Skip to main content
Log in

Games of Capacity Manipulation in Hospital-intern Markets

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Social Choice and Welfare Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we analyze capacity manipulation games in hospital-intern markets inspired by the real-life entry-level labor markets for young physicians who seek residencies at hospitals. In a hospital-intern market, the matching is determined by a centralized clearinghouse using the preferences revealed by interns and hospitals and the number of vacant positions revealed by hospitals. We consider a model in which preferences of hospitals and interns are common knowledge. Hospitals play a capacity-reporting game. We analyze the equilibria of the game-form under the two most widely used matching rules: hospital-optimal and intern-optimal stable rules. We show that (i) there may not be a pure strategy equilibrium in general; and (ii) when a pure strategy equilibrium exists, every hospital weakly prefers this equilibrium outcome to the outcome of any larger capacity profile. Finally, we present conditions on preferences to guarantee the existence of pure strategy equilibria.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdulkadiroğlu A, Sönmez T (1998) Random serial dictatorship and the core from random endowments in house allocation problems. Econometrica 66:689–701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abdulkadiroğlu A, Sönmez T (2003) School choice: a mechanism design approach. Am Econ Rev 93:729–747

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alcalde J (1995) Exchange-proofness or divorce-proofness? Stability in one-sided matching markets. Econ Des 1:275–287

    Google Scholar 

  • Alcalde J (1996) Implementation of stable solutions to the marriage problem. J Econ Theory 69:240–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alcalde J, Barberà S (1994) Top dominance and the possibility of the strategy-proof stable solutions to matching problems. Econ Theory 4:417–435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alcalde J, Romero-Medina A (2000) Simple mechanisms to implement the core of college admissions problem. Games Econ Behav 31:294–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balinski M, Sönmez T (1999) A tale of two mechanisms: student placement. J Econ Theory 84:73–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee S, Konishi H, Sönmez T (2001) Core in a simple coalition formation game. Soc Choice Welf 18:135–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubins LE, Freedman DA (1981) Machiavelli and the Gale-Shapley algorithm. Am Math Mon 88:485–494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gale D, Shapley LS (1962) College admissions and the stability of marriage. Am Math Mon 69:9–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gale D, Sotomayor M (1985a) Some remarks on the stable marriage problem. Discrete Appl Math 11:223–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gale D, Sotomayor M (1985b) Ms. Machiavelli and the stable matching problem. Am Math Mon 92:261–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irving RW (1998) Matching medical students to pairs of hospitals: a new variation on a well-known theme. In:Proceedings of ESA ’98, 6th annual European symposium on algorithms, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp. 381–392

  • Kara T, Sönmez T (1996) Nash implementation of matching-rules. J Econ Theory 68:425–439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kara T, Sönmez T (1997) Implementation of college admission rules. Econ Theory 9:197–218

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma J (1995) Stable matchings and rematching-proof equilibria in a two-sided matching market. J Econ Theory 66:352–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma J (1997) Manipulation and stability in a college admissions problem. Rutgers University working paper

  • Milgrom P, Shannon C (1994) Monotone comparative statics. Econometrica 62:157–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papai S (2000) Strategyproof assignment by hierarchical exchange. Econometrica 68:1403–1433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Postlewaite A (1979) Manipulation via endowments. Rev Econ Stud 46:255–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth AE (1982) The economics of matching: stability and incentives. Math Oper Res 7:617–628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth AE (1984) The evolution of the labor market for medical interns and residents: a case study in game theory. J Polit Econ 92:991–1016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth AE (1985) The college admissions problem is not equivalent to the marriage problem. J Econ Theory 36:277–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth AE (1991) A natural experiment in the organization of entry level labor markets: regional markets for new physicians and surgeons in the UK. Am Econ Rev 81:415–440

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth AE, Peranson E (1999) The redesign of the matching market for American physicians: some engineering aspects of economic design. Am Econ Rev 89:748–780

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth AE, Rothblum U (1999) Truncation strategies in matching markets - in search of advice for participants. Econometrica 67:21–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth AE, Sotomayor M (1989) The college admissions problem revisited. Econometrica 57:559–570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth AE, Sotomayor M (1990) Two-sided matching: a study in game theoretic modeling and analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth AE, Vande Vate JH (1990) Random paths to stability in two-sided matching. Econometrica 58:1475–1480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth AE, Xing X (1994) Jumping the gun: imperfections and institutions related to the timing of market transactions. Am Econ Rev 84:992–1044

    Google Scholar 

  • Sertel MR (1994) Manipulating Lindahl equilibrium via endowments. Econ Lett 46:167–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shin S, Suh SC (1996) A mechanism implementing the stable rule in marriage problems. Econ Lett 51:185–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sönmez T (1996) Strategy-proofness in many-to-one matching problems. Econ Design 1:365–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sönmez T (1997a) Games of manipulation in marriage problems. Games Econ Behav 20:169–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sönmez T (1997b) Manipulation via capacities in two-sided matching markets. J Econ Theory 77:197–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sönmez T (1999) Can pre-arranged matches be avoided in two-sided matching markets. J Econ Theory 86:148–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svensson LG (1994) Queue Allocation of Indivisible Goods. Soc Choice Welfare 11:323–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomson W (1987a) Monotonic allocation mechanisms. University of Rochester working paper

  • Thomson W (1987b) Monotonic allocation mechanisms in economies with public goods. University of Rochester working paper

  • Thomson W (1995) Endowment monotonicity in economies with single-peaked preferences. University of Rochester working paper

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Utku Ünver.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Konishi, H., Ünver, M.U. Games of Capacity Manipulation in Hospital-intern Markets. Soc Choice Welfare 27, 3–24 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-006-0097-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-006-0097-z

Keywords

Navigation