Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Is the Grass Greener on the Other Side? A Review of the Asia-Pacific Sport Industry’s Environmental Sustainability Practices

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In recent years, sport entities have begun to prioritise environmental sustainability (ES) initiatives in their business strategies with the aim of minimising their environmental impact and engaging stakeholders within the ES movement. There has been minimal academic consideration of the ES movement in professional sport, particularly outside of North America and Europe. The aim of the present study is to provide an overview of the type and profile of ES initiatives being undertaken and communicated to stakeholders in the Asia-Pacific region by the industry bodies. Further, the study offers a conceptual model of the global-, country-, industry- and organisational-level forces impacting these sporting organisations’ ES practices. Various communication mediums of 114 professional sport teams from seven countries—Australia, India, New Zealand, Japan, China, Taiwan and Korea—were evaluated using content analysis. The results reveal low communication of ES practices by professional sport teams in the Asia-Pacific region compared to North America. Extended findings on the existing global profile of ES engagement provide a descriptive understanding of the ES movement in the Asia-Pacific region, and contribute to the identification of possible antecedents and correlatives to be evaluated in future research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aguinis, H., & Glavas, A. (2012). What we do and don’t know about corporate social responsibility: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 38(4), 932–968.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babiak, K., & Trendafilova, S. (2011a). CSR and environmental responsibility: Motives and pressures to adopt green management practices. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 18, 11–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babiak, K., & Trendafilova, S. (2011b). CSR and environmental responsibility: Motives and pressures to adopt sustainable management practices. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 18(1), 11–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babiak, K., & Wolfe, R. (2006). More than just a game? Corporate social responsibility and the super bowl XL. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 15, 214–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee, S., Iyer, E., & Kashyap, R. (2003). Corporate environmentalism: Antecedents and influence of industry type. Journal of Marketing, 67, 106–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baughn, C., Bodie, N., & McIntosh, J. (2007). Corporate social and environmental responsibility in Asian countries and other geographic regions. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 14, 189–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradish, C., & Cronin, J. (2009). Corporate social responsibility in sport. Journal of Sport Management, 23, 691–697.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brammer, S., & Walker, H. (2011). Sustainability procurement in the public sector: An international comparative study. International Journal of Operations Production Management, 31(1), 456–476.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M. (2003). An analysis of online marketing in the sport industry: User activity, communication objectives, and perceived benefits. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 12(1), 48–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buysse, K., & Verbeke, A. (2003). Proactive environmental strategies: A stakeholder management perspective. Strategic Management Journal, 24, 453–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J. (2007). Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 946–967.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casper, J., Pfahl, M., & McSherry, M. (2012). Athletics department awareness and action regarding the environment: A study of NCAA athletics department sustainability practices. Journal of Sport Management, 26, 11–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapple, W., & Moon, J. (2005). Corporate social responsibility (CSR) in Asia: A seven-country study of website reporting. Business and Society, 44(4), 415–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiu, S., & Sharfman, M. (2011). Legitimacy, visibility, and the antecedents of corporate social performance: An investigation of the instrumental perspective. Journal of Management, 37(6), 1558–1585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Das, B., & Subramanian, A. (2011). Big winner, big money. Business Today, 20(9), 44–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dioguardi, B. (2012). How US pro sports teams rank on environmental disclosure. Green Biz website, published Feb 22, 2012 http://www.greenbiz.com/blog/2012/02/18/how-us-pro-sports-teams-rank-environmental-disclosure

  • Environmental Performance Index (2012). “2012 Environmental Performance Index Ranking”, Yale Center for Environmental Law and Policy and the Center for International Earth Science Information Network. http://epi.yale.edu/epi2012/rankings

  • Esrock, S., & Leichty, G. (1998). Social responsibility and corporate web pages: Self-presentation or agenda-setting? Public Relations Review, 24, 305–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, D., & Smith, A. (2004). Internet sports marketing and competitive advantage for professional sports clubs: Bridging the gap between theory and practice. International Journal of Sports Marketing and Sponsorship, 6, 86–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godfrey, P., & Hatch, N. (2007). Researching corporate social responsibility: An agenda for the 21st century. Journal of Business Ethics, 70, 87–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hickey, G., & Kipping, C. (1996). Issues in research: A multi-stage approach to the coding of data from open-ended questions. Nurse Researcher, 4, 81–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hines, T. (2010). Factiva: Gateway to business information. Journal of Business and Financial Librarianship, 15, 60–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horton, P., & Saunders, J. (2012). The ‘East Asian’ olympic games: What of sustainable legacies? International Journal of the History of Sport, 29(6), 887–911.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsieh, H., & Shannon, S. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, S., & Chang, H. (2011). The development of Asian sport industry. Asian Journal of Physical Education and Recreation, 17(1), 25–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husted, B. (2005). Culture and ecology: A cross-national study of the determinants of environmental sustainability. Management International Review, 45(3), 349–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Business Times (IBT) (2013). IPL 2013: First week matches breaks record-breaking 100 Million Viewers, April 15, 2013 http://www.ibtimes.co.in/articles/457109/20130415/ipl-2013-opening-ceremony-viewers-trp-ratings.htm

  • International Monetary Fund (IMF) (2012). 2012 Gross Domestic Product http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2012/02/weodata/index.aspx

  • Ioakimidis, M., Stergioulas, A., & Tripolitsioti, A. (2006). Environmental responsibility in the sport industry: Why it makes sense. Sport Management International Journal, 2(1–2), 103–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kassarjian, H. (1977). Content analysis in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 4, 8–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kellison, T. B., Trendafilova, S., & McCullough, B. P. (2015). Considering the social impact of sustainable stadium design. International Journal of Event Management Research, 10(1), 63–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, B. (2008). Finding growth in green: Seeds of opportunity. Sports Business Journal, 11(10), 16–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwek, G. (2013). AFL leaves other codes in the dust. Sydney Morning Herald, March 26, 2013, p. 44.

  • Lacey, R., & Kennett-Hensel, P. A. (2010). Longitudinal effects of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 97, 581–597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lo, C., Egri, C., & Ralston, D. (2008). Commitment to corporate, social, and environmental responsibilities: An insight into contrasting perspectives in China and the US. Organisation Management Journal, 5, 83–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lumbick, N. (2008). Will the dragon stay green? China after the Beijing Olympics. Environmental Science and Technology, 42, 5037–5044.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maguire, J., Jarvie, G., Mansfield, L., & Bradley, J. (2002). Sport worlds: A sociological perspective. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mallen, C., Adams, L., & Thompson, L. (2010). Environmental sustainability in the sport facility management: A Delphi study. European Sport Management Quarterly, 10(3), 367–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mallen, C., Stevens, J., & Adams, L. (2011). A content analysis of environmental sustainability research in a sport-related journal sample. Journal of Sport Management, 25, 240–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Margolis, J., & Walsh, J. (2003). Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(2), 268–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2008). “Implicit” and “Explicit” CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 33, 404–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCullough, B., & Cunningham, B. (2010). A conceptual model to understand the impetus to engage in, and the expected outcomes of, green initiatives. Quest, 62, 348–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review , 26(1), 117–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montiel, I. (2008). Corporate social responsibility and corporate sustainability separate pasts, common futures. Organisation & Environment, 21, 245–269. doi:10.1177/1086026608321329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morsing, M., & Schultz, M. (2006). Corporate social responsibility communication: Stakeholder information, response and involvement strategies. Business Ethics: A European Review, 15(4), 323–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen, S. N., Trendafilova, S., & Pfahl, M. (2014). The natural-resource-based view of the firm (NRBV): Constraints and opportunities for a green team in professional sport. International Journal of Sport Management, 15, 1–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • NRDC (2012). NRDC report, game changer: How the sports industry is saving the environment. http://www.nrdc.org/greenbusiness/guides/sports/game-changer.asp

  • Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M., & Kramer, M. (2006). Strategy and society: The link between competitive advantage and social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 84(12), 78–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramasamy, B., & Ting, H. W. (2004). A comparative analysis of corporate social responsibility awareness: Malaysia and Singapore firms. The Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 13, 109–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ratten, V., & Ratten, H. (2011). International sport marketing: Practical and future research implications. Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 26(8), 614–620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sabeti, H. (2011). The for-benefit enterprise. Harvard Business Review, 89(11), 98–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarkar, R. (2008). Public policy and corporate environmental behaviour: A broader view. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 15, 281–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schuler, D., & Cording, M. (2006). A corporate social performance-corporate financial performance behavioural model for consumers. Academy of Management Review, 31(3), 540–558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheth, H., & Babiak, K. (2010). Beyond the game: Perceptions and priorities in corporate social responsibility in the sport industry. Journal of Business Ethics, 91(3), 433–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A., & Westerbeek, H. (2007). Sport as a vehicle for deploying corporate social responsibility. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 25, 43–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thibault, L. (2009). Globalization of sport: An inconvenient truth. Journal of Sport Management, 23, 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, T., & Lamm, E. (2012). Legitimacy and organisational sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics, 110, 191–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, J., & Jackson, T. (2007). Sustainable procurement in practice: Lessons from local government. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 50(3), 421–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trendafilova, S., & Babiak, K. (2013). Understanding strategic corporate environmental responsibility in professional sport. International Journal of Sport Management and Marketing, 13, 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trendafilova, S., Babiak, K., & Heinze, K. (2013). Corporate social responsibility and environmental sustainability: Why professional sport is greening the playing field. Sport Management Review, 16, 298–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trendafilova, S., McCullough, B., Pfahl, M., Nguyen, S. N., Casper, J., & Picariella, M. (2014). Environmental sustainability in sport: Current state and future trends. Global Journal on Advances in Pure and Applied Sciences, 3, 9–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wahba, H. (2008). Does the market value corporate environmental responsibility? An empirical examination. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 15, 89–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welford, R. (2004). Corporate social responsibility in Europe and Asia: Critical elements in best practice. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 13, 31–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welford, R. (2005). Corporate social responsibility in Europe, North America and Asia. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 17, 33–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, K., & Nauright, J. (2006). A global perspective on the environmental impact of golf. Sport in Society, 9, 427–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, D., Lynch-Wood, G., & Ramsay, J. (2006). Drivers of environmental behaviour in manufacturing SMEs and the implications for CSR. Journal of Business Ethics, 67, 317–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IBIS World (2013). Cited in Sydney Morning Herald, accessed via website: http://www.smh.com.au/data-point/afl-leaves-other-codes-in-the-dust-20130326-2grkp.html

  • Yin, R. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The Florida State University, 139 Chieftan Way, Tallahassee, FL, 32306, USA

    Joanna Wall-Tweedie

  2. Faculty of Business & Law, Deakin Business School, Deakin University, 1 Gheringhap St., Geelong, VIC, 3220, Australia

    Sheila N. Nguyen

Authors
  1. Joanna Wall-Tweedie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sheila N. Nguyen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sheila N. Nguyen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wall-Tweedie, J., Nguyen, S.N. Is the Grass Greener on the Other Side? A Review of the Asia-Pacific Sport Industry’s Environmental Sustainability Practices. J Bus Ethics 152, 741–761 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3320-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3320-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation