Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Perceptions of Organizational Politics and Employee Citizenship Behaviors: Conscientiousness and Self-monitoring as Moderators

  • Published:
Journal of Business and Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of the study was to examine the joint moderating effects of employees’ conscientiousness and self-monitoring on the relationship between perceptions of organizational politics and organizational citizenship behaviors.

Design/Methodology/Approach

Data were collected from 139 subordinate–supervisor dyads through networks of business contacts and university alums of a university in the Midwest US.

Findings

We found a significant three-way interaction between perceived politics, conscientiousness, and self-monitoring in predicting citizenship behaviors. High self-monitoring alleviated the negative effects of politics perceptions on the OCB of highly conscientious employees. Conversely, perceived politics was negatively related to the OCB of employees who reported having either low self-monitoring and high conscientiousness or high self-monitoring and low conscientiousness.

Implications

Our results advance the theoretical understanding of the relationship between perceptions of organizational politics and citizenship behaviors by integrating the occupational stress perspective with social exchange theory within the socio-analytic framework. Evidence suggests that employees with certain combinations of traits (e.g., low self-monitoring and high conscientiousness or high self-monitoring and low conscientiousness) were particularly susceptible to the negative effects of perceived politics. This knowledge may help practitioners identify training needs or motivational strategies to help alleviate the negative effects of perceived politics on employee citizenship behaviors.

Originality/Value

This study is one of the few that took a holistic person-oriented approach when examining the moderating effects of individual traits on the linkages between perceived politics and citizenship behaviors. In addition, we utilized supervisor ratings of citizenship behaviors to overcome concerns associated with common source bias.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. We also examined the hypothesized effects with an overall OCB score, and the results were nearly identical to when OCBI and OCBO were treated as separate dimensions of OCB. The detailed results for the overall OCB analysis can be obtained from the first author.

References

  • Allen, T. D., & Rush, M. C. (1998). The effects of organizational citizenship behavior on performance judgments: A field study and a laboratory experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 247–260.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The big five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44, 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrick, M. R., Stewart, G. L., & Piotrowski, M. (2002). Personality and job performance: Test of the mediating effects of motivation among sales representatives. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 43–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blau, P. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borman, W. C., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1993). Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance. In N. Schmitt & W. C. Borman (Eds.), Personnel selection in organizations (pp. 71–98). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, C.-H., Rosen, C. C., & Levy, P. E. (2009). The relationship between perceptions of organizational politics and employee attitudes, strain, and behavior: A meta-analytic examination. Academy of Management Journal, 52, 779–801.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S., & Aiken, L. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cropanzano, R., Howes, J. C., Grandey, A. A., & Toth, P. (1997). The relationship of organizational politics and support to work behaviors, attitudes, and stress. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18, 159–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, J. F., & Richter, A. W. (2006). Probing three-way interactions in moderated multiple regression: Development and application of a slope difference test. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 917–926.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Day, D. V., & Schleicher, D. J. (2006). Self-monitoring at work: A motive-based perspective. Journal of Personality, 74, 685–713.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Day, D. V., Schleicher, D. J., Unckless, A. L., & Hiller, N. J. (2002). Self-monitoring personality at work: A meta-analytic investigation of construct validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 390–401.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eatough, E. M., Chang, C.-H., Miloslavic, S., & Johnson, R. E. (2011). Relationships of role stressors with organizational citizenship behavior: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 619–632.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fedor, D. B., & Maslyn, J. M. (2002). Politics and political behavior: Where else do we go from here? In F. Dansereau & F. J. Yammarino (Eds.), Research in multi-level issues (Vol. 1, pp. 287–294). Oxford: Elsevier/JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fedor, D., Maslyn, J., Farmer, S., & Bettenhausen, K. (2008). The contribution of positive politics to the prediction of employee reactions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 38, 76–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferris, G. R., Adams, G., Kolodinsky, R. W., Hochwarter, W. A., & Ammeter, A. P. (2002). Perceptions of organizational politics: Theory and research directions. In F. Dansereau & F. J. Yammarino (Eds.), Research in multi-level issues (pp. 179–254). Oxford: Elsevier/JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferris, G. R., & Kacmar, K. M. (1992). Perceptions of organizational politics. Journal of Management, 18, 93–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferris, G. R., Perrewé, P. L., Anthony, W. P., & Gilmore, D. C. (2000). Political skill at work. Organizational Dynamics, 28, 25–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferris, G. R., Russ, G. S., & Fandt, P. M. (1989). Politics in organizations. In R. A. Giacalone & P. Rosenfeld (Eds.), Impression management in the organization (pp. 143–170). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferris, G. R., Treadway, D. C., Kolodinsky, R. W., Hochwarter, W. A., Kacmar, C. J., Douglas, C., et al. (2005). Development and validation of political skill inventory. Journal of Management, 31, 126–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferris, G. R., Treadway, D. C., Perrewe, P. L., Brouer, R. L., Douglas, C., & Lux, S. (2007). Political skill in organizations. Journal of Management, 33, 290–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, L. R. (1999). A broad-bandwidth, public domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor models. In I. Mervielde, I. Deary, F. De Fruyt, & F. Ostendorf (Eds.), Personality psychology in Europe (Vol. 7, pp. 7–28). Tilburg: Tilburg University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, A. M. (2008). The significance of task significance: Job performance effects, relational mechanisms, and boundary conditions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 108–124.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Halbesleben, J. R. B., & Bowler, W. M. (2007). Emotional exhaustion and job performance: The mediating role of motivation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 93–106.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, A. T., Hochwarter, W. A., Ferris, G. R., & Bowen, M. G. (2004). The dark side of politics in organizations. In R. W. Griffin & A. M. O’Leary-Kelly (Eds.), The dark side of organizational behavior (pp. 237–261). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrell-Cook, G., Ferris, G. R., & Dulebohn, J. H. (1999). Political behaviors as moderators of the perceptions of organizational politics-work outcomes relationships. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20, 1093–1105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hochwarter, W. A., Kolodinsky, R. W., Witt, L. A., Hall, A. T., Ferris, G. R., & Kacmar, M. K. (2006). Competing perspectives on the role of understanding in the politics perceptions–job performance relationship: A test of the ‘antidote’ versus ‘distraction’ hypotheses. In E. Vigoda-Gadot & A. Drory (Eds.), Handbook of organizational politics (pp. 271–285). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hochwarter, W. A., Witt, L. A., & Kacmar, L. M. (2000). Perceptions of organizational politics as a moderator of the relationship between conscientiousness and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 472–478.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, B. J., Blair, C. A., Meriac, J. P., & Woehr, D. J. (2007). Expanding the criterion domain? A quantitative review of the OCB literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 555–566.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, R. (1991). Personality and personality measurement. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (2nd ed., Vol. 2, pp. 873–919). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, R., Hogan, J., & Roberts, B. W. (1996). Personality measurement and employment decisions. American Psychologist, 51, 469–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, R., & Shelton, D. (1998). A socio-analytic perspective on job performance. Human Performance, 11, 129–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hough, L. M. (1992). The “big five” personality variables—construct confusion: Description versus prediction. Human Performance, 5, 139–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ilies, R., Nahrgang, J. D., & Morgeson, F. P. (2007). Leader-member exchange and citizenship behavior: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 269–277.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R. E., Rosen, C. C., & Djurdjevic, E. (2011). Assessing the impact of common method variance on higher-order multidimensional constructs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 744–761.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kacmar, K. M., & Carlson, D. S. (1997). Further validation of the Perceptions of Politics Scale (POPS): A multi-sample approach. Journal of Management, 23, 627–658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamdar, D., & Van Dyne, L. (2007). The joint effects of personality and workplace social exchange relationships in predicting task performance and citizenship performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1286–1298.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lennox, R. D., & Wolfe, R. N. (1984). Revision of the self-monitoring scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 1349–1364.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Levy, P. E. (2010). Industrial-organizational psychology: Understanding the workplace (3rd ed.). New York: Worth Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Longenecker, C., Sims, H., & Gioia, D. (1987). Behind the mask: The politics of employee appraisal. Academy of Management Executive, 1, 183–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MaCrae, R. R., & Löckenhoff, C. E. (2010). Self-regulation and the five-factor model of personality traits. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Handbook of personality and self-regulation (pp. 145–168). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Magnusson, D. (1995). Individual development: A holistic, integrated model. In P. Moen, G. L. Elder Jr, & K. Luscher (Eds.), Examining lives in context (pp. 19–60). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Maslyn, J. M., & Fedor, D. B. (1998). Perceptions of politics: Does measuring different foci matter? Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 645–653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mount, M. K., Barrick, M. R., & Strauss, J. P. (1999). The joint relationship of conscientiousness and ability with performance: Test of the interaction hypothesis. Journal of Management, 25, 707–721.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Organ, D. (1994). Personality and organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Management, 20, 465–479.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrewé, P. L., Zellars, K. L., Ferris, G. R., Rossi, A. M., Kacmar, C. J., & Ralston, D. A. (2004). Neutralizing job stressors: Political skill as an antidote to the dysfunctional consequences of role conflict. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 141–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879–903.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, C. C., & Levy, P. E. Stresses, swaps, and skill: An investigation of the psychological dynamics that relate work politics to employee performance. Human Performance (in press).

  • Rosen, C. C., Chang, C. H., Johnson, R. E., & Levy, P. E. (2009a). Perceptions of the organizational context and psychological contract breach: Assessing competing perspectives. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 108, 202–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, C. C., Chang, C.-H., & Levy, P. E. (2006a). Personality and politics perceptions: A new conceptualization and illustration using OCBs. In E. Vigoda-Gadot & A. Drory (Eds.), Handbook of organizational politics (pp. 29–52). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, C. C., Harris, K. J., & Kacmar, K. M. (2009b). The emotional implications of perceived organizational politics: A process model. Human Relations, 62, 27–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, C. C., Levy, P. E., & Hall, R. J. (2006b). Placing perceptions of politics in the context of the feedback environment, employee attitudes, and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 211–220.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rusbult, C., Campbell, M., & Price, M. (1990). Rational selective exploitation and distress: Employee reactions to performance-based and mobility-based reward allocations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 487–500.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schuler, R. S. (1980). Definition and conceptualization of stress in organizations. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 25, 184–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shore, L. M., Tetrick, L. E., Taylor, M. S., Coyle-Shapiro, J., Liden, R., McLean Parks, J., et al. (2004). The employee–organization relationship: A timely concept in a period of transition. In J. Martocchio (Ed.), Research in personnel and human resources management (Vol. 23, pp. 291–370). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spector, P. E. (2003). Individual differences in health and well-being in organizations. In D. A. Hofmann & L. E. Tetrick (Eds.), Health and safety in organizations: A multilevel perspective (pp. 29–55). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spector, P. E. (2006). Method variance in organizational research: Truth or urban legend? Organizational Research Methods, 9, 221–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sturman, M. C. (2003). Searching for the inverted u-shaped relationship between time and performance: Meta-analyses of the experience/performance, tenure/performance, and age/performance relationships. Journal of Management, 29, 609–640.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valle, M., & Perrewé, P. L. (2000). Do politics perceptions relate to political behaviors? Tests of an implicit assumption and expanded model. Human Relations, 53, 359–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Scotter, J., Motowidlo, S. J., & Cross, T. C. (2000). Effects of task performance and contextual performance on systemic rewards. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 526–535.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vroom, V. H. (1964). Work and motivation. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, J. C., & Chen, G. (2005). Development and validation of a work-specific measure of cognitive failure: Implications for occupational safety. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 78, 615–632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, L. J., & Anderson, S. E. (1991). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors. Journal of Management, 17, 601–617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Witt, L. A., Burke, L. A., Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (2002a). The interactive effects of conscientiousness and agreeableness on job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 164–169.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Witt, L. A., & Ferris, G. R. (2003). Social skill as moderator of the conscientiousness–performance relationship: Convergent results across four studies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 809–820.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Witt, L. A., Kacmar, K. M., Carlson, D. S., & Zivnuska, S. (2002b). Interactive effects of personality and organizational politics on contextual performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23, 911–926.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

An earlier version of the paper was presented at the 2008 Southern Management Association Meeting.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chu-Hsiang Chang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chang, CH., Rosen, C.C., Siemieniec, G.M. et al. Perceptions of Organizational Politics and Employee Citizenship Behaviors: Conscientiousness and Self-monitoring as Moderators. J Bus Psychol 27, 395–406 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-012-9257-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-012-9257-6

Keywords

Navigation