Abstract
The growing tension between conservative attitudes and liberal policies on gender issues in Chile is reflected by the high rates of domestic violence juxtaposed by a strong governmental policy aimed at preventing this social problem. Attempts to understand factors associated with domestic violence in Chile, and in other countries as well, have not paid much attention to neighborhood-level factors. This manuscript examined the extent to which selected neighborhood characteristics were associated with domestic violence against women. Relying on theories of social disorganization and social stress, this study conceptualized residence in a disadvantaged neighborhood as a source of stress and examined the relationship between detrimental physical and social characteristics of neighborhoods and the chance of women experiencing domestic violence. Results revealed that a higher level of trash in neighborhoods was associated with increased rates of domestic violence above and beyond individual characteristics. Findings also suggested that the relationship between high levels of trash in neighborhoods and domestic violence was greater for women with higher levels of financial stress. Given the potential role of neighborhood environments in reducing domestic violence, a comprehensive approach incorporating both neighborhood- and individual-level factors may be critical in designing effective preventive interventions for domestic violence.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Delva J, Horner, P., & Sanchez, N. Adolescent pregnancy in Chile: a social, cultural, political analysis. In: Dillon ACaM, ed. International handbook of adolescent pregnancy: medical, psychosocial, and public health responses. NYC: Springer Publishing Company; in press.
Franceschet S. Explaining domestic violence policy outcomes in Chile and Argentina. Lat Am Polit Soc. 2010; 52(3): 1–29.
Ceballo R, Ramirez C, Castillo M, Caballero GA, Lozoff B. Domestic violence and women's mental health in Chile. Psychol Women Q. 2004; 28(4): 298–308.
Urzúa R, Ferrer M, Gutiérrez C. Detección y análisis. Prevalencia de la violencia intrafamiliar. Documento de trabajo. 2002.
Larraín S. Violencia puertas adentro: la mujer golpeada: Editorial Universitaria; 1994.
Ellsberg M, Jansen HAFM, Heise L, Watts CH, Garcia-Moreno C. Intimate partner violence and women's physical and mental health in the WHO multi-country study on women's health and domestic violence: an observational study. Lancet. 2008; 371(9619): 1165–1172.
Fantuzzo JW, Mohr WK. Prevalence and effects of child exposure to domestic violence. Future Child. 1999: 21–32.
Foster H, Brooks-Gunn J. Toward a stress process model of children’s exposure to physical family and community violence. Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2009; 12(2): 71–94.
Anderson KL. Theorizing gender in intimate partner violence research. Sex Roles. 2005; 52(11): 853–865.
Diez Roux AV, Mair C. Neighborhoods and health. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2010; 1186(1): 125–145.
Yonas M, Akers AY, Burke JG et al. Perceptions of prominent neighborhood individuals regarding neighborhood factors and intimate partner violence. J Urban Health. 2011; 88:214–224.
Sampson RJ, Morenoff JD, Gannon-Rowley T. Assessing" neighborhood effects": social processes and new directions in research. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 2002; 28:443–478.
Small ML, Newman K. Urban poverty after the truly disadvantaged: the rediscovery of the family, the neighborhood, and culture. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 2001; 27:23–45.
Larrañaga O, Sanhueza C. Residential segregation effects on poor’s opportunities in Chile. Santiago de Chile: Departamento de Economía, Universidad de Chile; 2007.
Ureta S. Noise and the battles for space: mediated noise and everyday life in a social housing estate in Santiago, Chile. J Urban Technol. 2007; 14(3): 103–130.
Cunradi CB. Drinking level, neighborhood social disorder, and mutual intimate partner violence. Alcohol: Clin Exp Res. 2007; 31(6): 1012–1019.
Benson ML, Fox GL, DeMaris A, Van Wyk J. Neighborhood disadvantage, individual economic distress and violence against women in intimate relationships. J Quant Criminol. 2003; 19(3): 207–235.
Browning CR. The span of collective efficacy: extending social disorganization theory to partner violence. J Marriage Fam. 2002; 64(4): 833–850.
Miles-Doan R. Violence between spouses and intimates: does neighborhood context matter? Soc Forces. 1998; 77: 623–645.
O'Campo P, Gielen AC, Faden RR, et al. Violence by male partners against women during the childbearing year: a contextual analysis. Am J Public Health. 1995; 85(8): 1092–1097.
Schaefer-McDaniel N, O'Brien Caughy M, O'Campo P, Gearey W. Examining methodological details of neighbourhood observations and the relationship to health: a literature review. Soc Sci Med. 2010; 70(2): 277–292.
Shaw CR, McKay HD. Juvenile delinquency and urban areas. 1942; Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Aneshensel CS. Social stress: theory and research. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 1992; 18: 15–38.
Pearlin LI. The sociological study of stress. J Health Soc Behav. 1989; 30: 241–256.
Latkin CA, Curry AD. Stressful neighborhoods and depression: a prospective study of the impact of neighborhood disorder. J Health Soc Behav. 2003; 44: 34–44.
Steptoe A, Feldman PJ. Neighborhood problems as sources of chronic stress: development of a measure of neighborhood problems, and associations with socioeconomic status and health. Ann Behav Med. 2001; 23(3): 177–185.
Laraia BA, Messer L, Kaufman JS, et al. Direct observation of neighborhood attributes in an urban area of the US south: characterizing the social context of pregnancy. Int J Health Geogr. 2006; 5(1): 11.
Perkins DD, Meeks JW, Taylor RB. The physical environment of street blocks and resident perceptions of crime and disorder: implications for theory and measurement1. J Environ Psychol. 1992; 12(1): 21–34.
Umberson D, Williams K, Anderson K. Violent behavior: a measure of emotional upset? J Health Soc Behav. 2002; 43: 189–206.
Farrington K. The application of stress theory to the study of family violence: principles, problems, and prospects. J Fam Violence. 1986; 1(2): 131–147.
Thoits PA. Stress, coping, and social support processes: where are we? What next? J Health Soc Behav. 1995: 53–79.
Sampson RJ, Raudenbush SW, Earls F. Neighborhoods and violent crime: a multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science. 1997; 277(5328): 918.
Groenewegen P, van den Berg A, De Vries S, Verheij R. Vitamin G: effects of green space on health, well-being, and social safety. BMC Publ Health. 2006; 6(1): 149.
Leonard TCM, Caughy MO, Mays JK, Murdoch JC. Systematic neighborhood observations at high spatial resolution: methodology and assessment of potential benefits. PLoS ONE. 2011; 6(6): e20225. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0020225.
Caughy MO, O'Campo PJ, Patterson J. A brief observational measure for urban neighborhoods. Health Place. 2001; 7(3): 225–236.
Lozoff B, De Andraca I, Castillo M, et al. Behavioral and developmental effects of preventing iron-deficiency anemia in healthy full-term infants. Pediatrics. 2003; 112(4): 846.
Lown EA, Vega WA. Prevalence and predictors of physical partner abuse among Mexican American women. Am J Public Health. 2001; 91(3): 441.
Straus MA. Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence: the conflict tactics (CT) scales. J Marriage Fam. 1979; 51: 75–88.
Agresti A. Analysis of categorical data: New York: Wiley; 1990.
Royston P. Multiple imputation of missing values. Stata J. 2004; 4: 227–241.
Schafer JL. Multiple imputation: a primer. Stat Meth Med Res. 1999; 8(1): 3–15.
Viera AJ. Odds ratios and risk ratios: what's the difference and why does it matter? South Med J. 2008; 101(7): 730.
Kessler RC, McLeod JD. Social support and mental health in community samples. In: Cohen S, Syme SL, editors. Social support and health. New York: Academic Press; 1985.
Leonard KE. Alcohol and intimate partner violence: when can we say that heavy drinking is a contributing cause of violence? Addiction. 2005; 100(4): 422–425.
Jewkes R, Levin J, Penn-Kekana L. Risk factors for domestic violence: findings from a South African cross-sectional study. Soc Sci Med. 2002; 55(9): 1603–1617.
Acknowledgements
We are extremely grateful to the families in Chile for their participation in this study. This study received support from the U.S. National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01 DA021181) and the Vivian A. and James L. Curtis School of Social Work Research and Training Center.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kim, H., Grogan-Kaylor, A., Han, Y. et al. The Association of Neighborhood Characteristics and Domestic Violence in Santiago, Chile. J Urban Health 90, 41–55 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-012-9706-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-012-9706-6