Abstract
It has recently been claimed that Sen’s capabilities approach can be used to advise the formation of public policy related to human wellbeing. It has also been proposed that measures of subjective wellbeing are inadequate for this purpose. These ideas are examined in relation to capabilities, using the same reference material as the proposing author. The theory of subjective wellbeing homeostasis is used as the alternative framework by which to understand the potential of subjective wellbeing for policy advice. This examination reveals an almost complete lack of evidence that capability measurement could fulfill the suggested role. While subjective wellbeing has more potential for this purpose, caveats to its employment for policy advice are also evident.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allan, B. A., & Duffy, R. D. (2014). Examining moderators of signature strengths use and well-being: Calling and signature strengths level. Journal of Happiness Studies, 15(2), 323–337.
Anand, P., Hunter, G., Carter, I., Dowding, K., Guala, F., & Van Hees, M. (2009a). The development of capability indicators. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 10(1), 125–152.
Anand, P., Santos, C., & Smith, R. (2009b). The measurement of capabilities. In K. Basu & R. Kanbur (Eds.), Festschrift for Prof Amartya Sen (pp. 283–310). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Andrews, F. M., & Withey, S. B. (1976). Social indicators of well-being: American’s perceptions of life quality. New York: Plenum Press.
Austin, A. (2016). On well-being and public policy: Are we capable of questioning the hegemony of happiness? Social Indicators Research, 127(1), 123–138.
Biswas-Diener, R., & Diener, E. (2001). Making the best of a bad situation: Satisfaction in the slums of Calcutta. Social Indicators Research, 55, 329–352.
Blalock, H. M., Jr. (1964). Causal inferences in nonexperimental research. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
Blore, J. D., Stokes, M. A., Mellor, D., Firth, L., & Cummins, R. A. (2011). Comparing multiple discrepancies theory to affective models of subjective wellbeing. Social Indicators Research, 100(1), 1–16. doi:10.1007/s11205-010-9599-2.
Brenner, B. (1975). Quality of affect and self-evaluated happiness. Social Indicators Research, 2(3), 315–331.
Brickman, P., & Campbell, D. T. (1971). Hedonic relativism and planning the good society. In M. H. Appley (Ed.), Adaptation-level theory: A symposium (pp. 287–302). New York: Academic Press.
Burchardt, T. (2006). Happiness and social policy: Barking up the right tree in the wrong neck of the woods. In L. Bauld, T. Maltby, & K. Clarke (Eds.), Analysis and debate in social policy (pp. 145–164). Bristol: Policy Press.
Burchardt, T., & Vizard, P. (2007). Definition of equality and framework for measurement: Final recommendations of the Equalities Review Steering Group on Measurement. London: LSE, Centre for the Analysis of Social Exclusion. CASE paper 120. http://sticerd.lse.ac.uk/dps/case/cp/CASEpaper120.pdf.
Burchardt, T., & Vizard, P. (2014). Using the capability approach to evaluate health and care for individuals and groups in England. In S. Ibrahim & M. Tiwari (Eds.), The capability approach: From theory to practice (pp. 148–170). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Capic, T., Li, N., & Cummins, R. A. (2017). Confirmation of subjective wellbeing set-points: Foundational for subjective social indicators. Social Indicators Research. doi:10.1007/s11205-017-1585-5.
Cummins, R. A. (2010). Subjective wellbeing, homeostatically protected mood and depression: A synthesis. Journal of Happiness Studies, 11, 1–17. doi:10.1007/s10902-009-9167-0.
Cummins, R. A. (2013). Subjective wellbeing homeostasis. In D. S. Dunn (Ed.), Oxford bibliographies Online. http://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/view/document/obo-9780199828340/obo-9780199828340-0167.xml.
Cummins, R. A. (2014). Can happiness change? Theories and evidence. In K. M. Sheldon & R. E. Lucas (Eds.), Stability of happiness: Theories and evidence on whether happiness can change (pp. 75–97). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Cummins, R. A. (2016a). The theory of subjective wellbeing homeostasis: A contribution to understanding life quality. In F. Maggino (Ed.), A life devoted to quality of life—festschrift in Honor of Alex C Michalos (Vol. 60, pp. 61–79). Berlin: Springer.
Cummins, R. A. (2016b). Happiness is the right metric to understand the functioning of society. Society, 53(3), 273–277. doi:10.1007/s12115-016-0011-y.
Cummins, R. A., Li, L., Wooden, M., & Stokes, M. (2014). A demonstration of set-points for subjective wellbeing. Journal of Happiness Studies, 15, 183–206. doi:10.1007/s10902-013-9444-9.
Cummins, R. A., Woerner, J., Weinberg, M., Collard, J., Hartley-Clark, L., & Horfiniak, K. (2013). Australian Unity Wellbeing Index: -Report 30.0—The wellbeing of Australians: Social media, personal achievement, and work. Melbourne: Australian Centre on Quality of Life, School of Psychology, Deakin University. http://www.acqol.com.au/reports/survey-reports/survey-030-report-part-b.pdf.
Cummins, R. A., et al. (2017). Why self-report variables inter-correlate: The role of Homeostatically Protected Mood. Journal of Wellbeing Assessment (submitted).
Davern, M., Cummins, R. A., & Stokes, M. (2007). Subjective wellbeing as an affective/cognitive construct. Journal of Happiness Studies, 8(4), 429–449. doi:10.1007/s10902-007-9066-1.
DEFRA. (2005). Securing the future: delivering UK sustainable development strategy. London: Department for Environment, food and Rural Affairs.
Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71–75.
Donovan, N., & Halpern, D. (2002). Life satisfaction: The state of knowledge and implications for Government. London: Prime Minister’s Strategy Unit.
Easterlin, R. A. (1974). Does economic growth improve the human lot? Some empirical evidence. In P. David & M. Reder (Eds.), Nations and households in economic growth (pp. 89–125). New York: Academic Press.
Eiser, J. R., & Stroebe, W. (1972). Categorization and social judgement. London: Academic Press.
Equalities and Human Rights Commission. (2007). Fairness and freedom-The final report of the equalities review. London: Author.
Gannotti, M. E., Minter, C. L., Chambers, H. G., Smith, P. A., & Tylkowski, C. (2011). Self-concept of adults with cerebral palsy. Disability and Rehabilitation, 33(10), 855–861.
Gittins, R. (2010). The happy economist: Happiness for the hard-headed. Melbourne: Allen & Unwin.
Hammond, T., Weinberg, M. K., & Cummins, R. A. (2014). The dyadic interaction of relationships and disability type on informal carer subjective well-being. Quality of Life Research, 23(5), 1535–1542.
Headey, B., & Wearing, A. (1989). Personality, life events, and subjective well-being: Toward a dynamic equilibrium model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 731–739. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.57.4.731.
Helson, H. (1964). Adaptation-level theory: An experimental and systematic approach to behavior. New York: Harper and Row.
Huxley, A. (1932). Brave new world. London: Chatto and Windus.
Ibrahim, S., & Tiwari, M. (2014). The capability approach: From theory to practice. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
International Wellbeing Group. (2013). Personal wellbeing index manual (Vol. 5). Melbourne: Deakin University. http://www.acqol.com.au/iwbg/index.php.
International Wellbeing Group. (2016). http://www.acqol.com.au/iwbg/wellbeing-index/pwi-a-english.pdf.
Joshanloo, M. (2013). A comparison of Western and Islamic conceptions of happiness. Journal of Happiness Studies, 14(6), 1857–1874.
Keyes, C. L. M., & Annas, J. (2009). Feeling good and functioning well: Distinctive concepts in ancient philosophy and contemporary science. Journal of Positive Psychology, 4(3), 197–201.
Krishnakumar, J., & Ballon, P. (2008). Estimating basic capabilities: A structural equation model applied to Bolivia. World Development, 36(6), 992–1010.
Lai, L. C. H., & Cummins, R. A. (2013). The contribution of job and partner satisfaction to the homeostatic defense of subjective wellbeing. Social Indicators Research, 111(1), 203–217. doi:10.1007/s11205-011-9991-6.
Land, K. C. (1983). Social indicators. Annual Review of Sociology, 9, 1–26.
Land, K. C. (2015). The Human Development Index. In W. Glatzer, L. Camfield, V. Møller, & M. Rojas (Eds.), Global handbook of quality of life: Exploration of well-being of nations and continents (pp. 133–157). Dordrecht: Springer.
Land, K. C., Lamb, V. L., & Zang, X. (2017). Objective and subjective indices of well-being: resolving the Easterlin paradox. In G. Brule & F. Maggino (Eds.), Metrics of subjective well-being. New York: Springer. (in press).
Learmonth, Y. C., Hubbard, E. A., McAuley, E., & Motl, R. W. (2014). Psychometric properties of quality of life and health-related quality of life assessments in people with multiple sclerosis. Quality of Life Research, 23(7), 2015–2023.
Lenzen, M., & Cummins, R. A. (2013). Happiness versus the environment—a case study of Australian lifestyles. Challenges, 4, 56–74. doi:10.3390/challe4010056.
Lepper, J., & McAndrew, S. (2008). Developments in the economics of well-being: Treasury Economic Working Paper 4. London: HM Treasury.
Lykken, D. T., & Tellegen, A. (1996). Happiness is a stochastic phenomenon. Psychological Science, 7(3), 186–189.
Merriam-Webster. (2016). Online dictionary. Retrieved from http://www.merriam-webster.com.
Nozick, R. (1974). Anarchy, state and utopia. Malden, MA: Basic Books.
Nussbaum, M. (2000). Women and human development: The capabilities approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
O’Donnell, G., Deaton, A., Durand, M., Halpern, D., & Layard, R. (2014). Wellbeing and policy. London: Legatum Institute.
OECD. (2013). OECD Guidelines on Measuring Subjective Well-being. Paris: OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/9789264191655-en.
Office for National Statistics. (2011). Measuring subjective well-being for public policy: Recommendations on measures. Newport: Office for National Statistics.
Office for National Statistics. (2012). Measuring national well-being: Life in the UK 2012. Newport: Office for National Statistics. http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/rel/wellbeing/measuring-national-well-being/first-annual-report-on-measuringnational-well-being/art-measuring-national-well-being-annual-report.html.
O’Neill, J. (2006). Happiness: Lessons for a new science. New Political Economy, 11(3), 447–450.
O’Neill, J. (2008). Sustainability, well-being and consumption: The limits of hedonic approaches. In K. Soper & F. Trentmann (Eds.), Citizenship and consumption (pp. 172–190). London: Palgrave.
Piantadosi, S., Byar, D. P., & Green, S. B. (1988). The ecological fallacy. American Journal of Epidemiology, 127(5), 893–904.
Rawls, J. (1972). A theory of justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rawls, J. (1999). The law of peoples. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Renn, D., Pfaffenberger, N., Platter, M., Mitmansgruber, H., Höfer, S., & Cummins, R. A. (2009). International Well-being Index: the Austrian version. Social Indicators Research, 90, 243–256.
Russell, J. A. (1980). A circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 1161–1178.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). On Happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 141–166.
Sen, A. (1985). Commodities and capabilities. Amsterdam: North Holland.
Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. New York: Anchor Books.
Sen, A. (2004). Capabilities, lists, and public reason: Continuing the conversation. Feminist Economics, 10(3), 77–80.
Smith, A. (1776). An inquiry into the nature and causes of the Wealth of Nations (1 edn, Vol. 2). London: W. Strahan. http://books.google.bg/books?id=C5dNAAAAcAAJ&pg=PP7#v=onepage&q&f=true Retrieved Sept 09 2014.
Srinivasan, T. (1994). Human development-A new paradign or reinvention of the wheel? American Economic Review, 84(2), 238–243.
Stiglitz, J., Sen, A., & Fitoussi, J.-P. (2010). Report by the commission on the measurement of economic performance and social progress. Paris: Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress http://www.stiglitz-sen-fitoussi.fr/documents/rapport_anglais.pdf.
Sugden, R. (1993). Welfare, resources, and capabilities: a review of inequality reexamined by Amartya Sen. Journal of Economic literature, 31, 1947–1962.
Sugden, R. (2003). Opportunity as a space for individuality: its value and the impossibility of measuring it. Ethics, 113(4), 783–809.
Tinkler, L., & Hicks, S. (2011). Measuring subjective well-being. UK: Office for National Statistics http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/guide-method/user-guidance/well-being/wellbeing-knowledge-bank/understanding-wellbeing/measuring-subjective-well-being.pdf.
Tomlinson, M., & Kelly, G. (2013). Is everybody happy? The politics and measurement of national wellbeing. Policy and Politics, 41(2), 139–157.
Tomyn, A. J., & Cummins, R. A. (2011). Subjective wellbeing and homeostatically protected mood: Theory validation with adolescents. Journal of Happiness Studies, 12(5), 897–914. doi:10.1007/s10902-010-9235-5.
Tomyn, A. J., Weinberg, M. K., & Cummins, R. A. (2015). Intervention efficacy among ‘at risk’ adolescents: A test of Subjective Wellbeing Homeostasis Theory. Social Indicators Research, 120(3), 883–895. doi:10.1007/s11205-014-0619-5.
Veenhoven, R. (2005). Happiness in hardship. In L. Bruni & P. L. Porta (Eds.), Economics and happiness (pp. 243–266). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Weijers, D. (2013). Intuitive biases in judgments about thought experiments: The experience machine revisited. Philosophical Writings, 41(1), 17–31.
WHO Regional Office for Europe. (2012). Measurement of and target-setting for well-being; Second meeting of the expert group, Paris, 25–26 June 2012. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe.
Yik, M., Russell, J. A., & Steiger, J. H. (2011). A 12-point circumplex structure of core affect. Emotion, 11(4), 705–731.
Acknowledgement
This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea Grant funded by the Korean Government (NRF-2013S1A3A2054622).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cummins, R.A., Land, K.C. Capabilities, Subjective Wellbeing and Public Policy: A Response to Austin (2016). Soc Indic Res 140, 157–173 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-017-1763-5
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-017-1763-5