Abstract
We live in a global phosphorus (P) system paradox. P access is becoming increasingly limiting, leading to food insecurity but at the same time an over-application or abundance of P in many agricultural and urban settings is causing environmental degradation. This has been recognised in the academic literature and at regulatory levels, but swift action and multi-level cooperation of all stakeholders is required to ensure the economically, environmentally and socially responsible use of P. To provide foundations for future cooperation, a conceptual model describing the elements of P need, P availability and P use in different systems and at different scales was developed during the Young Scientists Workshop in P Week 2014 in Montpellier, France. Here we describe our extended conceptual model and a theoretical P balance calculation tool for describing multi-scale P balances and imbalances to impartially advise all stakeholders on more sustainable P use across the world.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barrow NJ (2015) Soil phosphate chemistry and the P-sparing effect of previous phosphate applications. Plant Soil. doi:10.1007/s11104-015-2514-5
Cordell D, Neset TSS (2014) Phosphorus vulnerability: a qualitative framework for assessing the vulnerability of national and regional food systems to the multi-dimensional stressors of phosphorus scarcity. Glob Environ Change 24:108–122. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.11.005
Cordell D, White S (2013) Sustainable phosphorus measures: strategies and technologies for achieving phosphorus security. Agronomy 3:86–116. doi:10.3390/agronomy3010086
Cordell D, Drangert JO, White S (2009) The story of phosphorus: global food security and food for thought. Glob Environ Change 19:292–305. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.10.009
Dumas M, Frossard E, Scholz RW (2011) Modeling biogeochemical processes of phosphorus for global food supply. Chemosphere 84:798–805. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.02.039
Harmsen J (2007) Measuring bioavailability: from a scientific approach to standard methods. J Environ Qual 36:1420–1428. doi:10.2134/jeq2006.0492
Harmsen J, Rulkens W, Eijsackers H (2005) Bioavailability: concept for understanding or tool for predicting? Land Contam Reclam 13:161–172
Heppell J (2014) Optimising plant and soil management. Doctoral Thesis. University of Southampton
Hillier J, Walter C, Malin D, Garcia-Suarez T, Mila-i-Canals L, Smith P (2011) A farm-focused calculator for emissions from crop and livestock production. Environ Model Softw 26:1070–1078. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2011.03.014
Janssen BH, Guiking FCT, van der Eijk D, Smaling EMA, Wolf J, van Reuler H (1990) A system for quantitative evaluation of the fertility of tropical soils (QUEFTS). Geoderma 46:299–318. doi:10.1016/0016-7061(90)90021-Z
Jones CA, Cole CV, Sharpley AN (1984) A simplified soil and plant phosphorus model: I. Documentation 1. Soil Sci Soc Am J 48:800–805. doi:10.2136/sssaj1984.03615995004800040020x
Jordan-Meille L, Rubæk GH, Ehlert PAI, Genot V, Hofman G, Goulding K, Recknagel J, Provolo G, Barraclough P (2012) An overview of fertilizer-P recommendations in Europe: soil testing, calibration and fertilizer recommendations. Soil Use Manag 28:419–435. doi:10.1111/j.1475-2743.2012.00453.x
Langridge P, Cordell DJ, D’Occhio M (2014) Agriculture in Australia: growing more than our farming future. The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/agriculture-in-australia-growing-more-than-our-farming-future-22843. Accessed 18 Mar 2015
Liu M, Yu Z, Liu Y, Konijn NT (2006) Fertilizer requirements for wheat and maize in China: the QUEFTS approach. Nutr Cycl Agroecosystems 74:245–258. doi:10.1007/s10705-006-9002-5
Metson G (2015) Researchers have a role to play in decreasing inequality in access to phosphorus: thoughts from the Sustainable Phosphorus Summit. https://sustainablep.wordpress.com/2015/01/15/researchers-have-a-role-to-play-in-decreasing-inequality-in-access-to-phosphorus-thoughts-from-the-sustainable-phosphorus-summit/. Accessed 18 Mar 2015
Peñuelas J, Poulter B, Sardans J, Ciais P, van der Velde M, Bopp L, Boucher O, Godderis Y, Hinsinger P, Llusia J, Nardin E, Vicca S, Obersteiner M, Janssens IA (2013) Human-induced nitrogen–phosphorus imbalances alter natural and managed ecosystems across the globe. Nat Commun 4:2934. doi:10.1038/ncomms3934
Reijnders L (2014) Resources, conservation and recycling phosphorus resources, their depletion and conservation, a review. Resour Conserv Recycl 93:32–49. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2014.09.006
Rose TJ, Liu L, Wissuwa M (2013) Improving phosphorus efficiency in cereal crops: Is breeding for reduced grain phosphorus concentration part of the solution? Front Plant Sci 4:444. doi:10.3389/fpls.2013.00444
Smith J, Abegaz A, Matthews R, Subedi M, Orskov B, Tumwesige V, Smith P (2014) What is the potential for biogas digesters to improve soil fertility and crop production in sub-Saharan Africa? Biomass Bioenergy 70:58–72. doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2014.02.030
Steen I (1998) Phosphorus availability in the 21st century management of a non-renewable resource. Phosphorus Potassium 217:25–31
Wang X, Shen J, Liao H (2010) Acquisition or utilization, which is more critical for enhancing phosphorus efficiency in modern crops? Plant Sci. doi:10.1016/j.plantsci.2010.06.007
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Philippe Hinsinger, Hélène Guillemain and the sponsors and organisers of the YSW, PSP5 and SPS4 for the opportunity to meet and discuss the ideas that developed into this publication. We also thank the other YSW participants, PSP5 and SPS delegates for their input over the course of P Week.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shepherd, J.G., Kleemann, R., Bahri-Esfahani, J. et al. The future of phosphorus in our hands. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 104, 281–287 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-015-9742-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-015-9742-1