometry 57:911–927

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleindienst MR (1962) Components of the East African Acheulian assemblage: an analytic approach. In: Mortelmans G (ed) Actes du IVéme Congrés Panafricain de Préhistoire et de l’Etude du Quaternaire, vol 40. Musée Royal de l’Afrique Centrale, Tervuren, pp. 81–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Lepre CJ, Roche H, Kent DV, Harmand S, Quinn RL, Brugal JP, Feibel C (2011) An earlier origin for the Acheulean. Nature 477:82–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lycett SJ, Gowlett JAJ (2008) On questions surrounding the Acheulean ‘tradition’. World Archaeology 40:295–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Machin AJ, Hosfield RT, Mithen SJ (2007) Why are some handaxes symmetrical? Testing the influence of handaxe morphology on butchery effectiveness. J Archaeol Sci 34:883–893

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCall GS (2005) An experimental examination of the potential function of early Stone Age tool technology and implications for subsistence behavior. Lithic Technology 30:29–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGorry RW (2001) A system for the measurement of grip forces and applied moments during hand tool use. Appl Ergon 32:271–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGorry RW, Dempsey PG, O’Brien NV (2004) The effect of workstation and task variables on forces applied during simulated meat cutting. Ergonomics 47:1640–1656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merritt SR (2012) Factors affecting Early Stone age cut mark cross-sectional size: implications from actualistic butchery trials. J Archaeol Sci 39:2984–2994

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merritt SR (2015) Cut mark cluster geometry and equifinality in replicated early Stone ge butchery. Int J Osteoarchaeol. doi:10.1002/oa.2448

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell JC (1995) Studying biface utilisation at Boxgrove: roe deer butchery with replica handaxes. Lithics 16:64–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Newcomer MH (1971) Some quantitative experiments in handaxe manufacture. World Archaeology 3:85–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norton CJ, Bae K, Harris JWK, Lee H (2006) Middle Pleistocene handaxes from the Korean Peninsula. J Hum Evol 51:527–536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ohel MY (1987) The Acheulean handaxe: a maintainable multi-functional tool. Lithic Technology 16:54–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roche H (2005) From simple flaking to shaping: stone-knapping evolution among early hominins. In: Roux V, Bril B (eds) Stone knapping: the necessary conditions for a uniquely hominin behaviour. McDonald Institute Monographs, Cambridge, pp. 35–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Sampson C (2006) Acheulean quarries at hornfels outcrops in the Upper Karoo region of South Africa. In: Goren-Inbar N, Sharon G (eds) Axe age: Acheulean toolmaking from quarry to discard. Equinox Publishing, London, pp. 75–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Schick K (1998) A comparative perspective on Paleolithic cultural patterns. In: Akazawa T, Aoki K, Bar-Yosef O (eds) Neandertals and modern humans in western Asia. Plenum Press, New York, pp. 449–460

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiffer MB, Skibo JM (1987) Theory and experiment in the study of technological change. Curr Anthropol 28:595–622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Semaw S, Rogers M, Stout D (2009) The Oldowan–Acheulean transition: is there a “developed Oldowan” artefact tradition? In: Camps M, Chauhan PR (eds) Sourcebook of palaeolithic transitions: methods, theories, and interpretations. Springer, New York, pp. 173–194

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sharon G (2010) Large flake Acheulean. Quat Int 223:226–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shea J (2007) Lithic archaeology, or, what stone tools can (and can’t) tell us about early hominin diets. In: Ungar PS (ed) Evolution of the human diet: the known, the unknown, and the unknowable. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 212–229

    Google Scholar 

  • Shea J (2010) Stone Age visiting cards revisited: a strategic perspective on the lithic technology of early hominin dispersal. In: Out of Africa I: the first hominin colonization of Eurasia. Springer, New York, pp 47–64

  • de la Torre I, Mora R (2014) The transition to the Acheulean in East Africa: an assessment of paradigms and evidence from Olduvai Gorge (Tanzania). Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 21:781–823

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toth N (1985) The Oldowan reassessed: a close look at early stone artefacts. J Archaeol Sci 12:101–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toth N, Schick K (2009) The importance of actualistic studies in early Stone Age research: some personal reflections. In: Schick K, Toth N (eds) The cutting edge: new approaches to the archaeology of human origins. Stone Age Institute Press, Gosport, pp. 267–344

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker PL (1978) Butchering and stone tool function. Am Antiq 43:710–715

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang W, Lycett SJ, von Cramon-Taubadel N, Jin JJH, Bae CJ (2012) Comparison of handaxes from Bose Basin (China) and the western Acheulean indicates convergence of form, not cognitive differences. PLoS One 7:e35804

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wynn T (1995) Handaxe enigmas. World Archaeology 27:10–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

For important comments, we are grateful to Noreen von Cramon-Taubadel and the anonymous reviewers. During this work, AJKM was supported by a University of Kent 50th Anniversary Research Scholarship. SJL’s work is supported by the Research Foundation for the State University of New York.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alastair J.M. Key.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 16 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Key, A.J., Lycett, S.J. Reassessing the production of handaxes versus flakes from a functional perspective. Archaeol Anthropol Sci 9, 737–753 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12520-015-0300-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12520-015-0300-1

Keywords

Navigation