Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Impacts of innovativeness and attitude on entrepreneurial intention: among engineering and non-engineering students

  • Published:
International Journal of Technology and Design Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study attempted to explore the impacts of attitudinal antecedents on students’ entrepreneurial intention. Comparisons between students of engineering and non-engineering backgrounds and gender groups were made. Total of 998 students from universities in Hong Kong were surveyed, leading to a number of highlights in the study. First, it is found that the learning motivation strongly correlates with innovativeness, which in return affects the entrepreneurship intention. Second, the educational measures designed for senior year students would be slightly different from those for junior year students, whilst the junior year students may need more facilitation to motivate their learning. Thirdly, the ‘innovativeness’ of engineering students is found significantly and strongly correlated to ‘self-efficacy’ and significantly to ‘attitude’. The ‘attitude’ of engineering students is found more significantly contributing to their ‘entrepreneurial intention’. The interesting results show that for engineering students, though perceiving higher levels of innovativeness, ‘attitudes’ and ‘entrepreneurial intention’, the critical attributes in determining ‘entrepreneurial intention’ are ‘attitudes’ and ‘self-efficacy’. Fourthly, attitudes seem a lot more influencing to the entrepreneurial intention among female students, whilst ‘innovation’ is the a lot more influencing among male students. There are some limitations in this study, such as the sample size and survey design. In order to secure a high level of content validity, some items of the constructs are excluded possibly due to the sample size and the uneven numbers of the different sample groups. Future study is recommended to include students from different countries in order to have more representative results, and the research model could be further extended to explore the effects of other demographic parameters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behaviour. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, I. (2005). Attitudes, personality and behavior. New York: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, D. M. (2008). Design for manufacturability and concurrent engineering. Cambria, CA: CIM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arenius, P., & Minniti, M. (2005). Perceptual variables and ansent entrepreneurs. Small Business Economics, 24, 233–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armitage, C. J., & Conner, M. (2001). Efficacy of the theory of planned behavior: Meta-analysis review. British Journal of Social Science, 40(4), 471–499.

    Google Scholar 

  • Autio, E., Keeley, R., Klofsten, M., Parker, G., & Hay, M. (2001). Entrepreneurial intent among students in Scandinavia and in the USA. Enterprise and Innovation Management Studies, 2(2), 145–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babnik, K., & TrunkSirca, N. (2014). Knowledge creation, transfer and retention: The case of intergenerational cooperation. International Journal of Innovation and Learning, 15(4), 349–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, R., Green, W. S., Hubbard, R. G., Jain, D., Katehi, L., McLendon, G., et al. (2007). Entrepreneurship in American Higher Education. Report from the Kauffman Panel on Entrepreneurship Curriculum in Higher Education.

  • Byers, T., Seelig, T., Sheppard, S., & Weilerstein, P. (2013). Entrepreneurship: Its role in engineering education. The bridge: The bridge on undergraduate engineering education. National Academy of Engineering, 43(2), 35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bygrave, W., & Zacharakis, A. (2008). Entrepreneurship (1st ed.). New Jersey: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chin, W. (2010). How to write up and report PLS analyses. In V. Esposito Vinzi, W. W. Chin, J. Henseler, & H. Wang (Eds.), Handbook of partial least squares (pp. 655–690). Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Da Silva, G. B., Costa, H. C., & De Barros, M. D. (2015). Entrepreneurship in engineering education: A literature review. International Journal of Engineering Education, 31(6), 1701–1710.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pryor J. H., DeAngelo, L., Blake, L. P., Hurtado, S., & Tran, S. (2012). The American Freshman: National Norms Fall 2011. UCLA Higher Education Research Institute.

  • Dermol, V., & Cater, T. (2013). The influence of training and training transfer factors on organisational learning and performance. Personnel Review, 42(3), 324–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickson, P. H., Solomon, G. T., & Weaver, K. W. (2008). Entrepreneurial selection and success: Does education matter? Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 15(2), 239–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dutta, D., Li, J., & Merenda, M. (2010). Fostering entrepreneurship: Impact of specialization and diversity in education. Berlin: International Entrepreneurship Management Journal, April. Springer Science + Business Media LLC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esposito Vinzi, V., Trinchera, L., & Amato, S. (2010). PLS path modeling: from foundations to recent developments and open issues for model assessment and improvement. In V. Esposito Vinzi, W. W. Chin, J. Henseler & H. Wang (eds.), Handbook of partial least squares (pp. 47–82). Berlin: Springer.

  • Fayolle, A., Gailly, B., & Lassas-Clerc, N. (2006). Assessing the impact of entrepreneruship education programs: A new methodology. Journal of European Industrial Training, 30(9), 701–720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiet, J. (2001). The theoretical side of teaching entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 16, 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fornell, C., & Bookstein, F. L. (1982). Two structural equation models: LISREL and PLS applied to consumer exit-voice theory. Journal of Marketing Research, 19(4), 440–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gird, A., & Bagraim, J. (2008). The theory of planned behaviour as predictor of entrepreneurial intent amongst final-year university students. South African Journal of Psychology, 38(4), 711–724.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, V., Turban, D., Wasti, S., & Sikdar, A. (2005). Entrepreneurship and stereotypes: Are entrepreneurs from Mars or from Venus?” Paper presented at the Academy of Management conference, Honolulu, Hawaii.

  • Hair, J., Black, B., Babin, B., Anderson, R., & Tatham, R. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henseler, J., & Sarstedt, M. (2013). Goodness-of-fit indices for partial least squares path modeling. Computational Statistics, 28(2), 565–580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hisrich, R. D., Peters, M. P., & Shepherd, D. A. (2008). Entrepreneurship (7th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolvereid, L. (1996). Predictions of employment status choice intentions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 21(1), 47–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolvereid, L., & Isaksen, E. (2006). New business start-up and subsequent entry into self-employment. Journal of Business Venturing, 21(6), 866–885.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krueger, N., Reilly, M., & Carsrud, A. (2000). Competing models of entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Business Venturing, 15, 411–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langowitz, N., & Minniti, M. (2007). The entrepreneurial propensity of women. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 31(3), 341–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linan, F., Rodriguez-Cohard, J. C., & Cantuche, J. M. (2011). Factors affecting entrepreneurial intention levels: A role for education. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 7(2), 195–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lo, C., Sun, H., & Law, K. M. Y. (2012). Comparing the entrepreneurial intention between female and male engineering students. Journal of Women Entrepreneurship., 1, 28–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lohmöller, J. B. (1989). Latent variable Path Modeling with Partial Least Squares. Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Luthje, C., & Franke, N. (2003). The ‘making’ of an entrepreneur: Testing a model of entrepreneurial intent among engineering students at MIT. R&D Management, 33, 135–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mäkimurto-Koivumaa, S., & Belt, P. (2015). About, for, in or through entrepreneurship in engineering education. European Journal of Engineering Education,. doi:10.1080/03043797.2015.1095163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maritz, A., & Brown, C. R. (2013). Illuminating the black box of entrepreneurship education programs. Education + Training, 55(3), 234–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matlay, H. (2005). Researching entrepreneurship and education: Part 1: What is entrepreneurship and does it matter? Education + Training, 47(89), 665–677.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mbaziira, S., & Oyedokun, C. (2007). Advancing entrepreneurship education in Namibia: A practical approach. Paper presented at the 5th International Conference on Entrepreneurship and Innovation, the Polytechnic of Namibia, 24–25 October.

  • Nelson, A. J., & Byers, T. (2010). Challenges in university technology transfer and the promising role of entrepreneurship education. Kauffman: Emerging Scholars Initiatives.

    Google Scholar 

  • Novak, A., Čepar, Ž., & Trunk, A. (2016). The role of expected years of schooling among life expectancy determinants. International Journal of Innovation and Learning, 20(1), 85–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, A. (2013). A conceptual framework for entrepreneurship education policy: Meeting government and economic purposes. Journal of Business Venturing, 28(1), 546–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pekkinen, L., Aaltonen, K., Kujala, J., & Harkonen, J. (2015). evaluating sources of risks in large engineering projects: The roles of equivocality and uncertainty. International Journal of Management, Knowledge and Learning, 4(2), 163–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterfreund, A. R. (2013). Epicenter baseline survey: Report of findings. Available online at http://sagefoxgroup.com/epicenter.

  • R Core Team. (2014). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www.R-project.org/.

  • Radharamanan, R., & Juang, J.-N. (2012). Innovation and entrepreneurship in engineering education at MUSE. Journal of the Chinese Institute of Engineers, 35(1), 25–36. doi:10.1080/02533839.2012.624797.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez, J. C. (2011). University training for entrepreneurial competencies: Its impact on intention of venture creation. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 7(2), 239–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez, G. (2013). PLS path modeling with R. Berkeley: Trowchez Editions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez, G., & Trinciguera, L. (2013). PLSPM: Partial least squares data analysis methods. R package version 0.2-2.

  • Sheeran, P. (2002). Intention-behavior relations: A conceptual and empirical review. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European Review of Social Psychology (pp. 1–36). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Souitaris, V., Zerbinati, S., & Al-Laham, A. (2007). Do entrepreneurship programs raise entrepreneurial intention of science and engineering students? The effect of learning, inspiration and resources. Journal of Business Venturing, 22, 566–591.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tenenhaus, M., Amato, S., & Esposito Vinzi, V. (2004). A global goodness of fit index for PLS structural equation modeling. In Proceedings of the XLII SIS Scientific Meeting, Contributed Papers, CLEUP, Padova (pp. 739–742).

  • Tidd, J., & Bessant, J. (2009). Managing innovation: integrating technological, market and organizational change (4th ed.). England: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Gelderen, M., Brand, M., vanPraag, M., Bodewes, W., Poutsma, E., & van Gils, A. (2008). Explaining entrepreneurial intentions by means of the theory of planned behaviour. Career Development International, 13, 538–559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verheul, I., VanStel, A., & Thurik, R. (2006). Explaining female and male entrepreneurship at the country level. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 18, 151–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. FJ 408, Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hunghom, Hong Kong

    Kris M. Y. Law

  2. International School for Social and Business Studies, Celje, Slovenia

    Kristijan Breznik

Authors
  1. Kris M. Y. Law
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kristijan Breznik
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kris M. Y. Law.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Law, K.M.Y., Breznik, K. Impacts of innovativeness and attitude on entrepreneurial intention: among engineering and non-engineering students. Int J Technol Des Educ 27, 683–700 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-016-9373-0

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-016-9373-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation