Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Spatial and temporal distribution of the leaching of surface applied tracers from an irrigated monolith of a loamy vineyard soil

  • New approaches for low-invasive contaminated site characterization, monitoring and modelling
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Fresh water scarcity is an increasing problem worldwide. Strategies to alleviate water scarcity include the use of low-quality water for irrigation. The risk of groundwater contamination by pollutants in this water is affected by soil heterogeneity and preferential flow. These risk factors can be assessed by measuring the spatio-temporal redistribution of uniformly applied water and solutes. We placed a soil monolith (height 29 cm) from an Australian vineyard on a 100-cell multi-compartment sampler (MCS). At this vineyard, treated wastewater is used in response to the severe shortage of water in the summer. We studied the leaching risk associated with heterogeneous or preferential flow by irrigating the soil column with 24 applications to simulate one year. We applied simulated rainfall as well as wastewater (which contained chloride) during summer while relying on rainfall only in winter. We compared the chloride leaching with the leaching of bromide, which was applied during one of the applications as a pulse. During the entire simulated year, leaching of solutes from the monolith was measured. The results indicate that the assumption of uniform flow would underestimate the risk for the fresh groundwater reserves: 25 % of the solutes are transported though 6 % of the soil’s cross-section. The spatial distribution of drainage and solute leaching varied little during the experiment. Consequently, the mass flux density pattern of the bromide pulse was comparable to that of the repeatedly applied chloride. However, the MCS data suggested lateral ‘escape’ from chloride to non-mobile areas, which means in the long run, considerable quantities of these solutes can build up in areas that do not receive irrigation water.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • APHA (1999) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 20th edn. American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, and Water Environment Federation, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Badawy NS (1982) Soils of the vineyards of the Great Western district. Research Project Series No 133. Division of Agricultural Chemistry, Department of Agriculture, Victoria

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett AJ (2000) Environmental consequences of increasing production: some current perspectives. Agr Ecosyst Environ 82:89–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binnie C, Kimber M, Smethurst G (2002) Basic water treatment, 3rd Edition. Thomas Telford Publishing

  • Bloem E (2008) Variation in space and time of water flow and solute transport in heterogeneous soils and aquifers—a new multi-compartment percolation sampler and a new parameterization of the spatio-temporal solute distribution. Ph.D. thesis, Wageningen University, The Netherlands, xii+153 pp. ISBN 978-90-8504-922-7

  • Bloem E, Hogervorst FAN, de Rooij GH (2009) A field experiment with variable-suction multi-compartment samplers to measure the spatio-temporal distribution of solute leaching in an agricultural soil. J Contam Hydrol 105:131–145. doi:10.1016/j.jconhyd.2008.11.010

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bloem E, Hogervorst FAN, de Rooij GH, Stagnitti F (2010) Variable-suction multicompartment samplers to measure spatiotemporal unsaturated water and solute fluxes. Vadose Zone J 9:148–159. doi:10.2136/vzj2008.0111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchter B, Hinz C, Flury M, Flühler H (1995) Heterogeneous flow and solute transport in an unsaturated stony soil monolith. Soil Sci Soc Am J 59(1):14–21

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Candela L, Fabregat S, Josa A, Suriol J, Vigués N, Mas J (2007) Assessment of soil and groundwater impacts by treated urban wastewater reuse. A case study: Application in a golf course (Girona, Spain). Sci Total Environ 374:26–35

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman DC, Crossley DA (1996) Fundamentals of soil ecology. Academic Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • de Rooij GH (1996) Preferential flow in water-repellent sandy soils—model development and lysimeter experiments. Doctoral Thesis, Wageningen Agricultural University, The Netherlands, p 229

  • de Rooij GH, Stagnitti F (2000) Spatial variability of solute leaching: experimental validation of a quantitative parameterization. Soil Sci Soc Am J 64(2):499–504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Rooij GH, Stagnitti F (2002a) The solute leaching surface as a tool to assess the performance of multidimensional unsaturated solute transport models. In: Hassanizadeh SM, Schotting RJ, Gray WG, Pinder GF (eds) Pre-conference proceedings of the International Conference on Computational Methods in Water Resources. Delft, The Netherlands. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, pp. 639–646

  • de Rooij GH, Stagnitti F (2002b) Spatial and temporal distribution of solute leaching in heterogeneous soils: analysis and application to multisampler lysimeter data. J Contam Hydrol 54:329–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Rooij GH, Stagnitti F (2004) Applications of the beta distribution in soil science. In: Gupta AK, Nadarajah S (eds) Handbook of Beta distribution and its applications. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, pp 535–550

    Google Scholar 

  • EPA (2000) A guide to the sampling and analysis of waters, wastewaters, soils and wastes, 7th edn. Environment Protection Authority, Victoria, Publication 441

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein L, Bassein S (2001) Pesticide applications of copper on perenial crops in California, 1993 to 1998. J Environ Qual 30:1844–1847

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Flemming CA, Trevors JT (1989) Copper toxicity and chemistry in the environment: a review. Water Air and Soil Pollut 44:143–158

    Google Scholar 

  • Flühler H, Durner W, Flury M (1996) Lateral solute mixing processes—a key for understanding field-scale solute transport of water and solutes. Geoderma 70:165–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hespanhol I (1997) Wastewater as a resource. In: Helmer, R., Hespanhol, I. (Eds.), Water pollution control—A guide to the use of water quality management principles. Published by E. and F. N. Spon, London on behalf of WHO/UNEP, pp. 91–124

  • Isbell RF, McDonald WS, Ashton LJ (1997) Concepts and rationale of the Australian soil classification. CSIRO, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan AUH, Jury WA (1990) A laboratory study of the dispersion scale effect in column outflow experiments. J Contam Hydrol 5:119–131

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Maher PM, Hermon KM, Allinson G, Stagnitti F, Armstrong R (2005) Variability of soil chemistry following irrigation with municipal effluent: a Great Western vineyard study. Water Resour Manag III, WIT Trans Ecol Environ 80:655–675, ISBN: 1-84564-007-1

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nannipieri P, Badalucco L (2003) Biological processes. In: Bembi D, Nieder R (eds) Processes in the soil-plant system: modelling concepts and applications. The Haworth Press, Binghamton, NY

  • Pimentel D, Bailey O, Kim P, Mullaney E, Calabrese J, Walman L, Nelson F, Yao X (1999) Will limits of the earth’s resources control human numbers? Environ Dev Sustain 1:19–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poletika NN, Jury WA (1994) Effects of soil surface management on water flow distribution and solute dispersion. Soil Sci Soc Am J 58(4):999–1006

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Qadir M, Boers TM, Schubert S, Ghafoor A, Murtaza G (2003) Agricultural water management in water-starved countries: challanges and opportunities. Agr Water Manag 62:165–185

  • Quisenberry VL, Phillips RE, Zeleznik JM (1994) Spatial distribution of water and chloride macropore flow in a well-structured soil. Soil Sci Soc Am J 58(5):1294–1300

    Google Scholar 

  • Stagnitti F, Li L, Allinson G, Phillips I, Lockington D, Zeiliguer A, Allinson M, Lloyd-Smith J, Xie M (1999) A mathematical model for estimating the extent of solute- and water-flux heterogeneity in multiple sample percolation experiments. J Hydrol 215:59–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stagnitti F, Sherwood J, Allinson G, Evans L, Allinson M, Li L, Phillips I (1998) An investigation of localised soil heterogeneities on solute transport using a multisegment percolation system. New Zeal J Agr Res 41:603–612

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens D (2006) Growing crops with reclaimed wastewater. CSIRO Publishing, Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  • Strock JS, Cassel DK, Gumpertz ML (2001) Spatial variability of water and bromide transport through variably saturated soil blocks. Soil Sci Soc Am J 65(6):1607–1617

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • USEPA (1993) The determination of inorganic anions in water by ion chromatography. U.S. Environment Protection Agency Method 300.0, Cincinnati, Ohio,

  • Wildenschild D, Jensen KH, Villholth K, Illangasekare TH (1994) A laboratory analysis of the effect of macropores on solute transport. Ground Water 32(3):381–389

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This research was supported by the Research Council for Earth and Life Sciences (ALW) with financial aid from the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO). We thank the anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments that helped improve the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Soil and Environment Division, Bioforsk - Norwegian Institute for Agricultural and Environmental Research, Frederik A. Dahlsvei 20, 1430, Ås, Norway

    E. Bloem

  2. Soil Physics, Ecohydrology and Groundwater Management, Environmental Sciences Group, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands

    E. Bloem

  3. School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science Engineering and Built Environment, Deakin University, Warrnambool, Australia

    K. M. Hermon

  4. Department Soil Physics, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research—UFZ, Halle, Germany

    G. H. de Rooij

  5. Research and Graduate Studies Office, University of Ballarat, Ballarat, Australia

    F. Stagnitti

Authors
  1. E. Bloem
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. K. M. Hermon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. G. H. de Rooij
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. F. Stagnitti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. Bloem.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Zhihong Xu

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bloem, E., Hermon, K.M., de Rooij, G.H. et al. Spatial and temporal distribution of the leaching of surface applied tracers from an irrigated monolith of a loamy vineyard soil. Environ Sci Pollut Res 21, 8981–8991 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-014-2637-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-014-2637-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation