Skip to main content
Log in

Reflexive deliberation in international research collaboration: minimising risk and maximising opportunity

  • Published:
Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

International research collaboration raises questions about how groups from different national and institutional contexts can work together for common ends. This paper uses issues that have arisen in carrying out the first stage of an international research project to discuss a framework designed to map different kinds of multi-national research collaboration in terms of increasing complexity and increasing time to research outputs. The paper explores factors that enable and that constrain progress in carrying out collaborative research. The paper highlights the complex interplay within research practice of factors that derive from institutional structures and those that appertain to individuals as agents. It uses the personal and collective reflexive deliberations of the authors, to demonstrate that as the complexity of the research interface increases, and as the time to research outputs increases, so structural risk increasingly develops into agentic risk, and that structural risk becomes increasingly required to be managed through agentic action.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Archer, M. S. (2000). Being human: The problem of agency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Archer, M. S. (2003). Structure, agency and the internal conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archer, M. S. (2007). Making our way through the world: Human reflexivity and social mobility. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Australian Government. (2007). National statement on ethical conduct in human research. Canberra, ACT: Australian Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boud, D., Dahlgren, L-O., Abrandt Dahlgren, M., Larsson, S., Sork, T., & Walters, S. (2006). Creating a ‘world class’ program: reciprocity and constraint in networked global collaboration. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 25(6), 609–622.

  • Brew, A., & Boud, D. (2009). Understanding academics’ engagement with research. In A. Brew & L. Lucas (Eds.), Academic research and researchers (pp. 189–203). London: Open University Press and Society for Research into Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brew, A., Boud, D., & Namgung, S. U. (2011). Influences on the formation of academics: Perspectives of Australian academics. Studies in Continuing Education 33, 1, 51–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, K. (2010). Influences on academics' approaches to development: voices from below. International Journal for Academic Development, 15(3), 189–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kyvik, S., & Teigen, M. (1996). Child care, research collaboration, and gender differences in scientific productivity. Science, Technology and Human Values, 21(1), 54–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S., & Bozeman, B. (2005). The impact of research collaboration on scientific productivity. Social Studies of Science, 35(5), 673–702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Locke, W., & Bennion, A. (2010), The changing academic profession: The UK and beyond, UUK research report. London: Universities UK. Retrieved 10 July 2011 from http://www.open.ac.uk/cheri/documents/the_changing_academic_profession_in_the_uk_and_beyond.pdf.

  • Lucas, L. (2006). The research game in academic life. Maidenhead: Society for Research into Higher Education and the Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNay, I. (2003). Assessing the assessment: An analysis of the UK research assessment exercise 2001 and its outcomes, with special reference to research in education. Science and Public Policy, 30(1), 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McQueen, K. M., & Guest, G. (2008). Handbook for team based qualitative research. Plymouth: Altimira Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pérez, A. I., Blanco, N., Ogalla, M., & Rossi, F. (1998). The flexible role of the researcher within the changing context of practice: Forms of collaboration. Educational Action Research, 6(2), 241–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rambur, B. (2009). Creating collaboration: An exploration of multinational research partnerships. In A. Brew & L. Lucas (Eds.), Academic research and researchers (pp. 80–95). Basingstoke: Society for Research into Higher Education and the Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, N., Boud, D., Leontios, M., & Staron, M. (2001). Researchers are learners too: Collaboration in research on workplace learning. Journal of Workplace Learning, 13, 7/8, 274–281.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Angela Brew.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brew, A., Boud, D., Lucas, L. et al. Reflexive deliberation in international research collaboration: minimising risk and maximising opportunity. High Educ 66, 93–104 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-012-9592-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-012-9592-6

Keywords

Navigation