Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

‘Doing Something Positive’: Volunteers’ Experiences of the Well-Being Benefits Derived from Practical Conservation Activities in Nature

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There is a strong tradition in Britain of volunteering involving a wide range of activities and organisations. Increasingly volunteering is seen as a way of benefiting health and building sustainable communities. In a study in 2007 we aimed to address the research questions: what are the motivations for, barriers to, and benefits of formal practical environmental volunteering for those individuals involved? Qualitative and quantitative data collection was undertaken while spending a day each with ten volunteer groups as they undertook their practical conservation activities. In this paper we focus primarily on the physical, mental and social well-being benefits that volunteers derived from their activities. Our research involved 88 people volunteering regularly in a range of places from scenic natural landscapes to urban green spaces in northern England and southern Scotland. Respondents described a range of benefits they gained from their involvement including improved fitness, keeping alert, meeting others and reducing stress levels. We suggest that practical environmental volunteering has flexibility in the types of activity available and the time scale in which activities are undertaken and therefore can provide a range of physical, social and mental well-being benefits to people with very differing abilities and from different socio-economic backgrounds.

Résumé

la Grande-Bretagne bénéficie d’une forte tradition du bénévolat impliquant un large éventail d’activités et d’organisations. Le bénévolat est de plus en plus considéré comme un moyen de profiter à la santé et de créer des communautés durables. Dans une étude de 2007, nous avons cherché à répondre aux questions de recherche: quelles sont les motivations, les obstacles et les bénéfices de la pratique formelle du bénévolat environnemental pour les personnes concernées? Une collecte de données qualitatives et quantitatives a été effectuée au cours d’une journée passée avec dix groupes de bénévoles tandis qu’ils menaient leurs activités concrètes de conservation. Dans cette étude, nous mettons principalement en évidence les bienfaits du bien-être sur le plan physique, mental et social que les bénévoles retirent de leurs activités. Notre recherche a concerné 88 bénévoles réguliers dans différents lieux, allant des paysages naturels pittoresques aux espaces verts urbains, situés dans le nord de l’Angleterre et le sud de l’Écosse. Les personnes interrogées ont décrit divers bienfaits qu’elles retiraient de leur participation, notamment une meilleure condition physique, le maintien de la vigilance, les rencontres avec les autres personnes et la réduction des niveaux de stress. Nous avançons que la pratique du bénévolat environnemental permet une certaine flexibilité dans les types d’activités proposées et dans les délais pour réaliser les activités, et qu’elle peut donc apporter divers bienfaits en termes de bien-être sur le plan physique, mental et social pour des personnes aux compétences très différentes, issues de milieux socio-économiques variées.

Zusammenfassung

Ehrenamtliche Tätigkeiten in einer Reihe von unterschiedlichen Bereichen und Organisationen ist eine große Tradition in Großbritannien. Gemeinnützige Tätigkeiten werden zunehmend als ein Mittel zur Förderung der Gesundheit und zur Errichtung nachhaltiger Gemeinden betrachtet. In einer in 2007 durchgeführten Studie behandelten wir die folgenden Forschungsfragen: Was motiviert die Personen zur Ausführung formeller, praktischer, ehrenamtlicher Tätigkeiten im Umweltbereich und welche Hindernisse und Vorteile bringen diese Tätigkeiten mit sich? Wir begleiteten zehn Gruppen ehrenamtlich Tätiger jeweils einen Tag lang bei ihren praktischen Umweltschutztätigkeiten und sammelten dabei qualitative und quantitative Daten. In diesem Beitrag konzentrieren wir uns vornehmlich auf die Vorteile für das physische, psychische und gesellschaftliche Wohlbefinden der ehrenamtlich Tätigen aufgrund ihrer Arbeit. Unsere Studie umfasste 88 Personen, die regelmäßig an verschiedenen Orten - von schönen natürlichen Landschaften bis hin zu städtischen Grünflächen - in Nordengland und Südschottland ehrenamtliche Tätigkeiten ausübten. Die Befragten beschrieben eine Reihe von Vorteilen, die ihnen ihr Engagement brachte, zum Beispiel verbesserte Fitness, erhöhte Aufmerksamkeit, das Kennenlernen neuer Leute und die Minderung von Stress. Wir zeigen, dass praktische gemeinnützige Tätigkeiten im Umweltbereich in Bezug auf die möglichen Aktivitäten und die Zeitplanung flexibel sind und daher Personen, die über sehr unterschiedliche Fähigkeiten verfügen und aus unterschiedlichen sozioökonomischen Verhältnissen kommen, eine Reihe von physischen, psychischen und gesellschaftlichen Vorteilen bieten können.

Resumen

En Gran Bretaña existe una arraigada tradición de voluntariado que implica numerosas actividades y organizaciones. Cada vez más el voluntariado se considera una actividad beneficiosa para la salud y para crear comunidades sostenibles. En un estudio de 2007 buscábamos respuestas a las siguientes preguntas: ¿Qué motivaciones, barreras y ventajas plantea el voluntariado oficial de medio ambiente para las personas participantes? Recopilamos datos cualitativos y cuantitativos mientras pasamos un día cada uno con diez grupos de voluntariado que realizaban actividades prácticas de conservación. En este trabajo nos centramos sobre todo en las ventajas y el bienestar físico, mental y social que los voluntarios obtenían de sus actividades. Nuestro estudio incluía a 88 personas que, periódicamente, trabajan como voluntarios en distintos lugares, desde espectaculares parajes naturales a espacios verdes urbanos del norte de Inglaterra y el sur de Escocia. Los encuestados describían las ventajas que obtenían de su participación: mejor forma física, el mantenimiento de la atención, conocer gente y eliminar el estrés. Lo que sugerimos es que el voluntariado medioambiental ofrece gran flexibilidad por los tipos de actividades disponibles y la escala en la que se realizan las actividades y que, por tanto, puede proporcionar una serie de ventajas físicas, sociales y mentales a personas con distintas capacitaciones y extractos socioeconómicos.

摘要

在英国,志愿参与范围广泛的活动和组织是一个优良传统。积极的志愿服务被认为是一种有利于健康和建设可持续社区的方式。在2007年的研究中,我们旨在解决的问题是:对于那些参与活动的个人而言,正规的环保志愿服务的动机、障碍和益处是什么?当时,我们一天和10个志愿者小组一起,在其开展保护活动时收集定性和定量数据。本文主要侧重于探讨志愿者通过参加志愿活动在身体、精神和社会幸福感方面所获得的益处。我们的研究包括88名志愿者在英格兰北部和苏格兰南部的各种自然景观和城市绿色空间定期参与志愿活动。受访者描述了他们从参与这些活动中所获得的益处,包括强身健体、提高警惕、结交朋友和缓解压力。我们建议,环保志愿服务应在活动的类型和时间上具有灵活性,进而使不同能力、不同社会经济背景的人享有身体、精神和社会幸福感方面的益处。

ملخص

هناك تقليد قوي في بريطانيا للعمل التطوعي يشمل مجموعة واسعة من الأنشطة والمنظمات. يعتبر تزايد العمل التطوعي طريقة مفيدة للصحة وبناء مجتمعات مستدامة. في دراسة أجريت في عام 2007 كنا تهدف إلى معالجة أسئلة البحث: ما هي الدوافع ، العوائق، فوائد للعمل التطوعي البيئي العملي الرسمي لأولئك الأفراد المشاركين؟ تم جمع بيانات نوعية و كمية بينما كنا نمضي يوم مع كل عشر مجموعات متطوعة أثناء إجراءهم أنشطة الحماية العملية. نركز في هذا البحث أساساً على الفوائد البدنية، العقلية والرفاء الإجتماعي التي يستمدها المتطوعين من أنشطتهم. شمل بحثنا 88 شخص يعملون بالعمل التطوعي بشكل منتظم في مجموعة من الأماكن من المناظر الطبيعية الخلابة للمساحات الخضراء الحضرية في شمال إنجلترا وأسكتلندا الجنوبية. وصف المجيبين مجموعة من الفوائد المكتسبة من مشاركتهم بما في ذلك تحسين اللياقة البدنية ، حالة الإنتباة ، مقابلة الآخرين والحد من مستويات التوتر. نحن نقترح أن العمل التطوعي البيئي العملي له مرونة في أنواع الأنشطة المتاحة و مقياس الوقت الذي تجري فيه الأنشطة، ولذلك يمكن أن يوفر مجموعة من الفوائد البدنية والإجتماعية و الرفاهية العقلية للأشخاص ذوي القدرات المختلفة جداً ومن مختلف الخلفيات الإجتماعية-الإقتصادية.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Government defines the third sector as non-governmental organisations that are value driven and which principally reinvest their surpluses to further social, environmental or cultural objectives. It includes voluntary and community organisations, charities, social enterprises, cooperative and mutuals (Cabinet Office 2008b).

References

  • Australian Centre on Quality of Life. (2007). Personal well-being index. Accessed August 22, 2009, from http://acqol.deakin.edu.au/instruments/wellbeing_index.htm.

  • Australian Centre on Quality of Life. (2008). International well-being group. Accessed October 29, 2008, from http://acqol.deakin.edu.au/inter_wellbeing/index.htm.

  • Australian Unity and Deakin University. Undated. What makes us happy? Australian Unity Well-being report with Deakin University. Accessed July 6, 2009, from http://acqol.deakin.edu.au/index_wellbeing/Survey_18.2.pdf.

  • Bajekal, M., & Osbourne, V. (2006). Focus on health. Hants: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beddington, J., Cooper, C. L., Field, J., Goswami, U., Huppert, F. A., Jenkins, R., et al. (2008). The mental wealth of nations. Nature, 455, 1057–1060.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, S., Marzano, M., Kobierska, H., Podjed, D., Vandzinskaite, D., Reinert, H., Armaitiene, A., Grodzinska-Jurczak, M., & Mursic, R. (2008). What counts? Volunteers and their organisations in the recording and monitoring of biodiversity. Biodiversity Conservation. doi:10.10007/s10531-008-9357-9.

  • Black, W., & Living, R. (2004). Volunteerism as an occupation and its relationship to health and well-being. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 67, 526–532.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burls, A. (2007). People and green spaces: promoting public health and mental well-being through ecotherapy. Journal of Public Health, 6, 24–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cabinet Office: Office of the Third Sector. (2008a). Volunteering. Accessed February 28, 2003, from http://www.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/third_sector/volunteering.aspx.

  • Cabinet Office: Office of the Third Sector. (2008b). Volunteering for all programme. Accessed July 7, 2008, from http://www.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/third_sector/volunteering/volunteering_for_all.aspx.

  • Church, C. (2007). Changed places, changed lives: the social impacts of environmental action. Doncaster: British Trust for Conservation Volunteers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, R., Boyko, C., & Codinhoto, R. (2008). The effect of the physical environment on mental well-being. Foresight Report on Mental Capital and Well-being: Making the most of ourselves in the 21st Century. State of Science Review: SR-DR2. Government Office for Science, London.

  • Dalgleish, J. (2006). The opportunities for environmental volunteering to deliver Scottish Executive policies: A discussion paper. Report to Scottish Executive, Edinburgh.

  • Davis Smith, J. (1999). Volunteering and social development. A background paper for discussion at an expert group meeting. New York: United Nations Volunteers.

  • Dekker, P., & van der Broek, A. (1998). Civil society in comparative perspective: involvement in voluntary associations in North America and Western Europe. Voluntas, 9, 11–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Department of Communities and Local Government. (2007). The new performance framework for Local Authorities and Local Authority partnerships. London: DCLG.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Health. (2005). Choosing activity: A physical activity action plan. London: Department of Health.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Health. (2009). Change4life. Department of Health, London. Accessed March 11, 2009, from http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/News/Currentcampaigns/Change4Life/index.htm.

  • European Volunteer Centre. (2007). Volunteering in the Netherlands: Facts and figures. CEV (Centre Europeen du Volontariat), Brussels. Accessed May 30, 2010, from http://www.cev.be/data/File/Facts_Figures_NL_FINAL.pdf.

  • Harris, A. H., & Thoresen, C. E. (2005). Volunteering is associated with delayed mortality in older people: Analysis of the longitudinal study of ageing. Journal of Health Psychology, 10, 739–752.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartig, T. (2007). Three steps to understanding restorative environments as health resources. In C. W. Thompson & P. Travlou (Eds.), Open space: People space (pp. 163–179). London: Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • HM Government. (2007). PSA delivery agreement 21: Building more cohesive, empowered and active communities. London: HM Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • Home Office. (2005). The volunteering compact code of good practice. London: Home Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Institute for Volunteering Research. (2005). Unlocking the potential? Reviewing the Wildlife Trusts’ project to strengthen volunteering. Research Bulletin: Institute of Research Volunteering.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, S. (1995). The restorative benefits of nature: Toward an integrative framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15, 169–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, S. (2004). Some hidden benefits of the urban forest. In C. C. Konijendijk, J. Schipperin, & K. H. Hoyer (Eds.), Forestry Serving Urbanised Societies. Selected papers from conference jointly organised by IUFRO, EFI and the Danish Centre for forest, landscape and planning in Copenhagen, 27–30 August 2002. IUFRO World Series, Vol. 14, pp. 221–232.

  • Kitchen, S., Michealson, J., Wood, N., & Peter, J. (2006). 2005 Citizenship survey: Active communities topic report. London: Department Communities and Local Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lantra. (2008). Volunteers skills research. Lantra—the sector Skills Council for environmental and land based industries, Warwickshire.

  • Low, N., Butt, S., Paine, E., & Smith Davis, J. (2007). Helping out: A national survey of volunteering and charitable giving. London: Cabinet Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, R., & Popham, (2008). Effect of exposure to nature environment on health inequalities: An observation population study. The Lancet, 372, 1655–1660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, M., Townsend, M., & Oldroyd, J. (2007). Linking human and ecosystem health: The benefits of community involvement in conservation groups. EcoHealth, 34, 255–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, E. (2005). Trees and woodlands: Nature’s health service. Farnham: Forest Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ockenden, N. (2007). Volunteering in the natural outdoors in the UK and Ireland: A literature review. London: Institute for Volunteering Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peacock, J., Hine, R., & Pretty, J. (2007). Got the blues, then find some greenspace: The mental health benefits of green exercise activities and green care. MIND Week Report, February 2007, Centre for Environment and Society. University of Essex, Colchester.

  • Pope, J. (2005). Volunteering in Victoria over 2004. Australian Journal on Volunteering, 10(2), 29–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pretty, J., Peacock, J., Sellens, M., & Griffin, M. (2005). The mental and physical health outcomes of green exercise. International Journal of Environmental Health Research, 15, 319–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pretty, J., & Smith, D. (2004). Social capital in biodiversity conservation and management. Conservation Biology, 18, 631–638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruiter, S., & De Graaf, N. D. (2006). National context, religiosity, and volunteering: results from 53 countries. American Sociological Review, 71, 191–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. L., Kaplan, R., & Grese, R. E. (2001). Predicting volunteer commitment in environmental stewardship programmes. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 44, 629–648.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scottish Government. (2007). Playing our part: The Scottish Executive’s response to the Dalgleish report on environmental volunteering. Accessed February 21, 2007, from http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Publications/2007/02/01161357/0.

  • The Commission on the Future of Volunteering. (2008). Report of the Commission on the future of volunteering and Manifesto for change. London: The Commission on the future of volunteering.

    Google Scholar 

  • Townsend, M., & Ebden, M. (2006). Feel blue, touch green. Final report of a project undertaken by Deakin University, Barwon Health, Parks Victoria, Alcoa Anglesea, ANGAIR and Surf Coast Shire. Deakin University, Melbourne.

  • Tyerman, A., & Humphrey, M. (1984). Changes in self concept following severe head injury. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 7, 11–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Volunteer Development Scotland. (2006). Volunteering in the natural heritage; an audit and review of natural heritage volunteering in Scotland. Scottish Natural Heritage Commissioned Report No. 219 [ROAME No. F05NC07].

  • Volunteer Development Scotland. (2007). Scottish household survey results 2006—volunteering statistics. Volunteer Development Scotland.

  • Wollebaek, D., & Selle, P. (2002). Does participation in voluntary associations contribute to social capital? The impact of intensity, scope and type. Non Profit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 31, 32–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wollebaek, D., & Selle, P. (2003). Generation and organisational change. In P. Dekker & L. Halman (Eds.), The value of volunteering: Cross cultural perspectives (Chap. 10, pp. 161–178). New York: Kluwer Academic.

  • Yerrel, P. (2008). BTCV green gym national evaluation report: Summary of findings. Oxford Brookes University, Oxford. Accessed July 7, 2008, from http://www2.btcv.org.uk/gg_evaluation_0308.pdf.

Download references

Acknowledgements

Thanks are due to the Scottish Forestry Trust and Forestry Commission who funded this research; these organisations were keen that motivations and benefits of volunteers be researched, however, they were not involved in the design of the study, or data collection and analysis. Thanks also to all the organisations and volunteers that participated in the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Liz O’Brien.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

O’Brien, L., Townsend, M. & Ebden, M. ‘Doing Something Positive’: Volunteers’ Experiences of the Well-Being Benefits Derived from Practical Conservation Activities in Nature. Voluntas 21, 525–545 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-010-9149-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-010-9149-1

Keywords

Navigation