Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A Cross-Cultural Evaluation of the Personal Wellbeing Index – School Children in Samples of Australian and Portuguese Adolescents

  • Published:
Applied Research in Quality of Life Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The practice of comparing nations on subjective wellbeing (SWB) is becoming commonplace, with many countries ranked by economists and social scientists alike according to average levels of SWB based on survey responses. Such large, multi-national population surveys have the potential to generate insights into the causes and correlates of SWB within different cultural groups, as well as inform policy regarding how to improve the wellbeing of citizens. At the heart of these large-scale research endeavors are SWB measures that function equivalently between the various participating cultural groups. For this reason, it is concerning that their remains a paucity of research that supports measurement equivalence for many SWB instruments commonly employed. Thus, it remains unclear whether variations in SWB across cultures reflect true differences, or whether these differences reflect measurement biases (e.g., response bias inherent within a particular cultural group). The aim of this study was to examine the psychometric equivalence of the Personal Wellbeing Index–School Children (PWI-SC) in convenience samples of Australian and Portuguese adolescents using multiple-group confirmatory factor analysis. Participants comprising the Australian sample were 1104 Victorian high-school students aged between 12 and 19 years (M = 14.42, SD = 1.63). Participants comprising the Portuguese sample were 573 high-school students living in Portugal aged between 12 and 18 years (M = 14.32, SD = 1.72). The results demonstrated strict factorial invariance between both versions of the PWI-SC, suggesting that this scale measures the same underlying construct in both samples. Moreover, these findings provide preliminary support for quantitative comparisons between Australian and Portuguese adolescents on the SWB variable as valid.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akosile, W. (2015). Tobacco plain packaging and smoking rates in Australia. Australian Psychiatry, 23(1), 84–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arbuckle, J. L. (2006). Amos (version 7.0) [computer program]. Chicago: SPSS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Best, C. J., Cummins, R. A., & Lo, S. K. (2000). The quality of rural and metropolitan life. Australian Journal of Psychology, 52(2), 69–74.

  • Blore, J. D., Stokes, M. A., Mellor, D., Firth, L., & Cummins, R. A. (2011). Comparing multiple discrepancies theory to affective models of subjective wellbeing. Social Indicators Research, 100, 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brickman, P., & Campbell, D. T. (1971). Hedonic relativism and planning the good society. In M. H. Appley (Ed.), Adaptation level theory: A symposium (pp. 287–302). New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, B. M. (2010). Structural equation modeling in AMOS: basic concepts, applications, and programming (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.

  • Byrne, B. M. (2013). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casas, F., Sarriera, J. C., Abs, D., Coenders, G., Alfaro, J., Saforcada, E., & Tonon, G. (2011). Subjective indicators of personal well-being among adolescents. Performance and results for different scales in Latin-language speaking countries: a contribution to the international debate. Child Indicators Research, 5(1), 1–28. doi:10.1007/s12187-011-9119-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casas, F., Tiliouine, H., & Figuer, C. (2013). The subjective well-being of adolescents from two different cultures: applying three versions of the PWI in Algeria and Spain. Social Indicators Research, 115(2), 637–651. doi:10.1007/s11205-012-0229-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C., Lee, S. Y., & Stevenson, H. W. (1995). Response style and cross-cultural comparisons of rating scales among East Asian and North American students. Psychological Science, 6, 170–175. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.88.4.750.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 233–255. doi:10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Children’s Society. (2014). Children’s worlds: the international survey of children’s wellbeing. Retrieved from, http://www.childrenssociety.org.uk/what-we-do/research/well-being/international-survey-childrens-well-being. Accessed 11 Nov 2014.

  • Ciochină, L., & Faria, L. (2009). Individualism and collectivism: what differences between Portuguese and Romanian adolescents? The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 12(2), 555–564. doi:10.1017/S113874160000192X.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, R. A. (2010). Subjective wellbeing, homeostatically protected mood and depression: a synthesis. Journal of Happiness Studies, 11(1), 1–17. doi:10.1007/s10902-009-9167-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, R., & Lau, A. (2005). Personal wellbeing index–school children. Victoria: Deakin University. Retrieved from http://www.deakin.edu.au/research/acqol/instruments/wellbeing-index/pwi-sc-english.pdf. Accessed 3 Dec 2014.

  • Cummins, R. A., Lau, A. A., Mellor, D., & Stokes, M. A. (2009). Encouraging governments to enhance the happiness of their nation: step 1: understand subjective wellbeing. Social Indicators Research, 91(1), 23–36. doi:10.1007/s11205-008-9324-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, R. A., Woerner, J., Weinberg, M., Collard, J., Hartley-Clark, L., Horfiniak, K. (2013). Australian unity wellbeing index survey 30.0 part A: the report. The wellbeing of Australians: social media, personal achievement, and work. Retrieved November 17, 2014 from https://www.deakin.edu.au/research/acqol/auwbi/survey-reports/survey-030-report-part-a.pdf.

  • Cummins, R. A., Li, N., Wooden, M., & Stokes, M. (2014). A demonstration of set-points for subjective wellbeing. Journal of Happiness Studies, 15, 183–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curran, P. J., West, S. G., & Finch, J. F. (1996). The robustness of test statistics to nonnormality and specification error in confirmatory factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 1(1), 16. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.1.1.16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davern, M. T., Cummins, R. A., & Stokes, M. A. (2007). Subjective wellbeing as an affective-cognitive construct. Journal of Happiness Studies, 8(4), 429–449. doi:10.1007/s10902-007-9066-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dias, P. C., & Bastos, A. S. (2014). Application of the personal wellbeing index with Portuguese adolescents. In A. Michalos (Ed.), Encyclopedia of quality of life and well-being research (pp. 56–59). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Smith, H., & Shao, L. (1995). National differences in reported subjective well-being: why do they occur? Social Indicators Research, 34(1), 7–32. doi:10.1007/BF01078966.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiStefano, C., & Hess, B. (2005). Using confirmatory factor analysis for construct validation: an empirical review. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 23, 225–241. doi:10.1177/073428290502300303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dolan, K., MacDonald, M., Silins, E., & Topp, L. (2005). Needle and syringe programs: A review of the evidence. Canberra: Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eid, M., & Diener, E. (2004). Global judgements of subjective wellbeing: situational variability and long-term stability. Social Indicators Research, 65(3), 245–277. doi:10.1023/B:SOCI.0000003801.89195.bc.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elixhauser, A. (1990). The costs of smoking and the cost effectiveness of smoking-cessation programs. Journal of Public Health Policy, 11(2), 218–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elvas, S., & Moniz, M. J. (2010). Sentimento de comunidade, qualidade e satisfação de vida [Sense of community, quality and satisfaction with life). Análise Psicológica, 28(3), 451–464.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, L. (1985). Traffic safety and the driver. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaspar, T., Matos, M. G., Ribeiro, J. L., & Leal, I. (2006). Qualidade de vida e bem-estar em crianças e adolescentes [Quality of life and well-being among children and adolescents]. Revista Brasileira de Terapias Cognitivas, 2(2), 47–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregorich, S. E. (2006). Do self-report instruments allow meaningful comparisons across diverse population groups? Testing measurement invariance using the confirmatory factor analysis framework. Medical Care, 44(11), 78–94. doi:10.1097/01.mlr.0000245454.12228.8f.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Headey, B., & Wearing, A. (1989). Personality, life events, and subjective well-being: toward a dynamic equilibrium model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(4), 731. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.57.4.731.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howell, D. C. (2010). Statistical methods for psychology (7th ed.). Belmont: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huebner, E. S., Valois, R. F., Suldo, S. M., Smith, L. C., McKnight, C. G., Seligson, J. L., & Zullig, K. J. (2004). Perceived quality of life: a neglected component of adolescent health assessment and intervention. The Journal of Adolescent Health, 34(4), 270–278. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2003.07.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Wellbeing Group. (2013). Personal wellbeing index—adult. (5th ed). Melbourne: Australian Centre on Quality of Life, Deakin University. Retrieved March 20, 2014, at http://www.deakin.edu.au/research/acqol/iwbg/wellbeing-index/pwi-a-english.pdf.

  • Lau, A. L. D., Cummins, R. A., & Mcpherson, W. (2005). An investigation into the cross-cultural equivalence of the personal wellbeing index. Social Indicators Research, 72(3), 403–430. doi:10.1007/s11205-004-0561-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J. W., Jones, P. S., Mineyama, Y., & Zhang, X. E. (2002). Cultural differences in responses to a Likert scale. Research in Nursing & Health, 25(4), 295–306. doi:10.1002/nur.10041.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meredith, W. (1993). Measurement invariance, factor analysis and factorial invariance. Psychometrika, 58(4), 525–543. doi:10.1007/BF02294825.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michalos, A. C. (1985). Multiple discrepancies theory (MDT). Social Indicators Research, 16(4), 347–413. doi:10.1007/BF00333288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2014). How does PORTUGAL compare? Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/portugal/EMO-PRT-EN.pdf. Accessed 22 February 2015

  • Oishi, S. (2006). The concept of life satisfaction across cultures: an IRT analysis. Journal of Research in Personality, 40(4), 411–423. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2005.02.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, N. (2004). The role of subjective well-being in positive youth development. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 591(1), 25–39. doi:10.1177/0002716203260078.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, J. A. (2003). Core affect and the psychological construction of emotion. Psychological Review, 110(1), 145–172. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.110.1.145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stening, B. W., & Everett, I. E. (1984). Response styles in a cross-cultural managerial study. Journal of Social Psychology, 122(5), 151–156. doi:10.1080/00224545.1984.9713475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). MA: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomyn, A. J., & Cummins, R. A. (2011). The subjective wellbeing of high-school students: validating the personal wellbeing index—school children. Social Indicators Research, 101(3), 405–418. doi:10.1007/s11205-010-9668-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomyn, A. J., Fuller-Tyszkiewicz, M. D., & Norrish, J. M. (2013). The psychometric equivalence of the personal wellbeing index school-children for indigenous and non-indigenous Australian adolescents. Journal of Happiness Studies, 15(1), 43–56. doi:10.1007/s10902-013-9415-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNICEF. (2013). Child well-being in rich countries: a comparative overview. Retrieved February 21, 2015 from http://www.unicef-irc.org/publications/pdf/rc11_eng.pdf.

  • Van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Poortinga, Y. H. (1997). Towards an integrated analysis of bias in cross-cultural assessment. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 13(1), 29–37. doi:10.1027/1015-5759.13.1.29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4–70. doi:10.1177/109442810031002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Widaman, K. F., & Reise, S. P. (1997). Exploring the measurement invariance of psychological instruments: Applications in the substance use domain. The science of prevention: Methodological advances from alcohol and substance abuse research, 281–324. Retrieved November 14, 2015 from http://people.cehd.tamu.edu/~okwok/epsy651R/Articles/WidamanReise1997.pdf.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Psychology, Counseling and Psychotherapy, Cairnmillar Institute, Melbourne, Australia

    Adrian J. Tomyn

  2. Department of Psychology and Counselling, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia

    Elli Tamir

  3. School of Psychology, Deakin University, Burwood, Australia

    Mark A. Stokes

  4. Faculty of Philosophy, Catholic University of Portugal, Lisbon, Portugal

    Paulo C. Dias

Authors
  1. Adrian J. Tomyn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Elli Tamir
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mark A. Stokes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Paulo C. Dias
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adrian J. Tomyn.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tomyn, A.J., Tamir, E., Stokes, M.A. et al. A Cross-Cultural Evaluation of the Personal Wellbeing Index – School Children in Samples of Australian and Portuguese Adolescents. Applied Research Quality Life 11, 837–851 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-015-9400-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-015-9400-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation