Skip to main content
Log in

Subjective Wellbeing as a Social Indicator

  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

My essay contributes to the 50-year celebration of Bauer’s ‘Social Indicators’ by examining the progress of subjective social indicators. It begins with a description of how the three contributors to this volume, Bauer, Biderman and Gross, viewed subjective indicators, and then examines developments to the present. Of special interest is subjective wellbeing, most particularly as it is understood through the theory of subjective wellbeing homeostasis. The theory is described and the potential use of subjective wellbeing as an indicator, relevant to the development of public policy, is described. I conclude that it is timely for national statistical agencies to consider the adoption of a scale to measure subjective wellbeing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andrews, F. M., & Withey, S. B. (1976). Social indicators of well-being: American’s perceptions of life quality. New York: Plenum Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, R. A. (1966). Social indicators. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentham, J. (1780). An introduction to the principles of morals and legislation. London: T. Payne. http://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k93974k/f2.image.r=.langEN. Retrieved 09 Sept 2014.

  • Bentham, J. (1789). An introduction to the principles of morals and legislation. Garden City: Doubleday.

  • Biderman, A. D. (1966a). Social indicators and goals. In R. A. Bauer (Ed.), Social indicators (pp. 68–153). Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biderman, A. D. (1966b). Anticipatory studies and stand-by research capabilities. In R. A. Bauer (Ed.), Social indicators (pp. 272–340). Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blore, J. D., Stokes, M. A., Mellor, D., Firth, L., & Cummins, R. A. (2011). Comparing multiple discrepancies theory to affective models of subjective wellbeing. Social Indicators Research, 100(1), 1–16. doi:10.1007/s11205-010-9599-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, A. (1974). Quality of life as a psychological phenomenon. In B. Strumpel (Ed.), Subjective elements of well-being. Papers presented at a seminar of the organisation for economic co-operation and development. (pp. 9–20). Paris: OECD.

  • Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., & Rodgers, W. L. (1976). The quality of American life: Perceptions, evaluations, and satisfactions. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caplan, N., & Barton, E. (1978). The potential of social indicators: Minimum conditions for impact at the national level as suggested by a study of the use of ‘Social Indicators’ 73. Social Indicators Research, 5, 427–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Z., & Davey, G. (2008). Normative life satisfaction in Chinese societies. Social Indicators Research, 89(3), 557–564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, R. A. (2010). Subjective wellbeing, homeostatically protected mood and depression: A synthesis. Journal of Happiness Studies, 11, 1–17. doi:10.1007/s10902-009-9167-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, R. A. (2013). Subjective wellbeing homeostasis. In D. S. Dunn (Ed.), Oxford bibliographies online. http://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/view/document/obo-9780199828340/obo-9780199828340-0167.xml.

  • Cummins, R. A. (2014). Can happiness change? Theories and evidence. In K. M. Sheldon & R. E. Lucas (Eds.), Stability of happiness: Theories and evidence on whether happiness can change (pp. 75–97). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, R. A. (2016). The theory of subjective wellbeing homeostasis: A contribution to understanding life quality. In F. Maggino (Ed.), A life devoted to quality of life—Festschrift in honor of Alex C. Michalos (Vol. 60, pp. 61–79). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, R. A., Li, L., Wooden, M., & Stokes, M. (2014). A demonstration of set-points for subjective wellbeing. Journal of Happiness Studies, 15, 183–206. doi:10.1007/s10902-013-9444-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, R. A., & Nistico, H. (2002). Maintaining life satisfaction: The role of positive cognitive bias. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3(1), 37–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, R. A., Walter, J., & Woerner, J. (2007). Australian unity wellbeing index: Report 16.1—The wellbeing of Australians—Groups with the highest and lowest wellbeing in Australia. Retrieved from http://www.deakin.edu.au/research/acqol/index_wellbeing/index.htm.

  • Cummins, R. A., Woerner, J., Weinberg, M., Collard, J., Hartley-Clark, L., & Horfiniak, K. (2013). Australian Unity Wellbeing Index: —Report 30.0—The Wellbeing of Australians: Social media, personal achievement, and work. Melbourne: Australian Centre on Quality of Life, School of Psychology, Deakin University. http://www.deakin.edu.au/research/acqol/reports/auwbi.php.

  • Davern, M., Cummins, R. A., & Stokes, M. (2007). Subjective wellbeing as an affective/cognitive construct. Journal of Happiness Studies, 8(4), 429–449. doi:10.1007/s10902-007-9066-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E. (2006). Guidelines for national indicators of subjective well-being and ill-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 7(4), 397–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easterlin, R. A. (2016). Do people adapt to poorer health? Health and health satisfaction over the life cycle. In F. Maggino (Ed.), A life devoted to quality of life—Festschrift in honor of Alex C. Michalos (Vol. 60, pp. 81–92). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Eurobarometer. (2016). 40 years. http://ec.europa.eu/COMMFrontOffice/PublicOpinion/index.cfm/Archive/index.

  • Gross, B. M. (1966a). Preface: A historial note on social indicators. In R. A. Bauer (Ed.), Social indicators (pp. 9–18). Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross, B. M. (1966b). The state of the nation: Social systems accounting. In R. A. Bauer (Ed.), Social indicators (pp. 154–271). Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, T., Weinberg, M. K., & Cummins, R. A. (2014). The dyadic interaction of relationships and disability type on informal carer subjective well-being. Quality of Life Research, 23(5), 1535–1542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann, G. W. (1934). Personality traits associated with variations in happiness. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 29, 202–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Headey, B., Muffels, R., & Wagner, G. G. (2014). National panel studies show substantial minorities recording long-term change in life satisfaction: Implications for set point theory. In K. M. Sheldon & R. E. Lucas (Eds.), Stability of happiness: Theories and evidence on whether happiness can change (pp. 99–126). USA: Elsevier.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Household Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia Survey. (2016). https://www.melbourneinstitute.com/hilda/.

  • International Wellbeing Group. (2013). Personal Wellbeing Index Manual (5th Edition). Melbourne: Deakin University. http://www.acqol.com.au/iwbg/index.php.

  • Lai, L. C. H., Cummins, R. A., & Lau, A. L. (2013). Cross-cultural difference in subjective wellbeing: Cultural response bias as an explanation. Social Indicators Research, 114(2), 607–619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Land, K. C., & Michalos, A. C. (2016). Fifty years after the social indiators movement: Has the promise been fulfilled? An assessment and an agenda for the future. Social Indicators Research (in press).

  • Lau, A. L. D., Cummins, R. A., & McPherson, W. (2005). An investigation into the cross-cultural equivalence of the personal wellbeing index. Social Indicators Research, 72, 403–430. doi:10.1007/s11205-004-0561-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Likert, R. (1960). The dual function of statistics. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 55, 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2013). OECD guidelines on measuring subjective well-being. Paris: OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/9789264191655-en.

    Google Scholar 

  • President Lyndon B Johnson. (1966). Message to the Congress on domestic health and education, March 1.

  • Robinson, J. P., & Converse, P. E. (1972). Social change reflected in the use of time. In A. Campbell & P. E. Converse (Eds.), The human meaning of social change (pp. 17–86). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

  • Smith, A. (1776). An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations (2nd ed., Vol. 2). London: W. Strahan. http://books.google.bg/books?id=C5dNAAAAcAAJ&pg=PP7#v=onepage&q&f=true Retrieved 09 Sept 2014.

  • Solomon, E. S., Bouchouchi, V., Denisov, V., Hankiss, E., Mallman, C. A., & Milbrath, L. W. (1980). UNESCO’s policy-relevant quality of life research program. In A. Szalai & F. M. Andrews (Eds.), The quality of life (pp. 223–234). London: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J. E., Sen, A., & Fitoussi, J.-P. (2010). Report by the commission on the measurement of economic performance and social progress. Paris: Commission on the measurement of economic performance and social progress.http://www.stiglitz-sen-fitoussi.fr/documents/rapport_anglais.pdf.

  • Strumpel, B. (1974a). Economic well-being as an object of social measurement. In B. Strumpel (Ed.), Subjective elements of well-being. Papers preseneted at a seminar of the organisation for economic co-operation and development (pp. 75-122). Paris: OECD.

  • Strumpel, B. (1974b). Subjective elements of well-being. Papers preseneted at a seminar of the organisation for economic co-operation and development. Paris: OECD.

  • Tomyn, A. J., & Cummins, R. A. (2011). Subjective wellbeing and homeostatically protected mood: Theory validation with adolescents. Journal of Happiness Studies, 12(5), 897–914. doi:10.1007/s10902-010-9235-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomyn, A. J., Weinberg, M. K., & Cummins, R. A. (2015). Intervention efficacy among ‘at risk’ adolescents: A test of subjective wellbeing homeostasis theory. Social Indicators Research, 120(3), 883–895. doi:10.1007/s11205-014-0619-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Commerce. (1974). Social indicators, 1973. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Health Education and Welfare. (1969). Toward a social report. Retrieved from Washington, DC.

  • Watson, G. B. (1930). Happiness among adult students of education. Journal of Educational Psychology, 21, 79–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wessman, A. E., & Ricks, D. F. (1966). Mood and personality. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • WHO Regional Office for Europe. (2012). Measurement of and target-setting for well-being: Second meeting of the expert group, Paris, 25–26 June 2012. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea Grant funded by the Korean Government (NRF-2013S1A3A2054622).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert A. Cummins.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cummins, R.A. Subjective Wellbeing as a Social Indicator. Soc Indic Res 135, 879–891 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-016-1496-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-016-1496-x

Keywords

Navigation