Abstract
Purpose To assess the impact of workplace-based return-to-work (RTW) Coordinators’ interpersonal and functional activities on RTW outcomes. Methods Multivariable logistic regression analyses of cross-sectional and longitudinal survey responses of 632 injured workers with at least 10 days of work absence in Victoria, Australia, adjusting for demographic and other workplace factors. Outcome was being back at work for at least 1 month, measured at both baseline and 6 month follow-up survey. Participant responses to stressfulness of Coordinator interactions were dichotomised into good and poor and evaluated as a proxy for Coordinators’ interpersonal activities, while having a RTW plan was evaluated as a proxy for functional activities. Results At baseline, RTW plans doubled the odds of RTW (OR 2.02; 95% CI 1.40–2.90) and attenuated the impact of good Coordinator interactions (1.14; 0.77–1.70). At 6-month follow-up, the opposite was observed: good interactions nearly doubled odds of RTW (1.90; 1.22–2.95) while RTW plans were non-significant (1.02; 0.68–1.54). Conclusions Differences between when the two Coordinator activities were effective may be due to the nature of claimants who RTW in each survey period. Length of shorter-duration claims are influenced by injury related factors, while psychosocial factors tend to be more important for longer-duration claims. Such factors may determine whether a claimant is more likely to respond to Coordinators’ functional or interpersonal activities. The findings have important implications for increasing Coordinator effectiveness.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
International Labour Organization. Safety and health at work: a vision for sustainable prevention: XX world congress on safety and health at work 2014: global forum for prevention, 24–27 August 2014, Frankfurt, Germany. Geneva: International Labour Office; 2014. http://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---ed_protect/---protrav/---safework/documents/publication/wcms_301214.pdf.
Waddell G, Burton AK. Is work good for your health and well-being? London: Department for Work and Pensions; 2006.
McKee-Ryan FM, Song Z, Wanberg CR, Kinicki AJ. Psychological and physical well-being during unemployment: a meta-analytic study. J Appl Psychol. 2005;90(1):53–76.
Broom DH, D’Souza RM, Strazdins L, Butterworth P, Parslow R, Rodgers B. The lesser evil: bad jobs or unemployment? A survey of mid-aged Australians. Soc Sci Med. 2006;63(3):575–586.
Milner A, Krnjacki L, Butterworth P, Kavanagh A, LaMontagne AD. Does disability status modify the association between psychosocial job quality and mental health? A longitudinal fixed-effects analysis. Soc Sci Med. 2015;144:104–111. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.09.024.
Gardner BT, Pransky G, Shaw WS, Hong QN, Loisel P. Researcher perspectives on competencies of return-to-work coordinators. Disabil Rehabil. 2010;32(1):72–78.
Shaw WS, Hong QN, Pransky G, Loisel P. A literature review describing the role of return-to-work coordinators in trial programs and interventions designed to prevent workplace disability. J Occup Rehabil. 2008;18(1):2–15.
Franche RL, Cullen K, Clarke J, Irvin E, Sinclair S, Frank J, et al. Workplace-based return-to-work interventions: a systematic review of the quantitative literature. J Occup Rehabil. 2005;15(4):607–631.
Tompa E, de Oliveira C, Dolinschi R, Irvin E. A systematic review of disability management interventions with economic evaluations. J Occup Rehabil. 2008;18(1):16–26.
Durand MJ, Corbiere M, Coutu MF, Reinharz D, Albert V. A review of best work-absence management and return-to-work practices for workers with musculoskeletal or common mental disorders. Work. 2014;48(4):579–589. doi:10.3233/WOR-141914.
Bohatko-Naismith J, James C, Guest M, Rivett DA. The role of the Australian workplace return to work cordinator: essential qualities and attributes. J Occup Rehabil. 2015;25(1):65–73.
Bohatko-Naismith J, Rivett DA, James C, Guest M. A review of the role and training of return to work coordinators in Australia. J Health Saf Environ. 2012;28(2):173–190.
WorkSafe Victoria. Return to work coordination: the basics you need to know. In: Victorian WorkCover Authority, editor. Melbourne: WorkSafe Victoria; 2013.
Durand MJ, Iuliana N, Coutu MF, Bernier M. Practices of return-to-work coordinators working in large organizations. J Occup Rehabil. 2017;27(1):137–147.
Tan HSK, Yeo DSC, Giam JYT, Cheong FWF, Chan KF. A randomized controlled trial of a return-to-work coordinator model of care in a general hospital to facilitate return to work of injured workers. Work. 2016;54(1):209–222.
Vogel N, Schandelmaier S, Zumbrunn T, Ebrahim S, de Boer WEL, Busse JW et al. Return-to-work coordination programmes for improving return to work in workers on sick leave. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD011618.
Pransky G, Shaw WS, Loisel P, Hong QN. Development and validation of competencies for return to work coordinators. J Occup Rehabil. 2010;20(1):41–48.
WorkSafe Victoria. VCode: the nature of injury/disease classification system for Victoria. Melbourne: WorkSafe Victoria; 2008. https://www.worksafe.vic.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0010/10513/VCode_Vs1.2_1_July_2008_26_June_08.pdf.
Australian Safety and Compensation Council. Type of occurrence classification system 3rd edition revision 1. Canberra: Australian Government; 2008. https://www.safeworkaustralia.gov.au/system/files/documents/1702/type_of_occurrence_classification_system_3rd_edition_revision_1.pdf.
Berecki-Gisolf J, Clay FJ, Collie A, McClure RJ. Predictors of sustained Return to Work after work-related injury or disease: insights from workers’ compensation claims. J Occup Rehabil. 2012;22(3):283–291.
Steenstra IA, Lee H, de Vroome EMM, Busse JW, Hogg-Johnson S. Comparing current definitions of return to work: a measurement approach. J Occup Rehabil. 2012;22(3):394–400.
JGraph Ltd. draw.io. London, UK; 2017. https://www.draw.io/.
Lane TJ, Collie A, Hassani-Mahmooei B. Work-related injury and illness in Australia, 2004 to 2014: what is the incidence of work-related conditions and their impact on time loss from work by state and territory, age, gender and injury type? Melbourne: Monash University (ISCRR); 2016. Contract No.: 118-0616-R02. http://www.iscrr.com.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0020/540830/118_Work-injury-in-Australia-Review-2004-2014.pdf.
Hogg-Johnson S, Cole DC. Early prognostic factors for duration on temporary total benefits in the first year among workers with compensated occupational soft tissue injuries. Occup Environ Med. 2003;60(4):244–253.
Cole DC, Mondloch MV, Hogg-Johnson S. Listening to injured workers: how recovery expectations predict outcomes. Can Med Assoc J. 2002;166(6):749–754.
Kristensen TS, Hannerz H, Høgh A, Borg V. The Copenhagen psychosocial questionnaire: a tool for the assessment and improvement of the psychosocial work environment. Scand J Work Env Hea. 2005;31(6):438–449.
Franche RL, Corbière M, Lee H, Breslin FC, Hepburn CG. The Readiness for return-to-work (RRTW) scale: development and validation of a self-report staging scale in lost-time claimants with musculoskeletal disorders. J Occup Rehabil. 2007;17(3):450–472. doi:10.1007/s10926-007-9097-9.
Cousins R, MacKay CJ, Clarke SD, Kelly C, Kelly PJ, McCaig RH. ‘Management Standards’ work-related stress in the UK: practical development. Work Stress. 2004;18(2):113–136.
MacKay CJ, Cousins R, Kelly PJ, Lee S, McCaig RH. ‘Management Standards’ and work-related stress in the UK: policy background and science. Work Stress. 2004;18(2):91–112.
Breaugh JA. The measurement of work autonomy. Hum Relat. 1985;38(6):551–570.
Rothman KJ. Epidemiology: an introduction, 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2012.
Bliss R, Weinberg J, Webster T, Vieira V. Determining the probability distribution and evaluating sensitivity and false positive rate of a confounder detection method applied to logistic regression. J Biom Biostat. 2012;3(4):142. doi:10.4172/2155-6180.1000142.
Shrive FM, Stuart H, Quan H, Ghali WA. Dealing with missing data in a multi-question depression scale: a comparison of imputation methods. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006;6(1):57. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-6-57.
Downey RG, King CV. Missing data in likert ratings: a comparison of replacement methods. J Gen Psychol. 1998;125(2):175–191.
Krause N, Dasinger LK, Deegan LJ, Rudolph L, Brand RJ. Psychosocial job factors and return-to-work after compensated low back injury: a disability phase-specific analysis. Am J Ind Med. 2001;40(4):374–392.
Dasinger LK, Krause N, Deegan LJ, Brand RJ, Rudolph L. Physical workplace factors and return to work after compensated low back injury: a disability phase-specific analysis. J Occup Environ Med. 2000;42(3):323–333.
Glass D. Investigation into the management of complex workers compensation claims and WorkSafe oversight. Melbourne: Victorian Ombudsman; 2016. Contract No.: 203.
Schultz IZ, Gatchel RJ, editors. Handbook of complex occupational disability claims: early risk identification, intervention, and prevention. New York: Springer; 2005.
Street TD, Lacey SJ. A systematic review of studies identifying predictors of poor return to work outcomes following workplace injury. Work. 2015;51(2):373–381.
Steenstra IA, Busse JW, Tolusso D, Davilmar A, Lee H, Furlan AD, et al. Predicting time on prolonged benefits for injured workers with acute back pain. J Occup Rehabil. 2015;25(2):267–278.
Bohatko-Naismith J, Guest M, Rivett DA, James C. Insights into workplace return to work coordinator training: an Australian perspective. Work. 2016;55(1):29–36.
Cooney R, Mwila NK. Improving return to work (RTW) Coordinator training. Melbourne: Institute for Safety, Compensation and Recovery Research, Monash University; 2013. Contract No.: 1212-033-R2C.
Levine DI, Toffel MW, Johnson MS. Randomized government safety inspections reduce worker injuries with no detectable job loss. Science. 2012;336(6083):907–911.
Lobo FS, Wagner S, Gross CR, Schommer JC. Addressing the issue of channeling bias in observational studies with propensity scores analysis. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2006;2(1):143–151.
Acknowledgements
This research was funded by the Australian Research Council via a Linkage Grant (LP130100091).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
TJL conceived the study, conducted analyses, and drafted the manuscript. PMS, SH-J, RL, ADL, and MRS were responsible for the overall cohort design and data collection. TJL, PMS, SH-G, and MRS developed the analysis strategy. All authors made editorial contributions.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict interest
TJL receives salary support from a WorkSafe Victoria grant. WorkSafe Victoria regulates workers’ compensation policies affecting the participants in this study. PMS, RL, SH-J, ADL, and MRS declare they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical Approval
This project received a Human Ethics Certificate of Approval from the Monash University Human Research Ethics Committee on 19 November 2013. All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lane, T.J., Lilley, R., Hogg-Johnson, S. et al. A Prospective Cohort Study of the Impact of Return-to-Work Coordinators in Getting Injured Workers Back on the Job. J Occup Rehabil 28, 298–306 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-017-9719-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-017-9719-9