Abstract
This study explores the importance of different motivations to visit three types of recreational settings—farms, private forests, and state or national parks. Data were collected via a mail-back questionnaire administered to a stratified random sample of households in Missouri (USA). Descriptive and inferential statistics reveal both similarities and discontinuities in motivations for visiting farms, private forests, and state or national parks for recreation. Being with family, viewing natural scenery, and enjoying the smells and sounds of nature were all highly important motivations for visiting the three types of settings. However, all 15 motivations examined were perceived to be significantly more important for visits to state or national parks than to farms or private forests. Findings suggest that individuals are more strongly motivated to recreate at state and national parks relative to farmlands or forests. Post hoc paired t tests comparing motivations between both agricultural settings (farms and private forests) revealed significant differences in eight different recreational motivations. Individuals tended to place more importance on the ability to use equipment and test their skills when considering recreating on private forests. Conversely, social motivations (e.g., doing something with the family) were more important when individuals were considering recreating on farmland. Collectively, the findings suggest individuals expect distinctly different outcomes from their visits to farmlands, private forests, or state or national parks. Consequently, all three types of recreational settings have competitive advantages that their managers could capitalize on when making decisions about how to attract new visitors or produce the most desirable experiences for current recreationists.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Identical wording was used to solicit motivations for visiting the three types of settings except for one item: slightly different wording was used to assess “Share your outdoor skills with others,” where “outdoor” was replaced with “agritourism” when inquired about visiting agritourism farms.
References
Anderson DH, Fulton DC (2008) Experience preferences as mediators of the wildlife related recreation participation: place attachment relationship. Hum Dimens Wildl 13(2):73–88
Anderson DH, Wilhelm Stanis SA, Schneider IE, Leahy JE (2008) Proximate and distant visitors: differences in importance ratings of beneficial experiences. J Park Recreat Adm 26(4):47–65
Armstrong JS, Overton TS (1977) Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. J Mark Res 14(3):396–402
Barbieri C, Mahoney E (2009) Why is diversification an attractive farm adjustment strategy? Insights from Texas farmers and ranchers. J Rural Stud 25(1):58–66
Barbieri C, Mshenga P (2008) The role of firm and owner characteristics on the performance of agritourism farms. Sociol Rural 48(2):166–183
Barbieri C, Mahoney E, Butler L (2008) Understanding the nature and extent of farm and ranch diversification in North America. Rural Sociol 73(2):205–229
Barry JJ, Hellerstein D (2004) Farm recreation. In: Outdoor Recreation for 21st Century America. A Report to the Nation: The National Survey on Recreation and the Environment. pp 149–167
Beh A, Bruyere B (2007) Segmentation by visitor motivation in three Kenyan national reserves. Tour Manag 28(6):1464–1471
Bernath K, Roschewitz A (2008) Recreational benefits of urban forests: explaining visitors’ willingness to pay in the context of the theory of planned behavior. J Environ Manage 89(3):155–166
Butler BJ, Leatherberry EC (2004) America’s family forest owners. J For 102(7):4–14
Che D, Veeck A, Veeck G (2005) Sustaining production and strengthening the agritourism product: linkages among Michigan agritourism destinations. Agric Hum Values 22(2):225–234
Chen H (2008) A study of yoga participants’ leisure motivation, enduring involvement and benefits of leisure (Master thesis). Leader University, Taiwan
Clarke J (1999) Marketing structures for farm tourism: beyond the individual provider of rural tourism. J Sustain Tour 7:26–47
Cordell K (2004) Forest recreation. In: Outdoors Recreation for 21st Century America. A Report to the Nation: The National Survey on Recreation and the Environment. pp 141–148
Cordell K (2008) The latest on trends in nature-based outdoor recreation and tourism. Forest History Today Spring, Berlin, pp 4–10
Cordell K, Bergstrom J, Hartmann L, English D (1990) An analysis of the outdoor recreation and wilderness situation in the United States: 1989–2040. General Technical Report RM-189. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO
Daniel TC, Muhar A, Arnberger A, Aznar O, Boyd JW, Chan KMA, Costanza R, Elmqvist T, Flint CG, Gobster PG, Grêt-Regamey A, Lave R, Muhar S, Penker M, Ribe RG, Schauppenlehner T, Sikor T, Soloviy I, Spierenburg M, Taczanowska K, Tam J, von der Dunk A (2012) Contributions of cultural services to the ecosystem services agenda. Proc Natl Acad Sci 109(23):8812–8819
Devesa M, Laguna M, Palacios A (2010) The role of motivation in visitor satisfaction: empirical evidence in rural tourism. Tour Manag 31(4):547–552
Dillman DA, Smyth JD, Christian LM (2009) Internet, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: the total design method, 3rd edn. Wiley, New York, p 499
Driver BL (1976) Quantification of outdoor recreationists’ preferences. In: van der Smissen B (ed) Research on camping and environmental education. The Pennsylvania State University, State College, pp 165–188
Driver BL (1983) Master list of items for recreation experience preference scales and domains, Unpublished document, USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO
Driver BL (1996) Benefits-driven management of natural areas. Nat Areas J 16(2):94–99
Driver BL (2008) Managing to optimize the beneficial outcomes of recreation. Venture, State College
Geide C, Harmon L, Baker R (2008) Northern Virginia wineries: Understanding visitor motivations for market segmentation. In: Klenosky DB, Fisher CL (eds) Proceedings of the 2008 Northeastern Recreation Research Symposium; 2008 March 30–April 1; Bolton Landing, NY. Gen. Tech. Rep. NRS-P-42. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station, Newtown Square, PA, pp 350–356
Gil Arroyo C, Barbieri C, Rozier Rich S (2013) Defining agritourism: a comparative study of stakeholders’ perceptions in Missouri and North Carolina. Tour Manag 37:39–47
Graefe A, Thapa B, Confer J, Absher J (2000) Relationships between trip motivations and selected variables among Allegheny National Forest visitors. USDA Forest Service Proceedings RMRS-P-15-VOL-4
Graefe DA, Schuster RM, Green GT, Cordell HK (2010) Management implications of changes in recreation activity motivation across physical settings. In: Watts CE, Fisher CL (eds) Proceedings for the 2009 Northeastern Recreation Research Symposium; 2009 March 29–31; Bolton Landing, NY. General Technical Report NRS-P-66. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station, Newtown Square, PA, pp 257–263
Gursoy D, Chi C, Dyer P (2010) Locals’ attitudes toward mass and alternative tourism: the case of Sunshine Coast, Australia. J Travel Res 49(3):381–394
Hall T, Seekamp E, Cole D (2010) Do recreation motivations and wilderness involvement relate to support for wilderness management? A segmentation analysis. Leis Sci 32(2):109–124
Halpenny E (2006) Environmental behaviour, place attachment and park visitation: a case study of visitors to Point Pelee National Park (Master thesis). University of Waterloo, Waterloo
Howell DC (2013) Statistical methods for psychology, 8th edn. Wadsworth, Belmont
Huh C, Vogt C (2008) Changes in residents’ attitudes toward tourism over time: a cohort analytical approach. J Travel Res 46(4):446–455
Ilbery B, Bowler I, Clark G, Crockett A, Shaw A (1998) Farm-based tourism as an alternative farm enterprise: a case study from the Northern Pennines, England. Reg Stud 32(4):355–364
Iso-Ahola SE (1999) Motivational foundations of leisure. In: Jackson EL, Burton TL (eds) Leisure studies: prospects for the twenty-first century. Venture Publishing Inc., State College, pp 35–51
Jackson E (2005) Leisure constraints research: overview of a developing theme in leisure studies. In: Jackson EL (ed) Constraints to leisure. Venture, State College, pp 3–19
Jolly D, Reynolds K (2005) Consumer demand for agricultural and on-farm nature tourism. UC Small Farm Center Research Brief 2005–01. http://www.agri-toursolutions.com/pdf/agtourbrief013006.pdf. Accessed 10 June 2010
Karppinen H (1998) Values and objectives of non-industrial private forest owners in Finland. Silva Fennica 32(1):43–59
Kemperman A, Timmermans H (2006) Preferences, benefits, and park visits: a latent class segmentation analysis. Tour Anal 11(4):221–230
Kim H, Borges M, Chon J (2006) Impacts of environmental values on tourism motivation: the case of FICA, Brazil. Tourism Management 27(5):957–967
Kurtz W, Lewis B (1981) Decision-making framework for nonindustrial private forest owners: an application in the Missouri Ozarks. J For 79(5):285–288
Kyle G, Mowen A, Tarrant M (2004) Linking place preferences with place meaning: an examination of the relationship between place motivation and place attachment. J Environ Psychol 24(4):439–454
Kyle G, Absher J, Hammitt W, Cavin J (2006) An examination of the motivation–involvement relationship. Leis Sci 28(5):467–485
Lobo R (2001) Helpful agricultural tourism (agritourism) definitions. UC Small Farm Program. www.sfc.ucdavis.edu/agritourism/definition.html. Accessed 25 January 2010
Luo Y, Deng J (2008) The new environmental paradigm and nature-based tourism motivation. J Travel Res 46(4):392–402
Manfredo MJ, Driver BL, Tarrant MA (1996) Measuring leisure motivation: a meta-analysis of the recreation experience preference scales. J Leis Res 28(3):188–213
Marques H (2006) Searching for complementarities between agriculture and tourism—the demarcated wine-producing regions of northern Portugal. Tour Econ 12:147–155
McCool S, Reilly M (1993) Benefits segmentation analysis of state park visitor setting preferences and behavior. J Park Recreat Adm 11(4):1–14
McEwen J (2010) Examining the interrelationship of motivation and place attachment in a residential 4-h camping environment. Master’s thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA
McGehee NG (2007) An agritourism systems model: a Weberian perspective. J Sustain Tour 15(2):111–124
McGehee NG, Kim K (2004) Motivation for agri-tourism entrepreneurship. J Travel Res 43(2):161–170
Middleton VTC, Fyall A, Morgan M (2009) Marketing in travel and tourism, 4th edn. Elsevier Ltd., Oxford, p 502
Newman DH, Wear DN (1993) Production economics of private forestry: a comparison of industrial and nonindustrial forest owners. Am J Agric Econ 75:674–684
Nickerson N, Black R, McCool S (2001) Agritourism: motivations behind farm/ranch business diversification. J Travel Res 40(1):19–26
Nilsson PA (2002) Staying on farms—An ideological background. Ann Tour Res 17(3):227–352
Ollenburg C, Buckley R (2007) Stated economic and social motivations of farm tourism operators. J Travel Res 45(4):444–452
Packer J, Ballantyne R (2002) Motivational factors and the visitor experience: a comparison of three sites. Curator Mus J 45(3):183–198
Park D, Yoon Y (2009) Segmentation by motivation in rural tourism: a Korean case study. Tour Manag 30(1):99–108
Pierskalla CD, Lee ME, Stein TV, Anderson DH, Nickerson R (2004) Understanding relationships among recreation opportunities: a meta-analysis of nine studies. Leis Sci 26(2):163–180
Ritchie B, Tkaczynski A, Faulks P (2010) Understanding the motivation and travel behavior of cycle tourists using involvement profiles. J Travel Tour Mark 27(4):409–425
Sharpley R, Sharpley J (1997) Rural tourism: an introduction. Thomson Business Press, London, p 165
Siderelis C, Moore RL, Yeung Y-F, Smith JW (2012) A nationwide production analysis of state park attendance in the United States. J Environ Manage 99:18–26
Smith J (2008) Utah off-highway vehicle owners’ specialization and its relationship to environmental attitudes and motivations. Master thesis, Utah State University, Logan, UT
Smith WB, Miles PD, Vissage JS, Pugh SA (2003) Forest resources of the United States, 2002. General Technical Report NC-241. U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Forest Service, North Central Research Station, St. Paul, MN
Stein T, Denny C, Pennisi L (2003) Using visitors’ motivations to provide learning opportunities at waterbased recreation areas. J Sustain Tour 11(5):404–425
Teasley RJ, Bergstrom JC, Cordell HK, Zarnoch SJ, Gentle P (1999) Private lands and outdoor recreation in the United States. In: Cordell HK, Betz C, Bowker JM, English DBK, Mou SH, Bergstrom JC, Teasley RJ, Tarrant MA, Loomis J (eds) Outdoor recreation in American life: a national assessment of demand and supply trends. Sagamore Publishing, Champaign, pp 183–218
Tew C, Barbieri C (2012) The perceived benefits of agritourism: the provider’s perspective. Tour Manag 33(1):215–224
Thapa B, Confer J, Mendelsohn J (2004) Trip motivations among water-based recreationists. Paper presentation at the 2nd International Conference on Monitoring and Management of Visitor Flows in Recreational and Protected Areas. Rovaniemi, Finland, pp 208–212
U.S. Census Bureau (2011) State & county quick facts—Missouri. http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/29000.html. Accessed 23 March 2011
USDA Forest Service (2012) About Us. http://www.fs.fed.us/aboutus. Accessed 17 Jan 2012
USDA: ERS (2004) Measuring rurality: Rural-urban continuum codes. http://www.ers.usda.gov/briefing/rurality/ruralurbcon/. Accessed 9 Sept 2010
USDA: NASS (2009) 2007 Census of agriculture: United States Summary and State Data. Volume 1, Part 51. http://www.agcensus.usda.gov/Publications/2007/Full_Report/index.asp. Accessed April 2011
Veeck G, Che D, Veeck J (2006) America’s changing farmscape: a study of agricultural tourism in Michigan. Prof Geogr 50(3):235–248
Vogelsong H, Graefe A, Confer J, Solan D, Kramp J (1998) Relationships between motivations, activities and settings: the recreation opportunity spectrum within the Delaware state park system. In: Vogelsong HG, (comp, ed) Proceedings of the 1997 Northeastern Recreation Research Symposium; 1997 April 6–9; Bolton Landing, NY. Gen. Tech. Rep. NE-241. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station, Radnor, PA, pp 124–127
Walker G, Deng J, Dieser R (2001) Ethnicity, acculturation, self-construal, and motivations for outdoor recreation. Leis Sci 23(4):263–283
Walls M, Darley S, Siikamäki J (2009) The state of the great outdoors: America’s parks, public lands, and recreation resources. Resources for the Future. 1616 P Street, NW, Washington, DC 20036-1400. http://www.rff.org/RFF/Documents/RFF-RPT-ORRG-State-of-Outdoors.pdf. Accessed 25 Oct 2010
Weber D, Anderson DH (2010) Contact with nature: recreation experience preferences in Australian parks. Ann Leis Res 13(1–2):46–69
Wilhelm Stanis SA, Schneider IE, Anderson DH (2009) State park visitors’ leisure time physical activity, constraints and negotiation strategies. J Park Recreat Adm 27(3):21–41
Yuan MS, McEwen D (1989) Test for campers’ experience preference differences among three ROS setting classes. Leis Sci 11(3):177–185
Acknowledgments
The authors express their gratitude to the University of Missouri Research Board for funding this project. Our thanks are also due to the journal editors and the reviewers for their thorough suggestions and comments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sotomayor, S., Barbieri, C., Wilhelm Stanis, S. et al. Motivations for Recreating on Farmlands, Private Forests, and State or National Parks. Environmental Management 54, 138–150 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-014-0280-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-014-0280-4