Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Inter-sectoral action to support healthy and environmentally sustainable food behaviours: a study of sectoral knowledge, governance and implementation opportunities

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Sustainability Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There is increasing attention to the importance of healthy and environmentally sustainable food supply and demand but little empirical research exists on how this might be achieved. This study examines the potential for inter-sectoral policy and action to support consumer adoption of healthy and sustainable food behaviours, focusing on three key themes: (1) sectoral understandings of healthy and sustainable food behaviours; (2) modes of governance for inter-sectoral action on healthy and sustainable behaviours; and (3) barriers and enablers to inter-sectoral action. We undertook 29 semi-structured interviews with representatives of key government, food industry and non-government organisations in food-related health and environment sectors in Australia. We found that while definitions of health and sustainability are still diverse and often siloed, the rationale of a combined concept was generally acknowledged. There was also consensus on the need for any action to be inter-sectoral, but diverse views on what such action should entail. The main barriers to inter-sectoral action identified included relationships between food system actors and a lack of organisational attention to the issue. Enablers included political and institutional leadership to drive action as well as sector-specific enablers such as market incentives. Overall a range of governance modes were identified that would potentially create a suite of actions across sectors, as well as opportunities to facilitate their implementation. Drawn together our findings outline a framework for action to move beyond the prevailing focus on individual-level change and develop inter-sectoral action and collaboration to support adoption of healthy and sustainable food behaviours.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. As certain identified actions did not fit strictly into the concept of ‘diet’, we have chosen to utilise the broader term ‘food behaviours’ in our research.

References

  • Armstrong D, Gosling A, Weinman J, Marteau T (1997) The place of inter-rater reliability in qualitative research: an empirical study. Sociology 31:597–606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Auestad N, Fulgoni VL (2015) What current literature tells us about sustainable diets: emerging research linking dietary patterns, environmental sustainability, and economics. Adv Nutr 6:19–36

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ayres I, Braithwaite J (1992) Responsive regulation: transcending the deregulation debate. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey R, Harper DR (2015) Reviewing interventions for healthy and sustainable diets. University of Oxford, Oxford: Chatham House: The Royal Institute of International Affairs

  • Barosh L, Friel S, Engelhardt K, Chan L (2014) The cost of a healthy and sustainable diet—who can afford it? Aust N Z J Public Health 38:7–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basit TN (2003) Manual or electronic? The role of coding in qualitative data analysis. Edu Res 45:143–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braithwaite V, Murphy K, Reinhart M (2007) Taxation threat, motivational postures, and responsive regulation. Law Policy 29:137–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brownell KD, Warner KE (2009) The perils of ignoring history: big tobacco played dirty and millions died. How similar is big food? Milbank Q 87:259–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burlingame B, Dernini S (2011) Sustainable diets: the Mediterranean diet as an example. Public Health Nutr 14:2285–2287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buttriss JL (2011) Feeding the planet: an unprecedented confluence of pressures anticipated. Nutr Bull 36:235–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buttriss J, Riley H (2013) Sustainable diets: harnessing the nutrition agenda. Food Chem 140:402–407

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carter OB, Mills BW, Lloyd E, Phan T (2013) An independent audit of the Australian food industry’s voluntary front-of-pack nutrition labelling scheme for energy-dense nutrition-poor foods. Euro J Clin Nutr 67:31–35

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Crammond B, Van C, Allender S, Peeters A, Lawrence M, Sacks G, Mavoa H, Swinburn BA, Loff B (2013) The possibility of regulating for obesity prevention—understanding regulation in the Commonwealth Government. Obes Rev 14:213–221

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • DEFRA (2013) Sustainable consumption report. Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Health and Aging (2015) Front-of-pack labelling updates. http://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/foodsecretariat-front-of-pack-labelling-1-tor. Accessed 13 Jan 2016

  • Drahos P, Shearing CD, Burris S (2005) Nodal governance as an approach to regulation. Aust J Legal Philos 30:30–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Elkington J (1994) Towards the sustainable corporation: win-win-win strategies for sustainable development. Calif Manag Rev 36:90–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friel S, Dangour AD, Garnett T, Lock K, Chalabi Z, Roberts I, Butler A, Butler CD, Waage J, McMichael AJ, Haines A (2009) Public health benefits of strategies to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions: food and agriculture. Lancet 374:2016–2025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friel S, Barosh LJ, Lawrence M (2014) Towards healthy and sustainable food consumption: an Australian case study. Public Health Nutr 17(5):1156–1166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith-Emami S, Lobstein T (2013) The impact of initiatives to limit the advertising of food and beverage products to children: a systematic review. Obes Rev 14:960–974

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia Martinez M, Fearne A, Caswell JA, Henson S (2007) Co-regulation as a possible model for food safety governance: opportunities for public–private partnerships. Food Policy 32:299–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garnett T, Mathewson S, Angelides P, Borthwick F (2015) Policies and actions to shift eating patterns: what works? University of Oxford: Food Climate Research Network, Chatham House: The Royal Institute of International Affairs, 77

  • Gile KJ, Handcock MS (2010) Respondent-driven sampling: an assessment of current methodology. Sociol Methodol 40:285–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunningham N, Sinclair D (1998) Designing smart regulation. In: Gunningham N, Grabowsky P (eds) Smart regulation: designing environmental policy. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkes C (2009) Identifying innovative interventions to promote healthy eating using consumption-oriented food supply chain analysis. J Hunger Environ Nutri 4:336–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawkes C, Jewell J, Allen K (2013) A food policy package for healthy diets and the prevention of obesity and diet-related non-communicable diseases: the NOURISHING framework. Obes Rev 14:159–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins I, Sabaté J (2013) Defining “sustainable” and “healthy” diets in an era of great environmental concern and increased prevalence of chronic diseases. Am J Clin Nutr 97:1151–1152

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • He FJ, Brinsden HC, Macgregor GA (2014) Salt reduction in the United Kingdom: a successful experiment in public health. J Hum Hypertens 28:345–352

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hoek AC, Pearson D, James SW, Lawrence MA, Friel S (2017a) Healthy and environmentally sustainable food choices: consumer responses to point-of-purchase actions. Food Qual Pref 58:94–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoek AC, Pearson D, James SW, Lawrence MA, Friel S (2017b) Shrinking the food-print: a qualitative study into consumer perceptions, experiences and attitudes towards healthy and environmentally friendly food behaviours. Appetite 108:117–131

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • James S, Friel S (2015) An integrated approach to identifying and characterising resilient urban food systems to promote population health in a changing climate. Public Health Nutr 18:2498–2508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkin G, Signal L, Thomson G (2012) Nutrition policy in whose interests? A New Zealand case study. Public Health Nutr 15:1483–1488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones A, Magnusson R, Swinburn B, Webster J, Wood A, Sacks G, Neal B (2016a) Designing a healthy food partnership: lessons from the Australian Food and Health Dialogue. BMC Public Health 16:651

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones AD, Hoey L, Blesh J, Miller L, Green A, Shapiro LF (2016b) A systematic review of the measurement of sustainable diets. Adv Nutr 7:641–664

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lang T (2016) Sustainable Dietary Guidelines: a test case for ecological public health Pamela Mason. Euro J Pub Health 26:ckw173.025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence MA, Friel S, Wingrove K, James SW, Candy S (2015) Formulating policy activities to promote healthy and sustainable diets. Public Health Nutr 18:2333–2340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacRae R (2011) A joined-up food policy for Canada. J Hunger Environ Nutr 6:424–457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMichael A, Powles J, Butler C, Uauy R (2007) Food, livestock production, energy, climate change and health. Lancet 370:55–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Mebratu D (1998) Sustainability and sustainable development: historical and conceptual review. EIA Rev 18:498–520

    Google Scholar 

  • Mertens E, van’t Veer P, Hiddink GJ, Steijns JMJM, Kuijsten A (2016) Operationalising the health aspects of sustainable diets: a review. Public Health Nutr 20:739–757

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meybeck A, Gitz V (2017) Sustainable diets within sustainable food systems. Proc Nutr Soc 76:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millen BE, Abrams S, Adams-Campbell L, Anderson CAM, Brenna JT, Campbell WW, Clinton S, Hu F, Nelson M, Neuhouser ML, Perez-Escamilla R, Siega-Riz AM, Story M, Lichtenstein AH (2016) The 2015 dietary guidelines advisory committee scientific report: development and major conclusions. Adv Nutr 7:438–444

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mithril C, Dragsted LO, Meyer C, Blauert E, Holt MK, Astrup A (2012) Guidelines for the new nordic diet. Public Health Nutr 15:1941–1947

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nylen NG (2013) Why federal dietary guidelines should acknowledge the food-choice/environment nexus: examining the recommendation to eat more seafood. Ecology Law Quart 40:759–794

    Google Scholar 

  • Reisch L, Eberle U, Lorek S (2013) Sustainable food consumption: an overview of contemporary issues and policies. Sustain Sci Pract Policy 9:7–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards C, Lawrence G, Loong M, Burch D (2012) A toothless chihuahua? The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission, neoliberalism and supermarket power in Australia. Rural Soc 21:250–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seed B (2014) Sustainability in the Qatar national dietary guidelines, among the first to incorporate sustainability principles. Public Health Nutr 18:2303–2310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seed B, Lang T, Caraher M, Ostry A (2013) Integrating food security into public health and provincial government departments in British Columbia, Canada. Agric Human Values 30:457–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma LL, Teret SP, Brownell KD (2010) The food industry and self-regulation: standards to promote success and to avoid public health failures. Am J Public Health 100:240–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shill J, Mavoa H, Allender S, Lawrence M, Sacks G, Peeters A, Crammond B, Swinburn B (2012) Government regulation to promote healthy food environments—a view from inside state governments. Obes Rev 13:162–173

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Trevena H, Kaldor JC, Downs SM (2014) ‘Sustainability does not quite get the attention it deserves’: synergies and tensions in the sustainability frames of Australian food policy actors. Public Health Nutr 18:2323–2332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Dooren C, Marinussen M, Blonk H, Aiking H, Vellinga P (2014) Exploring dietary guidelines based on ecological and nutritional values: a comparison of six dietary patterns. Food Policy 44:36–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wegener J, Raine KD, Hanning RM (2012) Insights into the government’s role in food system policy making: improving access to healthy, local food alongside other priorities. Int J Environ Res Public Health 9:4103–4121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weible CM, Sabatier PA, McQueen K (2009) Themes and variations: taking stock of the advocacy coalition framework. Policy Stud J 37:121–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wellesley L, Happer C, Froggatt A (2015) Changing climate, changing diets: Pathways to lower meat consumption. Chatham House, London

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Regulation and Global Governance (REGNET), Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia

    Sarah W. James & Sharon Friel

  2. Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, Deakin University, Melbourne, Australia

    Mark A. Lawrence

  3. Annet Hoek Research and Consultancy, Faculty of Arts and Design, University of Canberra, Canberra, Australia

    Annet C. Hoek

  4. School of Buisness and Law, CQUniversity, Sydney, Australia

    David Pearson

Authors
  1. Sarah W. James
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sharon Friel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mark A. Lawrence
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Annet C. Hoek
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. David Pearson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sharon Friel.

Additional information

Handled by Ro Hill, Land and Water Flagship, CSIRO, Australia.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

James, S.W., Friel, S., Lawrence, M.A. et al. Inter-sectoral action to support healthy and environmentally sustainable food behaviours: a study of sectoral knowledge, governance and implementation opportunities. Sustain Sci 13, 465–477 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-017-0459-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-017-0459-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation