Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Review of Publicly-Funded Bariatric Surgery Policy in Australia—Lessons for More Comprehensive Policy Making

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Obesity Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The objective of the study was to determine the level of guidance provided by or to government health departments across different regions of Australia on publicly funded bariatric surgery.

Methods

Bariatric surgery policies and guidelines were sought from each Australian state (n = 6) and territory (n = 2) government health department and compared in relation to their origins, level of guidance on patient eligibility and priority, as well as recommendations for patient care, including follow-up surgical services. Comparison with national guidelines on bariatric surgery from Australia, the UK and USA was also made.

Results

Five of the eight states and territories had policies or guidelines informing practice. There was little uniformity among regional guidelines and variable consistency with national guidelines (e.g., defining obesity related comorbidity). Recommendations differed on patient eligibility, and none of the state documents mentioned re-operative bariatric or body-contouring surgery. There was limited guidance on prioritisation of eligible patients and gastric banding adjustments. Pre- and post-surgical multidisciplinary care was generally recommended.

Conclusions

Policies and guidelines on publicly funded bariatric surgery are highly variable across Australia and at times inconsistent with national guidelines. Insufficient guidance exists regarding the prioritisation of eligible patients and follow-up surgical services. These findings have implications for policy, research and practice and are particularly important in health service environments with resource constraints and inequitable patient access to services.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. National Health and Medical Research Council. Clinical practice guidelines for the management of overweight and obesity in adults, adolescents and children in Australia. Melbourne. 2013.

  2. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Obesity: identification, assessment and management of overweight and obesity in children, young people and adults. United Kingdom. 2014.

  3. National Heart Lung and Blood Institute. United States Department of Health and Human Services. Clinical guidelines on the identification, evaluation, and treatment of overweight and obesity in adults. Bethesda. 1998.

  4. Buchwald H, Oien DM. Metabolic/bariatric surgery worldwide 2011. Obes Surg. 2013;23(4):427–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Shields M, Carroll D, Ogden CL. Adult Obesity Prevalence in Canada and the United States, NCHS data brief, no 56. Hyattsville National Center for Health Statistics. 2011.

  6. Australian Bureau of Statistics. Microdata: Australian Health Survey 2011-2012. Canberra. 2012.

  7. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Weight loss surgery in Australia. Cat. no. HSE 91. Canberra. 2010.

  8. Edye M, Talbot ML. Inequalities of access to bariatric surgery in Australia. Med J Aust. 2014;201(9):502–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Korda RJ, Joshy G, Jorm LR, et al. Inequalities in bariatric surgery in Australia: findings from 49,364 obese participants in a prospective cohort study. Med J Aust. 2012;197(11):631–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lukas N, Franklin J, Lee CM, et al. The efficacy of bariatric surgery performed in the public sector for obese patients with comorbid conditions. Med J Aust. 2014;201(4):218–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Alfa Wali M, Ashrafian H, Schofield KL, et al. Is social deprivation associated with weight loss outcomes following bariatric surgery? A 10-year single institutional experience. Obes Surg. 2014;24(12):2126–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. International federation for the surgery of obesity and metabolic disorders. First IFSO global registry report. Oxfordshire. 2014.

  13. Owen-Smith A, Kipping R, Donovan J, Hine C, Maslen C, Coast J. A NICE example? Variation in provision of bariatric surgery in England. BMJ. 2013;1(346).

  14. Mukherjee S, Kamat S, Adegbola S, et al. Funding for postbariatric body-contouring (bariplastic) surgery in England: a postcode lottery. Plast Surg Int. 2014;2014:153194.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Government of Tasmania - Department of Health and Human Services. Final report from the bariatric surgery careway advisory group. Hobart. 2010.

  16. Government of Western Australia - Department of Health. WA health bariatric surgery plan—a standardised approach to surgery for obesity. Perth. 2012.

  17. Christou NV, Efthimiou E. Bariatric surgery waiting times in Canada. Can J Surg. 2009;52(3):229–34.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Government of Victoria - Department of Human Services. Surgery for morbid obesity. Framework for bariatric surgery in Victoria's public hospitals. Melbourne. 2009.

  19. Meyer SB, Booth S, Gray J, et al. Quantitative analysis of bariatric procedure trends 2001-2013 in South Australia: implications for equity in access and public health expenditure. Aust Health Rev. 2015;39:63–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Organisation for Economic and Cooperative Development. Obesity update. Paris. 2014.

  21. Greater Metropolitan Clinical Taskforce. Obesity management plan. Sydney. 2009.

  22. Government of Western Australia - Department of Health - Health Networks Branch. WA morbid obesity model of care. Perth. 2008.

  23. Government of South Australia. South Australia Health Elective Surgery Policy Framework and Associated Procedural Guidelines—appendix 2 guideline on selection for bariatric surgery. Adelaide. 2011.

  24. National Health Service England. Report of the working group into: Joined up clinical pathways for obesity. 2014.

  25. Medicare. Medicare item numbers 31569, 31572, 31575, 31578, 31581, 31587 from July 2013 to July 2014. Canberr.a 2014.

  26. Black JA, White B, Viner RM, et al. Bariatric surgery for obese children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Rev. 2013;14(8):634–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Borisenko O, Colpan Z, Dillemans B, Funch-Jensen P, Hedenbro J, Ahmed AR. Clinical Indications, Utilization, and Funding of Bariatric Surgery in Europe. Obes Surg. 2014.

  28. Curtis AJ, Russell CO, Stoelwinder JU, et al. Waiting lists and elective surgery: ordering the queue. Med J Aust. 2010;192(4):217–20.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. National Confidential Enquiry into Patient Outcome and Death. Too Lean a Service? A review of the care of pateints who underwent bariatric surgery. London. 2012.

  30. Sheppard CE, Lester EL, Chuck AW, et al. The Economic Impact of Weight Regain. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2013;2013:379564.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. National Health Service Commissioning Board. Clinical commissioning policy: Complex and specialised obesity surgery. Redditch. 2013.

  32. Brethauer SA, Kothari S, Sudan R, et al. Systematic review on reoperative bariatric surgery: American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Revision Task Force. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2014;10(5):952–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Medicare. Medicare item number 30511 from July 2003 to June 2013. Canberra 2014.

  34. National Bariatric Surgery Registry. First registry report. United Kingdom. (2010).

  35. Fried M, Yumuk V, Oppert JM, et al. Interdisciplinary European Guidelines on metabolic and bariatric surgery. Obes Facts. 2013;6(5):449–68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the assistance of the policy officers from the health departments of Australian state and territory governments.

Funding

This work was supported by a National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Partnership Project Grant (APP1076899). AV is supported by a NHMRC Research Fellowship.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alison J. Venn.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sharman, M.J., Hensher, M., Wilkinson, S. et al. Review of Publicly-Funded Bariatric Surgery Policy in Australia—Lessons for More Comprehensive Policy Making. OBES SURG 26, 817–824 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-015-1806-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-015-1806-4

Keywords

Navigation