Abstract
This study reports findings on the relative effects from a yearlong secondary intervention contrasting large-group, small-group, and school-provided interventions emphasizing word study, vocabulary development, fluency, and comprehension with seventh- and eighth-graders with reading difficulties. Findings indicate that few statistically significant results or clinically significant gains were associated with group size or intervention. Findings also indicate that a significant acceleration of reading outcomes for seventh- and eighth-graders from high-poverty schools is unlikely to result from a 50 min daily class. Instead, the findings indicate, achieving this outcome will require more comprehensive models including more extensive intervention (e.g., more time, even smaller groups), interventions that are longer in duration (multiple years), and interventions that vary in emphasis based on specific students’ needs (e.g., increased focus on comprehension or word study).
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Archer, A. L., Gleason, M. M., & Vachon, V. L. (2003). Decoding and fluency: Foundation skills for struggling older readers. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 26, 89–101.
Archer, A. L., Gleason, M. M., & Vachon, V. (2005). REWARDS intermediate: Multisyllabic word reading strategies. Longmont, CO: Sopris West.
Biancarosa, G., & Snow, C. E. (2004). Reading next—A vision for action and research in middle and high school literacy: A report from Carnegie Corporation of New York. Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellence in Education.
Corrin, W., Somers, M., Kemple, J. J., Nelson, E., Sepanik, S., Salinger, T., et al. (2008). The enhanced reading opportunities study: Findings from the second year of implementation. Washington, DC: US Department of Education (NCEE 2009–4037).
Denton, C., Bryan, D., Wexler, J., Reed, D., & Vaughn, S. (2007). Effective instruction for middle school students with reading difficulties: The reading teacher’s sourcebook. Austin, TX: University of Texas System/Texas Education Agency.
Denton, C. A., Wexler, J., Vaughn, S., & Bryan, D. (2008). Intervention provided to linguistically diverse middle school students with severe reading difficulties. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 23(2), 79–89.
Dobson, A. J. (1990). An introduction to generalized linear models. London: Chapman and Hall.
Edmonds, M. S., Vaughn, S., Wexler, J., Reutebuch, C. K., Cable, A., Tackett, K., et al. (2009). A synthesis of reading interventions and effects on reading outcomes for older struggling readers. Review of Educational Research, 79(1), 262–300.
Fletcher, J. M., Lyon, G. R., Fuchs, L. S., & Barnes, M. A. (2006). Learning disabilities: From identification to intervention. New York: Guilford.
Green, P., & Silverman, B. (1994). Nonparametric regression and generalized linear models. Glasgow: Chapman and Hall.
Heward, W. L., & Silvestri, S. M. (2005). The neutralization of special education. In J. W. Jacobson, R. M. Foxx, & J. A. Mulick (Eds.), Controversial therapies for developmental disabilities: Fad, fashion and science in professional practice (pp. 193–214). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Kamil, M. L., Borman, G. D., Dole, J., Kral, C. C., Salinger, T., & Torgesen, J. (2008). Improving adolescent literacy: Effective classroom and intervention practices: A practice guide. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, US Department of Education (NCEE 2008-4027).
Kaufman, A. S., & Kaufman, N. L. (2004). Kaufman brief intelligence test (2nd ed.). Minneapolis, MN: Pearson Assessment (K-BIT-2).
Kemple, J. J., Corrin, W., Nelson, E., Salinger, T., Herrmann, S., & Drummond, K. (2008). The enhanced reading opportunities study: Early impact and implementation findings. Washington, DC: US Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance.
Lang, L., Torgesen, J., Vogel, W., Chanter, C., Lefsky, E., & Petscher, Y. (2009). Exploring the relative effectiveness of reading interventions for high school students. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 2(2), 149–194.
Lee, J., Grigg, W. S., & Donahue, P. L. (2007). The nation’s report card: Reading 2007. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, US Department of Education (NCES 2007-4960).
Lexile Framework for Reading. (2007). Durham, NC: MetaMetrics.
McCray, A. D., Vaughn, S., & La Vonne, I. N. (2001). Not all students learn to read by third grade: Middle school students speak out about their reading disabilities. Journal of Special Education, 35, 17–30.
Muthen, L. K., & Muthen, B. O. (1998–2007). MPlus statistical analysis with latent variables: User’s guide (5th ed.). Los Angeles: Muthen & Muthen (NAEP, 2007).
SAS Institute. (2002–2003). SAS v. 9.1.3 Service Pack 4 [Computer program]. Cary, NC: Author.
Scammacca, N., Roberts, G., Vaughn, S., Edmonds, M., Wexler, J., Reutebuch, C. K., et al. (2007). Interventions for adolescent struggling readers: A meta-analysis with implications for practice. Portsmouth, NH: RMC Research Corporation, Center on Instruction.
Shinn, M. R., & Shinn, M. M. (2002). AIMSweb training workbook: Administration and scoring of reading maze for use in general outcome measurement. Eden Prairie, MN: Edformation.
Snow, C. E. (2002). Second language learners and understanding the brain. In A. M. Galaburda & S. M. Kosslyn (Eds.), Languages of the brain (pp. 151–165). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
Texas Education Agency. (2004a). Appendix 20—Technical digest 2004–2005. Retrieved January 8, 2009, from http://ritter.tea.state.tx.us/student.assessment/resources/techdig05/appendices.html.
Texas Education Agency. (2004b). Appendix 24—Technical digest 2004–2005. Retrieved January 8, 2009, from http://ritter.tea.state.tx.us/student.assessment/resources/techdig05/appendices.html.
Texas Education Agency. (2004c). Technical digest 2004–2005. Retrieved January 8, 2009, from http://ritter.tea.state.tx.us/student.assessment/resources/techdig05/index.html.
Torgesen, J., Alexander, A. W., Wagner, R. K., Rashotte, C. A., Voeller, K. K. S., & Conway, T. (2001). Intensive remedial instruction for children with severe reading disabilities: Immediate and long-term outcomes from two instructional approaches. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34, 33–58.
Torgesen, J. K., Houston, D., Rissman, L., Decker, S., Roberts, G., Vaughn, S., et al. (2007). Academic literacy instruction for adolescents: A guiding document from the Center on Instruction. Portsmouth, NH: RMC Research Corporation, Center on Instruction.
Torgesen, J. K., Rashotte, C., Alexander, A. W., Alexander, J., & MacPhee, K. (2003). Progress toward understanding the instructional conditions necessary for remediating reading difficulties in older children. In B. Foorman (Ed.), Preventing and remediating reading difficulties: Bringing science to scale (pp. 275–297). Baltimore: York.
Torgesen, J. K., Wagner, R. K., Rashotte, C. A., Rose, E., Lindamood, P., Conway, T., et al. (1999). Preventing reading failure in young children with phonological processing disabilities: Group and individual responses to instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 579–593.
Vaughn, S., Fletcher, J. M., Francis, D. J., Denton, C. A., Wanzek, J., Wexler, J., et al. (2008). Response to intervention with older students with reading difficulties. Learning and Individual Differences, 18, 338–345.
Vaughn, S., Linan-Thompson, S., & Hickman, P. (2003). Response to instruction as a means of identifying students with reading/learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 69, 391–409.
Wagner, R. K., Torgesen, J. K., Rashotte, C. A., & Pearson, N. (In press). The test of silent reading efficiency and comprehension (TOSREC). Austin, TX: PRO-Ed.
Wanzek, J., & Vaughn, S. (2007). Research-based implications from extensive early reading interventions. School Psychology Review, 36, 541–561.
Wilder, A. A., & Williams, J. P. (2001). Students with severe learning disabilities can learn higher order comprehension skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 268–278.
Woodcock, R. W., McGrew, K., & Mather, N. (2001). Woodcock-Johnson III tests of achievement. Itasca, IL:Riverside.
Zeno, S. M., Ivens, S. H., Millard, R. T., & Duvvuri, R. (1995). The educator’s word frequency guide. New York: Touchstone Applied Science Associates.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Vaughn, S., Wanzek, J., Wexler, J. et al. The relative effects of group size on reading progress of older students with reading difficulties. Read Writ 23, 931–956 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9183-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9183-9