Abstract
There is growing interest, worldwide, in collaboration between schools and community organisations in contributing to and enriching school science programs, yet such collaborations are inadequately understood. This paper reports data from an Australian study designed to probe the views of members of the community who have participated in a broad range of such collaborations in school science programmes in order to better understand the issues which impact on their operation. The data were collected by interviews with the community participants selected by opportunistic sampling. The analysis reveals a number of issues—purposes, communication, organisational structures and curriculum—which can be seen as impacting on the collaborations. These are examined through the concepts of communities of practice, boundaries and boundary crossing, associated with people from scientific communities of practice interacting with school communities. The paper reflects on the implications of these findings for constructing effective school-community collaboration in school science programs.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aikenhead, G. (2005). Science education for everyday life: Evidence-based practice. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Akkerman, S. & Bakker, A. (2011). Boundary crossing and boundary objects. Review of Educational Research, 81(2), 132–169.
Bernstein, B. & Solomon, J. (1999). ‘Pedagogy, identity and the construction of a theory of symbolic control’: Basil Bernstein questioned by Joseph Solomon. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 20(2), 265–279.
Bernstein, B. (1986). On pedagogic discourse. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research in the sociology of education (pp. 205–239). New York, NY: Greenwood.
Cripps Clark, J., Tytler, R., & Symington, D. (2014). School-community collaborations: Bringing authentic science into schools. Teaching Science, 60(3), 28–34.
Dobson, I.R. (2007). Sustaining science: University science in the twenty-first century. Melbourne: Australian Council of the Deans of Science.
Duschl, R. & Grandy, R. (2008). Reconsidering the character and role of inquiry in school science: Framing the debates. In R. A. Duschl & R. Grandy (Eds.), Teaching scientific inquiry: Recommendations for research and implementation (pp. 1–37). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense.
Faculty of Engineering and Built Environment. (2013). Science and engineering challenge. Retrieved August 28, 2013 from http://www.newcastle.edu.au/faculty/engineering/community-engagement/challenge/
Forbes, G.A. (2014). MyScience: Communities of practice around the teaching and learning of primary science (Unpublished doctoral thesis). Southern Cross University, Lismore, NSW. <http://epubs.scu.edu.au/theses/366/>
Forbes, A. & Skamp, K. (2013). Knowing and learning about science in primary school ‘Communities of Practice’: The views of participating scientists in the MyScience project. Research in Science Education, 43(3), 1005–1028.
Forbes, A. & Skamp, K. (2014). “Because we weren’t actually teaching them, we thought they weren’t learning”: Primary teacher perspectives from the MyScience initiative. Research in Science Education, 44(1), 1–25. doi:10.1007/s11165-013-9367-9.
Goodrum, D., Hackling, M., & Rennie, L. (2001). The status and quality of teaching and learning of science in Australian schools. Canberra, Australia: DEST.
Guile, D. & Griffiths, T. (2001). Learning Through Work Experience. Journal of Education and Work, 14(1), 113–131.
Howitt, C. & Rennie, L. (2009). ‘Science has changed my life!’: Evaluation of the Scientists in Schools Project (A report prepared for CSIRO). Canberra, Australia: Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations.
Husher, K. (2010). Evaluation framework for Australian science and maths outreach programs in schools. (PhD), University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia.
Kisiel, J. (2010). Exploring a school-aquarium collaboration: An intersection of communities of practice. Science Education, 94(1), 95–121.
Law, D. & Tsui, A. (2008). Mutual engagement and boundary crossing in lesson studies. In A. B. M. Tsui & G. Edwards (Eds.), Learning in school-university partnership: Sociocultural perspectives (pp. 111–131). London: Routledge.
Lyons, T. (2005). Different countries, same science classes: Students’ experiences of school science in their own words. International Journal of Science Education, 28(6), 591–614.
Marginson, S., Tytler, R., Freeman, B. & Roberts, K. (2013). STEM: Country comparisons. Canberra: Australian Council of Learned Academies.
Nistor, N. & Fischer, F. (2012). Communities of practice in academia: Testing a quantitative model. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 1(2), 114–126.
Office of the Chief Scientist (2012). Mathematics, engineering and science in the national interest. Canberra: Australian Government.
Office of the Prime Minister’s Science Advisory Committee (2011). Looking ahead: Science education for the twenty first century. Wellington: New Zealand Government.
Pencil. (n.d.). D10 assessment of pilot projects. http://www.xplora.org/shared/data/xplora/pdf/Pencil_D10.pdf: xplora.
Rennie, L. (2012). “A very valuable partnership”. Evaluation of the scientists in schools project, 2011–2012. Dickson, Australia: CSIRO Education.
Rogoff, B. (1994). Developing understanding of the idea of communities of learners. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 1(4), 209–229.
Schreiner, C. & Sjøberg, S. (2007). Science education and youth’s identity construction—two incompatible projects? In D. Corrigan, J. Dillon & R. Gunstone (Eds.), The re-emergence of values in the science curriculum. Rotterdam. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense.
Singh, P., Sadovnik, A., & Semel, S. (Eds.). (2010). Toolkits, translation devices and conceptual accounts: Essays on Basil Bernstein’s Sociology of Knowledge. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
Slater, J. & Ravid, R. (Eds.). (2010). Collaboration in education. New York, NY: Routledge.
Star, S. & Griesemer, J. (1989). Institutional ecology, ‘Translations’ and boundary objects: amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology. Social Studies of Science, 19(3), 387–420.
Symington, D. & Tytler, R. (2011). Schools and teachers supporting student open investigations. Teaching science, 57(1), 8–12.
Tanggaard, L. (2007). Learning at trade vocational school and learning at work: boundary crossing in apprentices’ everyday life. Journal of Education and Work, 20(5), 453–466. doi:10.1080/13639080701814414.
Tytler R. (2007). Reimagining science education: Engaging students in science for Australia’s future. Australian Educational Review, 51. Retrieved from http://research.acer.edu.au/aer/3.
Tytler, R. & Nakos, S. (2003). School Innovation in Science: Transformative initiatives in Victorian secondary schools. Australian Science Teachers Journal, 49(4), 18–27.
Tytler, R. & Osborne, J. (2012). Student attitudes and aspirations towards science. In B. Fraser, K. Tobin & C. McRobbie (Eds.), Second international handbook of science education. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
Tytler, R. & Symington, D. (2006). Science in School and Society. Teaching Science. The Journal of the Australian Science Teachers Association, 52(3), 10–15.
Tytler, R., Symington, D., Kirkwood, V., & Malcolm, C. (2008). Engaging students in authentic science through school – community links: learning from the rural experience. Teaching Science, 54(3), 13–18.
Tytler, R., Symington, D., & Smith, C. (2011). A curriculum innovation framework for science, technology and mathematics education. Research in Science Education, 41, 19–38.
Van Manen, M. & Adams, C. (2010). Qualitative research: Phenomenology. In: E. Baker, P. Peterson and B. McGaw, (Eds.) International encyclopedia of education. Melbourne, Austalia Elsevier.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, Australia: Cambridge University Press.
Wenger, E. (2006). Communities of practice: A brief introduction. http://www.ewenger.com/theory/communities_of_practice_intro.htm.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tytler, R., Symington, D. & Cripps Clark, J. Community-School Collaborations in Science: Towards Improved Outcomes Through Better Understanding of Boundary Issues. Int J of Sci and Math Educ 15, 643–661 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-015-9711-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-015-9711-9