Skip to main content
Log in

Struggling with food and eating—life after major upper gastrointestinal surgery

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Supportive Care in Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Few qualitative studies have explored patients' experience of food and eating following major upper gastrointestinal cancer surgery. The aim of this article was to explore the longer-term impact of different types of major upper gastrointestinal surgeries on people's relationship with food.

Methods

Twenty-six people having had major upper gastrointestinal cancer surgery greater than 6 months ago participated in semi-structured interviews. These interviews aimed to explore a person's physical, emotional and social relationship with food and eating following surgery. Interviews were tape-recorded, transcribed and analysed using an inductive thematic analysis approach.

Results

Interview findings revealed a journey of adjustment, grieving and resignation. The physical symptoms and experiences of people differed between types of surgery, but the coping mechanisms remained the same.

Conclusions

The grieving and resignation people experienced suggest adjustment and coping similar to that of someone with a chronic illness. Remodeling of health services is needed to ensure this patient group receives ongoing management and support.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Allum WH, Powell DJ, McConkey CC, Fielding JW (1989) Gastric cancer: a 25-year review. Brit J Surg 76(6):535–540

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Muller JM, Erasmi H, Stelzner M, Zieren U, Pichlmaier H (1990) Surgical therapy of oesophageal carcinoma. Brit J Surg 77(8):845–857

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Speer AG, Thursfield VJ, Torn-Broers Y, Jefford M (2012) Pancreatic cancer: surgical management and outcomes after 6 years of follow-up. Med J Aust 196(8):511–515

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Nunobe S, Okaro A, Sasako M, Saka M, Fukagawa T, Katai H, Sano T (2007) Bilroth 1 versus Roux-en-Y reconstructions: a quality-of-life survey at 5 years. Int J Clin Onc 12(6):433–439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Takiguchi S, Yamamoto K, Hirao M, Imamura H, Fujita J, Yano M, Kobayashi K, Kimura Y, Kurokawa Y, Mori M, Doki Y (2012) A comparison of postoperative quality of life and dysfunction after Bilroth 1and Roux-en-Y reconstruction following distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: results from a multi-institutional RCT. Gastric Cancer 15(2):198–205

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Rogers C (2011) Postgastrectomy nutrition. Nutr Clin Pract 26(2):126–136

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Viklund P, Wengström Y, Rouvelas I, Lindblad M, Lagergren J (2006) Quality of life and persisting symptoms after oesophageal cancer surgery. Eur J Cancer 42(10):1407–1414

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Carey S, Storey D, Biankin AV, Martin D, Young J, Allman-Farinelli M (2011) Long term nutritional status and quality of life following major upper gastrointestinal surgery—a cross-sectional study. Clin Nutr 30(6):774–779

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Pruzinsky T (2004) Enhancing quality of life in medical populations: a vision for body image assessment and rehabilitation as standards of care. Body Image 1(1):71–81

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Wainwright D, Donovan JL, Kavadas V, Cramer H, Blazeby JM (2007) Remapping the body: learning to eat again after surgery for esophageal cancer. Qual Health Res 17(6):759–771

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Harris M (1968) The Rise of Anthropometical Theory: A History of Theories of Culture. Thomas Y Crowell Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  12. Coveney J (2000) Food, Morals and Meaning. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  13. Olsson U, Bergbom I, Bosaeus I (2002) Patients' experiences of the recovery period 3 months after gastrointestinal cancer surgery. Eur J Cancer Care 11(1):51–60

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Olsson U, Bergbom I, Bosaeus I (2002) Patients' experiences of their intake of food and fluid following gastrectomy due to tumor. Gastroenterol Nurs 25(4):146–153

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Verschuur EM, Steyerberg EW, Kuipers EJ, Essink-Bot ML, Tran KT, Van Der Gaast A, Tilanus HW, Siersema PD (2006) Experiences and expectations of patients after oesophageal cancer surgery: an explorative study. Eur J Cancer Care 15(4):324–332

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Jaromahum J, Fowler S (2010) Lived experiences of eating after esophagectomy: a phenomenological study. Med Surg Nurs 19(2):96–100

    Google Scholar 

  17. Clarke C, McCorry NK, Dempster M (2011) The role of identity in adjustment among survivors of oesophageal cancer. J Health Psyc 16(1):99–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. McCorry NK, Dempster M, Clarke C, Doyle R (2009) Adjusting to life after esophagectomy: the experience of survivors and carers. Qual Health Res 19(10):1485–1494

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Olsson U, Bosaeus I, Bergbom I (2010) Patients' experiences of the recovery period 12 months after upper gastrointestinal surgery. Gastroenterol Nurs 33(6):422–431

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Morse J, Field P (1998) Nursing Research: the application of qualitative approaches, 2nd edn. StanleyThornes Ltd., Cheltenham, UK

    Google Scholar 

  21. Oppenheim AN (2000) Questionnaire design, interviewing and attitude measurement. Continuum International Publishing Ltd., London

    Google Scholar 

  22. Detsky A, McLaughlin J, Baker J, Johnston N, Whittaker S, Mendelson RA (1987) What is subjective global assessment of nutritional status? J Parenter Enteral Nutr 11:8–13

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Patton M (2002) Qualitative research and evaluation methods, 3rd edn. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  24. Braun V, Clarke V (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 3(2):77–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Guba EG (1981) Criteria for assessing the trustworthiness of naturalistic inquiries. Educational Resources Information Center Annual Review Paper 29:75–91

    Google Scholar 

  26. Lazarus RS, Folkman S (1984) Stress, appraisal, and coping. Springer Publishing Company, Inc., New York

    Google Scholar 

  27. Lazarus RS (1993) From psychological stress to the emotions: a history of changing outlooks. Annu Rev Psychol 44(1):1–21

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Fritz E, Hammer J (2009) Gastrointestinal symptoms in patients with liver cirrhosis are linked to impaired quality of life and psychological distress. Eur J Gastroen Hepat 21(4):370–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Bryant RV, van Langenberg DR, Holtmann GJ, Andrews JM (2011) Functional gastrointestinal disorders in inflammatory bowel disease: impact on quality of life and psychological status. J Gastroen Hepatol 26(5):916–923

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Spiegel BM, Khanna D, Bolus R, Agarwal N, Khanna P, Chang L (2011) Understanding gastrointestinal distress: a framework for clinical practice. Am J Gastroenterol 106(3):380–385

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Charmaz K (1995) The body, identity, and self: adapting to impairment. Sociol Quart 36(4):657–680

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Naus MJ, Ishler MD, Parrott CE, Kovacs SA (2009) Cancer survivor adaptation model: conceptualizing cancer as a chronic illness. J Clin Psychol 65(12):1350–1359

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Liedman B, Henningsson A, Mellstrom D, Lundell L (2000) Changes in bone metabolism and body composition after total gastrectomy: results of a longitudinal study. Digest Dis Sci 45(4):819–824

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Andreyev HJ, Norman AR, Oates J, Cunningham D (1998) Why do patients with weight loss have a worse outcome when undergoing chemotherapy for gastrointestinal malignancies? Eur J Cancer 34(4):503–509

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) (2006) Management of oesophageal and gastric cancer. A national clinical guideline. Jun, Edinburgh (Scotland) http://www.sign.ac.uk/guidelines/fulltext/87/index.html, Published online 08 June 2006

  36. Bae J, Park J, Yang H, Kim J (1998) Nutritional status of gastric cancer patients after total gastrectomy. World J Surg 22(3):254–260

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Scholmerich J (2004) Postgastrectomy syndromes—diagnosis and treatment. Best Pract Res Cl Ga 18(5):917–933

    Google Scholar 

  38. Carey S, He L, Ferrie S (2010) Nutritional management of patients undergoing major upper gastrointestinal surgery: a survey of current practice in Australia. Nutr Diet 67(4):219–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Kinnane NA (2012) Evaluation of a hospital-based cancer information and support centre. Support Care Cancer 20(2):287–300

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Hoey LM, Ieropoli SC, White VM, Jefford M (2008) Systematic review of peer-support programs for people with cancer. Patient Educ Couns 70(3):315–337

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Janet Conti for her consultation and insight into qualitative research methods.

Declaration of conflicting interests

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sharon Carey.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Carey, S., Laws, R., Ferrie, S. et al. Struggling with food and eating—life after major upper gastrointestinal surgery. Support Care Cancer 21, 2749–2757 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-013-1858-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-013-1858-8

Keywords

Navigation