Abstract
Although rainforests of eastern Australia grow in regions of high precipitation, there is a shift from a summer dry season in the temperate south to a winter dry season in the tropical north. Therefore, rainforest trees of eastern Australia provide an opportunity to investigate stomatal sensitivity of mesic trees to vapour pressure deficit (VPD) along a gradient in seasonality of precipitation. Eight rainforest canopy tree species were selected to cover the latitudinal range of rainforests in eastern Australia. Seedlings of these species were grown for a year in glasshouses under ambient conditions or at low VPD and water vapour exchange of leaves was measured during summer. Tropical species, which experience summer-dominant precipitation, showed higher stomatal sensitivities to VPD than temperate species, which experience winter-dominant precipitation. Growing plants under a low VPD increased stomatal sensitivity to increasing VPD in most species. The high stomatal sensitivity to VPD of the tropical species is consistent with the infrequent water stress experienced during their growing season and suggests a high susceptibility to water deficits. In contrast, temperate species may use other mechanisms to maintain photosynthesis under the relatively drier conditions of the temperate growing season.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Attiwill PM, Leeper GW (1987) Forest soils and nutrient cycles. Melbourne University Press, Melbourne
Ball MC, Cochrane MJ, Rawson HM (1997) Growth and water use of the mangroves Rhizophora apiculata and R. stylosa in response to salinity and humidity under ambient and elevated concentrations of atmospheric CO2. Plant Cell Environ 20:1158–1166
Beardsell MF, Mitchell KJ, Thomas RG (1973) Transpiration and photosynthesis in soybean. J Exp Bot 24:587–595
Brodribb T, Hill RS (1999) The importance of xylem constraints in the distribution of conifer species. New Phytol 143:365–372
Bunce JA, Miller LN, Chabot BF (1977) Competitive exploitation of soil water by five eastern North American tree species. Bot Gaz 138:168–173
Bureau of Meteorology (1989) Climate of Australia. Australian Government, Canberra
Cunningham SC (2001) Comparative ecophysiology of temperate and tropical rainforest trees of Australia relation to climate variables. School of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, p 323
Cunningham SC, Read J (2003) Comparison of temperate and tropical rainforest tree species: growth responses to temperature. J Biogeogr 30:143–153
Doley D (1981) Tropical and subtropical forests and woodlands. In: Kozlowski TT (ed) Water deficits and plant growth, vol 6. Woody plant communities. Academic Press, Sydney, pp 209–323
Doley D, Unwin GL, Yates DJ (1988) Spatial and temporal distribution of photosynthesis and transpiration by single leaves in a rainforest tree, Argyrodendron peralatum. Aust J Plant Physiol 15:317–326
Ewers FW, Oren R, Sperry JS (2000) Influence of nutrient versus water supply on hydraulic architecture and water balance in Pinus taeda. Plant Cell Environ 23:1055–1066
Franks PJ, Farquhar GD (1999) A relationship between humidity response, growth form and photosynthetic operating point in C3 plants. Plant Cell Environ 22:1337–1349
Gollan T, Turner NC, Schulze E-D (1985) The responses of stomata and leaf gas exchange to vapour pressure deficits and soil water content. III. In the sclerophyllous woody species Nerium oleander. Oecologia 65:356–362
Hollinger DY (1987) Gas exchange and dry matter allocation responses to elevation of atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration in seedlings of three tree species. Tree Physiol 3:193–202
Hopkins MS, Graham AW (1989) Community phenology patterns of lowland tropical rainforest in north-eastern Australia. Aust J Ecol 14:399–413
Houlder D, Hutchinson M, Nix H, McMahon J (1999) ANUCLIM user’s guide. CRES, Canberra
Hubbard RM, Ryan MG, Stiller V, Sperry JS (2001) Stomatal conductance and photosynthesis vary linearly with plant hydraulic conductance in ponderosa pine. Plant Cell Environ 24:113–121
Jones MM, Turner NC, Osmond CB (1981) Mechanisms of drought resistance. In: Paleg LG, Aspinall D (eds) The physiology and biochemistry of drought resistance in plants. Academic Press, Sydney, pp 15–37
Kawamitsu Y, Yoda S, Agata W (1993) Humidity pretreatment affects the response of stomata and CO2 assimilation to vapour pressure differences in C3 and C4 plants. Plant Cell Physiol 34:113–119
Körner C, Bannister P (1985) Stomatal responses to humidity in Nothofagus menziesii. N Z J Bot 23:425–429
Leuschner C (2002) Air humidity as an ecological factor for woodland herbs: leaf water status, nutrient uptake, leaf anatomy, and productivity of eight species grown at low or high vpd levels. Flora 197:262–274
Ludlow MM (1980) Adaptive significance of stomatal responses to water stress. In: Turner NC, Kramer PJ (eds) Adaptation of plants to water and high temperature stress. Wiley, New York, pp 123–138
Mahan JR, McMichael BL, Wanjura DF (1995) Methods for reducing the adverse effects of temperature stress on plants: a review. Environ Exp Bot 35:251–258
Mooney HA, Chu C (1983) Stomatal responses to humidity of coastal and interior populations of a Californian shrub. Oecologia 57:148–150
Oren R, Sperry JS, Katul GG, Pataki DE, Ewers BE, Phillips N, Schäfer KVR (1999) Survey and synthesis of intra- and interspecific variation in stomatal sensitivity to vapour pressure deficit. Plant Cell Environ 22:1515–1526
Park S-Y, Furukawa A (1999) Photosynthetic and stomatal responses of two tropical and two temperate trees to atmospheric humidity. Photosynthetica 36:181–186
Read J (1990) Some effects of acclimation temperature on net photosynthesis in some tropical and extra-tropical Australasian Nothofagus species. J Ecol 78:100–112
Read J (1998) Pattern and process in rainforest. In: Reid JB, Hill RS, Brown MJ, Hovenden MJ (eds) Vegetation of Tasmania. Government Printer, Hobart
Read J, Farquhar G (1991) Comparative studies in Nothofagus (Fagaceae). I. Leaf carbon isotope discrimination. Funct Ecol 5:684–695
Richter H, Wagner SB (1983) Water stress resistance of photosynthesis: some aspects of osmotic relations. In: Marcelle R, Clijsters H, van Poucke M (eds) Effects of stress on photosynthesis. Martinus Nijhoff/Junk, The Hague, pp 45–53
Roy J, Mooney HA (1982) Physiological adaptation and plasticity to water stress of coastal and desert populations of Heliotropium curassavicum L. Oecologia 52:370–375
Sarmiento G, Goldstein G, Meinzer F (1985) Adaptive strategies of woody species in neotropical savannas. Biol Rev 60:315–355
Schulze E-D, Hall AE (1982) Stomatal responses, water loss and CO2 assimilation rates of plants in contrasting environments. In: Lange OL, Nobel PS, Osmond CB, Ziegler H (eds) Encyclopedia of plant physiology, vol 12B. Physiological plant ecology. II. Water relations and carbon assimilation. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 181–230
Thompson WA, Huang L-K, Kriedemann PE (1992) Photosynthetic response to light and nutrients in sun-tolerant and shade-tolerant rainforest trees. II. Leaf gas exchange and component processes of photosynthesis. Aust J Plant Physiol 19:1–18
Webb LJ (1968) Environmental relationships of the structural types of Australian rain forest vegetation. Ecology 49:296–311
Webb LJ, Tracey JG (1981) Australian rainforests: patterns and change. In: Keast A (ed) Ecological biogeography of Australia, vol 1. Junk, The Hague, pp 607–694
Acknowledgements
I thank Jenny Read, Jacqui England and anonymous reviewers for commenting on the manuscript. Permission was given to collect seedlings by State Forests of N.S.W. and the Department of Natural Resources and Environment Victoria. This research was supported by a Monash Postgraduate Research Scholarship awarded to S.C. and an Australian Research Council Large Grant awarded to Jenny Read.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cunningham, S.C. Stomatal sensitivity to vapour pressure deficit of temperate and tropical evergreen rainforest trees of Australia. Trees 18, 399–407 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-004-0318-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-004-0318-y