Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

A life cycle assessment framework combining nutritional and environmental health impacts of diet: a case study on milk

  • LCA OF NUTRITION AND FOOD CONSUMPTION
  • Published:
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

While there has been considerable effort to understand the environmental impact of a food or diet, nutritional effects are not usually included in food-related life cycle assessment (LCA).

Methods

We developed a novel Combined Nutritional and Environmental Life Cycle Assessment (CONE-LCA) framework that evaluates and compares in parallel the environmental and nutritional effects of foods or diets. We applied this framework to assess human health impacts, expressed in Disability Adjusted Life Years (DALYs), in a proof-of-concept case study that investigated the environmental and nutritional human health effects associated with the addition of one serving of fluid milk to the present average adult US diet. Epidemiology-based nutritional impacts and benefits linked to milk intake, such as colorectal cancer, stroke, and prostate cancer, were compared to selected environmental impacts traditionally considered in LCA (global warming and particulate matter) carried to a human health endpoint.

Results and discussion

Considering potential human health effects related to global warming, particulate matter, and nutrition, within the context of this study, findings suggest that adding one serving of milk to the current average diet could result in a health benefit for American adults, assuming that existing foods associated with substantial health benefits are not substituted, such as fruits and vegetables. The net health benefit is further increased when considering an iso-caloric substitution of less healthy foods (sugar-sweetened beverages). Further studies are needed to test whether this conclusion holds within a more comprehensive assessment of environmental and nutritional health impacts.

Conclusions

This case study provides the first quantitative epidemiology-based estimate of the complements and trade-offs between nutrition and environment human health burden expressed in DALYs, pioneering the infancy of a new approach in LCA. We recommend further testing of this CONE-LCA approach for other food items and diets, especially when making recommendations about sustainable diets and food choices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abargouei A, Janghorbani M, Salehi-Marzijarani M, Esmaillzadeh A (2012) Effect of dairy consumption on weight and body composition in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials. Int J Obes 36:1485.1493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asselin-Balencon AC, Popp J, Henderson A, Heller M, Thoma G, Jolliet O (2013) Dairy farm greenhouse gas impacts: a pasimonious model for a farmer’s decision support tool. Int Dairy J 31(Supplement 1):S65–S77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aune D, Lau R, Chan D, Vieira R, Greenwood D, Kampman E, Norat T (2012) Dairy products and colorectal cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. Ann Oncol 23(1):37–45

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Aune D, Navarro Rosenblatt DA, Chan DS, Vieira A, Vieira R, Greenwood DC, Norat T (2015) Dairy products, calcium, and prostate cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. Am J Clin Nutr ajcn-067157

  • Charles R, Jolliet O, Gaillard G, Pellet D (2006) Environmental analysis of intensity level in wheat crop production using life cycle assessment. Agri Ecosyst Environ 113(1):216–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dougkas A, Reynolds CK, Givens ID, Elwood PC, Minihane AM (2011) Associations between dairy consumption and body weight: a review of the evidence and underlying mechanisms. Nutr Res Rev 24:72–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elwood P, Pickering J, Hughes J, Fehily A, Ness A (2004) Milk drinking, ischemic heart disease and ischeamic stroke II. Evidence from cohort studies. Eur J Clin Nutr 58:718–724

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fantke P, Jolliet O, Apte JS, Cohen AJ, Evans JS, Hanninen OO, McKone TE (2014) Health effects of fine particulate matter in life cycle impact assessment: findings from the Basel Guidance Workshop. Int J Life Cycle Assess 20(2):276–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frischknecht R, Jungbluth N, Althaus H-J, Doka G, Dones R, Heck T, Spielmann M (2005) The Ecoinvent database: overview and methodological framework. Int J Life Cycle Assess 10(1):3–9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez A, Frostell B, Carlsson-Kanyama A (2011) Protein efficiency per unit energy and per unit greenhouse gas emissions: protein contribution of diet choices to climate change mitigation. Food Policy 36(5):562–570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gronlund C, Humbert S, Shaked S, O’Neill M, Jolliet O (2015) Characterizing the burden of disease of particulate matter for life cycle assessment. Air Qual Atmos Health 8(1):29–46

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hallström E, Carlsson-Kanyama A, Börjesson P (2015) Environmental impacts of dietary change: a systematic review. J Clean Prod 91:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Han E, Powell LM (2013) Consumption patterns of sugar-sweetened beverages in the United States. J Acad Nutr Diet 113(1):43–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heller MC, Keoleian GA (2012) A novel nutrition-based functional equivalency metric for comparative life cycle assessment of food. Saint-Malo, France: 8th International Conference on LCA in the Agri-food Sector. Saint-Malo, France 2012:401–406

    Google Scholar 

  • Heller MC, Keoleian GA (2015) Greenhouse gas emission estimates of U.S. dietary choices and food loss. J Ind Ecol 19:391–401

  • Heller MC, Keoleian GA, Willett WC (2013) Toward a life cycle-based, diet-level framework for food environmental impact and nutritional quality assessment: a critical review. Environ Sci Technol 47:12632–12647

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson A, Asselin A, Heller M, Vionnet S, Lessard L, Humbert S, Jolliet O (2013) U.S. fluid milk comprehensive LCA: final report. Dairy Research Institute

  • Hong J, Shaked S, Rosenbaum RK, Jolliet O (2010) Analytical uncertainty propagation in life cycle inventory and impact assessment: application to an automobile front panel. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15:499–500

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Humbert S, Marshall JD, Shaked S, Spadaro JV, Nishioka Y, Preiss P, Jolliet O (2011) Intake fraction for particulate matter: recommendations for life cycle impact assessment. Environ Sci Technol 45(11):4808–4816

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • IHME (2013) GBD compare. Retrieved 2014, from www.vizhub.healthdata.org/gbd-compare

  • International Dairy Federation (2010) A common carbon footprint approach for dairy: the IDF guide to standard lifecycle assessment methodology for the dairy sector

  • IPCC (2007) Climate change 2007-the physical science basis: Working Group I contribution to the fourth assessment report of the IPCC (Vol. 4 ed.). Solomon S (ed), Cambridge University Press

  • Jolliet O, Margni M, Charles R, Humbert S, Payet J, Rebitzer G, Rosenbaum R (2003) IMPACT 2002+: a new life cycle impact assessment methodology. Int J LCA 8(6):324–330

  • Jolliet O, Mueller-Wenk R, Bare J, Brent A, Goedkoop M, Heijungs R, Itsubo N, Peña C, Pennington D, Potting J, Rebitzer G, Stewart M, Udo de Haes H, Weidema B (2004) The life cycle impact assessment framework of the UNEP-SETAC life cycle initiative. Int J LCA 9(6):394–404

  • Larsson S, Virtamo J, Wolk A (2012) Dairy consumption and risk of stroke in Swedish women and men. Stroke 43:1775–1780

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lim SS, Vos T, Flaxman AD, Danaei G, Shibuya K, Adair-Rohani H, Ezzati M (2012) A comparative risk assessment of burden of disease and injury attributable to 67 risk factors and risk factor clusters in 21 regions, 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet 380(9859):2224–2260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meier T, Christen O (2013) Environmental impacts of dietary recommendations and dietary styles: Germany as an example. Environ Sci Technol 47(2):877–888

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Murray CJ, Abraham J, Ali MK, Alvadaro M, Atkinson C, Baddour LM, Birbeck G (2013a) The state of US health, 1990–2010: burden of disease, injuries, and risk factors. JAMA 310(6):591–608

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Murray CJ, Vos T, Lozano R, Naghavi M, Flaxman AD, Michaud C, Bridgett L (2013b) Disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for 291 diseases and injuries in 21 regions, 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2010. Lancet 380(9859):2197–2223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ness A, Davey Smith G, Hart C (2001) Milk, coronary heart disease and mortality. J Epidemiol Community 55:379–382

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reijnders L, Soret S (2003) Quantification of the environmental impact of different dietary protein choices. Am J Clin Nutr 78(3):664S–668S

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Roy P, Nei D, Orikasa T, Xu Q, Okadome H, Nakamura N, Shiina T (2009) A review of life cycle assessment (LCA) on some food products. J Food Eng 90(1):1–10

  • Saarinen M (2012) Nutrition in LCA: are nutrition indexes worth using? 8th International Conference on LCA in the Agri-food Sector, Saint-Malo, pp 389–394

    Google Scholar 

  • Schau E, Fet A (2008) LCA studies of food products as background for environmental product declarations. Int J Life Cycle Assess 13(3):255–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smedman A, Lindmark-Mansson H, Drewnowski A, Edman A (2010) Nutrient density of beverages in relation to climate impact. Food Nutr Res 54

  • Thoma G, Popp J, Nutter D, Shonnard D, Ulrich R, Matlock M, Adom F (2013) Greenhouse gas emissions from milk production and consumption in the United States: a cradle-to-grave life cycle assessment circa 2008. Int Dairy J 31(Supplement 1):S3–S14

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • USDA & USHHS (2010) Dietary guidelines for Americans 2010. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office. Retrieved from www.dietaryguidelines.gov

  • USDA (2011) USDA national nutrient database for standard reference. Retrieved April 5, 2014, from http://ndb.nal.usda.gov/

  • USDA ERS (2012) Food availability (per capita) data system. Retrieved from http://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/food-availability-(per-capita)-data-system.aspx

  • van Dooren C, Marinussen M, Blonk H, Aiking H, Vellinga P (2014) Exploring dietary guidelines based on ecological and nutritional values: a comparison of six dietary patterns. Food Policy 44:36–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vieux F, Darmon N, Touazi D, Soler L (2012) Greenhouse gas emissions of self-selected individual diets in France: changing the diet structure or consuming less? Ecol Econ 75:91–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willet W (2012) Nutritional epidemiology. Oxford University Press, USA

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • World Cancer Research Fund / American Institute for Cancer Research (2007) Food, nutrition, physical activity, and the prevention of cancer: a global perspective. AICR, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was funded by an unrestricted grant of the Dairy Research Institute (DRI), part of Dairy Management Inc. (DMI). We thank Dr. Dominik Alexander for his support in interpreting the nutritional meta-analysis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109-2029, USA

    Katerina S. Stylianou, Alexi S. Ernstoff & Olivier Jolliet

  2. Center for Sustainable Systems, School of Natural Resources and Environment, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109-1041, USA

    Martin C. Heller & Gregory A. Keoleian

  3. Nutrition Impact, LLC, 9725 D Drive North, Battle Creek, MI, 49014, USA

    Victor L. Fulgoni III

  4. Quantitative Sustainability Assessment, Department of Management Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Produktionstorvet 426, 2800 Kgs., Lyngby, Denmark

    Alexi S. Ernstoff

Authors
  1. Katerina S. Stylianou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Martin C. Heller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Victor L. Fulgoni III
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Alexi S. Ernstoff
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Gregory A. Keoleian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Olivier Jolliet
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katerina S. Stylianou.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Niels Jungbluth

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(DOCX 68 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Stylianou, K.S., Heller, M.C., Fulgoni, V.L. et al. A life cycle assessment framework combining nutritional and environmental health impacts of diet: a case study on milk. Int J Life Cycle Assess 21, 734–746 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-015-0961-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-015-0961-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation