Skip to main content
Log in

A discrete element model to predict the pressure-density relationship of blocky and angular ceramic particles under uniaxial compression

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, we present a numerical model based on the discrete element method (DEM) that incorporates contact friction and rolling resistance to simulate the uniaxial, isostatic compaction of hard, blocky and angular ceramic powders. The model has been formulated using the open-source software, YADE. In this numerical model, packing followed by the compaction of up to 25,000 powder particles has been simulated and the Hertz–Mindlin contact model has been used to simulate the rolling resistance and contact friction between the particles. The numerical model is discussed in detail and the pressure-density relationships developed by this model are compared with experimental data derived during the course of this study as well as data from two previous studies. Overall, the proposed simplistic DEM model is shown to produce good agreement with test results under considered loading conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hetherington JG (1992) The optimization of two component composite armours. Int J Impact Eng 12(3):409–414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Lankford J Jr (2004) The role of dynamic material properties in the performance of ceramic armor. Int J Appl Ceram Technol 1(3):205–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hazell PJ, Appleby-Thomas GJ, Toone S (2014) Ballistic compaction of a confined ceramic powder by a non-deforming projectile: experiments and simulations. Mater Des 56:943–952

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Holmquist TJ, Johnson GR (2002) Response of silicon carbide to high velocity impact. J Appl Phys 91:5858–5866

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Grove DJ, Rajendran AM (1996) Effects of pulverized material strength on penetration resistance of ceramic targets. In: AIP Conference Proceedings, AIP Publishing

  6. Horsfall I, Edwards MR, Hallas MJ (2010) Ballistic and physical properties of highly fractured alumina. Adv Appl Ceram 109(8):498–503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Walker JD (2003) Analytically modeling hypervelocity penetration of thick ceramic targets. Int J Impact Eng 29:747–755

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Anderson CE Jr et al (2008) Time-resolved penetration into pre-damaged hot-pressed silicon carbide. Int J Impact Eng 35(8):661–673

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chocran S et al (2005) A constitutive model for damaged and powder silicon carbide. Advances in ceramic armor: a collection of papers Presented at the 29th International Conference on Advanced Ceramics and Composites. Wiley, Cocoa Beach

    Google Scholar 

  10. Zeuch DH et al (2001) Mechanical properties and shear failure surfaces for two alumina powders in triaxial compression. J Mater Sci 36:2911–2924

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Pizette P et al (2010) Compaction of aggregated ceramic powders: from contact laws to fracture and yield surfaces. Powder Technol 198:240–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Tran DV et al (1993) Numerical modelling of powder compaction processes: displacement based finite element method. Powder Metall 36:257–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Cundall PA, Strack ODL (1979) A discrete numerical model for granular assemblies. Geotechnique 29(1):47–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Iwashita K, Oda M (1998) Rolling resistance at contacts in simulation of shear band development by DEM. J Eng Mech 124:285–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Iwashita K, Oda M (2000) Micro-deformation mechanism of shear banding process based on modified distinct element method. Powder Technol 109:192–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Jiang MJ, Yu HS, Harris D (2005) A novel discrete model for granular material incorporating rolling resistance. Comput Geotech 32:340–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Foo YY, Sheng Y, Briscoe BJ (2004) An experimental and numerical study of the compaction of alumina agglomerates. Int J Solids Struct 41:5929–5943

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kong CM, Lannutti JJ (2000) Localized densification during the compaction of alumina granules: the stage I–II transition. J Am Ceram Soc 83(4):685–690

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Martin CL, Bouvard D, Delette G (2006) Discrete element simulations of the compaction of aggregated ceramic powders. J Am Ceram Soc 89(11):3379–3387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Skrinjar O, Larsson P-L (2004) On discrete element modelling of compaction of powders with size ratio. Comput Mater Sci 31:131–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Borg JP, Vogler TJ (2009) Aspects of simulating the dynamic compaction of a granular ceramic. Model Simul Mater Sci Eng 17:045003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wu Y, An X, Huang F (2014) DEM simulation on packing densification of equal spheres under compression. Mater Res Innov 18:S4–S1082

    Google Scholar 

  23. Minh NH, Cheng YP (2013) A DEM investigation of the effect of particle-size distribution on one-dimensional compression. Geotechnique 61(1):44–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Wiacek J et al (2012) Influence of grain shape and intergranular friction on material behavior in uniaxial compression: experimental and DEM modeling. Powder Technol 217:435–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Skrinjar O, Larsson P-L (2012) Size ratio effects on particle contact evolution at uniaxial powder compaction. Part Sci Technol 30:364–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Donze FV, Bouchez J, Magnier SA (1997) Modeling fractures in rock blasting. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 34(8):1153–1163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Šmilauer V et al. (2010) Yade documentation, Šmilauer V (ed), The Yade Project

  28. Jerier JF et al (2011) Study of cold powder compaction by using the discrete element method. Powder Technol 208:537–541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Harthong B et al (2012) Contact impingement in packings of elastic–plastic spheres, application to powder compaction. Int J Mech Sci 61:32–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Thornton C, Antony SJ (1998) Quasi–static deformation of particulate media. Phil Trans R Soc Lond A 356(1747):2763–2782

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Mindlin RD, Deresiewicz H (1953) Elastic spheres in contact under varying oblique forces. J Appl Mech 20:327–344

    Google Scholar 

  32. Osman H (2012) Granular flow and heat transfer in a screw conveyor heater: a discrete element modeling study. Department of Mechanical Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore

    Google Scholar 

  33. Hertz HR (1895) Ueber die Beruehrung Elastischer Koerper (on contact between elastic bodies). Gesammelte Werke (collected works). Johann Ambrosius Barth, Leipzig

    Google Scholar 

  34. Ai J et al (2011) Assessment of rolling resistance models in discrete element simulations. Powder Technol 206:269–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Plaissard J-P, Belheine N, Donze F-V (2009) A spherical discrete element model: calibration procedure and incremental response. Granul Matter 11:293–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Auerkari P (1996) Mechanical and physical properties of engineering alumina ceramics. VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, Espoo

    Google Scholar 

  37. Kovacik J (1999) Correlation between Young’s modulus and porosity in porous materials. J Mater Sci Lett 18:1007–1010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Widlunski L, Kozicki J, Tejchman J (2009) Numerical simulations of triaxial test with sand using DEM. Arch Hydro-Eng Environ Mech 56(3–4):149–171

    Google Scholar 

  39. Stransky J, Jirasek M (2012) Open source FEM-DEM coupling. In 18th International Conference, Engineering Mechanics 2012, Svratka, Czech Republic

  40. Šmilauer V et al. (2010) Yade using and programming. In: Šmilauer V (ed), Yade Documentation

  41. Dutt M, Elliott JA (2014) Granular dynamics simulations of the effect of grain size dispersity on uniaxially compacted powder blends. Granul Matter 16:243–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. He Y et al (2015) Numerical modelling of die and unconfined compactions of wet particles. In: The 7th world congress on particle technology (WCPT7). Beijing, China: Proceedia Engineering

  43. Gilabert FA, Roux J-N, Castellanos A (2007) Computer simulation of model cohesive powders: Influence of assembling procedure and contact laws on low consolidation states. Phys Rev E 75:011303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Metco S (2014) Material product data sheet—aluminium oxide thermal spray powders

  45. Briscoe BJ, Rough SL (1998) The effects of wall friction in powder compaction. Colloids Surf A 137(1–3):103–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Mr. Patrick Nolan of UNSW Canberra for his invaluable support in conducting the experiments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. Mitra.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mitra, E., Hazell, P.J. & Ashraf, M. A discrete element model to predict the pressure-density relationship of blocky and angular ceramic particles under uniaxial compression. J Mater Sci 50, 7742–7751 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-015-9344-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-015-9344-y

Keywords

Navigation