Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Journal self-citation rates in ecological sciences

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Impact factors are a widely accepted means for the assessment of journal quality. However, journal editors have possibilities to influence the impact factor of their journals, for example, by requesting authors to cite additional papers published recently in that journal thus increasing the self-citation rate. I calculated self-citation rates of journals ranked in the Journal Citation Reports of ISI in the subject category “Ecology” (n = 107). On average, self citation was responsible for 16.2 ± 1.3% (mean ± SE) of the impact factor in 2004. The self-citation rates decrease with increasing journal impact, but even high impact journals show large variation. Six journals suspected to request for additional citations showed high self-citation rates, which increased over the last seven years. To avoid further deliberate increases in self-citation rates, I suggest to take journal-specific self-citation rates into account for journal rankings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adam, D. (2002), The counting house. Nature, 415: 726–729.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agrawal, A. A. (2005), Corruption of journal impact factors. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 20: 157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ANON (2001), Statgraphics Plus for Windows, ver. 5.1. Manugistics, Rockville, MD, USA.

  • ANON (2004), R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. (URL http://www.R-project.org/ )

  • Baylis, M., Gravenor, M., Kao, R. (1999), Sprucing up one’s impact factor. Nature, 401: 321–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campanario, J. M., Gonzalez, L. (2006), Journal self-citations that contribute to the impact factor: documents labeled “editorial material” in journals covered by Science Citation Index. Scientometrics, 69: 365–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Editor’s Note (2005), Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 20: 157.

  • Garfield, E. (1999), Journal impact factor: A brief review. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 161: 979–980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hemmingsson, A., Edgren, J., Mygind, T., Skjennald, A. (2002b), Impact factors in scientific journals. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 15: 619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hemmingsson, A., Mygind, T., Skjennald, A., Edgren, J. (2002a), Manipulation of impact factors by editors of scientific journals. American Journal of Roentgenology, 178: 767.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, D. A. (2004), The scientific impact of nations. Nature, 430: 311–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kokko, H., Sutherland, W. J. (1999), What do impact factors tell us? Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 14: 382–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurmis, A. P. (2003), Understanding the limitations of the journal impact factor. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume, 85: 2449–2454.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, P. A. (2003), The politics of publication. Nature, 422: 259–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leimu, R., Koricheva, J. (2005), What determines the citation frequency of ecological papers? Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 20: 28–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monastersky, R. (2005), The number that’s devouring science. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 52: A12. (14 October 2005; http://chronicle.com/free/v52/i08/08a01201.htm)

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussey, D. H., Clutton-Brock, T. H., Elston, D. A., Albon, S. D., Kruuk, L. E. B. (2005), Phenotypic plasticity in a maternal trait in red deer. Journal of Animal Ecology, 74: 387–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Opthof, T. (1997), Sense and nonsense about the impact factor. Cardiovascular Research, 33: 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Partain, C. L., Fullerton, G. D. (2002), Editor’s Note. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 15: 619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, L. F. (2002), From the editor’s notebook; impact factor: the numbers game. American Journal of Roentgenology, 178: 541–542.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, R. (1999), Temporal differences in self-citation rates of scientific journals. Scientometrics, 44: 521–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, H., Bonzi, S. (1998), Patterns of self-citation across disciplines. Journal of Information Science, 24: 431–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, B. B. M., Kokko, H. (2005), Is science as global as we think? Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 20: 475–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Environmental Sciences, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland

    Jochen Krauss

  2. Department of Animal Ecology I, Population Ecology, Universitätsstrasse 30, 95447, Bayreuth, Germany

    Jochen Krauss

Authors
  1. Jochen Krauss
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jochen Krauss.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Krauss, J. Journal self-citation rates in ecological sciences. Scientometrics 73, 79–89 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1727-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1727-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation