Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Does the Statutory Regulation of Advance Decision-Making Provide Adequate Respect for Patient Autonomy?

  • Published:
Liverpool Law Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper considers advance decision-making in the context of healthcare. The common law recognition of advance decisions is contrasted with new statutory provision. This paper will examine the Mental Capacity Act 2005 framework for advance decisions and lasting powers of attorney. The ‚best interests’ test and substituted judgment as criteria for proxy decision-making are compared by application to a case example. The paper examines the statutory safeguards in respect of refusals of ‚life-sustaining treatment’ and postulates that these safeguards may render respect for autonomous advance decision-making difficult to achieve in practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carolyn Johnston.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Johnston, C. Does the Statutory Regulation of Advance Decision-Making Provide Adequate Respect for Patient Autonomy?. Liverpool Law Rev 26, 189–203 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10991-005-4843-6

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10991-005-4843-6

Keywords

Navigation