Skip to main content
Log in

Determinants of Responsible Hiking Behavior: Results from a Stated Choice Experiment

  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This research examined the determinants of responsible hiking behavior through a lab-based experiment in which two managerial factors believed to influence individuals’ behavior (the presentation of an educational message and the method of displaying degraded trail conditions) were varied across four experimental treatments in a 2 × 2 between subjects factorial design. The effect of trail degradation type (muddiness and erosion) and severity (moderate or severe) of trail degradation were also examined within each of the 4 treatment groups. Analyses revealed neither the educational message nor the method of displaying the image had a consistent and expected impact on individuals’ behavioral intentions. In fact, participants who viewed the educational message were more likely to indicate they would hike off the trail. The effects of both trail degradation type and severity were consistent and significant with muddiness and more severe levels of degradation having a greater influence on individuals’ intent to hike on the edge of or off the trail. The analyses also revealed both gender and hiking frequency had significant effects on behavioral intentions. Female participants were more likely to indicate they would turn around than males when they encountered degraded trail sections. Women were also less likely to indicate they would hike off the trail than men. Collectively, these findings highlight a variety of ways recreation resource managers can more efficiently inform recreationists about the impacts of off-trail hiking and prioritize trail management needs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alder J (1996) Costs and effectiveness of education and enforcement, Cairns Section of the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park. Environ Manag 20(4):541–551. doi:10.1007/BF01474654

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnberger A, Brandenburg C (2007) Past on-site experience, crowding perceptions, and use displacement of visitor groups to a peri-urban national park. Environ Manag 40(1):34–45. doi:10.1007/s00267-004-0355-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aucote HM, Miner A, Dahlhaus P (2012) Interpretation and misinterpretation of warning signage: Perceptions of rockfalls in a naturalistic setting. Psychol Health Med 17(5):522–529. doi:10.1080/13548506.2011.644247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bishop I, Rohrmann B (2003) Subjective responses to simulated and real environments: a comparison. Landsc Urban Plann 65(4):261–277. doi:10.1016/S0169-2046(03)00070-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolderkiijk JW, Lehman PK, Geller ES (2013) Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour with rewards and penalties. In: Steg L, van den Berg AE, de Groot JIM (eds) Environmental psychology: an introduction. Wiley, Chichester, pp 233–242

    Google Scholar 

  • Boy Scouts of America (2001) Teaching leave no trace: a nationally recognized outdoor and ethical awareness program. Boy Scouts of America, Irving, TX

    Google Scholar 

  • Bülthoff I, Bülthoff H, Sinha P (1998) Top-down influences on stereoscopic depth-perception. Nat Neurosci 1(3):254–257. doi:10.1038/699

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caputo P, Lewis S, Brochu L (2008) Interpretation by design: graphic design basics for heritage interpreters. InterpPress, Fort Collins

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole DN (2004) Impacts of hiking and camping on soils and vegetation: A review. In: Buckley R (ed) Environmental Impacts of Ecotourism. CABI Publishing, Oxfordshire, pp 41–60

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cole DN, Hammond TP, McCool SF (1997) Information quantity and communication effectiveness: Low-impact messages on wilderness trailside bulletin boards. Leisure Sci 19(1):59–72. doi:10.1080/01490409709512239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conlon KE (2014) Investigating the relationship between trail conditions and visitor behavior using the camera trap method (Unpublished master’s thesis). North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC

    Google Scholar 

  • Coppes J, Braunisch V (2013) Managing visitors in nature areas: Where do they leave the trails? A spatial model. Wildlife Biol 19(1):1–11. doi:10.2981/12-054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Antonio A, Monz C, Newman P, Lawson S, Taff D (2012) The effects of local ecological knowledge, minimum-impact knowledge, and prior experience on visitor perceptions of the ecological impacts of backcountry recreation. Environ Manag 50(4):542–554. doi:10.1007/s00267-012-9910-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dorwart CE, Moore RL, Leung Y-F (2010) Visitors’ perceptions of a trail environment and effects on experiences: a model for nature-based recreation experiences. Leisure Sci 32(1):33–54. doi:10.1080/01490400903430863

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doxtater D (2008) What visitors “do” in recreational landscapes: Using categories of affordances for evaluation, simulation and landscape design. In: Gimblett HR, Skov-Petersen H (eds) Monitoring, simulation and management of visitor landscapes. University of Arizona Press, Tucson, pp 13–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Dragovich D, Bajpai S (2012) Visitor attitudes and erosional impacts on the Coast Walk, Royal National Park. Proc Linnean Soc NSW 134:B113–B118

    Google Scholar 

  • Driver BL, Brown PJ, Peterson GL (eds) (1991) Benefits of leisure. Venture, State College

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunlap RE, Heffernan RB (1975) Outdoor recreation and environmental concern: An empirical examination. Rural Sociol 40(1):19–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Eder R, Arnberger A (2012) The influence of place attachment and experience use history on perceived depreciative visitor behavior and crowding in an urban national park. Environ Manag 50(4):566–580. doi:10.1007/s00267-012-9912-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gifford R (2014) Environmental psychology matters. Ann Rev Psychol 65:541–579. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115048

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haas GE (2001) Visitor capacity in the National Park System. Soc Sci Res Rev 2(1):1–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall TE, Ham SH, Lackey BK (2010) Comparative evaluation of the attention capture and holding power of novel signs aimed at park visitors. J Interpret Res 15(1):15–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammitt WE, Cole DN (1998) Wildland recreation: Ecology and management, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartzel J, Agresti A, Caffo B (2001) Multinomial logit random effects models. Stat Model 1(2):81–102. doi:10.1177/1471082X0100100201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson DR, Swearingen TC (1992) The effectiveness of selected trailside sign texts in deterring off-trail hiking at Paradise Meadow, Mount Rainier National Park. In: Christensen HH, Johnson DR, Brookes MH (eds) Vandalism: Research, prevention and social policy. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, OR, pp 103–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Keirle I, Stephens M (2004) Do walkers stay on footpaths? An observational study of Cwm Idwal in the Snowdonia National Park. Countrys Recreat 12:7–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirschenbauer S (2005) Applying “true 3D” techniques to geovisualization: An empirical study. In: Dykes J, MacEachren AM, Kraak M-J (eds) Exploring geovisualization. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 363–387

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kolasinska A, Adamski P, Ciapala S, Svajda J, Witkowski Z (2015) Trail management, off-trail walking and visitor impact in the Pieniny Mts National Park (Polish Carpathians). J Protect Mount Areas Res 7(1):26–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Leung Y-F, Marion JL (1996) Trail degradation as influenced by environmental factors: A state-of-the-knowledge review. J Soil Water Conserv 51(2):130–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Leung Y-F, Marion JL (1999) Assessing trail conditions in protected areas: application of a problem-assessment method in Great Smoky Mountains National Park, USA. Environmental Conservation 26(04):270–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leung Y-F, Smith JW, Seekamp E, Conlon K, Mayer J, Guo T, Walden-Schreiner C, Adams B, Keane R (2015) The effects of 2D and 3D imagery and an educational message on perceptions of trail impacts. Nat Areas J

  • Liddle MJ (1997) Recreation ecology: The ecological impact of outdoor recreation and ecotourism. Chapman & Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch JG (1999) Theory and external validity. J Acad Market Sci 27(3):367–376. doi:10.1177/0092070399273007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manning R (2011) Studies in outdoor recreation: Search and research for satisfaction, 3rd edn. Oregon State University Press, Corvallis

    Google Scholar 

  • McFadden D (1974) Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behaviour. In: Zarembka P (ed) Frontiers of econometrics. Academic Press, New York, pp 105–142

    Google Scholar 

  • McNamara KE, Prideaux B (2010) Reading, learning and enacting: Interpretation at visitor sites in the Wet Tropics rainforest of Australia. Environ Educ Res 16(2):173–188. doi:10.1080/13504620903486412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newsome D, Moore SA, Dowling RK (2012) Natural area tourism: ecology, impacts and management, vol 58, 2nd edn. Channel View Publications, Bristol

    Google Scholar 

  • Park LO, Manning RE, Marion JL, Lawson SR, Jacobi C (2008) Managing visitor impacts in parks: A multi-method study of the effectiveness of alternative management practices. J Park Recreat Adm 26(1):97–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce-Higgins JW, Yalden DW (1997) The effect of resurfacing the Pennine Way on recreational use of blanket bog in the Peak District National Park, England. Biol Conserv 82(3):337–343. doi:10.1016/S0006-3207(97)00034-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perry-Hill R, Smith JW, Reimer A, Mase AS, Mullendore N, Mulvaney K, Prokopy LS (2014) The influence of basic beliefs and object-specific attitudes on behavioural intentions towards a rare and little-known amphibian. Wildlife Res 41(4):287–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skrondal A, Rabe-Hesketh S (2004) Generalized latent variable modeling: Multilevel, longitudinal, and structural equation models. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Smith JW (2013) Adaptive participation in forest planning contingent upon a hypothetical large-scale forest disturbance. Forest Science 59(6):637–648

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terborg JR (1981) Interactional psychology and research on human behavior in organizations. Acad Manag Rev 6(4):569–576. doi:10.5465/AMR.1981.4285691

    Google Scholar 

  • Theodori GL, Luloff AE, Willits FK (1998) The association of outdoor recreation and environmental concern: Reexamining the Dunlap-Heffernan thesis. Rural Sociol 63(1):94–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walden-Schreiner C, Leung Y-F (2013) Spatially characterizing visitor use and its association with informal trails in Yosemite Valley Meadows. Environ Manag 52(2):163–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wimpey JF, Marion JL (2010) The influence of use, environmental and managerial factors on the width of recreational trails. J Environ Manag 91(10):2028–2037. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.05.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winter PL (2006) The impact of normative message types on off-trail hiking. J Interpret Res 11(1):35–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Zelditch M Jr (2007) The external validity of experiments that test theories. In: Webster M, Sell J (eds) Laboratory experiments in the social sciences. Academic Press, Burlington, pp 87–112

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jordan W. Smith.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Guo, T., Smith, J.W., Leung, YF. et al. Determinants of Responsible Hiking Behavior: Results from a Stated Choice Experiment. Environmental Management 56, 765–776 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-015-0513-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-015-0513-1

Keywords

Navigation