Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A hybrid simulation approach to model and improve construction labor productivity

  • Construction Management
  • Published:
KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering Aims and scope

Abstract

This research presents an integrated fuzzy System Dynamics (SD) approach for modeling and improving of labor productivity. The complex inter-related structure of different factors affecting labor productivity is modeled using SD approach. Owing to the imprecise and uncertain nature of many factors affecting the labor productivity, fuzzy logic is integrated into system dynamics to account for the existing uncertainties. The values of different uncertain factors affecting the labor productivity are determined by fuzzy numbers based on the opinions of different experts involved in the project. Using the proposed fuzzy-SD approach, the value of labor productivity is determined as a fuzzy number considering the effects of all the influencing factors. Different alternative solutions are then defined to improve the labor productivity. The impact of the alternative solutions on project performance is simulated using the proposed fuzzy-SD model prior to their actual implementation. Using the proposed integrated fuzzy-SD approach, the project manager may decide on the most appropriate alternative solution to improve the labor productivity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arashpour, M. and Arashpour, M. (2015). “Analysis of Workflow Variability and Its Impacts on Productivity and Performance in Construction of Multistory Buildings.” Journal of Management in Engineering, Vol. 31, Issue 6, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943- 5479.0000363, 04015006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borcherding, J. and Oglesby, C. (1974). “Construction productivity and job satisfaction.” Journal of Construction. Div., 100-3, pp. 413–431.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, C. K., Hanna, A. S., Lackney, J. A., and Sullivan, K. T. (2005). “Quantifying the impact of schedule compression on construction labor productivity.” Construction Research Congress, pp. 1–10. DOI: 10.1061/40754(183)58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dai, J., Goodrum, P. M., and Maloney, W. F. (2009). “Construction craft workers’ perceptions of the factors affecting their productivity.” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 135, No. 3. pp. 217–226, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2009)135:3(217).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • El-Gohary, K. and Aziz, R. (2014). “Factors influencing construction labor productivity in egypt.” Journal of Management in Engineering, Vol. 30, No. 1, pp. 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • El-Rayes, K. and Jun Dho, H. (2010). “Optimizing the utilization of multiple labor shifts in construction projects.” Automation in Construction, Vol. 19, Issue 2, pp. 109–119, DOI: 10.1061/41109(373)119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fayek, A. R. and Oduba, A. (2005). “Predicting industrial construction labor productivity using fuzzy expert systems.” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 131, No. 8, pp. 938–941, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2005)131:8(938).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forrester, J. (1961). Industrial dynamics, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gouett, M. C., Haas, C. T., Goodrum, P. M., and Caldas, C. H. (2011). “Activity analysis for direct-work rate improvement in construction.” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 137, No. 12, pp. 1117–1124, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grau, D., Caldas, C. H., Haas, C. T., Goodrum, P. M., and Gong, J. (2009). “Assessing the impact of materials tracking technologies on construction craft productivity.” Automation in Construction, Vol. 18, Issue 7, pp. 903–911, DOI: 10.1016/j.autcon.2009.04.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanna, A. S. (2001). “Quantifying the impact of change orders on electrical and mechanical labor productivity.” Research Rep., No. 158-11, Construction Industry Institute, Austin, Tex.

  • Hanna, A. S., Taylor, C. S., and Kenneth, T. S. (2005). “Impact of extended overtime on construction labor.” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 131, No. 6, pp. 734–739, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2005)131:6(734).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ibbs, W. (2005). “Impact of change’s timing on labor productivity.” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 131, No. 11, pp. 1219–1223, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2005)131:11(1219).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarkas, M. A. and Bitar, C. G. (2012). “Factors affecting construction labor productivity in Kuwait.” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 138, No 7, 811–820, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaming, P. F., Olomolaiye, P. O., Holt, G. D., and Harris, F. C. (1997). “Factors influencing craftsmen’s productivity in Indonesia.” International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 15, No. 1, DOI: 10.1016/S0263-7863(96)00019-1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maloney, W. F. (1981). “Motivation in construction: A review.” Journal of Construction. Div., 101-4, pp. 641–647.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mojahed, S. and Aghazadeh, F. (2008). “Major factors influencing productivity of water and wastewater treatment plant construction.” International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 26, pp. 195–202, DOI: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2007.06.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moselhi, O., Assem, I., and El-Rayes, K. (2005). “Change orders impact on labor productivity.” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 131, No. 3, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2005)131:3(354).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nasirzadeh, F. and Nojedehi, P. (2013). “Dynamic modeling of labor productivity in construction projects.” International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 31, pp. 903–911, DOI: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.11.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nasirzadeh, F., Afshar, A., Khanzadi, M., and Howick, S. (2008). “Integrating system dynamics and fuzzy logic modeling for construction risk management.” Construction Management and Economics, Vol. 26, pp. 1197–1212, DOI: 10.1080/01446190802459924.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ng, S. T., Skitmore, R. M., Lam, K. C., and Poon, A. W. C. (2004). “Demotivating factors influencing the productivity of civil engineering projects.” International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 22, pp. 139–146, DOI: 10-1016/S0263-7863(03)00061-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sterman, J. D. (2000). Business dynamics: System thinking and modeling for complex world, Mcgraw-hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, H. R. and Ellis, R. D. (2009). “Fundamental Principles of Weather Mitigation.” Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction, Vol. 14, No. 1, 29–35, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0680(2009)14:1(29).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watkins, M., Mukherjee, A., Onder, N., and Mattila, K. (2009). “Using agent-based modeling to study construction labor productivity as an emergent property of individual and crew interactions.” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 135, No. 7, pp. 657–667, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westover, J. H., Westover, A. R., and Westover, A. L. (2010). “Enhancing long-term worker productivity and performance.” International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Vol. 59, No. 4, pp. 372–387, DOI: 10.1108/17410401011038919.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh, L. A. (1965). “Fuzzy sets.” Inf. Control, Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 338–353.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Dept. of Construction Engineering and Management - Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

    Pouya Nojedehi

  2. Dept. of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Payame Noor University (PNU), PO BOX 19395-3697, Tehran, Iran

    Farnad Nasirzadeh

Authors
  1. Pouya Nojedehi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Farnad Nasirzadeh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pouya Nojedehi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nojedehi, P., Nasirzadeh, F. A hybrid simulation approach to model and improve construction labor productivity. KSCE J Civ Eng 21, 1516–1524 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-016-0278-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-016-0278-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation