Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Stakeholder knowledge of threatened coastal species; the case of beach-goers and the Hooded Plover Thinornis rubricollis

  • Published:
Journal of Coastal Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

One way of measuring pre-existing knowledge of a threatened species and its circumstances is to measure the degree of surprise expressed by stakeholders in relation to factual statements regarding the species. Beach-goers (n = 684) were surveyed in regard to their knowledge of the beach-dwelling, threatened, Hooded Plover Thinornis rubricollis, a coastal obligate in south eastern Australia. Principle components analysis revealed that respondents’ degree of knowledge could be categorized as involving ‘chick (flightless young) ecology’ and ‘human impacts’ (threatening processes). Respondents were more surprised by aspects of chick ecology than by threatening processes (F1,514 = 460.446, p < 0.001). Prior knowledge of the species was associated with less surprise at factual statements. Therefore, priorities for further education should focus on linking threats with chick ecology, particularly because an understanding that chicks are not stationary within fenced areas is critical to the interpretation and effectiveness of current signage used to mitigate human impacts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ajzen I (1991) The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 50:179–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charlesworth WR (1964) Instigation and maintenance of curiosity behavior as a function of surprise versus novel and familiar stimuli. Child Dev 35:1169–1185

    Google Scholar 

  • Context (2013) The dog walking review – Mornington Peninsula national park. Report to Parks Victoria, Context Brunswick Victoria

  • Decker DJ, Riley SJ, Siemer WF (2012) Human dimensions of wildlife conservation. John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  • Defeo O, McLachlan A, Schoeman DS, Schlacher TA, Dugan J, Jones A, Scapini F (2009) Threats to sandy beach ecosystems: a review. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 81:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dowling B, Weston MA (1999) Managing a breeding population of the Hooded Plover Thinornis rubricollis in a high-use recreational environment. Bird Conserv Intern 9:255–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eagles PFJ, Demare R (1999) Factors influencing children’s environmental attitudes. J Environ Educ 30:33–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kollmuss A, Agyeman J (2002) Mind the gap: why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behaviour? Environ Educ Res 8:239–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kellert SR (1985) Social and perceptual factors in endangered species management. J Wildl Manag 49:528–536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lees D, Sherman CDH, Maguire GS, Dann P, Cardilini APA, Weston MA (2013) Swooping in the suburbs; parental defence of an abundant aggressive urban bird against humans. Animals 3:754–766

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maguire R, Maguire P, Keane M (2011a) Making sense of surprise: an investigation of the factors influencing surprise judgments. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 37:176–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maguire GS, Duivenvoorden AK, Weston MA, Adams R (2011b) Provision of artificial shelter on beaches is associated with improved shorebird fledging success. Bird Conserv Int 21:172–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maguire GS, Cullen M, Mead R (2013a) Managing the Hooded Plover in Victoria: a site by site assessment of threats and prioritisation of management investment on Parks Victoria managed land. Parks Victoria Technical Report, Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  • Maguire GS, Rimmer JM, Weston MA (2013b) Stakeholder perceptions of threatened species and their management on urban beaches. Animals 3:1002–1020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller KK, Ritchie EG, Weston MA (2014) The human dimensions of dog-wildlife interactions. Chapter 12 Pp 286–304. In Gompper ME Free ranging dogs and wildlife conservation. Oxoford University Press, UK.

  • McKenzie-Mohr D, Smith W (1999) Fostering sustainable behaviour: an introduction to community-based social marketing. New Society Publishers, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Musser LM, Diamond KE (1999) The children’s attitudes toward the environment scale for preschool children. J Environ Educ 30:23–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ormsby AA, Forys EA (2010) The effects of an education campaign on beach user perceptions of beach-nesting birds in Pinellas county Florida. Hum Dimens Wildl 15:119–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petty RE, Fleming MA, Priester JR, Harasty Feinstein A (2001) Individual- versus group-interest violation: surprise as a determinant of argument scrutiny and persuasion. Soc Cogn 19:395–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pooley JA, O’Connor M (2000) Environmental education and attitudes: emotions and beliefs are what is needed. Environ Behav 32:711–723

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prochaska J, DiClemente C (1983) Stages and processes of self-change in smoking: toward an integrative model of change. J Consult Clin Psychol 5:390–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reisenzein R (2000) Exploring the strength of association between components of emotion syndromes: the case of surprise. Cogn Emot 14:241–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rimmer JM, Maguire GS, Weston MA (2013) Perceptions of effectiveness and preferences for design and position of signage on Victorian beaches for the management of Hooded Plovers Thinornis rubricollis. Vic Nat 130:75–80

  • Schlacher TA, Weston MA, Lynn D, Connolly RM (2013) Setback distances as a conservation tool in wildlife-human interactions: testing their efficacy for birds affected by vehicles on open-coast sandy beaches. PLoS One 8(9):e71200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solomon BD (1998) Public support for endangered species recovery: an exploratory study of the Kirtland’s Warbler. Hum Dimens Wildl 3:62–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vanhamme J (2000) The link between surprise and satisfaction: an exploratory research on how best to measure surprise. J Mark Manag 16:565–582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weston MA, Ehmke G, Maguire GS (2011) The influence of mobile and static anthropogenic disturbance on plover nest return times. J Wildl Manag 75:252–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weston MA, Elgar MA (2005a) Parental care in Hooded Plovers (Thinornis rubricollis). Emu 105:283–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weston MA, Elgar MA (2005b) Disturbance to brood-rearing Hooded Plover Thinornis rubricollis: responses and consequences. Bird Conserv Int 5:193–209

    Google Scholar 

  • Weston MA, Elgar MA (2007) Responses of incubating Hooded Plovers (Thinornis rubricollis) to disturbance. J Coast Res 23:569–576

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weston MA, Fitzsimons JA, Wescott G, Miller KK, Ekanayake KB, Schneider T (2014) Bark in the park: a review of domestic dogs in parks. Environ Manag 54:373–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weston MA, Dodge F, Bunce A, Nimmo DG, Miller KK (2012) Do temporary beach closures assist in the conservation of breeding shorebirds on recreational beaches? Pac Conserv Biol 18:47–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams KJH, Weston MA, Henry S, Maguire GS (2009) Birds and beaches, dogs and leashes: Dog owners’ sense of obligation to leash dogs on beaches in Victoria, Australia. Hum Dimens Wildl 14:89–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson C, Tisdell C (2005) Knowledge of birds and willingness to support their conservation: an Australian case study. Bird Conserv Int 15:225–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Gordon Institute of TAFE (EnviroTech) and BirdLife Australia (funded by the Australian Government’s Caring for Our Country program) collected data. This work was conducted under Deakin University Human Ethics Exemption 2012–204. We thank all respondents. This work was supported by the Deakin University Centre for Integrative Ecology (CIE) and a School of Life and Environmental Sciences New Initiatives Research Grant.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. A. Weston.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Maguire, G.S., Rimmer, J.M. & Weston, M.A. Stakeholder knowledge of threatened coastal species; the case of beach-goers and the Hooded Plover Thinornis rubricollis . J Coast Conserv 19, 73–77 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11852-014-0361-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11852-014-0361-9

Keywords

Navigation