Skip to main content
Log in

Examining the Cognitive and Affective Trust-Based Mechanisms Underlying the Relationship Between Ethical Leadership and Organisational Citizenship: A Case of the Head Leading the Heart?

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we investigate the trust-based mechanisms underlying the relationship between ethical leadership and followers’ organisational citizenship behaviours (OCBs). Based on three-wave survey data obtained from 184 employees and their supervisors, we find that ethical leadership leads to higher levels of both affective and cognitive trust. In addition, we find support for a three-path mediational model, where cognitive trust and affective trust, in turn, mediate the relationship between ethical leadership and follower OCBs. That is to say, we found that ethical leadership leads to the development of cognitive trust, which subsequently influences the development of affective trust. Affective trust, in turn, induces followers to exhibit OCBs as a means of reciprocating the leader’s favourable behaviour. Our findings suggest that both affective and cognitive trust plays an important role in the social exchange processes that underlie the relationship between ethical leadership and the discretionary behaviour of followers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Avey, J. B., Palanski, M. E., & Walumbwa, F. O. (2011). When leadership goes unnoticed: The moderating role of follower self-esteem on the relationship between ethical leadership and follower behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 98, 573–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bliese, P. D. (2000). Within-group agreement, non-independence and reliability. In K. J. Klein & S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions and new directions (pp. 349–381). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brislin, R. (1993). Understanding culture’s influence on behavior. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace College Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M. E., & Trevino, L. K. (2006). Ethical leadership: A review and future directions. Leadership Quarterly, 17, 595–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M. E., Trevino, L. K., & Harrison, D. A. (2005). Ethical leadership: A social learning perspective for construct development and testing. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 97, 117–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burke, C. S., Sims, D. E., Lassara, E. H., & Salas, E. (2007). Trust in leadership: A multi-level review and integration. Leadership Quarterly, 18, 606–632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chua, R. Y. J., Ingram, P., & Morris, M. W. (2008). From the head and the heart: Locating cognition- and affect-based trust in managers’ professional networks. Academy of Management Journal, 51, 436–452.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colquitt, J. A., LePine, J. A., Piccolo, R. F., & Zapata, C. P. (2012). Explaining the justice-performance relationship: Trust as exchange deepener or trust as uncertainty reducer? Journal of Applied Psychology, 97, 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colquitt, J. A., Scott, B. A., & LePine, J. A. (2007). Trust, trustworthiness, and trust propensity: A meta-analytic test of their unique relationships with risk taking and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 909–927.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cropanzano, R., & Mitchell, M. (2005). Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of Management, 31, 874–900.

    Google Scholar 

  • Den Hartog, D. N. (2003). Trusting others in organizations: Leaders, management and co-workers. In B. Nooteboom & F. E. Six (Eds.), The trust process, empirical studies of the determinants and the process of trust development. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

  • Dirks, K. T., & Ferrin, D. L. (2002). Trust in leadership: Meta-analytic findings and implications for research and practice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 909–927.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenbeiss, S. A. (2012). Re-thinking ethical leadership: An interdisciplinary integrative approach. Leadership Quarterly, 23, 791–808.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flynn, F. J. (2005). Identity orientations and forms of social exchange in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 30, 737–750.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James, L. R., Mulaik, S. A., & Brett, J. M. (2006). A tale of two methods. Organizational Research Methods, 9, 233–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, J., Brown, M. E., Trevino, L. K., & Finkelstein, S. (in press). Someone to look up to: executive-follower ethical reasoning and perceptions of ethical leadership. Journal of Management.

  • Kacmer, K. M., Bachrach, D. G., Harris, K. J., & Zivnuska, S. (2011). Fostering good citizenship through ethical leadership: Exploring the moderating role of gender and organizational politics. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 633–642.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalshoven, K., Den Hartog, D. N., & De Hoogh, A. H. B. (2011). Ethical leadership at work questionnaire (ELW): Development and validation of a multidimensional measure. Leadership Quarterly, 22, 51–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalshoven, K., Den Hartog, D. N., & de Hoogh, A. H. B. (2013). Ethical leadership and followers’ helping and initiative: The role of demonstrated responsibility and job autonomy. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 22, 165–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modelling (3rd ed.). New York: Guildford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Konovsky, M. A., & Pugh, S. D. (1994). Citizenship behavior and social exchange. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 656–669.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeBreton, J. M., & Senter, J. L. (2008). Answers to 20 questions about interrater reliability and interrater agreement. Organizational Research Methods, 11, 815–852.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K., & Allen, N. J. (2002). Organizational citizenship behavior and workplace deviance: The role of affect and cognitions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 131–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewicki, R. J., & Bunker, B. B. (1995). Trust in relationships: A model of development and decline. In B. B. Banker & J. Z. Rubin (Eds.), Conflict, cooperation, and justice (pp. 133–173). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewicki, R., & Bunker, B. (1996). Developing and maintaining trust in work relationships. In R. Kramer & T. Tyler (Eds.), Trust in organizations (pp. 114–139). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, D. M., Aquino, K., Greenbaum, R. L., & Kuenzi, M. (2012). Who displays ethical leadership and why does it matter: An examination of antecedents and consequences of ethical leadership. Academy of Management Journal, 55, 151–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20, 709–734.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, D. M., Kuenzi, M., Greenbaum, R., Bardes, M., & Salvador, R. (2009). How low does ethical leadership flow? Test of a trickle-down model. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 108, 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAllister, D. J. (1995). Affect- and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 24–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miao, Q., Newman, A., Yu, J., & Xu, L. (2012). The relationship between ethical leadership and unethical pro-organizational behavior: Linear or curvilinear effects? Journal of Business Ethics. doi:10.1007/s10551-012-1504-2.

  • Ng, K. Y., & Chua, R. Y. J. (2006). Do I contribute more when I trust more? Differential effects of cognition- and affect-based trust. Management and Organization Review, 2, 43–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piccolo, R. F., Greenbaum, R., Den Hartog, D. N., & Folger, R. (2010). The relationship between ethical leadership and core job characteristics. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31, 259–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Paine, J. B., & Bachrach, D. G. (2000). Organizational citizenship behaviors: A critical review of the theoretical and empirical literature and suggestions for future research. Journal of Management, 26, 513–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 539–569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preacher, K. J., Zyphur, M. J., & Zhang, Z. (2010). A general multilevel SEM framework for assessing multilevel mediation. Psychological Methods, 15, 209–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, D. M., Sitkin, S. B., Burt, R. S., & Camerer, C. (1998). Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23, 393–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz-Palomino, P., Ruiz-Amaya, C., & Knorr, H. (2011). Employee organizational citizenship behavior: The direct and indirect impact of ethical leadership. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 28, 244–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaubroeck, J., Lam, S. S. K., & Peng, A. C. (2011). Cognition-based and affect-based trust as mediators of leader behavior influences on team performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 863–871.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaubroeck, J., Peng, A. C., & Hannah, S. T. (in press). Developing trust with peers and leaders: Impacts on organizational identification and performance during entry. Academy of Management Journal.

  • Stapleton, L. M. (2006). An assessment of practical solutions for structural equation modeling with complex sample data. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 13, 28–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, A. B., MacKinnon, D., & Tein, J. Y. (2008). Test of the three-path mediated effect. Organizational Research Methods, 11, 241–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toor, S., & Ofori, G. (2009). Ethical leadership: Examining the relationships with full range leadership model employee outcomes, and organizational culture. Journal of Business Ethics, 90, 533–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walumbwa, F. O., Mayer, D. M., Wang, P., Wang, H., Workman, K., & Christensen, A. L. (2011). Linking ethical leadership to employee performance: The rules of leader–member exchange, self-efficacy, and organizational identification. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 115, 204–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walumbwa, F. O., Morrisson, E. W., & Christensen, A. L. (2012). Ethical leadership and group in-role performance: The mediating roles of group conscientiousness and group voice. Leadership Quarterly, 23, 953–964.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, S., Tomlinson, E. C., & Noe, R. (2010). The role of mentor trust and protégé internal locus of control in formal mentoring relationships. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 358–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, G. R., Treviño, L. K., & Agle, B. (2005). “Somebody to look up to:” Ethical role models in organizations. Organizational Dynamics, 34, 313–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, J., & Mossholder, K. W. (2010). Examining the effects of trust in leaders: A bases-and-foci approach. Leadership Quarterly, 21, 50–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, J., Mossholder, K. W., & Peng, T. K. (2009). Supervisory procedural justice effects: The mediating roles of cognitive and affective trust. Leadership Quarterly, 20, 143–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yidong, T., & Xinxin, L. (2012). How ethical leadership influence employees’ innovative work behavior: A perspective of intrinsic motivation. Journal of Business Ethics. doi:10.1007/s10551-012-1455-7.

  • Zhu, W., Newman, A., Miao, Q., & Hooke, G. (2013). Revisiting the mediating role of trust on transformational leadership effects: Do different types of trust make a difference? Leadership Quarterly, 24, 94–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qing Miao.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Newman, A., Kiazad, K., Miao, Q. et al. Examining the Cognitive and Affective Trust-Based Mechanisms Underlying the Relationship Between Ethical Leadership and Organisational Citizenship: A Case of the Head Leading the Heart?. J Bus Ethics 123, 113–123 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1803-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1803-2

Keywords

Navigation