Skip to main content
Log in

Happiness is the Right Metric to Measure Good Societal Functioning

  • Symposium: Understanding Happiness
  • Published:
Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Professor Etzioni argues that ‘happiness’ is ‘the wrong metric’ as a measure of a good society. He argues from the perspective of Communitarian Philosophy and uses two kinds of happiness evidence. One is correlational results from survey data and the other concerns ‘self-actualization’ as the highest-order need proposed by Maslow. Unfortunately, both kinds of evidence are flawed for this purpose. First, contemporary understanding of happiness allows a different perspective from the one depicted. Second, correlational results from cross-sectional studies cannot be used to conclude causation. Third, the construct of self-actualization has been discredited as having scientific validity. Overall, Etzioni’s argument rests on an outdated conception of happiness and the invalid interpretation of scientific evidence. It is concluded that happiness is the right metric by which to judge a successful society, as long as the nature of measured happiness is understood.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Further Reading

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics. 2014. 6523.0 - Household Income and Wealth, Australia, 2013–14. . Canberra: ABS. http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/mf/6523.0.

  • Bentham, J. 1780. An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation. London: T. Payne http://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k93974k/f2.image.r=.langEN Retrieved 09Sept2014.

  • Cannon, W. B. 1932. The Wisdom of the Body. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, R. A. 1995. On the Trail of the Gold Standard for Life Satisfaction. Social Indicators Research, 35(2), 179–200. doi:10.1007/BF01079026.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, R. A. 1998. The Second Approximation to an International Standard of Life Satisfaction. Social Indicators Research, 43(3), 307–334. doi:10.1023/A:1006831107052.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, R. A. 2000. Personal Income and Subjective Well-Being: A Review. Journal of Happiness Studies, 1(2), 133–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, R. A. 2001. The Subjective Well-Being of People Caring for a Severely Disabled Family Member at Home: A Review. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability, 26, 83–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, R. A. 2010. Subjective Wellbeing, Homeostatically Protected Mood and Depression: A Synthesis. Journal of Happiness Studies, 11, 1–17. doi:10.1007/s10902-009-9167-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, R. A., & Nistico, H. 2002. Maintaining Life Satisfaction: The Role of Positive Cognitive Bias. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3(1), 37–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, R. A., Woerner, J., Tomyn, A., Gibson, A., Knapp, T. 2006. Australian Unity Wellbeing Index: Report 16.0 - “The Wellbeing of Australians - Mortgage payments and home ownership”. Retrieved from http://www.deakin.edu.au/research/acqol/index_wellbeing/index.htm.

  • Cummins, R. A., Woerner, J., Weinberg, M., Collard, J., Hartley-Clark, L., Horfiniak, K. 2013. Australian Unity Wellbeing Index: −Report 30.0 - The Wellbeing of Australians: Social media, personal achievement, and work. Melbourne: Australian Centre on Quality of Life, School of Psychology, Deakin University. http://www.deakin.edu.au/research/acqol/reports/auwbi.php.

  • Cummins, R. A., Li, L., Wooden, M., & Stokes, M. 2014. A Demonstration of Set-Points for Subjective Wellbeing. Journal of Happiness Studies, 15, 183–206. doi:10.1007/s10902-013-9444-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., Scollon, C. N., & Lucas, R. E. 2004. The Evolving Concept of Subjective Well-being. The Multifaceted Nature of Happiness. In P. T. Costa & I. C. Siegler (Eds.), Recent Advances in Psychology and Aging (pp. 188–219). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science BV.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galen, L. W., Sharp, M., & McNulty, A. 2015. Nonreligious Group Factors Versus Religious Belief in the Prediction of Prosociality. Social Indicators Research, 122(2), 411–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagerty, M. R. 1999. Testing Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs: National Quality-of-Life Across Time. Social Indicators Research, 46(3), 249–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, T., Weinberg, M. K., & Cummins, R. A. 2014. The Dyadic Interaction of Relationships and Disability Type on Informal Carer Subjective Well-being. Quality of Life Research, 23(5), 1535–1542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanestad, B. R., & Albrektsen, G. 1992. The Stability of Quality of Life Experience in People with Type 1 Diabetes Over a Period of a Year. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 17, 777–784.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Headey, B., & Wearing, A. 1989. Personality, Life Events, and Subjective Well-Being: Toward a Dynamic Equilibrium Model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 731–739. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.57.4.731.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helliwell, J. F. 2003. Well-Being, Social Capital and Public Policy: What’s New? Economic Modelling, 20(2), 331–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, S. 1977. The Social Network, Support and Neurosis. The Function of Attachment in Adult Life. British Journal of Psychiatry, 131(2), 185–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawler, E. E., & Suttle, J. L. 1972. A Causal Correlational Test of the Need Hierarchy Concept. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 7, 265–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Locke, E. A. 1976. The Nature and Causes of Job Satisfaction. In M. D. Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (pp. 1297–1349). Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maslow, A. H. 1954. Motivation and Personality. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maslow, A. H. 1970. Motivation and Personality (2nd ed.). New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mill, J. S. 1863. Utilitarianism, 1st edition. London: Parker, Son & Bourn, West Strand, www.utilitarianism.com/.

  • Rothbaum, F., Weisz, J. R., & Snyder, S. S. 1982. Changing the World and Changing the Self: A Two-Process Model of Perceived Control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42(1), 5–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, J. A. 1980. A Circumplex Model of Affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 1161–1178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, J. A. 2003. Core Affect and the Psychological Construction of Emotion. Psychological Review, 110(1), 145–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarason, B. R., Sarason, I. G., & Pierce, G. R. 1990a. Social Support: An Interactional View. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarason, I. G., Sarason, B. R., & Pierce, G. R. 1990b. Social Support: The Search for Theory. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 9(1), 133–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seidlitz, L., & Diener, E. 1993. Memory for Positive Versus Negative Life Events: Theories for the Differences Between Happy and Unhappy Persons. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 654–664.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Transparency International. 2016. Corruption Perceptions Index 2015. http://www.transparency.org/cpi2015.

  • Yik, M., Russell, J. A., & Steiger, J. H. 2011. A 12-Point Circumplex Structure of Core Affect. Emotion, 11(4), 705–731.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zweig, J. S. 2015. Are Women Happier than Men? Evidence from the Gallup World Poll. Journal of Happiness Studies, 16(2), 515–541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert A. Cummins.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cummins, R.A. Happiness is the Right Metric to Measure Good Societal Functioning. Soc 53, 273–277 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12115-016-0011-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12115-016-0011-y

Keywords

Navigation