Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Psychosocial interventions to support partners of men with prostate cancer: a systematic and critical review of the literature

  • Review
  • Published:
Journal of Cancer Survivorship Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Prostate cancer poses many challenges for both the man and his partner. Partners have reported a range of issues that impact their own mental health following their partner’s diagnosis of prostate cancer. The aim of this review is to summarise and critically evaluate the current literature reporting psychosocial intervention studies for partners of prostate cancer patients.

Methods

An extensive literature search of electronic databases was conducted (OvidMEDLINE 1946, 26th September 2013, and psychINFO 1967, 26th September 2013) using the keywords prostate cancer AND intervention* OR therapy* OR psychosocial intervention* OR support* AND couple* or Spouse* or Partner* or Intimate partner* matched to the title as well as secondary scanning of reference lists. Studies were included if they described interventions for partners of prostate cancer patients, either solely for the partners or as a couple, intended to alleviate distress and enhance the partner’s or couple’s quality of life, and reported a measurable outcome for partners.

Results

A total of 11 prostate cancer-specific intervention studies that included partners and reported separate results for the partners were found. Only one of these interventions was partner specific, the other eight involved the patient-partner dyad. The studies identified primarily focussed on two areas: emotional distress and sexual intimacy, and mixed findings were reported for efficacy of interventions.

Conclusions

Despite strong evidence that partners of men with prostate cancer experience difficulties associated with the impact of prostate cancer, there is limited research that has investigated the efficacy of psychosocial interventions for partners. Of the reviewed studies, it is evident that interventions targeting the reduction of emotional distress, improved communication and sexual intimacy between the couple and utilisation of strategies that enable partners to express their distress, learn new strategies and implement behavioural change show the most promising results in enhancing partner well-being.

Implications for Cancer Survivors

Significant progress is required in developing and evaluating appropriate and effective psychosocial support interventions for partners of prostate cancer survivors as partners appear to have significant unmet needs in this area.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. AIHW & AACR. Cancer in Australia 2012: an overview. Canberra: AIHW; 2012.

  2. Lubeck DP, Litwin MS, Henning JM, Stoddard ML, Flanders SC, Carroll PR. Changes in health-related quality of life in the first year after treatment for prostate cancer: results from CaPSURE. Urology. 1999;53:180–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Nguyen LN, Pollack A, Zagars GK. Late effects after radiotherapy for prostate cancer in a randomized dose–response study: results of a self-assessment questionnaire. Urology. 1998;51:991–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Litwin MS, Melmed GY, Nakazon T. Life after radical prostatectomy: a longitudinal study. J Urol. 2001;166:587–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wootten A, Burney S, Frydenberg M, Foroudi F, Ng K, Coleman G. Long-term experience of residual symptoms following treatment for localised prostate cancer: an Australian sample. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2007;3:189–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Couper J, Bloch S, Love A, Macvean M, Duchesne GM, Kissane D. Psychosocial adjustment of female partners of men with prostate cancer: a review of the literature. Psychooncology. 2006;15:937–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bottorff JL, Oliffe JL, Halpin M, Phillips M, McLean G, Mroz L. Women and prostate cancer support groups: the gender connect? Soc Sci Med. 2008;66:1217–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Badr H, Taylor CL. Sexual dysfunction and spousal communication in couples coping with prostate cancer. Psychooncology. 2009;18:735–46.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Carlson L, Bultz B, Speca M, St PM. Partners of prostate cancer patients: Part 1. Impact, adjustment, and coping across the illness trajectory. J Psychosoc Oncol. 2000;18:39–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Boehmer U, Clark JA. Communication about prostate cancer between men and their wives. J Fam Pract. 2001;50:226–31.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Suls J, Green P, Rose G, Lounsbury P, Gordon E. Hiding worries from One’s spouse: associations between coping via protective buffering and distress in male post-myocardial infarction patients and their wives. J Behav Med. 1997;20:333–49.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Pitceathly C, Maguire P. The psychological impact of cancer on patients’ partners and other key relatives: a review. Eur J Cancer. 2003;39:1517–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Resendes LA, McCorkle R. Spousal responses to prostate cancer: an integrative review. Cancer Invest. 2006;24:192–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Sanders S, Pedro LW, Bantum EO, Galbraith ME. Couples surviving prostate cancer: Long-term intimacy needs and concerns following treatment. Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2006;10:503–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Couper JW, Bloch S, Love A, Duchesne G, Macvean M, Kissane DW. The psychosocial impact of prostate cancer on patients and their partners. Med J Aust. 2006;185:428–32.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Manne S, Babb J, Pinover W, Horwitz E, Ebbert J. Psychoeducational group intervention for wives of men with prostate cancer. Psychooncology. 2004;13:37–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Feltwell AK, Rees CE. The information-seeking behaviours of partners of men with prostate cancer: a qualitative pilot study. Patient Educ Couns. 2004;54:179–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Evertsen JM, Wolkenstein AS. Female partners of patients after surgical prostate cancer treatment: interactions with physicians and support needs. BMC Fam Pract. 2010;11:19.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Rozmovits L, Ziebland S. What do patients with prostate or breast cancer want from an Internet site? A qualitative study of information needs. Patient Educ Couns. 2004;53:57–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Roussi P, Miller SM. Monitoring style of coping with cancer related threats: a review of the literature. J Behav Med 2014.

  21. Pruchno RA, Resch NL. Husbands and wives as caregivers: antecedents of depression and burden. Gerontologist. 1989;29:159–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Neese LE, Schover LR, Klein EA, Zippe C, Kupelian PA. Finding help for sexual problems after prostate cancer treatment: a phone survey of men’s and women’s perspectives. Psychooncology. 2003;12:463–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Galbraith ME, Fink R, Wilkins GG. Couples surviving prostate cancer: challenges in their lives and relationships. Semin Oncol Nurs. 2011;27:300–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Filiault SM, Drumond MJN, Smith JA. Gay men and prostate cancer: voicing the concerns of a hidden population. J Mens Health. 2008;5:327–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Collins AL, Love AW, Bloch S, Street AF, Duchesne GM, Dunai J, et al. Cognitive existential couple therapy for newly diagnosed prostate cancer patients and their partners: a descriptive pilot study. Psychooncology. 2013;22:465–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Hampton AJ, Walker LM, Beck A, Robinson JW. A brief couples’ workshop for improving sexual experiences after prostate cancer treatment: a feasibility study. Support Care Cancer. 2013;21:3403–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Walker LM, Hampton AJ, Wassersug RJ, Thomas BC, Robinson JW. Androgen deprivation therapy and maintenance of intimacy: a randomized controlled pilot study of an educational intervention for patients and their partners. Contemp Clin Trials. 2013;34:227–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. McCorkle R, Siefert ML, Dowd MF, Robinson JP, Pickett M. Effects of advanced practice nursing on patient and spouse depressive symptoms, sexual function, and marital interaction after radical prostatectomy. Urol Nurs. 2007;27:65–77. discussion 8–80.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Manne SL, Kissane DW, Nelson CJ, Mulhall JP, Winkel G, Zaider T. Intimacy-enhancing psychological intervention for men diagnosed with prostate cancer and their partners: a pilot study. J Sex Med. 2011;8:1197–209.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Wittmann D, He C, Mitchell S, Wood Jr DP, Hola V, Thelen-Perry S, et al. A one-day couple group intervention to enhance sexual recovery for surgically treated men with prostate cancer and their partners: a pilot study. Urol Nurs. 2013;33:140–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Badger TA, Segrin C, Figueredo AJ, Harrington J, Sheppard K, Passalacqua S, et al. Psychosocial interventions to improve quality of life in prostate cancer survivors and their intimate or family partners. Qual Life Res. 2011;20:833–44.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Northouse LL, Mood DW, Schafenacker A, Montie JE, Sandler HM, Forman JD, et al. Randomized clinical trial of a family intervention for prostate cancer patients and their spouses. Cancer. 2007;110:2809–18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Canada AL, Neese LE, Sui D, Schover LR. Pilot intervention to enhance sexual rehabilitation for couples after treatment for localized prostate carcinoma. Cancer. 2005;104:2689–700.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Campbell LC, Keefe FJ, Scipio C, McKee DC, Edwards CL, Herman SH, et al. Facilitating research participation and improving quality of life for African American prostate cancer survivors and their intimate partners. A pilot study of telephone-based coping skills training. Cancer. 2007;109:414–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Harden J, Falahee M, Bickes J, Schafenacker A, Walker J, Mood D, et al. Factors associated with prostate cancer patients’ and their spouses’ satisfaction with a family-based intervention. Cancer Nurs. 2009;32:482–92.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Perez MA, Skinner EC, Meyerowitz BE. Sexuality and intimacy following radical prostatectomy: patient and partner perspectives. Health Psychol. 2002;21:288–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Donnelly JM, Kornblith AB, Fleishman S, Zuckerman E, Raptis G, Hudis CA, et al. A pilot study of interpersonal psychotherapy by telephone with cancer patients and their partners. Psychooncology. 2000;9:44–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Chambers SK, Ferguson M, Gardiner RA, Nicol D, Gordon L, Occhipinti S, et al. ProsCan for men: randomised controlled trial of a decision support intervention for men with localised prostate cancer. BMC Cancer. 2008;8:207.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Urology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Level 3 Centre, Grattan St, Parkville, VIC, 3050, Australia

    A. C. Wootten

  2. Epworth Prostate Centre; Epworth Healthcare, Richmond, VIC, Australia

    A. C. Wootten & A. Farrell

  3. Australian Prostate Cancer Research, East Melbourne, VIC, Australia

    A. C. Wootten

  4. National eTherapy Centre, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, VIC, Australia

    J. M. Abbott

  5. Centre for Mental Health and Wellbeing Research, School of Psychology, Deakin University, Burwood, VIC, Australia

    D. W. Austin

  6. ‘Robert HT Smith’ Professor and Personal Chair in Psychology and eHealth. DVC-Research & Innovation Portfolio; the School of Health Sciences; and the Collaborative Research Network, Federation University, Ballarat, Australia

    B. Klein

Authors
  1. A. C. Wootten
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. J. M. Abbott
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. A. Farrell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. D. W. Austin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. B. Klein
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. C. Wootten.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wootten, A.C., Abbott, J.M., Farrell, A. et al. Psychosocial interventions to support partners of men with prostate cancer: a systematic and critical review of the literature. J Cancer Surviv 8, 472–484 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-014-0361-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-014-0361-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation