Skip to main content
Log in

Gambling Participation and Problem Gambling Severity in a Stratified Random Survey: Findings from the Second Social and Economic Impact Study of Gambling in Tasmania

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Gambling Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Demographic characteristics associated with gambling participation and problem gambling severity were investigated in a stratified random survey in Tasmania, Australia. Computer-assisted telephone interviews were conducted in March 2011 resulting in a representative sample of 4,303 Tasmanian residents aged 18 years or older. Overall, 64.8 % of Tasmanian adults reported participating in some form of gambling in the previous 12 months. The most common forms of gambling were lotteries (46.5 %), keno (24.3 %), instant scratch tickets (24.3 %), and electronic gaming machines (20.5 %). Gambling severity rates were estimated at non-gambling (34.8 %), non-problem gambling (57.4 %), low risk gambling (5.3 %), moderate risk (1.8 %), and problem gambling (.7 %). Compared to Tasmanian gamblers as a whole significantly higher annual participation rates were reported by couples with no children, those in full time paid employment, and people who did not complete secondary school. Compared to Tasmanian gamblers as a whole significantly higher gambling frequencies were reported by males, people aged 65 or older, and people who were on pensions or were unable to work. Compared to Tasmanian gamblers as a whole significantly higher gambling expenditure was reported by males. The highest average expenditure was for horse and greyhound racing ($AUD 1,556), double the next highest gambling activity electronic gaming machines ($AUD 767). Compared to Tasmanian gamblers as a whole problem gamblers were significantly younger, in paid employment, reported lower incomes, and were born in Australia. Although gambling participation rates appear to be falling, problem gambling severity rates remain stable. These changes appear to reflect a maturing gambling market and the need for population specific harm minimisation strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Although the Productivity Commission reported on a national gambling study in 1999 they did not report demographic data based on a prevalence survey for Tasmania. Consequently, the 1999 national prevalence study is excluded from this analysis.

References

  • Allen Consulting Group, Problem Gambling Research and Treatment Centre, and the Social Research Centre (2011). Social and economic impact study of gambling in Tasmania (Vols. 1–3). Hobart, TAS: The Tasmanian Government Department of Treasury and Finance.

  • Australasian Gaming Council. (2012). Database on Australia’s gambling industries 09/10. VIC Author: Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2006a). Census of population and housing: Socio-economic indexes for areas. Canberra, ACT: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2006b). Population by age and sex, Australia. Canberra, ACT: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2011). Consumer price index. Canberra, ACT: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaszczynski, A., Ladouceur, R., Goulet, A., & Savard, C. (2006). How much do you spend gambling? Ambiguities in questionnaire items assessing expenditure. International Gambling Studies, 6, 123–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York, NY: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, T., & Rodgers, B. (2010). 2009 Survey of the nature and extent of gambling, and problem gambling, in the Australian Capital Territory. Canberra, ACT: Australian National University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Justice. (2009). Problem gambling from a public health perspective: A study of gambling in Victoria. Melbourne, VIC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Justice and Attorney-General. (2012). Queensland household gambling survey 2011–2012. Brisbane, QLD: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickerson, M., & Maddern, R. (1997). The extent and impact of gambling in Tasmania with particular reference to problem gambling: A follow up to the baseline study conducted in 1994. The extent and impact of gambling in Tasmania, 1996. Sydney, NSW: Australian Institute for Gambling Research.

  • Dickerson, M., Walker, M., & Baron, E. (1994). A baseline study of the extent and impact of gambling Tasmania with particular reference to problem gambling. Sydney, NSW: Australian Institute for Gambling Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowling, N. A. (2013). The cognitive-behavioral treatment of female problem gambling. In David C. S. Richard, Alex A. Blaszczynski and L. L. Nower (Eds.), The wiley-blackwell handbook for disordered gambling. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

  • Ferris, J., & Wynne, H. (2001). The Canadian problem gambling index: Final report. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse.

    Google Scholar 

  • Government Statistician. (2012). Australian gambling statistics. Brisbane, QLD: Queensland Treasury and Trade.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, R., & Derevensky, J. (2001). An examination of the differential coping styles of adolescents with gambling problems. Toronto, ON: Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hing, N., Vitartas, P., & Lamont, M. J. (2013). Gambling sponsorship of sport: An exploratory study of links with gambling attitudes and intentions. International Gambling Studies, 13, 281–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, A. C., Wynne, H., Dowling, N. A., Tomnay, J. E., & Thomas, S. A. (2010). Using the CPGI to determine problem gambling prevalence in Australia: Measurement issues. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 8, 570–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LaPlante, D. S., & Shaffer, H. J. (2007). Understanding the influence of gambling opportunities: Expanding exposure models to include adaptation. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 77, 616–623.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lesieur, H. R., & Blume, S. B. (1987). The South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS): A New instrument for the identification of pathological gamblers. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 144, 1184–1188.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McMillen, J., & Pitt, S. (2005). Review of the ACT government’s harm minisation measures. Canberra, ACT: Centre for Gambling Research, Australian National University.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Centre for Social Research. (2010). British gambling prevalence survey. Brimingham, West Midlands: The Gambling Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neale, P., Delfabbro, P., & O’Neil, M. (2005). Problem gambling and harm: A national definition. Adeliade, SA: Gambling Research Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Office for Problem Gambling (2006). Gambling prevalence in South Australia: October to December 2005. Adeliade, SA: Population Research and Outcome Studies Unit.

  • Ogilvy Illumination: Strategic Communication Research (2012). Prevalence of gambling and problem gambling in New South Wales. Sydney, VIC: NSW Office of Liquor, Gaming and Racing.

  • Productivity Commission (1999). Australia’s gambling industries. Report No. 10. Canberra, VIC. Author.

  • Productivity Commission (2010). Gambling. Report No. 50. Canberra, VIC. Author.

  • Purdie, N., Matters, G., Hillman, K., Murphy, M., Ozolins, C., & Millwood, P. (2011). Gambling and young people in Australia. Melbourne, VIC: Australian Council for Educational Research Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Risley, K. (2003). Report on smoke-free policies in Australia. Melbourne, VIC: World Health Organisation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy Morgan Research. (2001). The third study into the extent and impact of gambling in Tasmania with particular reference to problem gambling: Follow up to the baseline studies conducted in 1994 and 1996. Hobart, TAS: Department of Health and Human Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy Morgan Research. (2006). The fourth study into the extent and impact of gambling in Tasmania with particular reference to problem gambling: Follow up to the studies conducted in 1994, 1996, and 2000. Hobart, TAS: Department of Health and Human Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silvers, J. A., McRae, K., Gabrieli, J. D. E., Gross, J. L., Remy, K. A., & Ochsner, K. N. (2012). Age-related differences in emotional reactivity, regulation, and rejection sensitivity in adolescence. Emotion, 12, 1235–1247.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Social Research Centre (2013). Gambling prevalence in South Australia. Melbourne, VIC: Office for Problem Gambling, South Australia Department for Communities and Social Inclusion.

  • South Australian Centre for Economic Studies. (2008). Social and economic impact study into gambling in Tasmania. Hobart, TAS: Department of Treasury and Finance.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg, L. (2008). A social neuroscience perspective on adolescent risk-taking. Developmental Review, 28, 78–106.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wenzel, M., McMillen, J., Marshall, D., & Ahmed, E. (2004). Validation of the Victorian gambling screen. Canberra, ACT: The Gambling Research Panel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, L. M., Brown, K. J., Palmer, D., Liddell, B. J., Kemp, A. H., Oliveri, G., et al. (2006). The Mellow years? The neural basis of improving emotional stability over age. The Journal of Neuroscience, 26, 6422–6430.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, R. J., Volberg, R. A., & Stevens, M. G. (2012). The population prevalence of problem gambling: Methodological influences, standardized rates, jurisdictional differences, and worldwide trends. Guelph, ON: The Ontario Problem Gambling Research Centre and the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long Term Care.

Download references

Acknowledgments

The second Social and Economic Impact Study of Gambling in Tasmania was funded by the Tasmanian Department of Treasury and Finance (Project IGFP 2010 01).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Darren R. Christensen or Nicki A. Dowling.

Additional information

Darren R. Christensen and Nicki A. Dowling have contributed equally to this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Christensen, D.R., Dowling, N.A., Jackson, A.C. et al. Gambling Participation and Problem Gambling Severity in a Stratified Random Survey: Findings from the Second Social and Economic Impact Study of Gambling in Tasmania. J Gambl Stud 31, 1317–1335 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-014-9495-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-014-9495-9

Keywords

Navigation